II.   Instruments & Transactions

Regulation is the second highest form of Statute, promulgated under sovereign authority, through fiduciary procedures by fiduciary officers under solemn oath, in accord with established Sovereign Law, Ecclesiastical Law and Sacred Scripture first issued under the Scientiam Mysteria (Occult Knowledge) standards of instruments under King Henry VIII of England from the 16th Century. The word Regulation is derived from the Latin word Regula meaning literally “sovereign rule enacted by process or ritual”.

The key elements of the form of any valid Regulation in addition to the key elements of any valid Statute are:

(i) Preamble means that all valid Regulations commence with a formal Preamble consistent with a form of Deed of a Trust, or Estate or Fund explaining the purpose of the Statute by Regulation, any intended conveyance or transfer of personal property or any action of declaration, remediation, amendment, repeal, franchise, penalty, disability, enablement or consolidation; and

(ii) Fiduciary Persons means that the members of Juridic Person, or Body Politic or Society issuing such a Regulation do so under a solemn oath to Office as Officers and Trustees under full Fiduciary Capacity; and

(iii) Good Faith, Good Conscience and Good Character means that the Regulation is issued under the fundamental principles of Trust and Fiduciary Law being Good Faith, Good Conscience (Without Prejudice) and Good Character (Clean Hands and at arms length); and

(iv) Lawfully Consistent means that the Regulation does not contradict any valid Ordinance or the recognized foundations and principles of Rule of Law, Justice and Due Process recognized as the foundation of all law and the laws of the Juridic Person or Body Politic or Society.

No Body Politic or Juridic Person may issue a Statute concerning the creation or conveyance and transfer of any personal property except by valid Regulation. Only personal property may be defined, conveyed and transferred by Regulation. Real Property may only be conveyed and transferred through Statute by Ordinance. Any Statute by Regulation that seeks to create, define, convey or transfer real property is an abomination of law and null and void from the beginning, having no force or effect ecclesiastically, morally, lawfully or legally. 

If the members of the Juridic Person, or Body Politic or Society enacting the Statute by Regulation have effectively abjured their oath of office by virtue of a secret oath to a fraternity or society such as a Private Bar Guild, or through such pseudo-ritual as Kol Nidre, then such Statute enacted will only have the authority of a Policy and not a Statute as it ceases to be under Fiduciary Law. Therefore, any claimed conveyance or transfer of personal property shall have no force or effect and such a Statute will be null and void ab initio (from the beginning).

In terms of Regulations and their length, effect, alteration and repeal:

(i) Any Regulation that seeks to limit the future powers and authority of the Body Politic, or Legislative Body to repeal itself or other laws is null and void ab intio (from the beginning); and

(ii) Any Regulation that is morally repugnant or contradicts or repudiates the fundamental elements of form of a valid Statute is null and void ab intio (from the beginning); and

(iii) A Regulation can never be permanent or in perpetuity and if no temporary limit is stated, then such a Regulation exists only so long as it is not repealed by a new Regulation or Ordinance; and

(iv) A Statute by Regulation can never alter or repeal an Ordinance. A Statute by Policy can never repeal or alter a Regulation, much less a Statute by Ordinance.

A Statute cannot be ecclesiastically, morally, lawfully or legally considered to be a valid Regulation:

(i) If the alleged Statute contradicts or repudiates the fundamental elements of form of a valid Statute; or

(ii) If the alleged Statute contradicts or repudiates the fundamental elements of form of a valid Regulation.

Examples of Statutes that are invalid as Regulations are:

(i) The Statute 26 Hen. VIII c.1 (1534) claiming King Henry VIII as the authorized supreme head of a new Christian Church is not an Ordinance nor is it a valid Regulation as (1) the incipit to the Statutes of the year uses the words dread meaning “fearful and terrorizing” in profanity against Christian virtues and the word profit as heresy against the existing laws at the time against usury; and (2) the statute states an offer and not a fact when it pronounces “the King’s majesty justly and rightfully is an ought to be the supreme head of the church of England”; and (3) the act deliberately usurps the position of the existing Ecclesiastical Law and Sacred Scripture of the Body Politic and Society at the time (thus rendering the Statute null and void from the beginning); and (4) the opening of the Statute in no way conforms to the standards of an Ordinance; and (5) the statute seeks to convey Real Property and thus contradicts the limits of authority of a Regulation; and

(ii) The Statute 27 Hen. VIII c.10 (1535) claiming that no testament concerning lands, tenements and hereditaments be lawful except by the form prescribed by the king in writing known as a “will” as (1) the claimed statute in no way conforms at any level to a valid Ordinance; and (2) the statute seeks to convey Real Property and thus contradicts the limits of authority of a Regulation; and (3) the statute is morally repugnant in its scope, manner and contempt for the Rule of Law, Justice and Due Process with no recourse, or remedy; and

(iii) The Statute 27 Hen. VIII c.16 (1535) claiming that no conveyance of land or Real Property as well as Personal Property be conveyed or transferred unless it be in writing and by deed (indented), sealed and inrolled as (1) the claimed statute in no way conforms at any level to a valid Ordinance; and (2) the statute seeks to convey Real Property and thus contradicts the limits of authority of a Regulation; and (3) the statute is morally repugnant in its scope, manner and contempt for the Rule of Law, Justice and Due Process with no recourse, or remedy; and

(iv) The Statute 27 Hen. VIII c.24 (1535) claiming that no right of valid forum of law, or valid judgment of law, or Right of writ or Right over land or Real Property exist, except through the King alone as (1) the claimed statute in no way conforms at any level to a valid Ordinance; and (2) the statute seeks to convey Real Property and thus contradicts the limits of authority of a Regulation; and (3) the statute is morally repugnant in its scope, manner and contempt for the Rule of Law, Justice and Due Process with no recourse, or remedy; and

(v) The Statute 27 Hen. VIII c.28 (1535) claiming the dissolution of small monasteries having lands less than two hundred pounds per year and conveyance and transfer of such real property to the King as (1) the claimed statute in no way conforms at any level to a valid Ordinance; and (2) the statute seeks to convey Real Property and thus contradicts the limits of authority of a Regulation; and (3) the statute is morally repugnant in its scope, manner and contempt for the Rule of Law, Justice and Due Process with no recourse, or remedy; and

(vi) The Statute 31 Hen. VIII c.13 (1539) claiming the dissolution of monasteries and abbies and conveyance and transfer of such real property to the King as (1) the claimed statute in no way conforms at any level to a valid Ordinance; and (2) the statute seeks to convey Real Property and thus contradicts the limits of authority of a Regulation; and (3) the statute is morally repugnant in its scope, manner and contempt for the Rule of Law, Justice and Due Process with no recourse, or remedy.

Since 1801, no claimed Juridic Person, or Body Politic or Society under the direct control or influence of the Bank of England, or Central Banks has issued any Ordinance, or Regulations. Instead, all Statutes and Acts issued by such Legislative bodies have either been Policies or false Statutes having no force or effect ecclesiastically, morally, lawfully, legally and null and void ab initio (from the beginning):

(i) A fundamental condition of any Statute being valid as Regulation or Ordinance is that the members of the legislative body issue such instrument in Good Faith, Good Character and Good Conscience in full Fiduciary Capacity, to the benefit of the Juridic Person, or Society. In 1798, Westminster established an act granting power and authority of annuities to the Bank of England (39 Geo. III. c. 60) and obligating the Society to repay the debts; and

(ii) In the year 1801, following the 1800 Act of Union of Great Britain and Ireland (39 & 40 Geo. III. c. 67) creating the trading corporation known as the United Kingdom, Parliament granted the Bank of England (41 Geo. III. C.3. § XXV) the right to operate and administer the corporation of the same name (United Kingdom) until twenty eight million (£28,000,000) pounds of annuities (plus interest) were paid back including the previous £36,000,000 already borrowed since 1798. Thus, all Acts of Parliament of the United Kingdom since 1801 onward have been the internal Policies for employees of the Bank of England and not for the corporation of Great Britain. No valid Ordinance or Regulation has been passed since 1801; and

(iii) By 1816, Westminster had approved the figure of £372,374,471 (since 1798) through fifty five separate legislative acts granting unprecedented powers and authority to the Bank of England under the proviso that until the money and compounding interest was repaid, the Bank of England would remain in control as the defacto Crown and “United Kingdom”. The Bank of England (Advance) Act 1816 (56 G. III c.96) introduced further historic measures whereby the Bank of England was authorized by Policy Acts to pay the Public Service directly, rather than the Exchequer and that the bank’s own private notes were to be accepted for the first time as public money; and

(iv) The Consolidated Fund Act 1816 (56 G. III c.98) introduced the final key controls of the bank with the uniting and consolidation into one (1) fund all the purchase revenues of Great Britain and Ireland with the bank having the right to appoint commissioners to the Exchequer for the Consolidated Fund. The bank was then granted the right through its commissioners to extract interest and expenses from the Consolidated Fund directly with the effective “privatization of the exchequer. From this point onwards, all politicians and public servants and people became “employees” of the bank; and

(v) As no Statute or Legislative Act since 1801 by Westminster or any other Body Politic or Legislative Body under the control or influence of the Bank of England or any associated Central Bank represents a true and valid Ordinance or Regulation, all claimed Statutes and Acts purporting to define, transfer or convey Real Property or Personal Property are ipso facto (as a fact of law) null and void ab inito (from the beginning) having no force or effect whatsoever ecclesiastically, morally, lawfully or legally.