tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3568245374738606446.post7674317711592329976..comments2015-07-28T00:17:41.855-04:00UofUhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09487874114574597505noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3568245374738606446.post-63729889069891568252013-07-19T12:46:47.991-04:002013-07-19T12:46:47.991-04:00Proof of trust is...<br /><br />I perceive. That is proof enough to me. Whatever power creates anything, let alone everything, there is perception and I don&#39;t need anyone else having authority over me to prove that to me. At a minimum, therefore, as far as I am concerned, and separate in this respect from anyone else, the creator of my power to perceive proves the concept of trust, if trust ever exists anywhere, and again there is no need for me to fight for this, argue this, or fail to defend this reasonable understanding of the concept of trust at the root of it.<br /><br />If any power exists, capable of destroying my power to perceive, that has yet to be proven. A lasting fact, as I now perceive, proves that perception continues. So, as far as that goes, I am in that way still worthy of this perception. If any trust does exist, I am entrusted with this power of perception, as I type. <br /><br />Estate, on the other hand, as far as I can tell so far, concerns associations among those separate powers of perception whereby often is the case that one contends with another competitively (voluntarily) or criminally (resort to deception, threat, or aggressive violence). <br /><br />Voluntary association can be competitive in a voluntary way, while criminal association is always defined by the criminal in such a way as to always be an involuntary connection made by the criminal to the targeted victim. <br /><br />I add those thoughts at this point because it appears as if the concept of Estates are the beginnings of crimes by criminals being offered falsely as a voluntary association or an offer that is falsely advertized as an honest offer when in reality it is an invention of deception intending, willfully, to gain at the expense of the targeted victims. <br /><br />If there is a valid, legitimate, true authoritative version of Estate, then how is such a thing agreed upon by any number of people? <br /><br />If I am entrusted with this perceptible form of life, proven by my existence, and I am this trust, so long as I can still prove it, is the Estate then, in fact, anywhere I may exist at any given moment? <br /><br />I may have to return to reread the concepts offered here by Frank concerning awareness loving life. <br /><br />Trust is somehow first and then, for at least two reasons, there are estates created out of trusts. One I suspect is genuine, and useful in the willful employment of trust, to preserve, and improve, life, while the other, if a routine can be understood, is counterfeit, false, misleading, and criminally destructive to life.<br /><br />Joe Kelleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00956403563650135886noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3568245374738606446.post-56098587030356212282013-07-19T11:27:51.038-04:002013-07-19T11:27:51.038-04:00I am struggling with these concepts as the viewpoint is not my own, so there is much needed in willful effort, on my part, to realize, in my own way, this viewpoint that is foreign to my own.<br /><br />At the point at which I am now reading about inventions of words used during the time when Roman (criminal) Military Occupation lost power, and the former victims were inventing ways to defend themselves, cooperate, and minimize injury, at this point of reading words like Fee (fee simple?) I am thinking about my own existence as a custodian of life.<br /><br />I have life. What do I do with life? Am I worth of life? Am I worthy of having life? Is there such a thing as being trust worthy in me having life? <br /><br />Is this body and mind used by my power to perceive, or used by my soul, my self-awareness, is this body and mind an estate?<br /><br />Joe Kelleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00956403563650135886noreply@blogger.com