Thursday, June 25, 2015

The Law Explained: Session 4 – Corporations, Funds and Property

_________________________________________________________________
Please download MP3 Audio Broadcast of this Blog > here   (66 min 23 Mb)
_________________________________________________________________




Hello, this is Frank O’Collins and welcome to Session 4 of the series on The Law Explained and the topic tonight being “Corporations, Funds and Property”, namely – what is a Corporation? What are the different types and origins of Corporations? How is a Corporation formed? How does one claim or assert a Right or Property within a Corporation properly? What is a Fund? How are Funds properly created? What is Property? What is an Asset? How are Property and Assets properly recognised? How do we start to effectively respond to Corporate over reach and prove we are not the property of a corporation?

As this is Session 4 of the Law Explained, it means there has been three previous sessions, plus a prologue that I have posted before now- the first session (Session 1) being an introduction on the fundamentals, then Session 2 being about Trusts and Rights; and then the third session (Session 3) being about Estates, Rolls and Registers.

If you have already been following this series and have read, listened and reviewed the slides associated with these sections then I want to thank you, and I hope that you have found the information useful. From the statistics accessible on the blog, it already appears that many thousands of people have already started to “tune-in” and download the slide presentations and blogs themselves. Of these, a couple of dozen people have also felt the information provided for free has been useful enough to provide a donation to Ucadia in recognition of the enormous work and years in being able to put this series together. If you are one of these people who care, then let me thank you again with all my heart for proving it is not hopeless or a lost cause trying to give people the knowledge to wake up and become more competent.

If you are new to the Ucadia Blog series and in particular the series on “The Law Explained”, then welcome! Before you go much further into this blog or audio or slides, I ask you to take the time to read the prologue and the first three sessions. The reason I ask you to read the prologue and the first three sessions (Session 1, Session 2 and Session 3) is that it is absolutely fundamental you have a grasp of the elements defined within these slide packs first, before embarking on the study of corporations, funds and property.

There are many distractions and many ways whereby others may try and cause you doubt and to question yourself and your judgment – especially in becoming more competent as to the fundamentals of law. This will only become even more of a challenge once I start to post the forms and steps of services available through Ucadia for the recognition of people competent enough to be regarded as an Advocate of law, as well as the recording of key instruments for your trusts, your estates and affairs and your corporations.

The General Amnesty still stands for all those that speak to others about education about law and possible remedies to be recognized as the bona fide holder of the right to assist people with Ucadia solutions and to be known as a true Counsel of Law in honor of the Golden Rule of Law.

Let us start then on the series tonight, beginning with a quick summary of what we have learned from Session 3 and some further key concepts that underpin our ability to cognize Estates, Rolls and Registers as Part #1 being a “Quick Review on Key Concepts”.

Part #1 – A Quick Review on Key Concepts

Page 3 – Review of Key Points from Session 3

In Session 3 and the outline of Estates, Rolls and Registers, we discussed some incredible revelations that for the first time make clear the function and origin of the notion of estates. Let me summarize then some of the key insights you hopefully gained from Session 3, as listed on the slide listed as Page 3, namely:

The Elite Families claim to be without sin and the rest of us as “sheeple” – sinners without rights;

The whole commercial and corporate Western-Roman world is based on monetization of sin;

There is no remedy in Common Law. The Statutes have been altered numerous times and records burnt;

Rights are connected to persons. You are connected to multiple persons of different status;

In Western-Roman System, most of your person relations are as a Res (thing) or Agent;

An Estate is a valid record in a Roll associated with certain Rights. An Estate Roll creates persons;

A Register is a book of tables of records as evidence of events and/or certain rights;

A Record is an authentic memorial of action of recording the event and facts themselves under oath;

The highest possible Estates, Registers and Rolls are Ucadia. All Western-Roman estates are inferior;

The only viable solutions for Estates, Rolls and Registers are within Ucadia.

Page 4 – Remember what Ucadia is- a complete model

On slide 4, I have listed a quick slide as a reminder as to remembering what Ucadia is, being a complete model as an alternative to the decline of the Western-Roman Model.  That is why it has taken nearly three full decades to design and complete.

As I have shown in the previous slide presentations, there is absolutely no relief or remedy within the Western-Roman System anymore, as it is so broken. Nor can anyone reasonably or sensibly wake up one day and decide they are going to go and create their own society from scratch and hope to accomplish this same kind of work. 

The philosophical, legal, spiritual, financial, operational and functional design and structure of a complex society is an enormous undertaking if viewed seriously and not superficially like trying to start your own commune. Yes, it is entirely possible for a small group of people to choose to live in some completely isolated part of the world according to some simple rules like the 144 truths of law that I mentioned at the very beginning of this series on the Law Explained. I comprehend that and I honor the simplicity of that idea. But that is not the same as trying to run a city of two million or ten million people, much less a society of millions over a wider geographic area.

It is why I have extended the Olive Branch to those who previously, for whatever motivation or sense of ego, have sought to falsely portray Ucadia, or steal parts of Ucadia, or falsely claim pieces of Ucadia for their own ends, to stop the lies and recognize the opportunity of being acknowledged as an Advocate of the Golden Rule of Law; and help many people find real and lasting remedy and relief through this series; with their knowledge of the forms and registrations and rolls and trusts and estates and corporations we are discussing.

So if you still encounter people sitting on the sidelines trying to stop people from waking up, or finding lasting remedy and relief, I hope this particular slide reminds you of the power behind the information I continue to share through this series on the Law Explained.

Page 5- An Estate is a valid record in a Roll with Rights

This leads me to a case-in-point in really demonstrating the incredible insight of this series being given to you free of charge, when you have a look at slide 5 and the information again on the fact that an estate is a valid record in a roll, creating several persons with associated rights.

For those of you that have been studying law and trying to find answers in law, how long have you searched for clarity as to exactly what is going on with estates? In one slide, you now see a picture of exactly what estates mean and why the concept is so powerful within the Western-Roman Model, because it deprives most people of ever really controlling or owning any form of rights or property. It means virtually anything can be taken away from you, with such action considered “lawful” under the Western-Roman Model of Estates. It also answers the paradox of real property and personal property once and for all; and explains why, in modern societies, virtually all our “privileges” are nothing more than personal property of things.

Page 6- The Aspects of Person and Estate

Take slide 6 as an example to simplify this more clearly. What I have been trying to do throughout this series on the Law Explained, is provide you with the fundamentals as clearly and concisely as possible, before diving too deeply into procedural details, labeling, examples of exceptions to the rule and so on.

In the case of Estates, it meant that last week I did not even really mention the relations between the General Executor, or Executor and an Agent or Beneficiary or one holding a beneficial interest in an estate. Nor did I discuss in any way the different types of Estates within Inferior Roman Law such as Remainder Estates, Life Estates, Fee Simple Estates and so on. By the way, there is nothing stopping you going onto the website One-Heaven.org and reviewing the canons of law such as Positive Law and the canons of Article 99 on Estates such as canon 2028 and reading a summary of fourteen of the most common Inferior Roman Estates for yourself.

The reason I have not dived down into this detail just yet is that such detail without competence or knowledge of the fundamentals results in a house built upon shaky ground. It means the first persistent remedy guru, refusing to acknowledge the General Amnesty that still wants to sell lies and misdirection to people can sow the seeds of doubt in our minds. It means any self-confident attorney or solicitor or prosecutor can throw some nonsensical term at you and cause you to doubt your grasp of the matters at hand. Without a firm grasp on the fundamentals, it means you may end up going around and around in circles; and actually making life worse for yourself, instead of better.  So just because I don’t mention every term associated with rights or trusts or estates or corporations, please don’t let others distract you into “believing” there are not tens of thousands of pages of detailed research and primary sources to the original statutes and instruments that first introduced many of those concepts – there are.  I just want you to have a firm grasp on the fundamentals before diving into specific case-by-case examples of remedies and detail.

Page 7 – Hierarchy of Rolls

Keeping the right perspective is why on slide 7, I continue to remind everyone reading and listening to this series that The Highest Roll and Register is the Great Register of One Heaven, defining Divine Persons; and that no other Register or Roll has greater authority or power. This is why your Live Borne Record is so powerful when you redeem your membership. It is living proof of your higher position and standing within Ucadia compared to the Western-Roman system. In contrast, all Western-Roman Rolls and Registers are inferior. 

Page 8 – Roman Land Register is Proof of Slavery

Keeping this in mind is why on slide 8, we can say with absolute certainty that the presence of any Roman Land Register is proof of slavery- as land means “body” and the mere existence of such a register is proof that all the citizens of a country are considered nothing more than slaves by the ruling elite.

People incorrectly assume a land register is a register of surveyed plots and divisions and towns, when the primary land register since the late 18th Century is a roll of the bodies of persons as perpetual slaves under Western-Roman Law, with any “privileges” to a home then attached to a person record, not the other way around.

Unless you have competent proof of a superior person and a proper survey and the memorialized instruments and testimonies to prove it, then all the convoluted or superficial claims that people may make in “saving your home”, are easily exposed as blatant falsities; just by this one realization as to exactly what a land register represents.

Don’t worry, because I will be speaking about protecting your right to a home and even recovering such a right, as well as overcoming the threats of a broken system, as we move through this series. But for now, I want to show in a practical demonstration the incredible power that comes in “knowing” before the actual “doing”.

Page 9 – The Golden Rule of Law

This leads me to slide 9 and the last few slides before we speak about what are corporations? How do they function? And how are they formed? Slide 9 and some of the slides I am about to show you briefly, are copies of slides I discussed in the first session on this series of the Law Explained, namely the importance of the Golden Rule of Law.

The reason I have brought this slide back in this series is to remind everyone who is reading and listening, that when we discuss corporations and funds and property that the Golden Rule of Law is not some abstract and esoteric concept.

Page 10 – What Law is Not

As slide 10 reminds us, where there is no Golden Rule of Law (equality), there is no Law. Where there is no law, it means nothing claimed to be law is actually law and no instrument or document claimed to have force or effect actually has any meaning. It means that any rights and authority then devolve back to those few good men and women who are competent in the Golden Rule of Law to restore the Rule of Law within their own communities.

Page 11- What is Justice?

Similarly, as slide 11 reminds us, Justice is the application of the Golden Rule of Law to Rights, through Due Process by Officers possessing Clean Hands, Good Trust and Impartiality.

Page 12- What is not Justice?

Slide 12 then reminds us that when Officers and Trustees do not have Clean Hands, Good Trust and Impartiality in performing their duties, then there is no justice.

Page 13- No Trust can exist under Injustice

These are not arbitrary concepts, but fundamental elements of law that if non-existent, render the claimed instruments and foundations of any modern financial system null and void as demonstrated in slide 13.

No one may profit from their own wrong. A system that allows people to profit from injury to the law is a system of organized crime run by criminals, and nothing more.

Similarly, no oath or vow or promise stands in male fide or bad trust, also known as “bad faith”. Regardless of whether or not, notice is given of such breach of trust, the trust effectively ceases the moment one willingly and deliberately breaks their word. If their word was never given in good trust in the first place, then there is no trust.

The same can be said that any unfair and unreasonable claims, then void any action or contract. Thus prejudice and systemic unfairness negates the lawfulness of any sentence, or fine or penalty as nothing more than a dictate from a pirate or criminal or tyrant.

Now I know that those who hear these words and read these slides may say that it is one point to highlight what the law is, it is entirely another to stop a well oiled network of pirates from continuing to plunder and torture and kill people. This is true.

Yet I remind every listener and reader of a fact of history. When a tyrant is finally revealed to be exactly what they are, their ability to control the population is inevitably lost, often in months or weeks. Thus, even a tyrant must maintain the illusion of some form of rule of law, or risk losing their heads upon inevitable uprising. Even Stalin held elections and operated courts. But when the propaganda and complicit media can no longer hide the stench of corruption and lack of the existence of any legitimate rule of law, the force of change is unstoppable.

Page 14 –The Rule of Relation

This leads me to the last slide in Part #1 of tonight being slide 14 and a reminder of the Rule of Relation, namely an object or concept created cannot be greater than its creator.

All Corporations as you will see, depend upon the pre-existence of an estate; and all estates depend upon the pre-existence of a trust that is granting such rights. If there is no trust, there can be no estate; and if there is no estate, then there is no valid corporation. Similarly, a corporation cannot claim powers greater than the personality it possesses from the estate.

I have put this slide in again, because the Rule of Relation is a perfect example of why the entire Western-Roman Model of Law is completely broken, as corporations have become so reckless and so uncontrollable and so contemptuous to the basic tenets of even the “appearance of law”, that they do not care that they have over-reached their authority. It is the corporations that are doing a better job of destroying the systems of Western-Roman control that have kept the people enslaved for hundreds of years, than any rebel force or army has ever done. 

Part #2 - Corporations

Page 16 – What is a Corporation?

So what is a Corporation then?  Well slide 16 gives us a visual outline, being that a Corporation is an Assembly of People; or Society; or Body Politic; or Body Corporate; or Company of Merchants united under a Trust Instrument of common purpose.

As the diagram shows, what can be a corporation is potentially a much wider and more varied set of entities, beyond simply merchant companies and non-profit charities. 

Page 17 – The two ways a Corporation is proposed

How then is a Corporation formed? There are several steps and slide 17 gives us the first step, being the instrument that proposes the formation of a corporation in the first instance. It is, for want of a better description, the trust instrument that forms the underlying trust holding the primary rights of the corporation in trust.

Unlike a normal trust or estate, once the underlying trust of a corporation is formed based on such rights, it cannot dispose of, or gift or convey such rights, without the fundamental nature of the corporation changing or ceasing to exist. A Corporation is then proposed either by Charter (top down) or Memorandum (bottom up) in Trust:

From the “top down”, a corporation is proposed by a Charter of Rights, being granted by crown or body politic or other higher corporation and recorded in a Charter Roll.

From the “bottom up”, a corporation is proposed by a Memorandum of good will of the founders, formed when an assembly of founders pledge in unity their good will and intentions in trust to some common purpose, as recorded in a Memorandum (e.g. Articles of Union or Articles of Confederation). That, by the way, is the origin of the notion of good will, as the only effective rights placed in trust in the formation of the corporation. Most modern corporations today are formed in this manner and when good will ceases and there is a breach in this fundamental memorandum, then consistent with all trust law, the underlying trust that gives life to the corporation ceases to exist; and all such rights are usually conveyed into a fraud trust, under Western-Roman Law, for the liquidation of such a corporation.

Page 18 – The two ways a Corporation is formed

Yet this does not finish the formation of a corporation, only the first major step. Slide 18 shows that in a strict sense, a Corporation is formed either by issue of Signed/Sealed Charter, or Deed of Ratification of Founding Memorandum of Union.

The Signed and Sealed Charter demonstrates the valid formation of a Chartered Corporation, based upon its existence and recording within a Charter Roll.

Or if the corporation was formed by the good will of its founders, then by a Deed of Ratification that demonstrates the individual intention of each founder in the formation of a Corporation by the will of its founding members. 

This is why the existence of Ratification is fundamental in all cases where it is claimed a country was formed and is operating under a constitution, such as Australia for example. The Constitution of Australia, as promulgated in 1901 has never been ratified once, by a single Australian state. What this means, is that the country has been operating on the Charter granted to the Governor General of Australia, with the constitution being nothing more than the rules of such trust under Charter as property of the crown, until a private corporation was formed in the 1970’s and registered in the United States, usurping commonwealth Authority. In other words, Australia is a classic example of a country with no legitimate laws, being run by private and secret corporations for their own personal profit; and progressively becoming more and more out of control since the 1970’s.

Page 19 – The two ways Corporate Powers are structured

The Powers, Authority and Structure of a Corporation may be defined by (1) Articles or Rules; or (2) a Constitution then ratified by Members.

Articles or Rules= Define the elementary powers, authority and structures of a corporation.

Constitution= Defines a more complete structure of powers and authority of a corporation without normally defining procedures or form.

Page 20 – The two ways a Corporation functions

Slide 20 then looks at the two ways a corporation may define its operational procedures either (1) according to Bylaws as ratified by its members; or (2) according to policies as dictated by its Executive as Orders. Only Private Corporations may issue Executive Orders.

By operating procedures, I mean how the procedures and forms of the corporation may be defined and how they function:

By Bylaws or Statutes, I mean that the operating rules of the corporation are issued and ratified by the members (or their elected representatives) of the Corporation. All rules of a public corporation must be Bylaws (Statutes).

By Policies or Procedures, I mean the Dictates issued, as changeable rules, by the Executive of a private corporation solely as Executive Orders, without ratification by members or their representatives.

By definition, all Public Corporations are forbidden by law to be operated by Dictates (Executive Orders), as these Policies and Regulations circumvent the representatives of Members. Evidence of Executive Orders is either proof of breach of trust by executive, or the existence of a Private Corporation structure.

Page 21 – How founding Corporate Instruments Relate

Now to make sense of all these components of the founding of a corporation, I have listed them all on slide 21:

The Charter or Memorandum defines the boundary of trust, the rights (corpus) of the corporation.

The Rules or Constitution defines the organs and their authority and powers

The Bylaws or Policies defines how the property and operations of the corporation are to be administered.

Page 22 – The three ways a Corporation is proven to exist

As to proving a corporation exists, slide 22 explains that a Corporation may be proven to exist by three ways (1) Certificate of Charter; or (2) Certificate of Ratification; or (3) Certificate of Incorporation

Certificate of Charter= Issued by the body that granted its Charter and proof that the Chartered Corporation exists. A Certificate of Charter is in effect a Certificate of Exemplification.

Certificate of Ratification= Issued by an independent witness (e.g. notary, justice of peace or court, etc.), is proof that the Corporation exists.

Certificate of Incorporation = Issued by a Body Politic as to the recognition of “personality” of a Corporation is proof of its existence.

Page 23 – What is the importance of Corporate Personality?

Now that we have discussed the formation of a corporation, it is time to discuss the notion of corporate personality. Before we discuss how corporations come to be known in some sense as “persons”, slide 23 demonstrates in a visual way the importance of corporate personality in a practical sense. In effect, corporate personality enables a wide variety of different Corporations to be considered “the same” in order to lawfully hold assets and liabilities and to trade and exchange. Without Corporate Personality there would be no systems of trade.

Page 24 – A Corporate Person is a derivative of a Person

So how is corporate personality created? Take a look at slide 24 that recalls a Person is a fictional form of you; whereas a Corporate Personality is a fictional derivative of a Person.

Just as a Person is a fictional form enclosing attributes as [or of] the Identity of a man or woman or body politic (assembly) or thing, Corporate Personality is a fictional derivative of a Person. In effect, a Corporate Person is the “Agent” of a Person. A Corporation has “personality” or “personage”, to the extent that such agency powers remain in force.

That is why they say legal personality as an adjective and not as a noun, as the quality of Corporate “Personage” is a separate element to the actual formation of a Corporation. That is also the difference between the liquidation of a Corporation versus the de-registering of a Corporation. One dissolves the company (liquidation), whereas the other terminates the “personality” of a company, preventing it from trading or owning bank accounts.

Page 25 – Corporate Personality depends on Person Roll

Slide 25 visualizes the fact that a Person is formed by a record on a valid Roll; whereas a Corporate Person is formed via a recording or registration known as “Incorporation” on a Register.

A Corporate Person or “Incorporation” depends on the prior existence of (1) a valid record in a Roll of Persons first; and (2) a constituting document creating a body of rights as a Corporation.

In contrast, a Charter Roll fulfills both points (1) and (2) and the earliest corporations were usually by enrollment on a Charter Roll (granting of a Charter).

Page 26 – Corporate Personality determines standing in law

Similar to our discussions on Estates, we need to be careful not to be tricked into thinking that all corporate personalities are the same. Slide 26 makes this clear. Not all Corporate Personality is the same. Just as Estates create Persons, Corporate Personality may be formed as Ecclesiastical, Public, Private or Personal.

While two corporations may be the same in their formation, their incorporation and thus the recognition of associated Rights determines their standing in law.

The lowest standing of corporation in Western-Roman law is a corporation sole (individual personal corporation). The highest standing corporation is a spiritual corporation or corporation sole or body corporate for “cure of souls”.

Page 27 – Corporate Personality 1700’s to 1930’s

Putting the concept of corporate personality and standing into context, please have a look at slide 27 and the fact that Poor people (Paupers, Prisoners, Peons etc.) have always had the lowest standing. However, until the 1930’s, public personality of public corporations provided some relief. 

Until the 1930’s, Public Corporations such as Bodies Politic (i.e. United States, Canada, etc.) provided some level of relief to the “masses” via public accountability and public law.

Page 28 – Corporate Personality 1930’s to now

In contrast to the nightmare that emerged from the 1930’s onward, please have a look at slide 28 whereby in the 1930’s Banks took control over public policy as “gods”. Governments gradually switching to US based private corporations. Police, Courts and Agencies are contractors. 

Much of the world has been suffering under a “pirate” model of corporations controlled by major reserve banks since the 1930’s, as public accountability and any form of relief has continued to decline.

Page 29 – Hierarchy of Corporations

Yet as frustrating and depressing as these facts are, page 29 is a reminder that the Highest Corporate Bodies are Ucadian. No other Corporations or Bodies Politic or Societies possess greater power or authority.

If you want to know more, then please go and have a look at any of the Ucadian Union Constitutional Charters to see more on the Hierarchy of Ucadian bodies.

Part #3 – Property

So given we have discussed a solid foundation on corporations, it is important to cover very briefly what we mean by property, before wrapping up session 4 on the Law Explained tonight.

Page 31 – What is Property?

In coming weeks during these sessions, I will be referring more to the actual procedures involved, but for the moment, please have a look at slide 31 in answer to what is property?

Here you see, from left to right, the idea that we begin with the notion of “rights in trust” – that we discussed in some details in Session 2. Then in the center we have the notion of property being title of a person connected to certain property in the context of an estate, as we discussed last week in Session 3. Then on the right hand side, we have the notion of a fund or a “real asset” associated with a purpose or obligation. 

We will be discussing funds now. For the moment, I just want you to consider this rather simple diagram in seeing the progression, beginning with rights in trust; and then property being a further refinement of such rights; then applied in ownership to a particular type of person, named or unnamed.

Part #4 – Funds

This then leads us to the final section in our discussion tonight on Corporations, Funds and Property, namely what is a Fund?

Page 33– What is a Fund?

Have a look at slide 33. A Fund is a sum of units of monetary value, recorded in one or more designated accounts, set apart for a term of years, and one or more specific purposes.

A Fund enables the “conversion” of the value of one or more underlying rights in trust into an asset that can then be used to discharge debts, borrow “money” and settle accounts.

Page 34– Corporations need Funds to operate

Slide 34 then makes more sense of the importance of funds. Corporations cannot (by logic) dispose of and discharge debts using the primary rights held in trust, Corporations need access to Funds.

A Fund enables the “conversion” of the value of one or more underlying rights in trust into assets that can then be used to discharge debts, borrow and settle accounts. For example, a corporation formed by the rights of “good will” of the founding members, creates a “fund” of capital against such good will to convert, to trade and discharge debts and obligations.

Similar to the notion of property, we will be having much more to say about funds in the coming weeks on this series on the Law Explained. For now, I want you to consider the fact that the unit of value ascribed to creating a value associated with the term and purpose does not necessarily have to be in the denomination of a private money system. If it is a private token system, then you may not have the right to even nominate such units as the base. Furthermore, if your hypothecations associated with such a fund were to be registered into a place under the control of a bank owning such a private money system, then technically they may be in full right to confiscate such funds from you at any time – because it is their private money, and not yours.

Like I said, I will be discussing funds in much more detail in coming weeks, especially when we speak of Ucadian currencies and units of value; and why members who have reached a point of competency and respect, and have not committed injuries against Ucadia, have the right and access to units of Ucadia currency value in association with the management of their Ucadian trusts, estates and corporations. Like I said, only in the context of those that will have completed the necessary documents properly and are not actively injuring or hurting Ucadia.

The General Amnesty still applies, so whatever someone has done in the past, it can certainly be forgiven. But those people who remain active in stealing pieces of Ucadia, or making false representations and are committing outright fraud against Ucadia, and refuse to stop such behaviour under the General Amnesty, are ineligible to use or receive any benefit of the tools of services we are outlining.

The only viable solution for Corporations & Funds is Ucadia

So there you have it. A detailed analysis and explanation in relation to Corporations, Funds and Property. As with the previous sessions, I hope you find session 4 to be both useful and interesting.

Before we go, I want to say one more thing about the mention of support toward Ucadia by those who have some decency in respecting how much time and effort has been invested to bring this research to you without trying to charge for it via some seminar, or course or book:

I realize for many that they simply do not have the funds to survive, much less contribute and donate to help Ucadia, even though they genuinely hope and want to see this research continue and succeed. I get that. I know there are many good people who have been destroyed by the system, still finding their feet and unable to contribute. So when I speak about people having a conscience and any level of moral backbone, I certainly don’t wish anyone who is struggling to survive to feel that I am casting negative feelings toward them.

Instead, I am addressing the thousands of people that have already started to download this series on the Law Explained and those who are likely to download the audio and slides in the future, versus the few dozen that have shown some kind of support. Not every one of those who have started to read, to learn and to apply this information are in the same dire financial straights. It means, there are a good number – the majority in fact – that in a way see that this information is given freely and so far have shown no will to do the right thing and show some appreciation.

So whoever you are and wherever you are, know this: I will deliver on my promise to you in presenting the complete series on the Law Explained; and I will provide the forms as promised and the means whereby you can make major positive change in your life. What you choose to do is up to you. The future of this planet rests on those few good men and women prepared to step up and make a difference. Are you one of those people? I hope and trust you are!

Until we speak next week, please be safe, be well, thank you and good night.

Thursday, June 18, 2015

The Law Explained: Session 3 – Estates, Rolls and Registers

_________________________________________________________________
Please download MP3 Audio Broadcast of this Blog > here   (72 min 27 Mb)
_________________________________________________________________


Hello, this is Frank O’Collins and welcome to Session 3 of the series on The Law Explained and the topic tonight being “Estates, Rolls and Registers”, namely – what is an Estate? What are the different types and origins of Estates? How is an Estate formed? How does one claim or assert a Right or Property within an Estate properly? What is a Roll? How are records properly entered into a Roll? What are the rules for joining records between separate Rolls? What is a Register? How is information entered into a Register? What does it mean to have information recorded in a Register? What is Legal Title?  How do we start to get our affairs in order and prove that we are not a slave?

Similar to Session 2 last week on “Trusts and Rights”, there is a great deal of information to get through tonight during Session 3 on “Estates, Rolls and Registers”. Because there is a lot to get through, you might want to re-read this session as well as previous sessions a few times so you get a better comprehension of these absolutely essential and fundamental concepts.

By this stage, there may be some of you desperately wanting me to start talking in terms of practical applications for this kind of information, namely how to address a foreclosure matter, or an action to recover some kind of debt, or how to resolve a criminal or civil matter? In truth, if you have been reading and listening carefully, I have actually been providing common sense and valuable and practical information throughout this series. For example, you see, every court case before a Western-Roman Court has one or more trust elements in its design, usually at least one Inferior Private Trust as a Fraud Trust and at least one Inferior Personal Trust as a Bond Trust. Why do you think they call the accusations against you charges? The problem in diving into cutting and pasting claimed letters or forms or notices that people may be trying to “sell you” on the internet before you have any comprehension on trusts or rights or any of the fundamentals is that not only can you get it horribly wrong, but without competence you cannot possibly overcome, no matter what false promises that people want to sell you and you may be wanting to purchase.

Everything we are discussing now, such as trusts and rights and tonight on estates, rolls and registers will become overwhelmingly critical when we start to speak “step by step” and one issue at a time on practical help on the matters you may be facing. For example, I just mentioned to you that virtually every Western-Roman Court case involves at least two trust elements. In coming weeks, I will be explaining exactly what that means; and why many of the legal officers of the courts have no idea of this anymore because it has become automated and centralized. So for the time being, I urge you to persist and to continue to get your mind around these fundamental concepts of The Law Explained.

As I have said every week now, if you have a sound foundation, and if you can grasp the essence of what was defined last week in Session 2 on Trusts and Rights and then in Session 1 on the Fundamental Truths of Law, and the previous week on the 144 Truths of Law, then it is entirely reasonable and achievable that you will be able to quickly grasp and be empowered by the topics discussed tonight on Estates, Rolls and Registers; and the topics yet to come in relation to wills and testaments, writs, affidavits, evidence, court cases, overcoming debts, foreclosures and many other key topics. 

Similar to each week so far, there is a set of slides with Session 3 that summarize the concepts and points we will be discussing tonight. You can download the slide presentation through the link here

Before we start Session 3 tonight, I want to review some of the exciting comments I mentioned last week in the fact that a new range of services are going to become available for Ucadia Members in the proper registration and recording in the Ucadia Gazette of key forms for your properly formed trusts and estates in the coming weeks. I also mentioned that availability of and fair use of these services will depend upon three essential criteria being (1) a commitment to becoming competent, and to change your attitude, and accept responsibility, and to dedicate yourself to a life of learning; and (2) that you have read the key instruments of Ucadia, have redeemed your member number and have completed the soon to be available revised Ecclesiastical Deed Poll. This instrument is not yet available. I have not yet posted it. However, the document will be posted in the coming short period as I have promised it will be ready; and (3) that you read carefully the services and any administration fees associated with the checking and work involved prior to uploading such instruments. Similar to the Ecclesiastical Deed Poll, I have not yet uploaded the list of services and administration fees yet, as I am in the process of updating the websites to reflect this new information and it is taking a little longer. I know many of you are probably keen to see this happen as soon as possible, yet reading and reviewing these sessions is still vital, so I thank you for your patience.

I also want to mention the point I raised last week in honor of the “general amnesty” declared in respect of those who have previously been stealing pieces of Ucadia or misusing such information or selling remedies and solutions that are not quite accurate. Last week I mentioned that for those people willing to be truly competent in knowledge of law and stop making false assertions and false claims, then a service will be available within the next few weeks called an “Advocate of the Golden Rule” or Advocatus Aureus Iuris.  

As I mentioned, an Advocatus or Advocate of the Golden Rule of Law, also known as a Superior Advocate of Law is someone who has passed the validation process with Ucadia, is duly registered with Ucadia and on the Ucadia Gazette and so is then able to help others, knowing their competence is properly recognized, even if pirates still refuse to recognize the Rule of Law. Furthermore, an Advocate will be able to facilitate the registration and recording in the Ucadia Gazette of documents at a schedule of fees at a greatly reduced rate of one quarter the standard direct rates, simply because such Advocates of Law will be able to guide those people directly. The competency requirements and forms to be recognized as an Advocate of the Golden Rule of Law will also be available over the next few weeks through this series. Again, to those of you who may qualify for such recognition, please be patient with me and allow me to finish the updates reflecting these changes whilst you review the material associated with these sessions.

Finally, I want to extend the deepest expression of thanks and gratitude to those of you that cognize the enormous value of the information being shared with everyone at no cost, in being considerate and honorable enough to donate to Ucadia and support these efforts. Not only does your kind support and donations prove that there are conscious and competent people across the planet as more and more “wake up”, but your willingness to help support Ucadia in a tangible way is making a real difference. So while there remains thousands and indeed millions of people unaware of Ucadia, or too distracted or unwilling to donate and contribute to Ucadia, I want to thank each and everyone of you who do contribute and remind me each day that there are truly people who do care and do want to see positive change on this planet.

Let us start then on the series tonight, beginning with a quick summary of what we have learned from Session 2 and some further key concepts that underpin our ability to cognize Estates, Rolls and Registers as Part #1 being a “Quick Review on Key Concepts”.

Part #1 – A Quick Review on Key Concepts

Page 3 – Review of Key Points from Session 2

In Session 2 and the outline of Trusts and Rights, I provided some significant detail as to the truth of your incredible potential within the form of flesh within the universal Dream. I also demonstrated evidence that proves “in plain sight” how the elite Pisan/Venetian as well as Dutch and English families view you compared to themselves. I also discussed with you the nature of your Rights and the design and structure of Trusts and why the only viable solution for your Rights and Trusts is through Ucadia. There were numerous other insights that can be gained from Session 2. However, in remaining relevant to the topic today on Estates, Rolls and Registers, let me summarize then some of the key insights you hopefully gained from Session 2, as listed on the slide listed as Page 3, namely:

There has been no proper society under Rule of Law for more than 400 years;

While there is no true Rule of Law, the Roman System depends on “illusion of Law” for its existence;

The Western-Roman Model is a Mind Prison designed to shut people down;

There is “no way out” of the Western-Roman Model except Ucadia;

The elite Pisan/Venetian and Dutch/English families view themselves as Gods and the rest of the people as slaves;

Public Law is Roman Trust Law. Private Law is the Law of Piracy, dressed up as Admiralty Law;

The highest Rights and Trusts are Ucadia. Roman Rights and Trusts are Inferior;

Ucadia will help you prove your Rights & Trusts in coming weeks via Ucadia Register & Gazette;

Before these services are made available, you need to read and comprehend these notes;

Remedy via Ucadia is only available to those people willing to change their attitude and accept responsibility;

Page 4 – The Accounting of “Sin”

As we are speaking about Estates, Rolls and Registers and the notion of property, it is vitally important to reacquaint ourselves with the abhorrent and morally repugnant concept of Original Sin as introduced in the 17th Century but claimed to being within scripture and a dogma of Christianity for centuries earlier.

The slide listed as Page 4 shows the general principles of Original Sin as first introduced, namely it is a purely commercial term associated with forming a false legal argument to steal the rights of the people. It begins with the notion that Heaven can be viewed like some giant Venetian banking ledger of credits versus debits and that these columns of spiritual values must balance in heaven as well as on Earth.

Let me put it another way – any man or woman or preacher that accepts as valid the notion of Sin as taught by the various commercial churches today, is basically saying that either the Divine Creator is a Venetian Accountant or the God(s) in the Bible really are Venetian Banking Families as I showed you last week. In any event, if you really and sincerely feel that Heaven is completely pre-occupied with medieval Pisan and Venetian and later Dutch and English banking and piracy terms, then I am afraid you remain deeply affected by the Mundi Mind Virus keeping you enslaved in their system. Another example is in the earliest surviving dictionaries of English such as Bailey’s Etymological Dictionary that in 1675 stated the meaning of the word Belief is Credit as a commercial term and Credit is Belief. I mean, when they were rolling this system out at the end of the 17th Century, they didn’t hide it from their own people who had access to such texts. It was clear it was about a purely pirate commercial system to enslave the world.

So looking at the diagram, you have in Venetian heaven the idea that Sin is a Divine Debt offset by the Blood of the Martyrs from the Treasury of Heaven. Then on Earth, the ritual of Confession and Penance is evidence of the debt or guilt, with the Indulgence, or Dispensation being the Monetization of that debt or guilt to discharge it. If this still does not make sense, do not worry as I will be returning to these concepts as we continue through the series and address more accounting elements, particularly in the formation of assets and money.

Page 5- Elite Families Secretly Claim to be without Sin

For the moment, I want you to now look at the slide listed as Page 5 and the planning that happened in the 17th and 18th Centuries, predominantly centered around the Hanover Kings of Great Britain and then later the Pisan and Venetian and Dutch and English elite families that sought to reinforce their claim and position. What happened once the European wars had worked through and Great Britain had proven itself to be the greatest center of elite liars and pirates and psychopaths the planet had ever seen, was that these pirate families wanted even more control in their alliance with Rome as the Jus Patronatus or the “sole patron”.

The concept of “Original Sin” was the perfect mechanism as it was also connected to a much more subtle offset of philosophy whereby Mary was championed as the Queen of Heaven and without sin. No public mention or debate then was covered as to the other alleged siblings or family members of Jesus Christ and this is where the elite families got busy creating fake genealogies to usurp more then 5,000 years of detailed history of the tens of thousands of descendants of the Holly (Cuilliaéan) priest-kings around the planet. If you want to know the true genealogies of history, then please read Lebor Clann Glas

So what these pirate families did was hire false scribes to go and create these nonsensical and absurd genealogies that claimed the Hanover's and then later the merchant banking families were descended from Charlemagne and then from Charlemagne back through to Jacob, the brother of Jesus. They even created fake Jewish kingdoms in Spain in order to make sure all the elite members could claim to be descended from Mary and thus “born without sin”.

For the rest of the world, born in Original Sin, this horribly insane and criminal philosophy converted them into “sheeple” as sinning people without rights. The only people then who were allowed to own land were those “without sin” and therefore these elite families through the fake creation of allodial title.

By the way, if you have ever wanted to know what the most valuable treasures stored within the oldest banks of Switzerland are, then now you know. It is not bars of gold or ancient paintings, it is old fake genealogies, claiming certain people were descendants of the Holly or Cuilliaéan, when in fact they haven’t known anything about the true descendants of Yahusia and the last of the Great Prophets of Yeb until now. This, by the way, is the origin of the English Monarch claiming to be a God King or God Queen – as one born without sin in a world of sinners. The fact that the Aristocracy still refuse to acknowledge the Holly, even though the Holy See is literally named after the Holly, is yet another example that the lies and fakery of these people has been built upon complete and total ignorance.

Page 6- The Western-Roman Model has “No way out”

So what this means to you is really highlighted on slide 6 where I show the diagram of the multiple ringed prison of the mind again, only the labels for the rings now are the words Delinquent, Insolvent, Ignorant and Recalcitrant. As we move forward in these series, these words and the false imputations that led to them being asserted will be more and more important.

Let me explain. Delinquency is the assumed sin when you appear at court, that you are the one, not the trustee or the other party, that has been neglectful in your duties and obligations. Of course, if the administrators and surrogate trustees within the system fail to provide crucial information to you, or fail to provide proper accounting to you, leading to a default on your part, then who ultimately is the first cause? It is them – not you. Yet the presumption in their system when you are charged is that it is your fault first.

Let us take the notion of insolvency as another wall of the prison that is particularly important for private commercial law. If you are deemed insolvent, then it is assumed you have no real assets or security. Given that admiralty law is all about insurance and security, being claimed insolvent means you are immediately placed at a disadvantage whenever a controversy is raised, as you appearing at one of their courts without representation can easily be assumed as abandoned cargo, without security and immediately bailed into one of their warehouses as a surety against a debt. This notion of insolvency of course is yet another abomination that flies in the face of the Declaration of Independence and even the Bible itself, that both express we each possess unalienable rights. If you possess such priceless rights, then it is impossible to argue you could ever be an insolvent debtor. How do they get away with it? - By convincing people to be complete and utter idiots and sheeple in believing in “Original Sin”.

Page 7 – Western-Roman Accounting (1600’s)

Now the next three slides provide a clearer explanation of the accounting methods underpinning this awful system, starting with Page 7 showing the introduction of the monetization of sin model that still underpins the modern financial currency system of the world today. I won’t spend too much time on each of these slides as we will run out of time in getting to the meat of our discussion about Estates, Rolls and Registers.

Page 8 – European Annuity Accounting (1700’s)

So have a look at Page 8 and you see how the system continued to modify itself over the ages, now with the notion of bills or money being the offset against rights.

Page 9 – Privacy Securities Accounting (1800’s)

Then on slide 9 you see the global banking model that we live under today where modern currencies are underwritten by the pledge of the sweat labor of the population as slaves. However, as the diagram shows, in the last thirty years, the private agencies and owners that purchased government services and assets now no longer want to balance the accounting to provide the necessary “benefits” to the people as slaves. They want to make bigger profits and in many ways let the people starve. Not only is this notion, morally repugnant, but also is absolutely suicidal thinking as it has completely destroyed the fabric of Western-Roman Commerce, otherwise called Capitalism. Again, we will speak in more detail about this in coming weeks.

Page 10 – There is no Remedy in Common Law

Being mindful of time, I want to address another subject before we get into more detail on Estates, Rolls and Registers and prove to all that are listening that there is absolutely no remedy in Common law, and that if you hear someone persisting with being an island and ignoring the general amnesty of Ucadia, to keep using such words as “equity”, then slide 10 shows the danger of such words.

You see, slide 10 shows that the word Equity is actually a signpost leading back to the Inner Temple as the Court of Chancery. Thus, anyone who claims there is any form of relief within Equity, even if they are a senior judge, really is ignorant of what is hidden in plain sight in the symbol of Pegasus, the horse or “equis” in Latin as the root of the word equity. I mean, they could not make it more blatantly obvious, could they?

Page 11- English law as burnt and re-written many times

This leads me to yet another slide to keep in mind with what we are dealing with as shown on slide 11 and the fact that English Law has been burnt and re-written many times. This week was the claimed 800th anniversary of the Magna Carta – a document claimed as the foundation stone of Common Law, but in truth an instrument where no single clause has any current force or effect in Statute law in the United Kingdom, much less any other Western-Roman realms whatsoever. 

As for English Statutes and Great Britain statutes forming the basis of claimed “Common Law”, the truth is that there have been numerous documented fires throughout history that completely obliterated and turned to ash the historic records of law in England. To argue that it was somehow recreated accurately by inference is one of the biggest lies in the history of creating fake documents. You can see it for yourself in the parts of Scottish statutes that did survive and in looking at the language of claimed statutes in England – proving without question that the legal scholars of the Four Inns of Court pretty much made up whatever they felt was important, when re-writing English History in the 17th Century, then again in the 18th Century and again in the 19th Century and the 20th Century.

I am one of the few people alive today to have actually read carefully the tens of thousands of claimed statutes of Westminster from the time of the Magna Carta until the 20th Century and I can assure you that if you have the years of time to study them, you would see that contrary to the notion that such statutes are a glorious Constitution, such works are deliberately obscure, contradictory, infused with words and terms that didn’t exist when the alleged statute was supposed to have been promulgated and obsessed in the commercial advantages for a very, very few people.

So, we have addressed, I feel, some pretty important fundamentals that contribute to a better comprehension of the environment behind the formation of Estates, and what exactly are Rolls and Registers.  It is now time to look at the nature, structure, function and importance of Estates.

Part #2 - Estates

Page 13- Rights are connected to Persons

One of the key messages from Session 2 last week on Rights and Trusts is that in law, your Rights are always in some form of trust relation and are connected to one or more persons. Let us have a look at slide 13 as example.

Your access to Rights is through a particular person. It is the person that is connected to the rights, not the physical you. As we have discussed before, the physical “you” cannot hold an intangible concept such as rights. However, a person can. Instead, the physical “you” is connected to one or more persons by virtue of the attributes and likeness of the person and ultimately by agreement and consent.

Page 14 –You are connected to multiple Persons

Take a look at slide 14 for another perspective on what we have been discussing, namely that if you live in any modern Western-Roman society, then the physical “you” will be connected to multiple “persons” as normal.

In one system of registers and rolls, you will probably be listed as a State Citizen of the state where you were registered at the time you were born. That is one form of unique person. Similarly, you may well be registered as a Federal Citizen of the country sharing similar boundaries with the state of your birth, usually by choosing to vote, or take up some kind of federal benefits or some other agreement.

Yet, the physical “you” is also likely to be associated with many other potential persons such as being a “government benefits recipient” or a “registered taxpayer” or a “licensed driver” or even a “defendant” or “plaintiff” in a court matter.

The point I am trying to make here is that each of these many instances is a completely unique person, claimed in one sense to be the property of the government department or agency or corporation that formed it. They may have very similar or even identical sounding and looking names, but please do not be tricked into thinking they are all one same person. Anyone that says or claims “you are the person” in “believing” you only have one person for your entire set of relations within society is either lying or is completely misguided.

Page 15 – Remember the three “Aspects” of Persons?

Now, it is not just the fact that our “physical selves” are almost certainly connected to multiple persons, but the fact that each of these persons may also be of a different type, based on the three aspects of person we have discussed in the previous sessions.

Take a look at slide 15 for example to see what I mean. By three aspects, I am referring to the application of the notion of 1st person, 2nd person and 3rd person in practice. This time, let us look at these three aspects in terms of the role of the trustee as 1st person, also known as the principal, when the beneficiary is named. Then, let us view the 2nd person as the named beneficiary and therefore the agent; and finally the 3rd person as the “res” or “thing” as a form of property and beneficial right of use, for the one holding some kind of certificate.

To the right hand side, you see the labels used in instruments to formally identify what type of relation of a person that a physical self may claim to be connected, whether it be propria persona as 1st person, or agentis juris as agent of the principal as 2nd person, or someone, who in complete ignorance, claiming to be “pro se” as short for “pro se in rem” or declaring in a court that “I am a thing”, as third person.

Page 16 – The 3 Aspects of Person in Trust

Slide 16 gives us a different context when we look at these three aspects and three types of persons in relation to a classic Trust structure. So what we are saying then is that for all those different types of persons we listed on page 14 of the slides, there are 3 possible aspects being 1st person, 2nd person and 3rd person; or trustee, beneficiary and beneficial interest; or principal, agent and thing.

Think about this for a second, because, I hope you see this is a critically important notion to consider whenever you have tried to make sense of where you stand in relation to the different types of persons as listed on page 14. For example, in the case of being a holder of a birth certificate, our association may only be as a 3rd person, or as a thing. Or in the case of a passport, we are definitely only holding the status of res and a thing as a 3rd person. Or in the case of a driver’s license, we may hold two levels of status, the first being as a registered driver as a 2nd person and the second level being the holder of a driver’s license as a 3rd person.

Page 17 – The formality of connection to Person

Slide 17 hopefully makes this even clearer. So in the case of a 1st person, such association is proven by a properly executed and recorded Deed that is associated with the Trust, or a Certificate of Deed if the Trust is registered in a foreign jurisdiction, such as a Superior Ucadian Trust being recognized by an Inferior Western-Roman Court.

In the case of a 2nd person, such association is proven by a properly executed, signed and recorded Letter such as a Letter of Appointment or Letter of Commission such as a Letter of Attorney; or if such appointment is done in a foreign jurisdiction such as Ucadia, then a Certificate of Appointment is needed for recording into an Inferior Western-Roman Court.

In the case then of a 3rd person, such association is proven by possession of a properly sealed and numbered certificate, corresponding to an entry in some register of such rights. For example a birth certificate or a passport or a certificate of driver’s license or share certificate are all examples.

What does this mean then?  Well, it means that you cannot simply go into an Inferior Roman Court and claim yourself propria persona, when (a) you did not create the trust and (b) the only association you can possibly hold in the primary trust is as a thing, or “pro se in rem”. To claim otherwise is to proclaim yourself ignorant of the law, and therefore an idiot, and automatically incapacitated. You have just kicked an “own goal” by such stupidity.

What is another revelation from this slide? Well, take the idea of where we might potentially hold two different forms of relation, being as an agent or beneficiary; and secondly as the holder of a beneficial interest “in rem”. A driver’s license is a classic example of this. Insurance is against the registered driver on their computer systems. You don’t need to hold any form of driver’s license to prove you are a valid registered driver, just sufficient identification to enable a police officer to establish your identity. 

So why do they insist on demanding to see you produce and hold a valid driver’s license? For two key reasons: Firstly, because the Police Officer is a private contractor working for a private corporation of debt collectors and bounty hunters masquerading as a proper court. They are claiming the position as agents in order to create a person. Secondly, because they automatically need you to be charged “in rem” as a thing and as a “holder” of beneficial interest and not in any agent or beneficiary capacity if they are going to make money off of you. This is because it becomes a purely commercial pirate transaction, without the need to prove injured party. It is a contract agreement, based on you – the holder, as the res or “thing” – not contesting the letter of demand, being the summons or ticket produced by the police officer.

As I have said, we will speak in more detail on these specific insights as we move through the series on a case-by-case basis. But before you think to jump off and start ignoring the production of your driver’s license when a police officer pulls you over, please consider the fact that I have been reinforcing throughout this series and that is that a police officer today, just like an attorney today, or a court clerk today or even judges today, know far less about the law than at any other time in Western-Roman history – because ignorance of the law has become part of the defense of the system as “plausible deniability”. There is absolutely no benefit in trying to argue with a police officer, as it most likely will make matters manifestly worse. 

Like I showed in session 1, there is a massive cognitive dissonance across all aspects of the legal and judicial system in most countries where what a police officer thinks he or she knows, compared to the “public view” is completely wrong, when compared to the truth of the statutes and laws. The first people to whom they lie are their own and it makes any attempt to teach the law on the fly, during a traffic stop a very dangerous and often stupid course of action. So please be patient and let us get through this series in a step-by-step basis, and we will address all these cases and issues many of you are facing or have faced.

Page 18 – An Estate is a valid record in a Roll with Rights

Slide 18 now reveals for the first time the clarity of exactly what is a valid Estate record being a Record in a Roll, creating a person with associated Rights. There it is, hidden in plain sight! An Estate being created when a record is duly entered or “enrolled” in a special type of Register called a “Roll”. The owner of the Roll then retains the right to the legal title of the person and then the appointment of any surrogate or trustee as principal, called an executor or administrator.

The owner of the Roll then grants as privilege to one or more other persons the benefit and/or beneficial interest in the 2nd person and 3rd person and any associated rights in trust. So if we take the classic example of a Remainder Estate, also known as a Residential Estate, then we see once a Roman State registers the baby in a Roll, it creates three persons, holding one for itself, while the other two persons may be used by someone else. In the case of corporations operating and pretending to be proper estates since the 1930’s the role of the agent or 2nd person of birth certificates has been hijacked by the banking cartels under the claim of perpetual bankruptcy, leaving only beneficial interest or 3rd person, via holders of birth certificates.

Let me put that another way – what I just said is that the very fact your local state hands you a birth certificate, is prima facie evidence that the only rights the state claims you have in your name, or your body, or your mind or your soul is as a 3rd person, or a thing, being less than a slave. They can argue all they like in ignorance to the contrary. The evidence of a Birth Certificate or piece of plastic is irrefutable evidence of this fact. The very point that a clerk or registrar in births, deaths and marriages hasn’t got a clue about this is also proof of just how ignorant, delusional and incapacitated their entire apparatus has become in relation to the administration of pseudo law and pseudo justice.

In contrast, your Live Borne Record as derived from your redeemed membership in Ucadia is proof of first in time and first in line and that you, yes you are the principal of a True Estate as the Office of Man or Office of Woman and no inferior and false system of pirate law can claim otherwise. The only way they can succeed is if they get enough paid and insane government agents out there to try and convince people not to support Ucadia and not redeem their member numbers, while they do it for themselves. Why? You see under the Western-Roman System, not even a judge is free.

Page 19 – The authority to create a person is hierarchical

Slide 19 reveals another potential “failsafe” within the Western-Roman System and the notion that the creation of persons and therefore estates via rolls is hierarchical. Thus, the Roman Death Cult has by tradition, acted as a kind of licensor to permit others to claim the names and bodies and minds of others as property, then within estates, or states. Legislative authority via statutes and validated by elections is also a source of such authority. Then finally, corporate authority is claimed as a franchisee of such claimed rights of states via their bylaws, such as the US Codes for example. However, corporations still need consent in order to validate such persons being created, and this is ultimately the only reason they still need warm bodies to appear in courts. Thanks to technology, of course, this need is diminishing as video footage at time of arrest or charge or claim is making the system more automated, especially for lesser alleged crimes.

Page 20 – Hierarchy of Rolls

Yet as we show on slide 20, no matter what the Inferior Western-Roman Courts and Legislatures claim, the highest Roll and Register is the Great Register of One Heaven as the only Divine Roll accessible through this temporal plain as the Ucadia Register and the Ucadia Gazette also as the True Rolls. Then there are the Superior and Juridic Rolls and Registers of Ucadia communities; and then finally at the very bottom are the Inferior Rolls and Registers of the Western-Roman world.

So as much as a clerk or registrar or judge may like you to “believe” that you are less than a slave and nothing more than a “thing” in their court room, to those of you who have finally awakened and redeemed your member number and have your Live Borne Record as proof of first in time and first in line, then you know all the claims of inferior Western-Roman Law are a lie.

By the way, just because I have mentioned Live Borne Record and court in the same breath, please do not make the mistake of filing such valuable instruments directly into a court case. Not only is that explicitly forbidden in accord with the sacred Covenant Pactum De Singularis Caelum, but it is a lazy and ignorant act that dishonors this knowledge and proclaims you are delinquent in two systems – both Ucadia and the Western-Roman System. Instead, I will address court issues as we progress through this series. For now, please be clear, you should never, ever file directly into a Western-Roman Court your Live Borne Record, unless you want to declare to the entire Universe you are a complete idiot.

Part #3 – Registers and Rolls

Given we are speaking about filing and registering and recording, I want to finish Session 3 tonight by speaking briefly about Registers and Rolls in more detail.

Page 22 – What is a Register?

Slide 22 summarizes some key points concerning Registers. If you want to know more about Registers and Rolls, then go and read the Canons of Fiduciary Law on the site One-Heaven.Org in more detail. For now, let me read the key points listed on this slide:

+ A register as a table contains at least six or more columns being a (a) unique record number; and (b) action and subject; and (c) time of action; (d) place of action; and (e) witness who attests to the event; and (f) the name of the registrar making the entry;  and

+ A register as a table can be a section of a book or a whole series of books; and

+ All registers by definition are ecclesiastical property; and

+ A particular action or event can only be recorded once in the same valid Register. Where two records exist for the same property, it is called clouded title or contested title; and

+ The Trustee holding custody of a Register is called a Registrar, or Recorder or Clerk.

Page 23 – What is a Record?

Slide 23 then summarizes what is a Record. In the interest of time and the fact that I have already referred you to the Canons of Fiduciary Law for more information, let me summarize the key points listed:

+ A Record is the memorial of the rituals of Recording an Event, as well as the summary facts themselves. The facts alone, without the proper procedure, even if entered into a Register, does not make a valid Record; and

In other words, a Record is the memoralization of the rituals and events of recording an event, not simply the facts of the event itself. This is a sometimes subtle, but a critically important distinction. The deed and affidavit and other instruments are the actual memorialization of the event. The record is merely a summary of the core facts from these documents, but also a validation that some basic protocols and quality checking has been followed.

+ A Record comprises five essential actions, entered into four separate books, being (1) Recording the Memorandum or Deed being facts of the event; and (2) Entering an Affidavit of Witness to the Event as proof of the event; and (3) Conveying the facts and proof into the main Register; and (4) Transferring the record number into a Register of Certificates; and (5) Delivering the Certificate as Instrument of Record and Proof of Acknowledgment; and

+ All records by definition are ecclesiastical property.

Page 24 – What is Originality vs. Original Certificate?

Now in coming weeks, we will be discussing more and more the elements of instruments, as well as the detail behind proper conveyance of titles and rights. However, in using slide 24 as an example, I want to really focus on the difference between registering original instruments such as Deeds, Affidavits and Certificates in a system, versus having actual evidence in the form of types of Certificates as proof that such instruments have been duly registered in another jurisdiction.

This is extremely important as the very nature of Registration is by its definition, the recognition of a transfer or receiving of certain rights to another, or from another. If you place original deeds, or affidavits into the existing Western-Roman System, then you are automatically granting rights and use of such instruments – to empower them to enclose such instruments and choose to provide or not provide any associated benefits.

However, when these sorts of documents have been properly registered within Ucadia on the Ucadia Register and published on the Ucadia Gazette, then you need extracts of Certificates to this effect, rather than any originals of such documents to be placed within a lesser Western-Roman System. Effectively, the Certificate “tells” the clerk that an existing record has already been created – For example, the critical importance of a Certificate of Exemplification when dealing with the recording of authentic transcripts and copies of instruments into a foreign jurisdiction as evidence.

Page 25 – The concept of Validation

This leads me to the second last slide for tonight, being slide 25 and the concept of validation and the fact that an instrument must be accepted as authentic for it to be entered into a record. As listed, there are two types of validation between foreign jurisdictions being Exemplification and Apostille; and two types of validation within an existing jurisdiction being between Authentication and Certification.

I want to end on this slide, because it highlights once again so much of the miscommunication, misunderstanding and just plain wrong information concerning how instruments may or may not be accepted into foreign jurisdictions as evidence.

Since the Apostille Treaty first came into effect in 1961, there has been a steady increase in the number of countries using this form of validation to where approximately 108 nations are signatories as of 2015. So pervasive has this method of validating documents between nations become, that many people both within and outside of the legal fraternity have forgotten the original and still functional method of validation called Exemplification. 

Unlike Apostille or Authentication, the process of Exemplification requires that those attesting to the authenticity of the instrument also provide their designated credentials and validate their authority, as part of the validation process as having the delegated powers and authority to make, seal and/or sign the Certificate of Exemplification.

I will discuss Certificates of Exemplification in more detail when we discuss the services of Ucadia in coming weeks.

The Only Viable Solution for Estates, Rolls and Registers is Ucadia

So there it is– A detailed analysis and explanation in breaking down the confusion and uncertainties as to Estates; as well as the function of Registers and Rolls. As with the previous sessions, I hope you find session 3 to be both useful and interesting.

To all of you who have so far shown your appreciation, by making some kind of donation to Ucadia, I thank you again. To everyone else who comes to read and copy this material that is yet to consider supporting Ucadia by showing some decency and respect, I hope that one day soon, as you become more competent through reading this material, you will also develop a stronger conscience. And that with your activated and functioning conscience, you now begin to consider that you cannot ultimately be successful until you demonstrate respect for the many years and extensive effort that has been invested into doing the research for all people, in order to share with you the level of clarity of these sessions you see now.

To each and every one of you, thank you! And until we speak next week, please be safe, be well, thank you and good night.

Cheers, Frank