II.   Sovereign

Sacre rit, or “Holy Writ” are two names for a type of peremptory precept adhering to “Scriptura” first invented in the 8th Century under the Carolingians, issued under authority of the Sovereign from a Cancellocum (Chancery Publishing Scriptorium) to an officer, agent or subject to perform or cease some act or attend some place and answer some claim or controversy. All writs are ultimately derived from the original form, purpose and structure of “Sacre rits”.

The word rit comes from the Latin word rite meaning “proper formality, ritual, ceremony or manner”. Therefore, the first and original meaning of Sacre rit, or “Holy Writ” is “a form of action consistent with proper formality, ritual, ceremony or the manner of the law”.

As a precept issued under the authority of a Sovereign, a “Holy Writ” is a rule or teaching principle especially directed towards the personal conduct of one or more persons, that of itself does not create any new universal law nor grant any particular permanent right. The word precept coming from the Latin praecipere meaning “to teach, admonish or direct”.

As a peremptory instrument from a Sovereign, a properly authorized issued “Holy Writ” is not subject to debate, appeal and is considered absolute, decisive, conclusive and final. The word peremptory coming from Latin peremptus meaning “to destroy, to prevent or kill”.

As an ecclesiastical instrument always issued from the cancellocum, a writ by its very name and nature from its origin is an absolute and precise instrument that must conform to the strictest standards to be considered valid.  Therefore, from its inception under the Carolingians in the 8th Century, a writ is only valid if it possesses the following attributes:

(i) An associated memorandum of petition or simply “memorandum” signed and witnessed by at least three other parties; and

(ii) The insignio of the inventor or scriptor issuing the writ meaning their distinguishing mark, seal, badge, decoration or name; and

(iii) The obsignio of the official authorizing the writ being their official seal; and

(iv) The testabus of the obsignio meaning a sentence or phrase as a testification or attestation, usually at the bottom of a document that it has been duly authorized; and

(v) The imprimo being the distinguishing mark, seal, decoration or watermark of the cancellocum (publishing location) from which the writ was issued.

Since the creation of the concept of a writ in the 8th Century by the Carolingians, Holy Writs have been the means by people were called (summonsed) to official meetings such as parlomentum (parliament) as well as the commencement of all valid legal proceedings, as demonstrated by the two (2) legal maxims that underpin Sacred Law and the foundation of Western Law and Catholic Law:

(i) Valida rit dat genuit ad actionem meaning "a legitimate writ gives birth to legal action"; and

(ii) Nulli rit est non actio meaning "when no writ exists, no right of action exists (in law)".

In the 13th Century, the Venetians through King Edward I of England (1272 – 1307) reintroduced the concept of “writs” as prerogative being able to be issued without direct order from the Sovereign or his officials, but “franchised” through the privatization of law to the Arte de Guidici e Notai known as the Guild of Judges and Notaries of Venice, the sale of Thorne Island (Westminster) and the establishment of curia (courts) under their control.

While the law of England was privatized to Arte de Guidici e Notai known as the Guild of Judges and Notaries of Venice from the 13th Century, the foundational obligation of sacred and western law that a valid writ must always be issued first to give rise to a legal action continued to be honored until 1848 with the introduction of the Summary Jurisdiction Act and the Indictable Offences Act.

As the Parliament of Great Britain and Ireland chose to openly defy the foundations of sacred law, western law, Catholicus Ecclesia (Catholic Church) Law and their own claims and terms of the operation of the courts through the abandonment of the issue of valid writs to commence any legal action from 1848, all legal judgments, orders, motions and sentences since this moment throughout all legal jurisdictions are therefore invalid, illegal, unlawful and null and void.

Any court, owing its origin and general functions to the court system of Great Britain no longer issues valid writs to commence any legal action, such failure to adhere to the foundations of sacred law, western law and true Catholicus Ecclesia (Catholic Church) Law renders any subsequent judgments, orders, motions and sentences from the time of abandonment therefore invalid, illegal, unlawful and null and void.