II.   Instruments & Transactions

An Ordinance (or Capitulum or Cap.) is the highest form of Statute, promulgated through religious practice and ritual by spiritual officials under solemn vow in accord with prescribed Ecclesiastical Law and Sacred Scripture first issued under the ancient standards (Sacré Loi) of sacred instruments and writing or “Scriptura” of the Carolingians from the 8th Century CE. The word Ordinance is derived from two Latin Words Ordo and Nuntius meaning literally “an order from a spiritual messenger or body”.

The key elements of the form of any valid Ordinance in addition to the key elements of any valid Statute are:

(i) Solemn Prayer means that all valid Ordinances commence with a solemn invocation and prayer to some higher spiritual deity in whom the members of the Juridic Person, or Body Politic or Society recognize as the source of their power; and

(ii) Ecclesiastical Persons means that the members of Juridic Person, or Body Politic or Society issuing such an Ordinance do so under their ecclesiastical rights and office, under some solemn pledge, oath or vow, irrespective of whether they have taken holy orders, or are known as priests or not; and

(iii) Ethically and Morally Just means that the Ordinance upholds the highest principles of Rule of Law, Justice and Due Process and does not diminish those rights recognized as being granted by divine authority; and

(iv) Theologically Consistent means that the Ordinance does not contradict the Ecclesisatical Law or Sacred Scripture recognized as the foundation of law for the Juridic Person or Body Politic or Society.

No Body Politic or Juridic Person may issue a Statute concerning the creation or conveyance and transfer of any real property except by valid Ordinance. Only personal property may be defined, conveyed and transferred by Regulation. Any Statute that is not an Ordinance that seeks to create, define, convey or transfer real property is an abomination of law and null and void from the beginning, having no force or effect ecclesiastically, morally, lawfully or legally.

Examples of Statutes in the form of Ordinances include, but are not limited to:

(i) Carolingian Statutes (Capitulum) from the 8th Century which began with the invocation and prayer: “By the Grace of God, from whom all favors are gladly accepted by the faithful, desiring then to dispense (them) to (those/one) who confess true contrition. To all the faithful of Christ to whom these present letters shall come, everlasting greeting”; and

(ii) The Opening Prayer of the Magna Carta claimed from the 13th Century as 9 Hen.3. Magna Carta (1224) being: “Henry by the grace of God, King of England, Lord of Ireland, Duke of Normandy and Guyan and Earl of Anjou, to all Archbishops, Bishops, Abbots, Priors, Earls, Barons, Sheriffs, Provosts, Officers, and to all Bailiffs and other faithful Subjects, which shall see this present Charter, greeting. Know ye that we, unto the Honor of Almighty God, and for the salvation of the souls of our progenitors and successors Kings of England, to the advancement of the holy Church, and amendment of our Realm, of our meer and free will, have given and granted to all Archbishops, Bishops, Abbots, Priors, Earls, Barons, and to all free-men of this our realm, these liberties following, to be kept in our kingdom of England for ever”; and

(iii) The Statute of Provisors claimed under Edward III as 25 Edw. 3 stat.5. (1350) being “At the parliament summonsed at Westminster in the feats of St. Hilary, the year of the reign of our Lord King Edward the Third after the conquest of England the five and twentieth, and of France the twelfth; our said lord the King, by the assent of the prelates, earls, barons, and all the commonalty of his realm of England summonsed to parliament, to the honor of God and holy church, and in amendment of his said realm, hath ordained and established the things underwritten”; and

(iv) The Papal Bull Romanus Pontifex (Jan 8, 1455 Nicholas V) being : “Nicholas, bishop, servant of the servants of God. For a perpetual remembrance. The Roman pontiff, successor of the key-bearer of the heavenly kingdom and vicar of Jesus Christ…”; and

(v) The Papal Bull Aeterni Regis (June 21, 1481 Sixtus IV) being : “Sixtus, bishop, servant of the servants of God. For a perpetual remembrance. Since, through the Eternal King's clemency, wheryby kings reign, we have been placed in the most lofty watchtower of the Apostolic See…”; and

(vi) The Opening sentences of the Declaration of Independence (July 4, 1776) being: “When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness”; and

(vii) The Incipit of the prescribed Voluntatem Et Testamentum template being: “IN THE NAME OF ONE TRUE DIVINE CREATOR, LORD OF ALL, ALL LAW, ALL LIFE AND ALL PROPERTY AND RIGHTS”.

In terms of Ordinances and their length, effect, alteration and repeal:

(i) A Public Ordinance exists so long as the body politic, or entity that created it exists, unless it specifies a temporary limit in which case it can be repealed by another Ordinance; or the Ordinance is repealed by a higher Juridic Person possessing a more authoritative position consistent with these canons and the sacred covenant Pactum De Singularis Caelum; and

(ii) A Private Ordinance is always temporary and can never be specified as permanent and perpetual without rendering such an Ordinance null and void from the beginning; and

(iii) A Statute by Regulation can never alter or repeal an Ordinance. A Statute by Policy can never repeal or alter a Regulation, much less a Statute by Ordinance.

A Statute cannot be ecclesiastically, morally, lawfully or legally considered to be a valid Ordinance:

(i) If the alleged Statute contradicts or repudiates the fundamental elements of form of a valid Statute; or

(ii) If the alleged Statute contradicts or repudiates the fundamental elements of form of a valid Ordinance.

Examples of Statutes that are invalid as Ordinances are:

(i) The Statute 26 Hen. VIII c.1 (1534) claiming King Henry VIII as the authorized supreme head of a new Christian Church is not an Ordinance as (1) the incipit to the Statutes of the year uses the words dread meaning “fearful and terrorizing” in profanity against Christian virtues and the word profit as heresy against the existing laws at the time against usury; and (2) the statute states an offer and not a fact when it pronounces “the King’s majesty justly and rightfully is an ought to be the supreme head of the church of England”; and (3) the act deliberately usurps the position of the existing Ecclesiastical Law and Sacred Scripture of the Body Politic and Society at the time (thus rendering the Statute null and void from the beginning); and (4) the opening of the Statute in no way conforms to the standards of an Ordinance; and

(ii) The Statute 27 Hen. VIII c.28 (1535) claiming the dissolution of small monasteries having lands less than two hundred pounds per year and conveyance and transfer of such real property to the King as (1) the claimed statute in no way conforms at any level to a valid Ordinance; and (2) the claimed statute is clearly written as a Regulation; and (3) the statute is morally repugnant in its scope, manner and contempt for the Rule of Law, Justice and Due Process with no recourse, or remedy; and

(iii) The Statute 31 Hen. VIII c.13 (1539) claiming the dissolution of monasteries and abbies and conveyance and transfer of such real property to the King as (1) the claimed statute in no way conforms at any level to a valid Ordinance; and (2) the claimed statute is clearly written as a Regulation; and (3) the statute is morally repugnant in its scope, manner and contempt for the Rule of Law, Justice and Due Process with no recourse, or remedy; and

(iv) The Papal Bull Dominus ac Redemptor by Pope Clement XIV in 1773 claiming to permanently and irrevocably suppress the Jesuits, proven by the letter Sollicitudo omnium ecclesiarum by Pius VII in 1814 repudiating the claims of the Papal Bull of Clement having no force or effect.