VII. Law
7.10 Forums of Law
Article 299 - Roman Court
A Roman Court is a Forum for the exclusive private business of a Law (Bar) Guild sanctioned by the previous laws of the former Roman Death Cult and rebel forces refusing to acknowledge the supremecy of the sacred covenant Pactum De Singularis Caelum, whereby members of the guild presume certain roles on behalf of the "government" in order to make profit for the guild and its members through direct asset seizure and the commercialization of various securities, bonds and bailments.
Prior to the creation of the Bar Associations in the 19th Century, the private Bar Guilds were known as "guilds" as well as "livery" companies and often by the name as Judges and Notaries since the 13th Century coinciding with the invention of Indulgences of the Roman Death Cult.
In order to make “guild” money, called “Guilt” or “Guilty”, the Private Bar Guilds normally oversee a unique hidden trust for each controversy or “suit” that comes into the private Roman Court. Any bonds that are generated, called “Guilt bonds” are connected to the hidden trust, which the private Bar Guild members are sworn to deny exists.
A Roman Court does not operate according to any true Rule of Law, much less the Golden Rule of Law at taught by Jesus Christ but by presumptions of the law. Therefore, if presumptions presented by the private Bar Guild are not rebutted they become fact and are therefore said to stand true. There are twelve (12) key presumptions asserted by the private Bar Guilds which if unchallenged stand true being Public Forum, Public Record, Public Service, Public Oath, Immunity, Summons, Custody, Court of Guardians, Court of Trustees, Agent and Agency, Incompetence, and Guilt:
(i) The Presumption of Public Forum is that any matter brought before a lower Roman Court is within a Public Forum when in fact it is presumed by the members of the private Bar Guild that the matter is a private Bar Guild business matter. Unless successfully challenged as a matter to be held in a Public Forum under Public Statutes and Rules, the matter remains a private Bar Guild matter completely under private Bar Guild rules and procedures; and
(ii) The Presumption of Public Record is that any matter brought before a lower Roman Courts is a matter for the Public Record when in fact it is presumed by the members of the private Bar Guild that the matter is a private Bar Guild business matter and their own records. Unless the public function of the judge or magistrate is properly exposes as being nothing more than a Public Registrar, all statements, testimonies, debate and documents remain the private records of the private Bar Guild rules; and
(iii) The Presumption of Public Service is that judges, magistrates, bailiffs, prosecutors, attorneys, clerks and other Court Officials are supposed to have sworn an “oath” and have been appointed as Public Officials under the Public Statutes of the State or Nation when in fact all members of the Private Bar Guild swear a solemn secret absolute oath to their Guild repudiating their public duties and obligations of Public Service. Therefore, in most cases all “officials” in a court are not true Public Servants but imposters, private contractors and members of organizations performing acts in defiance of public laws against false representations; and
(iv) The Presumption of Public Oath is that all members of the Private Bar Guild acting in the capacity of "public officials" who have sworn a solemn public oath remain bound by that oath and therefore bound to serve honestly, impartiality and fairly as dictated by their oath. Unless openly challenged and demanded, the presumption stands that the Private Bar Guild members have functioned under their public oath in contradiction to their Guild oath. If challenged, such individuals must recuse themselves as having a conflict of interest and cannot possibly stand under a public oath; and
(v) The Presumption of Immunity is that key members of the Private Bar Guild in the capacity of "public officials" acting as judges, prosecutors and magistrates who have sworn a solemn public oath in good faith are immune from personal claims of injury and liability. Unless openly challenged and their oath demanded, the presumption stands that the members of the Private Bar Guild as public trustees acting as judges, prosecutors and magistrates are immune from any personal accountability for their actions; and
(vi) The Presumption of Summons is that by custom a summons unrebutted stands and therefore one who attends Court is presumed to accept a position (defendant, juror, witness) and jurisdiction of the court. Attendance to court is usually invitation by summons. Unless the summons is rejected and returned, with a copy of the rejection filed prior to choosing to visit or attend, jurisdiction and position as the accused and the existence of "guilt" stands; and
(vii) The Presumption of Custody is that by custom a summons or warrant for arrest unrebutted stands and therefore one who attends Court is presumed to be a thing and therefore liable to be detained in custody by "Custodians". Custodians may only lawfully hold custody of property and "things" not flesh and blood soul possessing beings. Unless this presumption is openly challenged by rejection of summons and/or at court, the presumption stands you are a thing and property and therefore lawfully able to be kept in custody by custodians; and
(viii) The Presumption of Court of Guardians is the presumption that as you may be listed as a "resident" of a ward of a local government area and have listed on your "passport" the letter P, you are a pauper and therefore under the "Guardian" powers of the government and its agents as a "Court of Guardians". Unless this presumption is openly challenged to demonstrate you are both a general guardian and general executor of the matter (trust) before the court, the presumption stands and you are by default a pauper, and lunatic and therefore must obey the rules of the clerk of guardians (clerk of magistrates court); and
(ix) The Presumption of Court of Trustees is that members of the Private Bar Guild presume they have the right to create a trust, without divulging to you your role, or interest or the property in question. Nor is there any statement of account against which the charges are made and which you are expected to accept of defend. At the conclusion of the case, you are then expected to assume the role of trustee of the trust, which you didn’t create, for which you have incomplete information and no proper disclosure and perform the obligations of that trust. Unless the incomplete presumptions are challenged at the commencement of the case and that clear disclosure of full accounting, it is impossible for you to perform or agree to such incomplete information; and
(x) The Presumption of Agent and Agency is the presumption that under contract law you have expressed and granted authority to the Judge and Magistrate through the statement of such words as "recognize, understand" or "comprehend" and therefore agree to be bound to a contract. Therefore, unless all presumptions of agent appointment are rebutted through the use of such formal rejections as "I do not recognize you", to remove all implied or expressed appointment of the judge, prosecutor or clerk as agents, the presumption stands and you agree to be contractually bound to perform at the direction of the judge or magistrate; and
(xi) The Presumption of Incompetence is the presumption that you are at least ignorant of the law, therefore incompetent to present yourself and argue properly. Therefore, the judge/magistrate as executor has the right to have you arrested, detained, fined or forced into a psychiatric evaluation. Unless this presumption is openly challenged to the fact that you know your position as executor and beneficiary and actively rebuke and object to any contrary presumptions, then it stands by the time of pleading that you are incompetent then the judge or magistrate can do what they need to keep you obedient; and
(xii) The Presumption of Guilt is the presumption that as it is presumed to be a private business meeting of the Bar Guild, you are guilty whether you plead "guilty", do not plead or plead "not guilty". Therefore unless you either have previously prepared an affidavit of truth and motion to dismiss with extreme prejudice onto the public record or call a demurrer, then the presumption is you are guilty and the private Bar Guild can hold you until a bond is prepared to guarantee the amount the guild wants to profit from you.


