II.   Sovereign

Chancery, or more formally the Courts of Chancery are two primary jurisdiction courts established at the end of the 17th Century (but falsely claimed of older provenance) following the granting of the private Court of Exchequer, and Court of Wards and Liveries to the Inner and Middle Temple for £666 by the Royal Society (Royal Society of London for Improving Natural Knowledge):

(i) The Court of Equity (Pegasus) or Inner Temple addressing matters relating to the purchased Court of Exchequer; and

(ii) The Court of Conscience (Lamb of God) or Middle Temple, addressing matters relating to the purchased Court of Wards and Liveries.

The Courts of Chancery are the original source of the perceived notions of “natural justice” and “common law” in Western-Roman (Cult) Legal traditions and remain still in operation:

(i) The term “equity” is born from the Latin equis meaning “horse” as an anagram for Pegasus and the ancient historic reference to the Patrician classes of Rome who claimed their heritage as Atlanteans – the ancient name of Euboea Island in Greece and the Yahudah settlements of Sum-Ur which the Greeks called Chalcis, but which the Romans called Remus and Sulum-Ur, which the Greeks called Eretria and the Romans called Romulus; and

(ii) The reference to equity in Chancery from its inception in the late 17th Century is a obscure symbol as to its primary purpose as remedy to those who “claim their birthright” properly and respectfully and thus (if successful) are recognized as a plebian, or possibly even welcomed as a patrician; and

(iii) The term “conscience” is born from the Latin con+scientia meaning literally “with knowledge” as a reference both to the requirement of competence in law and pleading as well as the implied position of those deemed “incompetent” or wards; and

(iv) The term chancery is derived from the ancient Carolingian structure of the cancellarium as a place of original record and thus both a literal and implied reference to the power of Chancery to correct any mistake of record of any lower court under its jurisdiction; and

(v) The history surrounding equity and chancery prior to the end of the 17th Century is fabricated based in part on some historical fact as a means of promoting the Royal Societies notion of “natural justice” whereby men and women select their station in society not simply by birthright but by intellectual competence; and

(vi) The Roman Death Cult in the 18th Century followed by the Bank of England in the 19th Century in the creation of a global bank known as the “United Kingdom” regarded the Courts of Chancery as a threat to their powers. Therefore, the powers of the Courts of Admiralty were expanded and promoted in preference to the Courts of Chancery. Beginning in the early-mid 19th Century, the Bank controlled Parliament began restricting the access to Chancery and powers of Chancery; and

(vii) By the end of the 19th Century, the clear, defined and public doors to Chancery within the “United Kingdom” were sealed shut through the Supreme Court of Judicature Act of 1875 whereby the Court of Chancery ceased to exist within the Bank controlled realm. In its place a pseudo-door was formed through the High Court (of Admiralty) of Justice, Chancery Division. However, private access has never fully been removed to those pleading through the Kingdom of Great Britain.