Summa Elementis Theologica

icon2   Scientia Sacra - Sacred Science

3   Numerologia - Numerology

1   Numerologia - Numerology

1What is a maxim of common sense and logic possessed by our ancestors that remains irrefutable even today?
2It is that the universe may be expressed in unique arrangements of Numbers.
3As we have already discussed, Numbers are certain symbols belonging to a language that enables us to count, to label and measure objects and concepts.
4In fact, Numbers are the purest symbols of meaning. Take away the meaning of a number and you have nothing.
5Numbers also have certain natural properties and abilities when attributing meaning, superior to other forms of symbology and language.
6Numbers are the superior form of meaning for describing Existence; and
7Numbers are the superior form of meaning for describing Quantity; and
8Numbers are the superior form of meaning for describing Relative Position and Relations between other Objects or Concepts; and
9Numbers are the superior form of meaning for describing Relative Motion and Change between Objects or Concepts and themselves; and
10Numbers are the superior form of meaning for describing Relative Uniqueness.
11Thus Numbers are an indispensable gift for making sense not only of the world around us, but ourselves and our journey through the world.
12The meaning of One, even though such symbols have changed over time, is as old as civilization itself.
13The meaning of Two, carries deep historic, social and spiritual meaning for humanity and our species.
14This is not attributing aspects to Numbers that do not exist, but undeniable fact as to the power of Numbers.
15Thus, the wisest of every generation have recognized that Numbers possess a powerful and unique place in our lives and conscious awareness.
16At the dawn of the earliest civilizations, philosophers discovered that wherever and whenever Numbers are applied as a means of describing existence or the Universe, there exists certain relations and patterns.
17In the relation of all objects and concepts, the description of any set can be described as 1; and
18In the reproduction of higher order species, the division of male and female meant the need for 2 in order to create at least 1 new life form; and
19In the description of relation, measure and geometry, the number 3 is predominant; and
20In the reflection of the highest concepts of truth and existence, the Numbers 0 and 1 describe the Paradox that nothing can be proven to be perfectly true.
21To trivialize and to belittle the significance of Numbers then is the height of ignorance and stupidity.
22For Numbers are at the heart of Science and therefore Sacred Science (Scientia Sacra).
23Indeed, to prove or disprove the existence of the Divine and the nature of Divine Mind, one must comprehend Numbers and their relations.
24Why then would the study of Numbers themselves and the natural relations between them be so discredited by some people and groups?
25What possible motive and agenda could exist to try and cause confusion and ignorance as to the fundamental principles of Numbers?
26The argument that the repudiation of the study of Numbers on their own is a positive evolution of the knowledge of Mathematics is an absurd and false misrepresentation.
27Those finest of minds that discovered the very framework of geometry that served the world for more than two thousand years placed the knowledge of numbers as central to their respect of the universe.
28Hundreds of the greatest philosophers and mathematicians have proven the undeniable and irrefutable fact that the Paradox is at the heart of any formula or axiom,
29Yet revisions to sciences since the 19th Century have firmly rejected the notion of Paradox and uncertainty and since created a pseudo form of mathematics.
30Mathematics has become obsessed in procedure rather than deeper knowledge and nowhere is this more explicit than in the disrespect shown to Numbers.
31So arrogant has certain sections of pseudo science become in their use of a two dimensional language to describe a three dimensional existence (four if you include time),
32That the defense against criticism has been increasing complexity in formula and axioms in complete contradiction to the elegance and simplicity of natural axioms embedded and hidden within the workings of Calculus and the greatest discoveries of history.
33Despite the fact that nature has proven over and over again that complex systems resolve themselves to simple results, whereas simple systems produce massively complex opportunities,
34The existence of nonsensical, confusing and false assertions within Mathematics itself concerning Numbers, contributes to a level of mental illness and false conclusions within Science that continues to injure the advancement of genuine knowledge.
35It therefore leaves us with the need to consider an alternative approach in discussing Numbers so as not to suffer the corruptions and embedded bias and gross errors now littering modern pseudo sciences.
36To this end, we define our investigation of Numbers as the science of Numerology,
37With the word etymology derived from the Ancient Latin words numero meaning “count, enumerate, reckon and esteem” and logica meaning “logic”.
38Then within the context of Numerology we recognize the language of Eikos of Ucadia and the wisdom of past generations as to Numbers.
39Let us therefore express those irrefutable and undeniable conclusions of fact concerning Numbers through Eikos so that there can be no doubt:
40All Numbers are both unique concepts and objects in themselves; and
41All Numbers may be represented symbolically; and
42All Numbers are real by virtue of their own existence; and
43All Numbers represent reality to some degree; and
44The degree of reality of a Number is dependent upon the degree to which the Number represents real world objects or concepts; and
45All Numbers may be defined as a single Set; and
46All Numbers excluding 0 are members of a Set of 1 called the UniSet; and
47The pure concept of nothing may be represented by the valid Number 0; and
48As nothing can exist in reality, the Number 0 can only be used to describe theoretical impressions of reality, never reality itself. Thus all forms of nothing and 0 are fictional; and
49As nothing can be deducted from nothing, there is no valid Number conceptually or in reality less than 0; and
50As nothing is both a concept and a valid Number as 0, it can be recognized as something “in theory” and attributed the value 1. However, in reality nothing can come from nothing; and
51As the concept of subtraction infers the process of deducting one or more values from something, the concept of deducting something from nothing is an absurdity and contrary to the laws of the Universe and Existence; and
52As it is an absurdity and contrary to the laws of the Universe and Existence to conceive the notion of something less than nothing “in theory” or “in reality”, negative numbers cannot exist either in theory or in reality; and
53As it is an absurdity and contrary to the laws of the Universe and Existence to conceive the notion of something less than nothing “in theory” or “in reality”, negative numbers cannot exist either in theory or in reality; and
54All Numbers of the UniSet may be expressed as existing between the Prime Numbers of 0 and 1 by some degree or multiple (ratio); and
55As All valid Numbers may be defined as some degree or multiple (ratio) between 0 and 1, all valid Numbers may be said to be inherited from 0 and 1; and
56Any number expressed as less than 0 is either an incorrectly defined degree or multiple (ratio) or a falsity and absurdity; and
571 is a UniSet and a member of itself; and
580 is a member of itself and is only a member of the UniSet in theory; and
59If one member of the UniSet ceased to exist, the total set being UniSet would cease to exist; and
60The existence of UniSet is therefore dependent on the existence of each individual member of the UniSet for itself to exist; and
61All Numbers within the UniSet may then be defined at the highest level as either Perfect or Imperfect; and
62A Perfect Number is any whole positive number that is not a ratio but can be expressed as a ratio of itself or other positive numbers; and
63An Imperfect Number is any positive number that is a ratio but cannot be expressed as a whole positive number; and
64All Perfect and Imperfect Numbers may be defined as either Unique, or Similar or Theoretical; and
65Unique Perfect Numbers– can represent uniquely real objects (e.g.1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 etc.) and are found most commonly in the unique measurement of real objects; and
66Similar Perfect Numbers – can only represent collective real objects (e.g. 2, 4, 6 etc.) and are found most commonly as sets of real world objects; and
67Theoretical Perfect Numbers – cannot represent real objects (e.g. infinity); and
68Perfect Numbers are equivalent in part to integers in mathematics as the term incorporates the set of positive numbers. However, as integers may also contain negative numbers, the term Integer is never permitted within Eikos Language System; and
69Unique Imperfect Numbers– represent uniquely real ratios (e.g. pi, e); and
70Similar Imperfect Numbers – can only represent collective real ratios (e.g. 0.5, 1.2, 180º); and
71Theoretical Imperfect Numbers – cannot represent real ratios or real objects (e.g. 0); and
72Imperfect Numbers are equivalent in part to integers in mathematics as the term incorporates the set of numbers. However, as integers may also contain natural numbers, the term Integer is never permitted within Eikos Language System; and
73A Unique Perfect Number is divisible only by itself and 1; and
74The simplest Perfect Number is 1; and
75The largest Perfect Number is infinity also expressed as 1; and
76The total set of all Perfect Numbers is less than the UniSet (sum of all Number) and is ultimately derived from the simplest Perfect Number being 1; and
77Existence is a Theoretical Perfect Number tending toward a Unique Perfect Number; and
78Unique Perfect Numbers exist within the UniSet as a perfect pattern of randomness called the Prime (itself an Unique Imperfect Number); and
79The Prime may be defined as unique pattern of existence of Unique Perfect Numbers and Similar Perfect Numbers within the UniSet related to a multiple ratio of the simplest synergetic number 6; and
80A Similar Perfect Number is a number that can only be expressed as a ratio of itself as a collective of Perfect Unique Numbers; and
81A Similar Perfect Number is divisible by itself, Unique Perfect Numbers, Similar Perfect Numbers and 1; and
82The simplest Similar Perfect Number is 2; and
83The largest Perfect Similar Number is one less than infinity; and
84All Similar Perfect Number greater than two (2) may be defined as the Sum of two (2) Perfect Unique Numbers; and
85Existence is the interaction of Unique Perfect Numbers and Similar Perfect Numbers tending toward a Unique Perfect Number; and
86Similar Perfect Numbers may be defined as Synergetic. Synergetic Numbers are numbers equal to the sum of all their possible divisors except itself. The smallest Synergetic numbers are 6, 28, 496 and 8128; and
87Similar Perfect Numbers may be defined as Sympathetic. Sympathetic Numbers are two numbers where each is the sum of all the possible divisors of the other. The smallest Sympathetic pairs are (220, 284), (1184,1210) and (17,296 18,416); and
88A Similar Perfect Number is divisible by two (2) if the last digit is even. A Similar Perfect Number is divisible by three (3) if the Sum of its digits is divisible by 3; and
89A Similar Perfect Number is divisible by four (4) if the last two digits are divisible by 4. A Similar Perfect Number is divisible by five (5) if it ends in 5 or 0; and
90A Similar Perfect Number is divisible by six (6) if the number is divisible by 2 as well as 3. A Similar Perfect Number is divisible by eight (8) if the SUM of its last three digits is divisible by 8; and
91A Similar Perfect Number is divisible by nine (9) if the SUM of its last three digits is divisible by 9. A Similar Perfect Number is divisible by ten (10) if it ends in zero; and
92A Similar Perfect Number is divisible by twelve (12) if the number is divisible by 3 as well as 4; and
93A Theoretical Perfect Number is a number that cannot express a real object but can be defined as a ratio of itself and other positive numbers such as Infinity; and
94A Theoretical Perfect Number cannot be a uniquely expressed ratio, as this is the proper classification of a Unique Imperfect Number; and
95A Unique Imperfect Number is a number that represents real ratios but can only be expressed as a ratio of itself uniquely; and
96A Unique Imperfect Number is divisible only by itself and 1; and
97All Unique Imperfect Numbers may be defined as Decimals. All Unique Imperfect Number Decimals will always have an Infinite number of Decimal points; and
98The most perfect Unique Imperfect Number is Pi; and
99Existence is a Unique Imperfect Number; and
100A Similar Imperfect Number is a number that can only be expressed as a collection of real ratios; and
101A Similar Imperfect Number is divisible by itself, or Unique Perfect Numbers, or Similar Perfect Numbers and 1; and
102All Similar Imperfect Numbers may be defined as a Fraction or a Decimal. All Fractions may be converted to a Decimal or vice versa; and
103All Similar Imperfect Number Decimals will always have a finite number of Decimal points; and
104A Theoretical Imperfect Number is a number that cannot be expressed as a real object nor be defined as a ratio of itself such as the number zero (0); and
105Infinity is both a unique Number and a set; and
106Infinity equals the UniSet less 1; and
107All Numbers may be described in sets of degrees of Infinity; and
108As Existence depends upon Infinity + 1, the Number continues to grow at a predictable Rate; and
109Infinity is the Boundary Number of all Real Numbers. Only the UniSet in theory (thus including the number zero (0) in the form of 1) is greater; and
110A Motion Set is any set expressed by its dimension and some kind of active motion of its Elements; and
111There are only two (2) main kinds of Motion Sets, Growth and Decay; and
112A Simple Growth Set denotes the statement - "the sum Set of all elements of type [a] by Addition as the Number of the Set [t] increases by 1 as the value of type [a] elements increase from value [x] to [z] by method [c]"; and
113A Simple Exponential Growth Set denotes the statement - "the sum Set of all elements of type [a] by Multiplication as the Number of the Set [t] increases by 1 as the value of type [a] elements increase from value [x] to [z] by method [c]"; and
114A Simple Decay Set denotes the statement - "the sum Set of all elements of type [a] by Subtraction as the Number of the Set [t] increases by 1 as the value of type [a] elements decrease from value [x] to [z] by method [c]"; and
115A Simple Exponential Decay Set denotes the statement - "the sum Set of all elements of type [a] by Division as the Number of the Set [t] increases by 1as the value of type [a] elements decrease from value [x] to [z] by method [c]".
116Thus in revisiting the knowledge of our ancestors, we can see the power of the knowledge of Numbers in helping us better comprehend the Universe itself.
117Thus in revisiting the knowledge of our ancestors, we can see the power of the knowledge of Numbers in helping us better comprehend the Universe itself.
118There is nothing mystical or occult or paranormal or subjective about this knowledge of Numbers described as Numerology and Eikos.
119In contrast, it highlights the undeniable fact and evidence that it is modern mathematics that has fallen into a pseudo-science of occult, absurdity, mythology and mysticism.
120The repudiation of the central paradox behind all things at the simplest of levels is the hallmark of hubris and stupidity of cult-like behavior by such pseudo-science.
121Yet as we have proven with these few simple verses, knowledge of Numbers heralds an extraordinarily powerful insight into not only the existence of the Universe, but evidence of the nexus between the real and the unreal, the fictional and factual, the Dream and the Dreamer.
122Let us continue then our journey of Sacred Science then with new found confidence and respect of true scientific knowledge as expressed through Summa Elementis Theologica.