VI.   Homo Sapien Life

Competence of a Child is defined according to both the concept of whether an Child is fit, proper and qualified to produce and argue Reason through knowledge and skill of Law, Logic and Rhetoric against opposing arguments and secondly whether a Child possesses sufficient authority and qualification of standing within the limits of statutes of law.

As the necessary tools of cognition required for mental competence develop after the age of seven (7) and do not mature until the end of youthhood from age nineteen (19) and above, a Child is only ever party capable of the tools required to legitimately being considered mentally competent.

A Child is absolutely forbidden to be nominated, appointed or recognized as a sovereign, executor, trustee or administrator given their mental incompetency. Therefore, a Child can never be considered legally competent.

Given all Children are legally and mentally incompetent, it is absolutely forbidden to claim a Child as party to any form of unilateral, bilateral or trilateral consensus including but not limited to any claimed contract, agreement, pact, pledge, promise, deed, covenant or treaty.

As all Children are absolutely forbidden to be claimed as a party to any form of unilateral, bilateral or trilateral consensus, it is forbidden to render a Child as a party to any bill of sale, cost, conveyance or transaction, expense or liability.

All existing bilateral or trilateral consensus where it is claimed a Child is party is hereby null and void ab initio, having no force nor effect of law.

All existing bills of sale, costs, conveyances, bonds, transactions or securities where it is claimed a Child is party is hereby null and void ab initio, having no force nor effect of law.