_________________________________________________________________________________
Please download MP3 Audio Broadcast of this Blog > here (55 min 18.5 Mb)
_________________________________________________________________________________
Whenever someone posts a topic like pole shift or pole reversal, doomsday, Armageddon, or some impact of a coming asteroid or planet X, I don’t know about you but I personally get a kind of visceral reaction where I just want to delete emails, turn off audios and move on.
It’s not because I don’t find the information informative which it may well be; I have pretty much heard it all before. There isn’t a month that goes past without someone sending me some kind of “the world is going to end” email. In fact I have to tell you that by the end of last year it was pretty much happening every week because of the focus on the Mayan calendar.
“The world is going to end is the favorite ‘catch cry’ of many who may have far too much time on their hands, especially those that are leaders of the religious right, people who have staked their reputations, and huge fund-raising programs and personal wealth on predictions of the end of the world. All they do when the end of the world doesn’t happen is ‘roll it forward,’ and keep on making money.
The claim is an asteroid is going to hit the earth and that is pretty self-explanatory. But other than asteroids, and even when people talk about pole shifts, usually the justification behind end of the world claims tend to be pretty superficial, judgmental and ‘old-fashioned.’ It’s either that the world is full of sinners or because the universe is run by some narrow-minded, emotionally unstable psychopathic deity who loves to torment his creations and demands that we sacrifice our first-born, or burn animals, etc. Or a deity that has some kind of deep confidence problem with our not worshiping other idols or a deity who keeps professing who it is such as, “I am who I am,” or who indeed is a deity that bears grudges and cannot stand happiness.
Thankfully as people have grown up and away from the clutches of such cults and false teachings and people who still spew forth such gross mental illness, many have come to realize that our world is indeed a paradise. It is not a prison, but a place where we are stewards and custodians rather than jailers, slaves, or owners. Tonight we are not talking about the end of the world.
The coming pole shift will not be the end of the world, I assure you. But it will be the end of certain economic models. It may well be an end of certain deep mental illness. And there will be winners and losers, clearly. There may well be some major implications geopolitically. But the world will continue to go on and our species will continue to go on.
In this audio we are going to talk about the many natural cycles, logic and common sense regarding the earth and its relation to the sun and the planets; and the planets relation to the sun and the sun and the stars in relation to other stars in the galaxy. All are going through cycles within cycles and seasons within seasons. The evidence is overwhelming that different regions of the earth have at one time been fertile and even equatorial while other regions have been under ice.
North America for example and Hudson Bay in particular was at one time the North Pole. Australia was the South Pole for millions of years (which in part is why the land mass is so flat). Thousands of years ago Saudi Arabia was fertile and had sustained forests and large numbers of animals. So was North Africa. Today they are deserts. There is evidence of dramatic major climatic change well before the human species arrived and it is overwhelming.
Tonight is not a debate on how much impact the human race has had on the earth or how little impact the human race has had on the earth. What we need to do and what we must do is approach things with as much common sense, competence, and sensible thinking as possible and that we don’t simply accept things that don’t have logic. Twenty years ago when Mt. St. Helens exploded in North America, just one volcano with one eruption, produced more pollution than all the cars in North America up until that time for twenty five years.
When the Icelandic volcanoes erupted a few years ago, disrupting traffic across Europe, those volcanoes in a matter of a few days produced enough pollution that all the cars in Germany, France and Great Britain combined for five years. So as much as the human race impact and has indeed impacted the climate, our impact relative to dramatic changes and events can be argued as minuscule at best and a non-event at worst. That is despite many of the great conspiracy theories that continue to erupt and that all the climactic changes we are seeing is the result of some super weapon controlled by elements of the government in the United States. I am sure there are people in the military who love the psy-ops and the continued free publicity that people in the truth movement desperately want to do as unwitting or as willing, desperate agents of the industrial-military complex by producing and continuing to foment that kind of argument.
Can disasters be artificially created? Of course they can. Blow up the dam wall and you produce a flood and kill thousands of people. The dam wasn’t created by nature; we created it. If you blow it up it’s absolutely an artificially created natural disaster of a great flood. You can do the same with fracking and building mines and filling the mines full of liquid and moving under pressure. Of course you can cause earthquakes as they did under Haiti.
Tonight we are talking about the logical consequences and the natural cycle of changes of changes, most specifically the natural cycle of the movement of the poles and the movement of poles where certain regions shift from temperate to freezing and certain regions shift from temperate to equatorial and certain regions shift from equatorial to freezing. It’s the natural cycle in the movement of the earth’s crust.
2015 - less than two years away
Before we get into that let’s do a quick preview of what we mean by 2015 and the kind of winners and losers, the kind of changes that are going to happen when the poles shift. The poles are going to shift; they have shifted in the past. We will go through those cycles of the major cycles. 230,000 years ago the North Pole was located at 75 degrees north and 163 degrees west. We will talk about the shift of the pole 119,000 years ago when the pole shifted to 63 degrees north and 195 degrees west. When the poles shifted again 84,000 years ago, North Pole was to 72 degrees north and 10 degrees east. There was a dramatic shift of the poles 48,000 years ago and North Pole was 60 degrees north and 83 degrees west. When the poles shifted again 11,000 to 12,000 years ago it was to the present position of 90 degrees north and 0 degrees west.
The coming shift of the pole will be to close to 80 degrees north and about 80 degrees east, by 2015. What does that mean? When that pole does move and the indication is that the poles are shifting towards to post of Russia, and while I have said that the North Pole could be 80 degrees north and 80 degrees east, it could be shallower than that. It could be close to 70 degrees. The severity of that (coming) pole shift is an unknown. There could be a 5 to 10 degree difference that is difficult to predict.
It could be shallower and more conservative than this. 80 degrees is a conservative estimate. But that shift of 10 degrees is going to have massive, massive impact on the long-term climate change.
These pole shifts are in spaces of 20,000 to 40,000 years and longer in some cases. Great civilizations such as the Roman Empire lasted only over 1000 years and that was considered a great, great Empire. Pax America has only been around for 150-plus years. We are talking 20,000 to 40,000 years. So the climate effects over that period of time are going to be significant in this pole shift.
What are we going to see? In 2015 or thereabouts, plus or minus a year, and it might be into 2016, there will be a pole shift; it is unlikely we will see it before then. This is why I have said 2015. We are likely to see the movement of the entire east coast of America to be closer to the Equator given the new position of the poles. That means that New York’s climate effectively in relation to the pole as Atlanta apparently has now. Australia will be another great winner. Australia will move substantially to the Equator and the whole northern part of Australia will become far more fertile. It will be a major, strategic place for food sovereignty.
The change in the Equator will have the southern part of the Amazon becoming a loser in the positioning. As the Equator moves further north it will cover Venezuela and Columbia and the tip of Costa Rica. Given that the Equator will move further north, the southern Amazon will dry out. In Argentina there will likely be a dramatic change in climate. In fact the southern part of South America will almost joined and that passage will become iced over potentially as the South Pole moves closer to the tip of South America.
Other dramatic changes in 2015 are going to be the movement of the currents as the Equator changes position. We are likely to see an impact with the North Atlantic Current which will terminate off the coast of Spain as opposed to off the coast of Britain is it is presently. As the North Pole will be almost at the coast line of Russia, the whole of Europe and the whole of North Asia will return to an age of Ice. Large parts of Siberia will be uninhabitable and under permanent ice throughout the year.
Glaciers will return to the north of Britain and potentially to the north of Ireland. China is likely to see great droughts and desertification as the North Pacific Current becomes much shallower and terminates much further south. Given that Russia and China are major political and military powers the effect of this climate change within the next few years is going to have massive geopolitical implications. As China will have a climate and environment, unless there are dramatic changes in the design of that culture, which I would suggest to you is too late now, where the climate will make the sustainability of a population of more than 100,000,000 virtually impossible. 900,000,000 people will either have to fight for their survival or simply cease to exist within 15 to 20 years.
There will be massive geopolitical change. But, as I said, for North America and particularly the United States, they are a big, big winner with one proviso. There is unlikely to be any building unless it is done with substantially better building codes in the South and Southeast United States of greater than 3 stories that will survive the kind of storms that will come one board. So you can expect major changes in Florida.
This is what is coming; this is a normal part of the cycle of the Earth, the movement of the poles and the resting of the crust. In order to make sense of this we need to tackle some areas that remain ‘sacred cows’ to the orthodoxy of science. We are going to tackle some of these to get our minds around the ‘why.’ And we need to get our minds around the ‘how’ and in particular we will talk about “Day Zero” and what we are likely to see leading up to the pole shift and how we can predict step by step and stage by stage what we are witnessing.
Hopefully we can get over the disinformation of things like “HAARP” and the kind of “end of the world” rhetoric that people jump on to raise money and all the other distractions. We will talk about this sensibly. In order to talk about this sensibly, I ask you to go to the website, Ucadia.com. On Ucadia.com we have a series of documents that have been there for years and years regarding the knowledge of science and the environment. These are the Ucadia patents. They are documents that I have presented to scientists and groups of scientists with the same predictable results. They refuse to read, to acknowledge, to debate, they will not argue and they are only prepared to simply dismiss and pretend this information does not exist, thus proving that we are dealing with the underbelly of desperate orthodoxy.
Orthodoxies that blind us to 2015
There are several sacred cows that make any discussions of pole shifts difficult and the first one is the cult, and it is absolutely a cult, which is the extension of the scientific orthodoxy of “flat earth” that didn’t fully expelled until 350 to 400 years ago. What replaced “flat earth” was the Pangaea Cult which is so stupid, is a philosophy that believes that the land masses of the Earth were lopsided so the Earth was covered with land only land on one side and the rest of the Earth was oceans. Somehow land was a bit like moving moss or creatures that moved out across the Earth so that they all spread out. Now of course Pangaea is an absolute mad mind virus that entraps incredibly talented people. I am not attacking scientists; I am addressing a philosophy of insanity.
What Pangaea prevents science from seeing is the footprint across the surface of the Earth of all the great asteroid impacts that formed and forged the surface of the Earth and helped shape the formation of the land that enriched the history of our planet. Pangaea blinds us to that history. I mentioned the asteroid impacts before in previous audios and I am putting those links back up as part of this audio blog for you to see those impact zones all across the Earth.
See: 4000m (Antarctica), 3600m (Canada), 3200m (Nth Atlantic), 2800m (Alaska), 2500m (West Africa), 2500m (West Asia), 1600m (East India), 1400m (Iceland), 1200m (Nth America), 1000m (Africa), 635m (Antarctica), 542m (Himalayas), 542m (Asia), 485m (Nth America), 443m (Nth Antarctica), 419m (Russia), 358m (Nth Atlantic), 298m (Central Atlantic), 251m (Sth America), 247m (East Asia), 235m (Sth America), 200m (Sth America), 145m (Australian Bight), 65m (Central America), 60m (Central America).
These massive impacts are beyond just the creation of the Gulf of Mexico. These impacts formed whole coast lines such as the eastern coast line of America and the eastern coast line of South America. Hudson Bay was a major impact that helped form the surface and the oceans of the planet. So hopefully that is one myth, orthodoxy, cult that can one day be broken.
Another cult that makes the common sense logic of the cycle of the movement of the poles difficult to describe is the recognition that the earth should be viewed much like a gyroscope as to a solid object, or semi-solid object that moves as one. With the gyroscope you can see the internal workings of one pole or one element moving one way and another pole or element moving another way. It gives a really lovely image for the mind to comprehend a bit like a spherical version of Russian dolls. If you can have a sphere within a sphere within a sphere, each of those spheres can be at slightly different angles. And yet they can all be part of the same.
In recent time there have been a number of people that spoken about or wanted to talk about the concept of the surface of the Earth being hollow and that they have made the mistake of extending their theory out to try to believe that whole Earth is hollow. No, the crust of the Earth is an incredible membrane. That is exactly what it is—a membrane that protects the inner workings of the Earth and the inner spheres of the Earth and is of a certain porous nature that allows it to absorb gases, liquids and energies. It is thin enough to allow an interaction between the internal workings of the Earth. But, that membrane also needs to be rested because the internal forces of the Earth and the external fields of the Sun are so great that if the longitude movement of those fields is allowed to continue over hundreds of thousands of years, then there can be a catastrophic collapse of the membrane.
The membrane is delicate. I will give you an example of how delicate that the crust of the Earth is relative to the internals of the Earth. Take an egg: if you hit that egg hard enough, the egg will crack. If you hit the egg really hard, the internals of the egg will explode, the crust will crack. If you hit even harder the whole thing will split. The width of the crust of the Earth relative to the internals of the Earth is so thin that the shell of that egg that you look at would have to be less than 1/10th of what it is. So any knock of any significance would cause dramatic harm to the shell or the crust of the Earth. That is how delicate the crust of the Earth is.
The survival of this planet and the functioning of this planet as a water-based planet is a key mechanism for our Sun in attracting water-based comets that bring huge amounts of hydrogen in from the external fields into the Sun and replenish the Sun’s hydrogen, much like going to a petrol station. The Earth has a major part to play within the inner parts of the solar system in being a massive water-based planet. The crust and the integrity of the Earth’s crust are crucial in maintaining our oceans. If our crust was to collapse and break away, our atmospheres would vaporize and we would not be able to function. Of course there would be another life, but we would not be able to function as we do in the balance of life and eco-system of our star and other planets.
So, we must get our heads around the idea that there are inner fields and that there indeed more than one pole, more than one element to view the Earth. In the simplest way we can talk about the core of the Earth, the mantle, and the crust of the outer Earth. That is a simple model and we will stick with that simple model. We are not necessarily talking about one pole, but three poles and the movement of the three poles. If you look at the document of Ucadia Patent diagrams of U005, the Ucadia Hydro Helio Model of Atomic Elements, and then go to page 56 and figure 60. As you scan through the documents you will see that there are physical diagrams created to look at the internals of every single atomic element made up of combinations of hydrogen and helium. Look at figure 60 and you will see that there is a model that defines the orbit positions of the different energy particles which allows us to see the different poles of the Earth. We can say effectively that there are 3 poles. There is a pole of light and positrons, there is a pole of magnetism and there is a pole of heat.
The internals at right angles then have internal fields that correspond to those poles. There is the internal equator of light, there is the internal equator of heat that interacts and there is the internal equator of magnetism. For example the region that corresponds strongly between the heat and light in terms of magnetism, that equator, corresponds for example, with the Bermuda Triangle in that angle across there. The poles in terms of light correspond to the south regions of some of the nation of Australia and to the regions in the North of Canada. The three poles give us a view and ability to read the Earth and the movement of the Earth.
What we call the geographic poles are really the heat poles of the Earth. They are not fixed. The Earth does not have a ‘tilt.’ Think about the idea. Was it knocked on a tilt and kept ‘tilting’ along? That Kepler Model of mechanics has restricted us from seeing the dynamic interaction of energy and the fact that what we interpret as the ‘tilt’ is really the heat poles of the Earth. The Sun produces two key particles in relation to heat energy: electrons and hetons, the heat particle or the opposing particle to photons. It is something that scientists have attempted to get through their minds for years and years with no success. They refuse to consider the concept of heat as a particle even though they have invented infrared viewing! Heat viewing! If you are viewing through infrared then why can’t you view heat as a particle, the same as light is viewed as a particle?
Yes, light operates in fields, but it’s a particle operating in fields. So the particles operating in fields can be viewed as a wave and can be viewed as a discreet object. Geographical poles are the heat poles so when the output of the Sun varies, the position of our poles, the tilt of our Earth also varies. We consider the angle of the tile. Similarly as the output of light and photons change, the change in the light poles changes. The output in magnetism changes then that changes our magnetic poles. So this is the way to view that the Earth has 3 poles.
The crust of the Earth by virtue of its nature must move periodically in order to preserve its integrity. So, let’s talk about the cycle in leading up to a pole change. Is there a pole reversal? No, a pole reversal similar to the creation of flux fields with AC/DC current is a sure way to destroy the integrity of an object. Why AC/DC equipment breaks down over time is simply that the process is corroding and disruptive. If the movement of the crust of the Earth is to preserve its integrity, then the Earth is not going to do something to destroy the integrity. That would not make sense. This is why I have been talking about breaking down the cults and orthodoxies of science that stop us from seeing the logic of what is happening in front of us.
What is going to happen from 2015 onwards
I am going through the notes on website heal-the-earth.org These notes (see Climate Change) were done in 2009 and they need to be update but they do give a process. In order for the crust to move there is certain locking mechanism. First there needs to be in increase in CO2 over a period of 500 to 600 years (see process). The ice around the poles provides a locking mechanism. Only one pole needs to melt to release that locking mechanism. In fact it would allow a swing to move. The South Pole doesn’t need to have as much ice melt. Only one pole needs to liquefy. That is the North Pole. By liquefying it allows the crust to become lose and to move and shift relative to the mantle and relative to the core.
In 500 to 600 years you would expect to see an increase in the warming and the gases, principally CO2. Over a period of 6 to 12 years there needs to be a rapid melting of the ice cap, a very rapid melting. Why is this done over such a short period? The integrity of the crust depends on being locked into place with the ice and the stability depends on that so it does not swing from one position to another. Once it is able to move it doesn’t continue to move. The stability of the currents and the stability of fields mean that this process needs to happen over a very short time period in order to minimize disruption.
The problem is that once the ice caps start to melt and the problem that once the gases start to increase is the violence of storms and the violence of energy across the surface of the Earth increases. This is a risk to the stability. Major surface cells and surface storms can change the climate and they can also be disruptive. So the period of the melting will happen over a fairly short period. Now, in order for the crust to ultimately move, the balance between fresh water and salt water needs to tip so that over a period of really a day or half a day, the ocean currents of the Earth effectively neutralize to allow the crust to move. When the currents re-set the currents will re-start in the different directions based on the geographic structures within the oceans and the energy particles and the energy fields.
So the day of movement of the crust is really a ‘non-event.’ It is a day like being literally in the eye of the storm and it will be the calmest of days when it takes place. It must be the calmest of days. The shift of the crust can literally occur in a few hours. I know that disaster movies like 2012 and all these movies talk about the movement of the crust causing disruptions of the ocean and all kinds of earthquakes. The reality is that it has to be done like removalists removing a 100 foot pane of glass that is less than one centimeter thick. If it is not done carefully and the glass shatters then the whole process and reason to move is redundant.
Why is it moving? It is moving because of the integrity. It is moving because of this cycle to allow the earth to continue to function optimally. The crust has to move because the forces of the internals in the Earth and the forces of the externals of the Sun cause degradation. Once the crust moves, that is when major climate changes will occur. You can expect that at the end of the movement of the crust, several events will happen virtually simultaneously. The first is that the movement will trigger a reaction in the releasing of the CO2. Trapped within the oceans particularly when the currents stop, this is the release of massive amounts of CO2 and that huge amounts of increase in the density of the atmosphere will cause ‘super-cell storms.’
I could also trigger a number of the caldera volcanoes around the world to erupt, such as Yellowstone, Java. They may or may not erupt. There is no guarantee they will erupt, nor is there necessarily a need for those calderas to erupt. But, they may erupt. If Yellowstone were to erupt it would wreak havoc in a number of states in America. If Java were to erupt, you could pretty much wipe out 100,000,000 souls in Indonesia. In any event the super-cell storms are very similar to the logic of the film, The Day After Tomorrow, are likely to emerge in the climate change and the re-setting of the currents.
In a period of days, if not weeks, we will see the complete re-establishment of ice in the new location of the North Pole as to the coastline of Russia and within days and weeks after the crust has shifted, we could see the entire north of Europe return to ice and snow. That ice and snow could extend further south even to a few hundred miles to the edge of the Mediterranean in a mini-Ice Age before the climate finally re-stabilizes after 100 years.
The "Three Little Pigs" scenario of willful ignorance
So what does this mean? Are we all going to die in some great disaster like those disaster movies? No, we are not. The event itself will be incredibly gentle. There will be an increase in storms and volatility leading up to the pole shifts as the level of CO2 continues to rise and as the ice continues to melt. The tipping point will cause the currents to be stalled for a period. Within a day, within a few hours we will see the shift of the crust. Then there will be a release of massive amounts of CO2 in the oceans. There will be 20 to 40 times the present amount of CO2 in the atmosphere released within hours. This will be the fuel for the super-cell storms that sweep across the extreme temperate, Artic, Antarctic regions. There will be new Artic and Antarctic regions and an Ice Age will be formed within days, if not weeks.
Given the speed of these events if there has not been preparation then a number of countries will inevitably caught off-guard. The long term ramifications of these events, particularly in the countries like China that sustain a population of one billion, will mean that population of one billion will be unsustainable. It will be impossible for Europe to maintain levels of hundreds of millions of people as it does at present. The present design is impossible to maintain and this will cause massive political and economic change.
Through those events there is the possibility of war and there is clearly the possibility of depressions, famines and great upheavals. But, it is not the end of the world. So, what do we do? I have spent 18 years writing the Ucadia model to address future events. Was I aware of these events when I started writing? No, I was not. Am I trying to promote Ucadia because of these events? No, I have tried everything I can to make people aware. This effort and people’s reading is entirely up to them. This is all free information and it has been on the internet for many years. Some people read, but most don’t. Some people help and the vast majority don’t care. Sadly, this is the Three Little Pig scenario that determines our history.
If someone had resources and wealth what could they do? The least they could do is to take a drop of that wealth and consider what could be done if Ucadia could be accelerated and completed in terms of the models where we don’t have to have the type of regime as portrayed in some of these horrific future movies where people all live in gulags because there aren’t resources and there are militaristic elite that run the world. We don’t have to live in that scenario.
But if there are not the resources to finish the Ucadia model, we may run out of time because people get out of the Three Little Pigs mentality and they cannot get out of their pettiness and they will not help. Do you know that even today there are less than 40 people that have helped Ucadia financially? After all that has been done, the vast majority of people cannot give a damn to support. There is a group of people that think that just asking for that belittles the information. Maybe it does. I am only telling the truth that this information comes from a man who has spent 18 years and everything he could to bring Ucadia forward. And still there is no support.
It’s like the Titanic, The Three Little Pigs, Atlantis, The Roman Empire, The Byzantine Empire, The English Empire, The Sumerian Empire, The Akkadian Empire, The Hittite Empire, The Phrygian Empire, and on and on, it is inevitable that the people who have the resources will lose them all. It is inevitable that the people who could have helped will not. It is inevitable that this change is coming and when it comes there will be bleating cries all around asking why? Why didn’t we help? Then it will be too late. In 2 to 4 years it will be way, way too late.
Will you do anything? Will you change?
Will the Ucadia model be finished? I hope so. I am certainly working towards that. 80 to 90 percent of it is there. I have showed you, there is knowledge in knowing what energy particles do for making machines and making energy. I still don’t have and still can’t get through the orthodoxies of science to see things differently. Maybe on this audio and what you read on this blog you will. It’s not designed to frighten you. It is designed to say that we are about to go through major change again.
Just as the poles shifted 230,000 years ago, 190,000 years ago, 84,000 years ago, 48,000 years ago, 12,000 years ago, the poles are going to shift again. When they do, there will be winners and losers depending on where you live. You may be a natural recipient winner or you may be part of a culture that will undergo some dramatic change.
All cultures will go through dramatic change.
Thank you for listening. I hope you find the information and the links as part of this blog useful. Thank you for those who are capable of looking beyond and who keep helping and supporting Ucadia. We need that help and without it we could not continue to do what we do. Until the next audio, thank you and all the best. Good night.
_________________________________________________________________________________
Please download MP3 Audio Broadcast of this Blog > here (45 min 14.5 Mb)
_________________________________________________________________________________
The topic for audio and blog this week is the second and final part (Part 2) of a series on Agent being: What are the effective actions of an agent when dealing with the Roman system? handling and responding to the actions of the pirates of the Private Bar Guilds? and how to respond and follow up any criminal behavior and official corruption you may encounter along the way in the Western-Roman system?
Last week, we introduced the concepts and background behind agents, namely: what is an agent? Why is the role of agent so important to the present system? How are agents supposed to be appointed? How do their powers work in practice and how can any impostor agents and false powers be brought to account and dissolved?
In discussing the origin and importance of agent last week, we went back to the 15th and 16th Century and the Venetian and Pisan banks where we saw the origin of agents being part of a new form of banking and commerce that was forced on both trading empires by the inability for them to settle accounts in the old fashioned way. Instead, this new banking model centered around accounting forced the banks as principal to send out authorized agents also known as chartered accountants to live and to work alongside commercial ventures and if necessary act as if they were speaking as the directors of the bank in settling accounts, underwriting purchases and writing promissory notes and the earliest bills of exchange.
We then fast forwarded to the present day to look at the meaning and importance of agent to the modern private corporate world masquerading as countries and courts and entities. There we saw the importance of enduring powers of attorney and irrevocable powers of attorney when perversely now the Roman system permits agents to claim an interest in the estate making it impossible for the principal to revoke such powers.
Finally, we made clear the connection of the principal being not only the central banker of the estate but since the 19th Century also its government how one may give proper notice of the appointment of a new primary agent in the form of the minister plenipotentiary, plus the proper appointment by affidavit of full and durable powers of attorney- revoking all previous durable and irrevocable powers of attorney.
Now it is time to look at the practicality of this information, particularly with the existing Roman system. How to put such knowledge into practice and what to do when faced with the not infrequent criminal behavior and official corruption of pirates in the private bar guilds breaking their own rules.
Agents and Facing the Courts and Court Actions
As we have spoken about on a number of these audios and written a number of times, all administrative law, all public statute law and all court rules and procedures of the present Roman system depend and rest upon the presence of the legal person also known as a statutory person or surrogate person. This was stated in the article “The Paradox of Person” and it is the effective control of the person. If the Person present for the matter of controversy within one of the private Bar courts of the private Bar guilds is not a legal person, but a “superior form” of person that does not agree to surrender its authority to the court, then the court has a problem, as it has to serve the best interests of resolving the controversy concerning the person associated with the matter; and
Names such as employee, citizen, taxpayer, driver, employer, and recipient are some of the many hundreds of terms used within public statutes to describe “legal persons”. As modern Western-Roman courts operate within the first form of law (without recess or deliberate change of form) as administrative law courts, the application of personal jurisdiction of the court pertains to an alleged controversy associated with a public statute or code concerning a type of legal person and the presence of the legal person in question; and
If however, the person who is present is not a legal person, but a Level 6 Higher Order Life form who has chosen to represent themselves in propria persona otherwise known as first person, as a Natural Person, then the court must effectively convince the Natural Person to surrender their position to the absolute authority of the court. This is most frequently done by a combination of force, trickery and intimidation through such corruptions as:
(i) Forcing the Natural Person to stand “pro se” and therefore automatically agree to the personal jurisdiction; the difference of propria persona which means Natural Person as first person and “pro se” is that “pro se” literally means to stand as the legal person, so then they trick people. You say “propria persona” and the magistrate or judge answers, “oh, so you are going to stand “pro se.” It is a trick just as simple as changing the words in front of you and if you don’t correct the record then they believe that they have jurisdiction;
(ii) asking if the Natural Person is willing to “understand the charges against (the person)” therefore stand under the absolute authority of the court; or
(iii) demand the Natural Person take an oath “under the court” thereby creating a legal person and then automatically surrendering their Natural Person state; or
(iv) if all else fails, and this is increasingly more common and why we are talking about what to do when facing criminal behavior, so if all else fails the court will simply intimidate, trick, falsify and unsettle the Natural Person by completely ignoring due process until through inaction by the Natural Person against breach of due process they “surrender” to the power of the judge or magistrate; and
I am not here as a supporter of the outrageous behavior of incompetent, arrogant and extremely ignorant attorneys and prosecutors. What we are saying here is that to understand the mechanics of their world from their view, we will see the world through the eyes of the potential adversary. We will see it from their position.
If the person regarding the controversy is a 2nd person, also known as an “artificial person” as in a classic agent-principal relation, then courts have a number of ways of frequently obtaining personal jurisdiction, remembering as we have said from the training and imaging of attorneys and members of the Private Bar Guilds their interpretation of principal is that the Principal is the government and they represent the government; that is their image training until you are able to show an affidavit in the appointment of powers of attorney that you have “changed the government.” The government has changed in regards to your estate and that is the role of the Minister Plenipotentiary who gave the Notice. So if the person is a second person then how they will obtain personal jurisdiction, if not assuming they already have it, most frequently is:
(i) Demanding that only members of the Private Bar Guild may be agents or attorneys and therefore by their oaths, automatically submitted to the absolute authority of the court and of course this is not strictly accurate and in fact this is a deliberate misconstruing of the truth. If one looks at the definition of attorney the first definition in Black's is “attorney in fact,” not attorney at law. An attorney is fact is a legal agent and it occurs when one has appointed someone with the powers of attorney in fact. There is nothing the court can do to remove that unless of course it is proven that the appointment is deficient, that the ability to appoint was inadequate; or
(ii) Demanding the agents have suitable insurance (bond) and swear an oath to “uphold due process” and by default to stand under the absolute authority of the court; or
(iii) Demanding the paperwork of agents are originals with wet ink signatures when submitted to the court clerk, therefore transferring original “title” of the agent-principal relation to the control of court; that is a frequent trick of the court when they convince people to submit originals for the court to then enclose; or
(iv) Removing the right, or mention or forms available for proper recording of an agent or power of attorney to represent the principal in court. So, just simply refusing that you can submit the documents for lodging on the record.
This is why it is absolutely vital to properly establish an agent relationship whereby that agent has properly constituted, irrevocable and enduring powers of attorney. This is done through the proper power of the affidavit and the example that we included on the link on the blog and in the link that I have now included in this week’s blog.
The next question is what to do next? What do we do when we are hit with a summons or we are hit with demands? how do we proceed if we have done everything properly up until this point?
A question is once we have given notice and provided an affidavit with the proper appointment of the agent with powers of attorney (download Word doc) is to ask for key information to be provided and for there to be a form of interrogatories by affidavit by the agent that then permits the agent to proceed if those questions have not been forwarded by placing the court and those in controversy in default and then to proceed further in the form of a Memorandum and Affidavit.
This is what we will go through now and I will explain why we still bother with this and why this is so important and relevant. One of the things you always want to avoid as it is a mark of competence or if ignored, a definite sign of incompetence is to allow steps of notification and steps of material to stand on their own merits. The notification of a proper appointment of powers of attorney and certainly in addressing the issues of enduring and irrevocable powers of attorney should stand on its own merits and there should be no subject or no right for the court to object, withdraw or any form of negative averment. The court has absolutely no right to intervene in the appointment by a man as the Grantor and as the General Executor and therefore through that role into the Minister Plenipotentiary and therefore the Principal. The court has no right to interfere if a man has properly prepared, or a woman has properly prepared her paperwork.
If you have been reading and I do trust and hope that you have been reading, and if you have been listening to these broadcasts over the last few weeks beginning with trusts and then the 3 parts concerning estates (see Part 1, Part 2 and Part 3) and then the first part concerning agents (see Agent Part 1), it may appear that as you do all this paperwork you are doing lots and lots of things that may not initially appear to have any direct impact. But, if you have done your Will and Testament and if you have properly established the Manor Rolls and master accounts of your estate (see Estate Form Templates), and if you can show the proper appointment by charter of the General Executor and then the appointment by Full Powers of the Minister Plenipotentiary, then you are able to show by any form of argument in law, any form of argument in law, that the authority to appoint an agent with irrevocable and endurable powers of attorney has been done properly.
By lodging that as an Affidavit this should be on the record of any matter that has been brought forward and if you due to go to court on a summons, if you are due to go to court on a matter of controversy, if there is a hearing and providing there is a case number, then you have every ability to make sure that is placed on the record well before the day. Separate to that, and following that, one Affidavit can then be sent by the agent as a matter of Interrogatories to certain questions that the court needs to answer. The point is that these are important questions that you need answered before you go to court so you know where you stand. Now we will go through the questions carefully. They are legitimate and justifiable questions that a court must answer for anyone to know where one stands before one even deals with the matters at hand. These questions would be in writing in an affidavit with a request that these questions are answered at least several days before the matter goes before a judge or magistrate. If the answers are not given then they are consenting to the fact that they are in default.
Key Interrogatories before visiting court
For some, an alternate approach may be to enable the court to clarify its position before the need or risk of such a confrontation in officially visiting court whereby an interrogatories is properly formed (see Example document) and annexed in response to any summons whereby the status of the person is established, and key questions are rightfully asked of the court to be duly established first, such as:
(i) Is the court acting as a public forum or a private meeting of a private business or association? If the court is private, who is responsible and under what authority did this responsible person nominate a matter of public interest relating to a public statute to be heard in a private court? That is the first question, so what are we asking in a nutshell? We are basically asking, “Am I going to a public court or a private court?” We know they all claim to be public and we know that the magistrates claim to be public as well as the district courts, county courts and supreme (state) courts claim to be public. But are they public? If they are public or private we have the right to ask; it is not clear. If they are private then we are asking for the mechanism by which a public matter has been turned into a private hearing.
(ii) Is the judge or magistrate to hear the matter a duly sworn public official or a privateer? If they are a duly sworn official, can a record of the lodgment of their oath be produced prior to proceeding? If they are a privateer, can a record of their warrant or letter of marque be produced and under what authority was such letter granted for this matter? So, what are we saying here? We are really trying to determine if the judge or magistrate in this matter is a fiduciary that is someone who is bound by the laws of the estate and the role of trustee, or are they going to hear the matter as a private contractor or as a privateer. We are not being offensive when we say privateer which is one who is granted authority and are a form of agent granted authority to retrieve property, to interrogate, to prosecute under a letter of marque. So we want to know exactly what the status is of the judge or magistrate, not only generally but specifically to this matter. We only have 6 questions to ask.
(iii) If the court is private and the court officers are privateers, what is the insurance, underwriting, bonds or guarantees to ensure that the court and its officials uphold the public law, any fiduciary obligations, act in good faith and swear to speak the whole truth? In other words if the court is functioning privately by what means is there insurance underwriting to see that the court acts in good faith.
(iv) Is there, or is there planned to be one or more bonds issued for this matter? By whom? Under what authority? For what amount? For whose benefit? And Why?
(v) As the matter is in relation to one or more specific statutes relating to one or more legal persons, please provide a summary of the evidence and brief as to what is considered proof and the court’s claim of jurisdiction? In other words if we or someone we know has been charged an offense against a public statute that identifies a form of legal person, an employee, a traveler, or any other description of a legal person what is the evidence in Brief to claim that role exists in this matter? We could qualify that further by saying to please provide the contracts of agreement or please provide the wet ink signature agreement to penalties or please provide the pay slips.
(vi) What is the exact form of law and procedure by which the court will conduct any and all hearings and resolution of the matter? Is this public procedure and practice or private? Where is a copy of these procedures listed? If private, by what authority is private procedure used to resolve a public matter? If the courts, prosecutors, clerks, magistrates, judges are acting honorably then nothing can be misconstrued by these questions. These questions are matters of utmost importance in being able to defend and address the matter.
In no way are these questions listed in bad faith, nor may any competent or reasoned person argue that such questions imply vexatious behaviour. You have every right to ask these questions and they are obligated to answer them before you enter a building and come forward to a hearing where these questions are unclear. A competent, honorable, peaceful litigant has every right to ask such questions before they enter a court room and indeed are obligated if they truly are a competent person to ask such questions.
This is why you have every right in an Affidavit, and this would be the Affidavit presented after you have done the Power of Attorney, not part of the Affidavit regarding the Power of Attorney. This is issued by the Agent to give a certain time frame where these questions need to be answered before you enter the building. If they refuse to answer the questions, and they still demand that you attend, then they have obstructed and you are now dealing with very serious criminal matters and official corruption; and
Will members of the Private Bar Guilds answer such questions? It is hard to tell, but based on the track record to date, it is highly unlikely. Which brings us to the next point- what do you do when judges, magistrates, court officials and attorneys cheat and lie? Now we are at the question of default and unclean hands.
Let’s summarize what we have said in terms of logical steps. Obviously it would be preferable that you have read, comprehend and completed the necessary documentation concerning your estate to show that you are well on the way to managing the affairs of your estate. The next thing, once this is done, is to make sure that we can send the notice of power of attorney and separate to that that we submit by the agent the interrogatories and questions to the court to be answered before the agent attends.
The notice of default
If the court fails to answer these questions then the Agent has every right to issue a follow-up Affidavit in Support of a Notice of Fault and Default (see Example document). It is an Affidavit supporting a Notice of Default. What is this affidavit? This affidavit summarizes the powers of attorney that the agent has been duly authorized and has the authority to represent the interests of the ‘principal’ who is appointed by the estate. The Affidavit of Default outlines the questions that were requested to be answered as a matter of importance and the failure to have received any proper answer addressing these specific questions. The default also concludes that to proceed and to be obstructed by the court in being unable to know the form of law, being unable to know the procedures, to be unable to know whether it is public or private all represent that the court is proceeding with Unclean Hands.
What do we mean by Unclean Hands? The reason that the General Executor cannot engage in business is for the very reason of Unclean Hands. That is to say that when a court or any official engages in official business by which they stand to earn an interest, then that interest may be construed as an incentive to act in a certain way for their own benefit as opposed to being impartial. A court that obstructs the cause of justice and makes it impossible to determine whether there are in fact bonds, interest, charges and accounts in outstanding matters that could rightly be settled becomes an active participant and becomes an interested party in the matter. By being an interested party the court acts with Unclean Hands.
In the history of law throughout the world from the first of civilizations the rule of Unclean Hands is one of the central tenets to justice. It was present in Sumeria, Babylon, Syria, the Akkadian Empire, the Egyptian Empire, Roman Empire, the Greek-Hellenic Empire, the Carolingian Empire, and in the feudal system of the Roman cult, in commonwealth law, in common law and it is embedded and fundamental into the law presently under this modern form of commercial law. It is still present. When a judge or magistrate, attorney, prosecutor, district attorney knowingly, willingly, openly, clearly obstruct the courts of justice and proceed with malicious intent, and proceed with unclean hands in bad faith, you have in black and white the evidence you need that the system is now being run by ignorant, arrogant and dangerous pirates that have destroyed the rule of law.
This brings us to the key point of what follows the Affidavit and Notice of Default. We have the example of an Affidavit and Notice of Default on this blog. So, what happens next? Over the last few years I have heard many arguments that people say the system is corrupt, the system is unjust, there is no relief in the system. And, if you come from the impartial perspective without knowing and presuming that a particular court was openly unjust or that a particular system was clearly broken such as the US Justice system which is horribly broken and absolutely overflowing and bursting with corruption, and if an official was willingly and openly obstructing the course of justice and behaving with criminal intent, then would you not presume that some agency if alerted would then go about and form a prosecution and charge them? If there was any justice in the system then surely someone would do that. Sometimes in history, sometimes it is left to people on the fringe or the outside to begin the healing by standing up to injustice. That is really the next step that we are speaking of when we speak of the Memorandum and Affidavit following the Notice of Default.
The memorandum and affidavit
The memorandum and affidavit, once the Notice of Default is given, is in support not only of the matter being struck out, but of their being a case to prosecute certain officials involved in the matter using their own laws against them. if you can show that there has been a clear failure to respond, that there has been a properly appointed Power of Attorney, that the court is knowingly and willingly obstructing and there is clear evidence of Unclean Hands and that the court is proceeding and ignoring, then you have every right to refer to their own laws which deem such actions as criminal.
Just as they are supposed to prepare an indictment, we use their laws to prepare an indictment. We don’t call it an indictment, we call it a Memorandum which summarizes the events beginning with the appointment of the Power of Attorney and following through the steps and events that have taken place to indicate the beginning of the potential and alleged acts that may have taken place. Will this stop the corruption? Will this stop courts that are running over people? I honestly don’t know, and I don’t think anyone can foresee what future events will hold. What I do know is this: if you are not prepared to take a stand, if you are not prepared to see something through and if you are not prepared to do it properly and place your confidence in the law even in their law, then you do not the law an opportunity to heal itself. All great change in history has not come from people being violent, necessarily, but from people who were willing to stand against injustice and violence through passive, intelligent, non-consent.
As far as Agent is concerned and as far as relief is concerned, even if you do not see remedy, by standing your ground, by being clear, by documenting, by referring them to their own laws, You give yourself the best opportunity of addressing the underlying controversy and seeking some form of relief.
This is a short audio this week and there is a lot packed into it. I hope you find the updated documents on default and the examples and arguments in terms of the Memorandum as being useful. I hope the series you have seen so far has been useful and next week we will take a bit of a break from talking in the series now, as we have reached the point of agent, the power of the agent and the agent to address matters and to respond on behalf of the principal (of the Estate), next week we will be talking about the unfolding climate change in the next two years and the winners and losers when the pole shift by about 1400 to 1500 kilometers within the next two years.
Thank you for all those who continue to help and support in any way you can. Thank you and I wish you all well.
_________________________________________________________________________________
Please download MP3 Audio Broadcast of this Blog > here (104 min 22 Mb)
_________________________________________________________________________________
The topic for the audio and blog this week is Part 1 of a new series following the three blogs and audios on Estates and the one blog and audio on Trusts concerning: What is an agent? Why are the roles of agents so important to the present Private Corporation System? How are agents supposed to be appointed? How do their powers work in practice and how can any impostor agents and false powers be brought to account and dissolved?
The reason why we return in the Ucadia blog series to discussing agents is for several reasons. One is that it is in fact the logical follow-up to the end of the blog and article series on estates. The last element of the paperwork in your estates was the appointing of the minister plenipotentiary under "full powers" (LL0011 word template) which happens to be the primary agent of your estate. This is why we begin to talk about agents and what that role is. The other is the promise that was made last week and throughout the series concerning estates, that we would start to provide practical examples of how this information over the previous series may be specifically applied to the issues you are facing.
For example, at the end of the audio and blog last week, we discussed a detailed definition of affidavits and the fact that when affidavits are properly constructed they form an incredibly important element of defense and response to claims by the pirates of the private bar guilds. In fact the first application of properly constructed affidavits for many will probably be addressing the issue of having a properly appointed Agent as Attorney-In-Fact, possessing valid Powers of Attorney and therefore able to overcome any false or impostor agents that are trying to get you to claim to be a “legal person” and wholly under their control.
It is why we begin then with the definition of function and role of agent once again- to make clear of what we mean by, “What is an agent?” “Why the role of agent is so important and powerful in the present private corporate system?” “How is an Aagent properly appointed and how may this be validly used to dissolve any false claims of agency appointments and false agency powers?”
Now given the role of agent and principal is so important to the existing system, it should not be surprising that there is a huge amount of disinformation and deliberate confusion on the subject. So to be clear, let’s go back to what we already know in history and try to make sense of the origin of the concept of agent and principal in history and how these terms and concepts came about:
The origin of an Agent, Principal and relation to types of Persons
While the concept of Estates we discussed in the past three audios comes from the 16th Century, the origin of agents comes from a century earlier and the 15th Century in Europe. As we cover this background, please have a look on http://one-heaven.org at the Canons of Sovereign Law and Article 205 - Central Bank. There are quite a few canons and I want to cover a few of these that directly relate to the origin and history of agent. We are talking about banks so we will start with we actually mean by the term ‘bank.’
I apologize for the technical nature of the definitions, but given that you have listened to the last three audios regarding estates and read the last three blogs concerning estates (see Estates Part 1, Part 2, Part 3), and I hope you have listened to the first audio regarding trusts and the blog regarding trusts (see Trust blog and audio), that what we have in the canons in the definition of bank should hopefully and immediately create a light bulb going off in your mind in that this definition is eerily similar to the definition of what exactly an estate.
An estate in the English law of the 16th century concept is the derivative of a trust, a temporary trust, a Cestui Que Vie Trust, and indeed a hypothecation of its value. In the canons below we see in the origin of banks that is precisely what banks were doing; they were storing valuable objects in trust and therefore creating a trust and then hypothecating the value of those valuables and effectively creating ‘estates’ with the accounts.
The origin of hypothecation and derivatives is not unique to this century. You will see that expressed in Canon 6865 with example of clay and paper certificates going back to the great Karnak temples and exchanges in Upper Egypt back to the 16th and even 17th centuries, BCE, which is more than 3500 years ago. The Carolingians through the creation of chancery were doing the same thing in regards to gold certificates. Under the Venetians, and the Pisans that founded it when they created the Order of the Poor Knights of the Temple, or what we know as the Ordo Pauperes Templum, or simply the Knights Templar, we see the extension of banking and the creation of banking networks to an entirely new level.
Canon 6864
Bank is a 15th Century term describing a body possessing certain franchised rights to create and distribute funds through the hypothecation of valuables given or granted in trust then recorded against accounts for the conduct and settlement of trade including official business of the state through the management of such accounts, funds, valuables and associated derivative instruments.
Canon 6865
While the term “bank” or “banco” originates from the 15th Century, the concepts associated with financial services (deposits, loans, credit, bills of exchange), date as far back as the Karnak Temple and Exchange of the Hyksos in Ancient Egypt:
(i) The issue of a hypothecation or derivative such as a paper or clay certificate or token in exchange for coin or actual goods was in complete operation in the 16th Century BCE at the great Karnak Temple and Exchange in ancient Egypt. Similarly, the Romans and Persians heavily used such facilities both to mint and validate coin and to exchange and settle debts and commercial transactions; and
(ii) The Carolingian Empire from 8th Century to 10th Century greatly restricted financial practices of hypothecation (and therefore trade) in preference for the promotion of actual standard coin, which had the effect of creating a “boom-bust” environment due to a lack of capital, rise in corruption and an inability to settle debts effectively; and
(iii) The Persian and “High Moor” exiles that founded the Pisan Empire of the Western and Eastern Mediterranean were the first to reintroduce by Doga (Doge) Pietro Morosini (1088 - 1119) of Pisa and Roman Pontiff Callixtus I (II) (1119 - 1130) a stable international financial system through a semi-religious Ordo Pauperes Templum or “Order of the Poor of the (Money) Temple”, later known as the “Knights Templar”. The Pisan Knights issued certificates upon the deposit of valuables and coin at one secure fortress which could then be exchanged by the possessor of a valid certificate (bill of exchange) for coin at another sometimes thousands of miles away; and
(iv) In 1306, the network of Ordo Pauperes Templum (Knights Templar) was seized by combined forces of the Genoese and Lavagna under Count Ottobuono Fieschi of Lavagna and the French under King Philip IV of France (1268-1314). In 1339, Simon “Boccanegra” Fieschi took power over Genoa and had himself declared “Doge” including the formation of the second financial system based around Palaces called “Houses” known as the Palazzo delle Compere di San Giorgio or “House of Merchandizing of St George”. Each Palace had a public place for trade out front called the quadrate (public square) and an inner space called the cort (court) for private and exclusive business. The Genoese then established “Houses” managed by noble Genoese families at key locations around the world; and
(v) In contrast to the Genoese model of adopting a purely “public/private” model of commerce around a Palace (Palazzo) for financial services, in 1374 the Venetians adopted an ecclesiastical model by modifying St Mark’s Basilica and a created a new sacred space called the “sagrestia” (sacristy) for the operation of the camera di prestiti or “Chamber of Loans”; and
(vi) By 1401, the use of a form of financial services began in Barcelona then Valencia was the Plaza de Barcelona or “Plaza of Barcelona” whereby a large public space was divided for merchants and a section was exclusively rented as benches and tables or “banco” for moneylenders. Therefore, the association of moneylenders or loan merchants or pawnbrokers being “banco” or “banks” grew from this formalization of regular markets at a permanent space; and
(vii) In 1406, the Medici of Florence sought to control both financial services and the growing prosperity of trade by demanding an edict from Roman Pontiff Innocent VI (VII) (1404-1406) (Cosimo de Migliorati, Naples) licensed the Medici so that only the Medici could operate moneylending. Thus the Banco di Medici network controlled by a sole family was born; and
(viii) In reaction to the attempted banking monopoly by the Medici of Florence and following Roman Pontiff Gregory VI (XII) (1406-1415) (Angelo Corraro, Venice) coming to power, in late 1406 the Banco della Piazza di Rialto or “Bank of the Piazza of Rialto (Island)” or Bank of Venice was formed. However, instead of being held by one family such as the Medici of Florence, the Bank of Venice granted exclusive franchises eventually to all the ten patriarchal families representing the Council of Ten and leadership of Venice to form “Palaces” or Banking Houses. The first was Palazzo Pisani by 1408, followed by Palazzo Contarini by 1410, Palazzo Priuli by 1415, Palazzo Barbaro by 1425 and then Palazzo Gradenigo and others by 1430; and
(ix) During the 15th Century, the trade war between Genoa, Naples, Florence and Venice forced the Venetian Banking Houses to radically modify their business practices by eliminating the need for physical shipment of coin to Venice for settlement (account to account settlement), make the bank the central record of trade as well as market and exchange (Venetian bookkeeping) and agents of the bank accompanying the transport of cargo, shipments and major trade to both record details and validate the exchange remotely for the bank. These skills created out of necessity would prove to be a strength of Venetian banking in the 16th Century and beyond; and
(x) Following the near collapse of the Venetian State against the Habsburgs and Genoa, Venice and Pisan banking families pursued an aggressive stand at establishing a new form of banking intimately linked to royal families whereby the “value” was in knowledge not in stores of gold that could be expropriated by a monarch. The first of these “private partnerships” was in 1515 under Francis I (1515- 1547) of France and the creation of the Chambres des comptes (Court of Exchequer) with the Pisan exiles. The second was in 1518 and the House (Bank) of Pisano and King Henry VIII (1509-1547) of England and another Court of Exchequer. The third was in 1525 in Sweden through Gustav I (1523-1560) of Sweden and the formation of Kammarkollegium.
In the case of Venice and the rivals of Venice was the breakup of the Pisan Empire known as Genoa. We see the creation firstly of banking houses and then the forced need for the Venetians to extend what their banks did and the origin of the creation of agent and principal roles. Under the Genoese we see the creation of the Palaces, or Palazzos, the creation of squares at the front and we see this in Venice in point (vi) under Canon 6865, regarding the creation of the plazas for banking. What we see at the time of the Venetians in point (ix) and (x) of Canon 6865 is when the Venetians were under attack, their ability to settle debts by merchants bringing their gold to Venice became prohibitively dangerous and indeed, the Venetians being able to send gold out also became extremely dangerous at the time that Venice was under attack.
So to solve this problem, the Venetians radically modified their business practices which we cover in point (ix) of Canon 6865, “The Origins of the Agent and the Principal.” The first agent in history was the creation of the Venetian banking agent known as a ‘chartered accountant.’ These skills were born out of necessity and proved to be the enormous strength of the Venetian banking system from the 16th century and beyond. Point (x) in Canon 6865 covers the next challenges the Venetians overcame which we will cover. That is how private banks became central banks. This was when the Hapsburgs and others started to ex-appropriate the very gold that was underpinning the value of these now sophisticated banks. This required the Pisan and Venetian houses to form alliances directly with Crowns in the creation of Courts of Exchequer. The first was in 1515 under Francis I under the Chambres des comptes (Court of Exchequer) and the second was in 1518 with the House (Bank) of Pisano and King Henry VIII and the Court of Exchequer and the third was 1525 in Sweden through Gustav I and the formation of Kammarkollegium and was the third central bank, the third Court of Exchequer.
We see the origin of the agent which was derived directly out of necessity through the Venetian banking system where now, instead of the merchants coming to the bank with their gold, with their records to settle the accounts, the bank sent their own agents out into the field with those merchants and business was settled, in the first instance in the field. Then it was ratified by the bank when those agents returned with the receipts to the bank to perform an accounting.
This leads us then to understanding exactly what is meant by accounting which is a central role and a central function of the agent. The agent must absolutely be able to provide a means of accounting and a mechanism of accounting as to their authority. Now look at Article 202- Accounting on Sovereign Law. Let’s see what we mean by accounting, since the first agents were accountants. Remember, we covered accounting in some degree in the last audio. I am not going through all the canons that are listed under Article 202, here, but will pick out the key points to make sense of the power of the agent and having a proper set of accounts, and the role of the agent in being able to competently address matters of accounting for the estate.
What is an account and what is accounting?
Canon 6853
Accounting is a 16th Century term used to describe an organized system centered on the concept of “accounts” for recording, tabulating and extracting information from various record keeping systems for the purpose of banking, commerce, taxation and governance.
Canon 6854
An Account is (1) a collection of documents, books and records relating to a distinct relation formed in trust; and (2) the original record of event as to its creation and validity entered into some formal register of similar types of accounts; and (3) any subsequent statement or summary in time referencing key information concerning its function and performance.
A Trust, Entity or Company possesses a single supreme Account or “Master Account”, but may possess one (1) or several lesser Accounts or “Sub Accounts” attached to the “Master Account”.
Canon 6855
The collection of documents, books and records relating to an Account may include an Inventory, Manifest, Memorandum, Journal, Ledger and Statement:
(i) An Inventory is the survey of all property, or debts or credits associated with the Account completed immediately after its creation and thereafter at an appointed regular time; and
(ii) A Manifest is the history of ownership and possession of any property, rights, money and other interests now recorded as associated with the Account; and
(iii) A Memorandum is a book of detailed records of all transactions associated with the Account, including minutes, resolutions, letters, correspondence, decisions and procedural actions recorded in day and time order; and
(iv) A Journal is a book that extracts the information recorded and memorialized in the Memorandum and arranges it in category order and then day/time order according to a journal; and
(v) A Ledger is a book that extracts the information recorded in a Journal Entry and extracts the highest level information matched according to double entry bookkeeping; and
(vi) A Statement is an extract of a Ledger Balance or Simple Balance of Assets and Debts, or Concessions and Remittances of the Account.
Canon 6856
The term Account and Accounting is derived from three (3) Latin words ac- meaning “to, towards or near”; and con- meaning “with; together” and te meaning “the letter t and balance”. Thus account (acconte) in its original etymological form literally defined “to balance the T (debts and credits)”.
Canon 6857
Two (2) of the oldest concepts of calculation and financial reckoning is checking an inventory and crossing values received and given known as “checking the I’s and crossing the T’s” whereby:
(i) A tablet or papyrus writing surface is prepared and two (2) lines drawn being one (1) down the center separating the surface into two (2) halves. The second line separates the top of the surface into two (2) small boxes into which the top left lists a reference in time / space / age for the review and the right references some total or confirmation of check; and
(ii) Into the left hand side of the surface is placed all those values received and credited, while into the right hand side are all those values given, paid or stored in inventory; and
(iii) What is received is then added up against what is pair or stored in inventory and the total value should be 0. If the number is still in the positive, then an asset or value has not been properly accounted. If the number is in the negative then an expense or inventory has not been properly accounted.
(iv) This system existed until its dramatic corruption in 14th Century by the Venetians in association with the Roman Cult by its inversion thus perversely creating debt into an asset and debits into credit.
Canon 6858
While the recording, keeping and calculation of financial information is a feature of virtually all advanced civilizations for at least seven thousand (7,000) years, the “modern” system of accounting was formalized by the Venetians in the 14th Century:
(i) General accounting practices, particularly the concept of “double-entry bookkeeping”- whereby each transaction is extracted into a summary ledger as two “separate” entries under different categories of debt and credit - was well established by the Persian traders and Byzantine Empire well before the 4th Century CE. While almost all historic records have otherwise been destroyed or lost over time, there is sufficient evidence to suggest ancient double entry bookkeeping treated income as credits and expenses as debt, consistent with natural logic. Therefore, the Venetian invention in the 14th Century is the reversal of ancient logic and a new system of bookkeeping based on ecclesiastical principles; and
(ii) During the growth of dominance of the Pisan Empire of the Western and Eastern Mediterranean during the 12th and 13th Century, followed by the civil war between major centers such as Genoa versus Venice from 14th to 16th Century, major houses increasingly faced ruin from defaults against loans. At the same time, from 1356 following the “Golden Bull” of Charles IV, the primary of the Venetian-Pisan controlled Roman Cult over the true Catholic Church of France-Saxony was secured. The changes to accounting by the Venetians was in response to “harnessing” this new found power to enforce their financial claims against delinquent debtors; and
(iii) The Venetians through the development of the theology of the Roman Cult from the 14th Century, firstly infused the notion that all transactions on Earth have a mirror twin in Heaven and so to default against a loan on Earth is a grave and mortal sin against Heaven. This introduced a much stronger precedence to the notion of “all debts must be paid” even if such debts are unfair and carry extraordinary levels of interest. The Venetians then secondly promoted the notion that giving to pay ones debts is the only “true credit”, whereas to receive is the lesser and in effect an obligation and a “debt”- flipping seven thousand (7,000) years of logic on its head. This introduced the perverse notion of cerebrating “poverty” as somehow a gift and grace; and
(iv) To reinforce the dramatic changes in philosophy concerning the reversal of ancient accounting practices by make its purely ecclesiastical in terms of the philosophy of the Roman Cult, the Venetians also introduced a step by step ritual, to mimic the concept of sacraments both as claimed “proof” and to reinforce the sacred nature of proper accounting. (1) Competent owners were required to be able to account for their property through a detailed inventory, renewed annually; and (2) Merchants were required to record in a memorandum detailed records of all transactions associated with the Account, including minutes, resolutions, letters, correspondence, decisions and procedural actions recorded in day and time order; and (3) Periodically, merchants then were required to extract the information recorded and memorialized in the Memorandum and arranges it in category order and then day/time order according to a journal; and (4) Upon important days, merchants then were required to submit a book (ledger) that ext
racted the information recorded in a Journal Entry to the highest level information matched according to double entry bookkeeping whereby all value received (Credit) was to be entered as Debit and all value given (Expense or Debit) was to be entered as Credit; and
(v) The Venetian system of converting accounting into a purely administrative recording of sacred ecclesiastical events, combined with the detailed “proof” of Inventory, Memorandum, Journal and Ledger System both dramatically improved the financial management of Venetian resources, but enabled Venetian and later Genoese traders to periodically demand the enforcement of the repayments of debts by sovereigns in default, using the military forces of the Holy Roman Emperor as well as the ecclesiastical threats of the Vatican for “committing the sin” of failing to pay “valid” debts; and
(vi) It is the original creation by the Pisan and Venetian families of the concept of accounting being divinely inspired first and temporal second from the 14th Century that introduced the notion of fiduciary (accounting competence) responsibility being of the highest importance; and
(vii) The earliest surviving copy of describing the Venetian double-entry bookkeeping system is by Luca Pacioli an Summa de Aithmetica” from 1494 demonstrating the revised Venetian system of making accounting “ecclesiastical” was well established by this time; and
(viii) The first books on accounting practice in German appear in 1531 through Johan Gotleb with “Ein Tentsch…” and in Dutch by Jan Ympyn Christoffels in 1543 through “Nieuwe Instructie Eude Bewijs…”. However, the first books on accounting in English does not appear until 1588 and John Mellis through “a briefe instruction and maner to keepe books of accompts after the order of Debitor and Creditor..”; and
(ix) Contrary to deliberately false information, it appears the Venetian - Pisan method of double entry bookkeeping faced two (2) significant obstacles within England until a more complete work was published in 1636 called “The Merchants’ Mirror or Directions for the Perfect ordering and Keeping of His Accounts”: (1) the level of numeracy in England by 1500 was less than four percent (4%) of the population, well lower than Continental Europe and (2) a persistent refusal by the educated classes of England to adopt the illogic of flipping income to debit and expenses to credit as per the Venetian Ecclesiastical system of accounting. However, by the mid 18th Century, the Kingdom of Great Britain had become an accounting powerhouse through its banking and merchant practices in adopting the Venetian Vatican standards of accounting.
Many of you, if you listened to the third audio on estates last week, may have groaned at the amount of detail involved in the Maner Role (Manor Roll), but now I hope this will start to make sense when we talk about accounting, the primary functions of the agent and the primary agent which is the Minister Plenipotentiary. It is directly related and relevant to dealing with the Roman system.
We see the meaning of “account” in Canon 6854 1. It is a collection of documents, books and records relating to a distinct relation formed in trust and 2. The original record of the even as to its creation and validity entered in some form of register of similar types of accounts, and 3. Any subsequent statement or summary in time referencing key information concerning its function and performance. If you look at the definition of accounts, and these are and need to be very technical in their detail, then what you see is in effect a summary of everything we described last week in regards to the Manor Role and in regards to the various registers of the estate. That is to say, the accounts and the records and the proper management of your estate are indeed, accounting. They are one and the same.
Why is this important? If you properly manage your Manor Roles, having established a Manor Role, if you have established a Will and Testament of your estate, if you are General Executor as sovereign of your estate and has been duly appointed by the Great Register and if you have appointed the primary agent of the estate in the form of the Minister Plenipotentiary by the appointment and it has been accepted then you possess the master accounts. I REPEAT, YOU POSSESS THE MASTER ACCOUNTS OF THE ESTATE, THE ROMAN SYSTEM DO NOT, THE TREASURY DO NOT, THE IRS OR TAX DEPARTMENT DO NOT, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL’S DEPARTMENT DO NOT. You hold the master accounts and by that all other accounts must be brought into alignment with those master accounts. There must be a proper accounting and a balancing.
Anyone that is conducting business regarding the estate must recognize that. If they do not they are breaching the most fundamental rules of their entire banking system, the most fundamental rules of their entire legal system, the most fundamental rules to the entire commercial system in the world at present. THIS IS HOW IMPORTANT THESE PRINCIPLES ARE. This is not information plucked out of thin air; it is not supposition, it is not fallacy, it is not guessing, but information borne out of forensic, detailed, documented research as to the provenance and history of law, the history of banking, the history of commerce and a level of competence, reasoning and overview that brings us to clarity of what these things are.
What are accounts in regard to accounting? This is covered under Canon 6855 which says that the collection of documents, books and records relating to an account may include: inventory, manifest, memorandum, journal, ledger, and a statement. These are all the things we spoke about on the third audio on Estates last week. All of those are directly related to accounts. Two of the oldest concepts of accounting are covered in Canon 6857. These are the concepts of calculation and financial reckoning which is the inventory and crossing of values which is known as dotting the ‘i’s and crossing the ‘t’s which is settling the accounts and providing the accounting.
Before we move on, let’s summarize what we have said to date in regards to the origin of the agent and to the relationship with the accounts, accounting, and accountants. What we have said is that the original role of the agent, as is still in operation today, was borne out of necessity by the Pisan and the Venetian banks which were under siege and unable to conduct the banking in the traditional methods, and then forced to find a way to maintain and settle accounts by creating the role of a foreign, traveling, commercial agent who was an official of the bank. The bank was the Principal. These agents were sent out into the field with the merchants to maintain the records of trade, the books and the ledger, and to be able to provide an accounting and indeed authorized to issue paper for the bank, such as bills of exchange before those bills and accounts are reckoned and settled by the central bank.
As to the accounts and accounting, we see that it is the proper records of the estate and if we do maintain those records ourselves properly, we are ecclesiastically, lawfully and legally able to hold the master accounts of our own estate. All other accounting by other agents MUST BE BROUGHT TO THE PRINCIPAL AS THE MINISTER PLENIPOTENTIARY TO BE BALANCED. If they do not they are in breach of the most basic rules of their own system.
The origin of "Principal" and Central Banks
Before we complete the background and before we get to the contemporary meaning of Agent, let’s cover one more key and missing piece of the historical puzzle in regards to Agent. That is, what exactly is meant by ‘Principal’ in the Agent/Principal relationship? For many of you and many over time there has been a lot of confusion as to who and what is the Principal is. Let’s have a look at Article 203 regarding Exchequer. Before, you heard me speak about the origin of Central Banking and I said that the first three central banks were created by necessity because the groups such as the Hapsburg's were plundering the gold of the private banks, so the first three private partnerships with monarchs were Francis I under the Chambres des comptes (Court of Exchequer) with the Pisan exiles. The second was in 1518 with the House (Bank) of Pisano and King Henry VIII and the first Court of Exchequer was formed. The third was 1525 in Sweden through Gustav I and the formation of Kammarkollegium and was the third central bank, the third Court of Exchequer.
What do we mean by Exchequer? Let’s cover this history now that gives context to the meaning and the real function of Agent. There is a lot of disinformation creating confusion that is deliberate. Look at Article 203 - Exchequer and Canon 6859 and see what we mean by Exchequer.
Canon 6859
The Exchequer, or more formally the “Court of the Exchequer” is a private franchise first formed in the 16th Century (but claimed of much older provenance) possessing the rights as Principal of the Crown or simply Principal to control and enclose commerce, collect taxes and to distribute funds through the hypothecation of valuables given or granted in trust then recorded against accounts for the conduct and settlement of trade including official business of the state through the management of such accounts, funds, valuables and associated derivative instruments on behalf of the “crown”.
Canon 6860
The word Exchequer is derived from the Anglaise word eschequier meaning “chessboard” in direct reference to the chessboard literally referring to all commerce and trade of the realm and the public “squares” of commerce consistent with 14th Century “plaza” banking model. Thus the phrase “Court of Exchequer” literally means "Private Public (Bank)".
Canon 6861
In contradiction to the false historical claims of the Court of Exchequer, its formation was under King Henry VIII (1508-1547) of England and Wales in agreement with the House (Bank) of Pisano of Venice for a series of loans beginning with 40,000 gold ducats in 1518-19 to remodel the English economy, military and government:
(i) Contrary to false history, the English had little to no organized record keeping, low literacy and relatively poor economy prior to the arrival of the Venetians and Pisan exiles; and
(ii) The “new banking” model of Venice both enclosed trade and commerce through sophisticated record keeping (Venetian double entry bookkeeping) as well as generating substantial increases in trade and revenue; and
(iii) While the public statutes of 1516 to 1522 have been deliberately lost or destroyed, it is probable that the false claims of Exchequer statutes dating earlier are based on the acts passed during this period; and
(iv) The reference to the word “court” is in respect of the conduct of private business within the Venetian pseudo-legal procedures of the Venetian private banks, not as is presumed an adaption of the Curia (Legal Chambers) or “halls” of ancient Feudal and Sacred (Carolingian) law; and
(v) The success of the House of Pisani in acquiring the control of taxation and revenue collection for the Crown of England as the Court of Exchequer, encouraged other Venetian noble families to offer further loans and rewards in the enclosure or “privatization” of other areas of Crown business including the Courts of Assize by the House (Bank) of Priuli and the Courts of Wards and Liveries by the House (Bank) of Barbaro; and
(vi) In the 17th Century when the Venetian and Pisan nobles staged a coup de’tat to take over control sparking the first Civil War in England, the defeat of the Parliamentary forces saw the abolition of certain court franchises and the sale of the Court of Exchequer to the Inns of Court, also known as the Inner and Middle Temple; and
(vii) In the 19th Century, upon the Bank of England assuming effective control of the Government of Great Britain due to debts, the bankers regained effective control of the Exchequer by creating the Exchequer of the United Kingdom controlled by the Bank.
Summary of the origins and history of Agent
So what we see is that the role of agent was originally formed out of necessity as the duly authorized representative of a private bank and then a central bank or exchequer. The key words under the definition of Canon 6859 are the words, “private franchise formed through the Crown through the General Executor of the Estate as the Principal of the Crown, the Minister Plenipotentiary of the Crown, to enclose everything within regarding the funds. This is the chessboard in the game of chess. They don’t want you to know this and they cannot afford for you to know this. That is why the exchequer is never defined as private; it is always obscured and it is desperately described as coming from a much, much earlier provenance than the 16th century. Most of the flaws within the statutes and the fraudulent statutes of within English law claim that exchequer originated in the 13th century, which is complete rubbish. Their accounting concepts claimed in the 13th century weren’t invented until the 15th century.
It is easily exposed once you see what accounting is. However, like much of their system of fraud, they do not want you to know the origin. Once you know the origin, you know what the principal is.
What is the principal? The principal is that franchise, that central bank, the central banker for the estate. Every since the officials of the estate have been paid directly by the central bank which began in the 19th century when the Bank of England was allowed to pay public servants in their own script. Once that started the central bank became not only the controlling franchise in terms of commerce, taxes, and funds, but became the government. THE BANK ALSO BECAME THE GOVERNMENT OF THE ESTATE, OF THE NATION in the 19th century. This is why when you go to court or write in any of your documents and claim that you are the principal or you are acting for the principal those few judges, those few magistrates, or even fewer prosecutors and/or attorneys that know the origin of their law, or the basic competence of their law, just smile.
What you have done when you say that you are the principal or that you are acting for the principal, is that you truly do not know the provenance of these most essential terms. If we claim to be the Agent of the Principal we have accepted that we are wholly and totally under the jurisdiction of the government, and the government is the central bank, and the private bank under the control of the families that control the central banks. Now you see that in exchequer, through the original definition, what the real meaning of the Principal is. This is why the government is perfectly happy when people say I am the principal. The government is the principal in their minds, because they were appointed by the processes of the law when the estate was abandoned.
What is considered an agent today?
Let’s consider what the system describes as the meaning of Agent today. Blacks 9th Edition Pg 72 defines an “agent” as “one who is authorized to act for or in place of another; a representative”. That is an unfinished definition and in the earlier Black’s Law editions they complete the definition and let us know that “another” was the principal and the representative was the principal. So, “One who is authorized to act for or in place of the Principal” is the more complete and honest definition of an agent. We are living in times of rampant incompetence, piracy, thievery, stupidity and insanity by their system, so you cannot expect to be given such clarity.
Black’s goes on to say on page 72 and this is an insight into how they view us and the challenge to all of us in terms of competency, “generally speaking, anyone can be an agent who is in fact capable of performing the functions involved. The agent normally binds not himself but his principal by the contract he makes…Thus an infant or a lunatic may be an agent, though doubtless the court would disregard either’s attempt to act as if he were so young or so hopelessly devoid of reason as to be completely incapable of grasping the function he was attempting to perform”. The Principal is the government and the Will of the Principal, or the Government, is its statutes which define who and what you may be such as an ‘infant’ under parens patriae, the power of the father, or a ward of the state, or mentally ill, lunatic, criminal, enemy of the bank, enemy of the state. All of these things have been put in place. There are a wide variety of ways that the government and its duly authorized agents in the court can deny your ability to act effectively as an Agent. They disregard any attempt you make as an agent through that.
Another way they have of interpreting the clause which reinforces what we have been speaking constantly through these audios, is that if you refuse to read, if you refuse to hear, if you refuse to learn and be competent, then you accept whether you realize it or not, the full consequences of your actions. What the government does to you because you have tacitly and/or openly admitted that you are in fact an infant, an incompetent, a lunatic, when you fill in and send some of the most absurd documents that are floating around (whether they are documents that are sent out as claimed ‘writs’ or ‘claims’ or ‘notices’ or other absolutely false, absurd, and deliberately misconstruing things like courtesy notices) and when you believe all that rubbish, then you are telling the system that not only do you refuse to obey but you are a belligerent incompetent, an absolute lunatic who needs to be locked up. You are saying, “please take away my property, please strip me of every right because I do not deserve those rights and I’m an idiot.
You are telling the government that you are a complete and total idiot because you are too lazy to read, too deluded to listen and whatever other excuses you make not to read and listen. What you have just seen in the definition of Agent that the Agent is at the center of their system. If you are not prepared to learn and if you are too busy being lazy and there are a million excuses such as “I am under attack; I don’t have time; I can’t, I can’t, I can’t.” You don’t want to learn; you are abdicating (responsibility of learning). So you must accept the full consequences of what happens. There is no guarantee if you do read, listen, become competent, that pirates being pirates will do the right thing. No one can promise that. If anyone promises you that they are not telling the truth.
What is possible is to force the pirates, impostors to clearly and openly defy their own rules and to openly commit crimes against their own rules, to openly declare there is no justice and to have it on the record there is no justice. What is possible is to expose themselves before their own superiors and the world that they are criminal. That is what you can do when you are competent. You can push them to that point. No one force anyone, especially not you, to do the right thing. And, if you cannot be forced then you cannot force them to do the right thing. But, when you stand in honor you can push them to that point where it is overwhelmingly clear in your case that they have committed crimes, they have breached every single rule of their own duties and that if you even bothered to pursue the matter a number of people could quite possible be charged, lose their jobs and go to prison. It has happened before, even in the pirate system. Judges have gone to prison. Attorneys and prosecutors have gone to prison. Why? Competent, diligent, honorable, sensible, reasonable people have bothered to take care of themselves and the law and have stood up and not given up. It has happened before. Unless competent people do stand up, then there won’t be any change.
There are all kinds of agents and I am trying my absolute best in these audios and in the decades of research I have done to try to help you. I can’t help each and every man and woman who write to me. I am trying everything (in the research) to specifically help those men and women. Listen and read, please.
There are many types of labels and some of those labels deliberately create confusion. Some of the labels are just ‘slicing and dicing’ and in some cases the law is strategy and piracy. There are many types of agents now including (but not limited to):
Apparent Agent
Bail-Enforcement Agent or Bounty Hunter
Bargaining Agent
Broker Agent
Business Agent
Clearing Agent
Closing Agent, or Settlement Agent
Co-Agent or Dual Agent
Commercial Agent
Common Agent
Corporate Agent
Del Credere Agent
Diplomatic Agent
General Agent
Special Agent
Black’s even defines the etymology of “agent” as “from the Latin verb, ago, agere; the noun agens, agentis. The word agent denotes one who acts, a doer, force or power that accomplishes things”; and Blacks 9th Pg 147 defines an attorney firstly as “one who is designated to transact business for another; a legal agent. – Also termed attorney-in-fact; private attorney”. The definition of an attorney being “a person who practices law; lawyer” is a distinct and secondary definition to attorney;
Similarly, Blacks 9th Edition Pg 401 defines a “counsel” firstly as “advice or assistance” without any reference to a Counsel in the first definition having to be a Lawyer or member of the Bar, which is listed as the second and third separate definitions respectively;
The right to appoint an attorney is well established in English and Western-Roman Law with the Statute of Merton (1235), considered to be the first English statute, stating “Every freeman that oweth suit to the county, tithing, hundred, or wapentake, or to a court baron, may make an attorney to do those suits for him, 20 H.3. Stat. Merton c.10. It was not until the reign of George II and 2 Geo.2. c.23 in 1729 that the role of Attorney and Solicitor was enclosed across the realm to a system of indenture with existing members of the Inns Court, also known as “The Temple” and “Temple Bar”.
We have defined the origin of Agent from its commercial sense, where it comes from, the origin of Principal and where it comes from and we have been absolutely clear about who and what the Principal is and how they view the Principal. How do we tackle this issue of the Principal and what other tricks up their sleeves does the system have to keep us in control in regards to the Agent. I was going to review some of the definition of person as an agent is obviously a person. I do ask you to go and look at Article 17 under Positive Law at www.one-heaven.org . In particular look at the different types of persons defined under Canon 1503 and the concept of a ‘second person.’ When we talk about Agents we are talking about second persons:
Canon 1503
All Persons may be categorized according to the three (3) possible types of Relation being the Author (Principal) to Actor (Agent) being: 1st Person (Self), 2nd Person (Another) and 3rd Person (Not Known):
(i) 1st Person, also known as a Natural Person and in propria persona is when the competent mind of a carnate Level 6 Higher Order Life Form as Author (Principal) appoints, records and publishes themselves by Special (Private) appointment as Actor (Agent) by some solemn binding agreement. Therefore, a 1st Person or Natural Person possesses “natural title” to right of beneficial use associated with the 1st Person synonymous with such pronouns as “I, thou, me, my, mine, myself, we, us, our, ours and ourselves”; and
(ii) 2nd Person, also known as an Artificial Person is when a carnate Level 6 Higher Order Life Form as Author (Principal) appoints another carnate Level 6 Higher Order Life Form by Special (Private) appointment as Actor (Agent) by some solemn binding agreement. Thus, a 2nd Person or Artificial Person is synonymous with such pronouns as “you, yours, yourself and yourselves”; and
(iii) 3rd Person, also known as a Legal Person, or Statutory Person or Surrogate Person is when the Author (Principal) is hidden or not known and the Level 6 Higher Order Life Form fails to properly express any competent in propria persona (1st Person) or 2nd Person Author (Principal) to Actor (Agent) Relation prior to the commencement of any interpersonal intercourse. In the 3rd Person, the flesh and body of a Living Level 6 Higher Order Life Form is mis-taken, and presumed to be, by default, the "person" and the Statutes of Law, or Rules of the Court as Script (Deed) and the Judge or Magistrate as the Author (Principal). Thus, a 3rd Person or Legal Person is synonymous with such pronouns as “he, she, it, they, them, their, theirs and themselves”.
There are three different types of persons defined under Canon 1503. In particular there is the concept of a ‘second person.’ When we talk about agents, we are talking about ‘second persons.’ So, artificial persons are formed between the author and another high order life form who is appointed as the actor as the agent. So the author is the principal appointing the actor as the agent by some binding agreement. They are you, yours, yourself—all are the second person. These canons bring it into focus.
When you look at Canon 1503 you see the third person, the legal person which is the type of person that the courts need you to be. That is why the government can claim itself as the principal and then steps in and demotes any claim you have as an Agent so you end up going back to becoming a legal person. They need you to be the legal person. If you are the legal person then they have the ability to say the author is hidden and not known so they step in as the surrogate. Then they use their law to impose their will against your will and against your estate and make that ‘legal.’ That is what they are doing in foreclosures, criminal matters, any matters in their courts. This is exactly how the system runs so smoothly.
Applying the knowledge of Agent and Person relating to Private Courts
All administrative law, all public statute law and all court rules and procedures depend and rest upon the presence of a legal person (also known as a statutory person or surrogate person) or the effect “control of the person. If the Person present for the matter of controversy is not a legal person, but a “superior form” of person that does not agree to surrender its authority to the court, then the court has a problem – as it has to serve the best interests of resolving the controversy concerning the person associated with the matter; and
Names such as employee, citizen, taxpayer, driver, employer, and recipient are some of the many hundreds of terms used within public statutes to describe “legal persons”. As modern Western-Roman courts operate within the first form of law (without recess or deliberate change of form) as administrative law courts, the application of personal jurisdiction of the court pertains to an alleged controversy associated with a public statute concerning a type of legal person and the presence of the legal person in question; and
If however, the person who is present is not a legal person, but a Level 6 Higher Order Life form that has chosen to represent themselves in propria persona as a Natural Person then the court must effectively convince the natural person to surrender their position to the absolute authority of the court. This is most frequently done by a combination of force, trickery and intimidation through such corruptions as:
(i) forcing the Natural Person to stand “pro se” and therefore automatically agree to the personal jurisdiction; or
(ii) asking if the Natural Person is willing to “understand the charges against (the person)” therefore stand under the absolute authority of the court; or
(iii) demand the Natural Person take an oath “under the court” thereby creating a legal person and automatically surrendering their Natural Person; or
(iv) if all else fails, simply intimidate, trick, falsify and unsettle the Natural Person by ignoring due process until through inaction by the Natural Person against breach of due process they “surrender” to the power of the judge or magistrate; and
If the person is a 2nd person, also known as an “artificial person” as in a classic agent-principal relation, then courts frequently obtain personal jurisdiction by:
(i) Demanding only members of the Private Bar Guild may be agents or attorneys and therefore by their oaths, automatically submitted to the absolute authority of the court; or
(ii) Demanding the agents have suitable insurance (bond) and swear an oath to “uphold due process” and by default to stand under the absolute authority of the court; or
(iii) Demanding the paperwork of agents are originals with wet ink signatures when submitted to the court clerk, therefore transferring original “title” of the agent-principal relation to the control of court; or
(iv) Removing the right, or mention or forms available for proper recording of an agent or power of attorney to represent the principal in court.
So properly establishing the Agent-Principal relation in respect of your estate is essential to reducing the risk of such obstruction of justice by pirates of the private bar guilds.
Durable Powers of Attorney and Revocable Powers of Attorney
What are other tricks of the system? There are two powers that are important in their system. One is the concept of the durable powers of attorney and the other is the revocable powers of attorney. What do I mean by an attorney? Black’s 9th on page 147 defines an attorney as one who is designated to transact business for another; a legal agent, which is also termed an ‘attorney-in-fact’ or ‘private attorney.’ The concept of an attorney is a person who practices law or a lawyer is distinct and the secondary definition. So the first definition, the primary definition of an attorney is actually one who transacts business for another, a legal agent, and attorney-in-fact.
The durable power of attorney means a power that continues beyond the point that the one who conveys the power is disabled or incapable of engaging his in own affairs. So, the durable power of attorney would be the kind of power that is granted to someone before a severe illness occurs or some dangerous activity or voyage where there is the risk of being delayed or incapacitated. This means that the management of your estate could be in jeopardy so the one given durable power of attorney would then be able to step in even though you are obstructed, incapable of executing instructions. The real chestnut, the one that is established in America for example, has three points. They are through the Department of Agriculture, the Department of Treasury, and through the Department of Transportation. This is the concept of what is called the irrevocable power of attorney and is the humdinger that is used to bring actions against one. What is the irrevocable power of attorney?
The irrevocable power of attorney in one sense is the durable power of attorney, a power that extends beyond our incapacitation and beyond our inability if we are obstructed or in custody. It goes further: the irrevocable power of attorney actually prevents the Principal, the one who is said to grant the power in the first place, from dissolving the power. You can see how this is extremely important for the system. In fact it is central to them. If a government cannot dissolve the powers granted to certain agents in Treasury and therefore the IRS, in Agriculture and therefore treating you as animals and social security and chattel; and Transportation in regards to your being an agent of commerce, then the system really has a failsafe. Its control is unassailable in theory so long as the exiting principal, the existing bank, the existing arrangement is not challenged.
How is an irrevocable power of attorney formed? It is an artful and perverse method that they use. What they do is they say that an interest is granted when an irrevocable power of attorney is created. What do we mean by interest? We mean that the agent that is involved in the process actually has an interest in the estate. It is created in the estate at the time the estate is created. When the agency as a franchise is created, they have an interest. Until that interest is resolved, not even the Principal can dissolve it. Think about the reason why.
An interest is, of course, a benefit. A benefit means that they become a beneficiary. By becoming a beneficiary it means that the in the role of the Agent and the Principal as the primary agent only someone higher up in the estate can in fact dissolve such an arrangement. That is what they mean regarding when the agent is granted a benefit say in court cases, you have an absolute perversion of the course of justice, a perversion of all known law, a complete perversion of the concept of ‘clean hands’ and there is not a single case in the United States of America that I am aware of now that is conducted with true ‘clean hands.’ What an abomination that is; every single court case has with it a financial claim entered with the Department of Treasury through the UCC whereby the private contractor in the form of the Magistrate or the Judge takes up an interest and forms an irrevocable power of attorney in the matter. They have the controlling power of attorney role in the matter being brought before them. What an abomination and extraordinary perversion that is.
How do we deal with it? We appoint an Agent with Power of Attorney. That is what we do. But first we make it clear that the Principal has been replaced and that the powers of the Principal have been revoked and the government can no longer consider itself to be the government of your estate by presumption, assumption, and supposition. We do that by presenting to key areas of the existing system a Notice of the Appointment of the Minister Plenipotentiary. Why can you never, ever, ever stand in court and claim to be the General Executor? If you do that you might as well give up. Why can you never engage in commerce in the role of the General Executor, unless you are dealing directly with an agent as to their agency powers? You should never deal with that directly and that should be up to your primary Agent, your Minister Plenipotentiary. It is because of Clean Hands.
The sovereign of your Estate is the General Executor is bound to remain objective and impartial as to all matter concerning the estate. Therefore the General Executor appoints another person to deal with matters so that the General Executor is above commerce, business and banking. This is crucial particularly when you consider another failsafe in their system which considers that “commerce is a sin.” When you send notice of the appointment of a Minister Plenipotentiary you are indeed sending notice of the appointment of the Principal to the Secretary of State, to the office of Secretary of Transportation, to the Secretary of the Treasury, and to the Secretary of Agriculture. Never send it to the man, or woman. Never send a document to a man or woman, just to the office.
It is the office of the Secretaries of State, Treasury, Transportation, and Agriculture that you are sending notice. Now, as a courtesy it can be said that the US Secretary of State and your State Secretary of State receive notice from you. It is entirely up to you. If you have given notice and your Maner Role proves that you have given notice, and you have records of that, and you have given notice as an extract that is perfectly fine. That means that you don’t give them a white copy, you don’t give them a yellow copy, you give them a BLUE COPY of the Notice of Appointment of the Minister Plenipotentiary. The pink copy goes to the various sub-departments and the blue copy goes to the Secretary of State. I have not given a template on this at the moment, as if you have complete your estate material, this step should be well within your competencies.
Now you have given notice that there is a new government of your estate under the Will and Testament. Part of that process includes sending the credentials and I have links on the audio so you can see how simple it is to set this up. These are simply taking extracts of what we have already done in the third part of your estate. Once you have given notice that the Principal, when you refer to the Principal, is the Minister Plenipotentiary of your Estate and the Primary Agent, then you are in a position to now appoint a Power of Attorney. You appoint that to an Agent. The functions and role of the Power of Attorney when you appoint a new agent, is outlined in the example that we give here. In granting this role (see Power of Attorney Appointment example) and in granting the fact that there is a new Principal, all durable and irrevocable powers of attorney (the have in the system) are null and void.
You see, when a beneficial interest is created by the Principal, he or she cannot change it. But, when the General Executor who is the sovereign (of the Estate) is the one whom appoints a Principal through the Appointment of the Minister Plenipotentiary and therefore has the absolute power to revoke and nullifies all previous actions of previous Ministers Plenipotentiary, then all irrevocable and durable powers of attorney are null and void. It all starts again. One of the key things in regard to the appointment of power of attorney is that it is done by Affidavit. There is an example of a very simple affidavit. I leave that up to you because in certain jurisdictions the way that you design the affidavit will be different. But, what the power of attorney affidavit does is that it shows the terms of the appointment as Facts, it shows the acknowledgement of an oath being given in the process, it shows the acknowledgement that it is a true affidavit and it shows separately to that an affidavit of the acceptance of the power of attorney.
Once you have done this, once you have given notice of the appointment of the Minister Plenipotentiary as the new Principal of the Estate, and once you have then prepared an affidavit in regards to any of the matters that are before you in the appointment of Power of Attorney and then revoking through that any previous, existing powers of attorney and any attorney appointed by the court, then that Agent holding those powers of Attorney then has the powers by their system to demand an accounting, to settle the matter, to clear the record and to close the matter. As to how they conduct themselves in regards to these matters, we will deal with that in the second part of Agent next week, of how the Agent clears up the matters.
Let’s summarize from this audio exactly what we have now accomplished and exactly where we are. We now realize that the role of the Agent is front and center. We know their system is commercial. We see that the role of the Agent is key and we realize now what the Principal is in terms of the government or the central bank. We realize from the work we did last week that we are that point in our own records to establish that. We see how important our master records are as Maner Roles (Manor Rolls) as the master accounts. We see that we need to give notice so that there can be no dispute that the Estate has appointed a new government and has appointed a new Minister Plenipotentiary. We are then in position to appoint a power of attorney and revoke any claimed durable or irrevocable powers (the system claims). At that point we are then able to have that role of Agent deal with settling matters and resolving disputes.
Mark my words you will be tested by their system. As many of you may find and as you see their system as criminal as it has become, and sadly they will try everything they can to put you in dishonor, to obfuscate, delay and defer. It is why we will be addressing in part 2 next week, the conduct of the duly appointed and authorized agent with proper Powers of Attorney "smoking out" these impostor agents and false powers which they refuse to dissolve, including how to remain always in honor when pursuing key questions for the estate and what to do when faced with the typical silence, dishonor, trickery and deception of pirates of the private bar guilds.
Thank you for listening and thank you for all of those of you who continue to support Ucadia and help. Without your help, this research and educational work provided without cost could not continue. So, thank all of you who genuinely care about seeing proper rule of law and justice restored in supporting the work of Ucadia.
