Wednesday, May 29, 2013

The Spiritual Blockage on the path to Awakening. Why we must address the endemic addiction to negative energy.

_________________________________________________________________________________
Please download MP3 Audio Broadcast of this Blog > here   (60 min 20.7 Mb)
_________________________________________________________________________________

If you have been listening to the audios and reading the blogs in the last few weeks and in particular last week, then you are aware that we have been on this path of trying to provide some tangible proof and evidence as to what the existing system of the private BAR guilds actually know.  We have also been trying to establish what level of information they don’t know and whether or not the problems that you, I and anyone who deals with the legal system faces are questions of miscommunication or malevolence or incompetence, or parts of all three.

Last week we gave the topic of the pirate hand in the cookie jar.  What I tried to express as a key revelation is that the creation of the case number whenever you go to court is proof that a legal person was created without your permission.  If you are new to these audios and you don’t know exactly what a legal person, then go to www.one-heaven.org and do some background reading first.  Otherwise some of the things I say tonight you may think you know and you don’t exactly know.  When we speak of the legal person we are speaking of the lowest form of person otherwise known as the third person. This is explained under Article 17 of Positive Law, person, where we explain the origin, history, components of person and who established it, how it works and why.   

If you are new to this, we have defined person and explained person in many, many of these audios.  Please go listen to those audios and read the definition of person at Article 17 of Positive Law and www.one-heaven.org.  We have many legal persons; when we grow up in a modern society we have a legal person in the form of what is created with our Birth Certificate, when we have health services or Social Security benefits such as Medicare in Australia or Social Security in the United States or NHS in the United Kingdom.  When we get a driver’s license we have a legal person formed in the creation of that license. 

What makes the court case different as we explained last week is that unlike the arguments around the Birth Certificate, which is consent by the parents, or Social Security, Tax Numbers, and Driver’s License which are done with our consent, the creation of the court case is really without our consent and on the presumption of our consent?   So, the legal person created using the court case number is done without our permission.  If we don’t object it is presumed that we consented to its creation.   We went through last week and explained the commercial elements of it and we explained why they do this and the absolute fraud of what they are doing.  They are allowing a judge or magistrate to have an interest in the matter and still hear the matter with unclean hands which is an absolute deliberate fraud and injury against the law.  They know that it is an injury and they know it is a fraud.  This is why judges and magistrates refuse to yield.

Once a judge or magistrate take on a case and accept the ‘business’ of that case, they are not going to yield to you one single inch because of what they are doing.  Despite making it clear, despite making it crystal clear, the only feedback I received was from two people writing on the blog last week, who misread and misheard what I clearly and forensically said.  They picked up on one minor part of the information and ignored the crucial piece of information that I have just shared with you, and instead misinterpreted the information. 

The point I made is a series of questions you must act yourself before you move and write an affidavit someone wrote that I was implying or saying that affidavits should contain questions.  I have never said that.  In the times that I have explained affidavit over and over again on these audios I have made it plain that affidavits are a form of fact, testimony and because they are sworn testimony they are extremely potent and powerful evidence which is why one produces sworn testimony in the form of affidavit proving that you are the in propria persona, the natural person and not the legal person.  A judge and a magistrate will worm and squirm and refuse to accept that affidavit on the record. Why?  Because you are asking them to prove that they have committed fraud because of the fact they created the case number as a legal person without your consent. 

I’m not upset; people misread and mishear things all the time.  I do.  The fact that we mishear and misconstrue is a function of modern life.  I had another example that happened this week.  This happens with someone that I have an enormous respect for.  This individual shared with me an audio in regards to people in the United States speaking in a very compelling way, that for all the complexity we have talked about in the formation of your estate and the completion of your Will and Testament, the appointment of your agent and crossing all your ‘t’s and dotting all your ‘i’s that if one knows their scripture, one really needs to go to court and stand as a living man or living women.  One would not accept the injury and would defend the trespass and action against your property.

In essence the audio was saying that a man is able to defend any injury against their property without getting into any of the apparent complexities of what we have said.  Now, as I say it’s a very compelling argument and it sounds brilliant.  It’s one that has been around for some years.  Five years ago, I even raised this issue well before the completion of positive law.  But at the time I did not appreciate that in the foundation of western law and the origin of Blackstone, Lord Coke, and the maximums that are the foundation of western Roman law and the foundation of the private BAR guilds, that the only entity that can control or claim property is a person.  A man, by definition cannot own or control property.  A man, by scripture is disenfranchised by the very definition of original sin.   To misread that in scripture and to misconstrue that in law is proof that whoever makes those comments is a complete and utter idiot, at best, or at worst, an agent.

I know my language is strong, but when we have gone through and read texts of their system and extracted the essence of their texts and made clear the fundamentals of their system, then for people to come through and mix apples and oranges, lemons and pears, and say they have the magic salad and then click your heels and off you go.  At best we are making it easy for the system to prove that we have no bloody idea whatsoever how it works.  Why then, do these people say there are examples and this man and that woman have done it and it worked?  Do you how many times I can call up audios over the last ten, fifteen, and twenty years from gurus and people around the world that started their movement down that road only to find that hundreds and hundreds of people were duped and tricked?   They did it with liens, and the Tim Turner movement, and with courtesy notices on the false OPPT movement.  There is an endless Congo line of false promises, false gurus, paid agents of the pirates who play on people’s gullibility to be entertained and their unwillingness to do hard work.  This belief is that somehow if we click our heels we will be ‘back in Kansas.’  Why?

We say to ourselves surely it cannot be that complex.  What have we been doing?   Why have we been doing what we have been doing?  We covered this last week.  What we have been trying to do is establish clearly, forensically and systematically the unwillingness of the present system to follow its own rules and laws.  It is the unwillingness of the system to be able to dispense fair justice and it is either: a. a general incompetence in their own rules and procedures as some suggest or b. that we have missed and overlooked something and we are miscommunicating, or c. a willing, tacit conspiracy where people willingly and knowingly are participating in organized crime and corruption.   They are getting away with it because no one has been able to effectively prove such corruption by closing off every possible argument and bore they could use to claim that we are the ones at fault, that we are the ones that are incompetent, that we are the ones that have misconstrued the matter.

This is why we have gone to the effort to read the law, going back to their foundation and of perfecting our claim.  I don’t want to be spending all my time doing paperwork.  I don’t want to be spending everyday designing crests, studying books 300, 400, 500, 600, 700 old, all the statutes, all the codes, all the maxims, all the procedures, rules and cases.  Why would I want to study tens of thousands of pages?  Why?  Because, I wanted to answer this once and for all.  Too many people have gone to prison on false promises.  Too many people have been caught up and trapped.  We are not dealing with rocket scientists.  I wanted to know the answers and you deserve to know the answers and someone needed to make the answers clear in order to end this matter once and for all.  That is why we have explained estate, trusts, agents, persons, legal persons, case numbers and all these elements so that it is clear. 

When you go to court the judge is an independent contractor.  The magistrate is an independent contractor with unclean hands, having an interest in the matter before you.  He or she has a stake and they are making money off that case.  That is corruption and breaking all the most fundamental maxims of property and conveyance and law since law began.  It cannot be more corrupt than that.  It cannot be more malevolent and incompetent than that.  But to prove that means that you need to have a claim of custodianship and management before you can claim any sort of injury against using your property without permission.  Why?  The only way they get away with what they are doing is that they are claiming that we are incompetent, lazy, stupid and you know what?  When we listen to false gurus and get knocked off the track easily and mix oranges, apples and lemons and all that confusion, we prove time and time again to be right when we won’t stand up, when we won’t read or do the effort.

When we won’t do those things we prove over and over again.  You know what we are saying to them?  "Go right ahead on the presumption that you can get away with it because we are stupid and lazy.  Congratulations, you found our Achilles’ heel".  Because even though I have explained this, and many people have explained and shown this, the number of people that are prepared to do this are very, very few.  The excuse sometimes people say is that "I shouldn’t have to prove that they are corrupt.  I shouldn’t have to prove you are organized crime.  You should do the right thing".  I am sorry but history is full of people not doing the right thing. History is full of it.  Should they do the right thing?  Yes.  Should they follow their own rules?  Yes. 

If we were dealing with a system that was following its own rules, I would tip my hat to those people who are gurus and say, “go right ahead because you will find there is some remedy because these people will follow their own rules.  They will take and understand what you intention is and they will at least try their best.”  We are not dealing with that.  We are dealing with people who knowingly and willingly are committing fraud and getting away with it.  It is not going to take a lot, but just a few people to read and be competent, a few people to listen. 

To name a thing for what it truly is...

Last week I promised we would go into the details of affidavits and we would go through the practical steps of how we take the knowledge of the legal person created without our permission and how we use it.  In light of the feedback I have received and in light of the construing, misnaming and misplacing I will delay that by a week.  Instead I will talk about a subject we have not fully brought to the surface.  We have discussed it in the past and we have not fully named it for what it is.  In the time that remains we will talk about The Spiritual Blockage on the path to Awakening.  Why  we must address the endemic addiction to negative energy.

What am I talking about?  I am talking about the fact that when we talk of the mind virus that all of us must deal with, the mind virus that has converted our courts into organized criminal cartels and converted our public services into a system of treating the public as enemies, has converted our politicians into openly stealing from the public.  We are not just dealing with a lack of education; we are not just dealing with a malevolent intent in the minds of those people.  We are dealing also with a spiritual dimension, a dimension that we need to name to see it for what it is.

We are calling this a spiritual blockage and it is truly a negative energy.  Let me begin for those who may be new to this and preface a few things before I get the meat of this topic tonight.  It’s not a long topic, and there are just a few elements to cover.  But, nonetheless it is an important concept to get our heads around.  If you read the Covenant of One Heaven on the website www.one-heaven.org you will see a document that goes through and speaks of the aspirations of a world where we end concepts that enslave use and curse us.  When we speak of a place called ‘hell’ we may have hoped and trusted in the past through some divine judgment those that slighted us and those that committed heinous acts were somehow punished and there was somehow some great spiritual justice that balanced the books.

The power of the mind and intention

But, if you believe in aspects of a spiritual world where there is a place of great condemnation and damnation, then this is not a resolution.  It may appear to be a justice, but it is certainly not a balance.   If you believe in ‘hell’ as I have said before then you have believed and still believe that there is war in heaven.  What the covenant said is that until you end concepts of war, damnation, pain and suffering spiritually, you cannot end the madness on this planet.  You cannot end the concepts of manifesting murder, rape and torture that we see time and time again not only on our television, but the horrific act of two men in broad daylight being filmed hacking a soldier to death in London and in the repercussions of that.  It’s also in the video games.  It’s the DVD’s that our children watch as entertainment where people are dismembered.  This is supposed to be entertainment and it’s on TV. 

If you do not end the concepts we cannot address the concepts we see.   It feeds on itself and it’s a vicious circle.  To those that have controlled us the fear of death and eternal damnation have been some of their most powerful weapons of control for millennia.  If you want to change the world, end the world of slavery, stop being a slave, then you need to stop being a slave to your fear, stop being a slave to those things that stop you from reading, stop you from seeing and it begins with addressing these concepts.  That is what the Covenant of One Heaven does.

Some people may not agree with this and some people may see it as overreaching.   Some people may not understand it.  I recognize that we are all at different levels.  But, I just mention that as part of this preface.   Another thing I want to mention is the historic realization that the most ancient and respected priests, prophets, viziers, wizards of times past, such as the history of the Celts and the high priests known as the Cuilliaéan  the foundation stones of the spirit and the divine messengers, the Cuilliaéan who were later called the Druids, believed that not only was life a dream but that every thought had a consequence.  Every word uttered had a repercussion.  While actions would reverberate in this dimension, what we manifest in our minds has a profound implication on what we manifest in this world because of the dreamlike nature of existence.

Oddly enough even though science refuses to recognize the unity of body, mind and spirit, and prefers to separate and deny the existence of God, but by default the existence of the concept of God even to argue that.  When they speak of the chaos theory of the butterfly flapping its wings causing a tornado somewhere else in the world, they are already identifying the same concepts that were expressed to us thousands of years ago and that is everything is connected.  Everything is connected.  

The manifest effect of negative intention and action

This is my next and second last point of preface of the topic of spiritual blockage and what is it?   without getting into the argument of devil, Satan, Lucifer and all these words and evocative, provocative, and historically laden terms, if you take the modern New Age concept of people that can go places and sense things and feel things then there is a long-standing belief and certainly animals are extremely sensitive to this, that wherever there has been tremendous pain, suffering and torture it leaves a mark and leaves a stain that is not easily erased.

When we speak of a mark and of a stain are we talking purely in terms of the energy as a spiritual energy or are we talking of a physical energy.  Or, are we talking of something that breaches both worlds, almost creating an energy portal if you like.  It’s creating a doorway between those two aspects of the dream.  Abattoirs (slaughterhouse) are famous for this kind of energy where animals refuse to go near old abattoirs.  People have been able to sense sites of mass murder and brutal murders.  Is it because people know what it is, what it looks like, or is there something there?

I would suggest, skeptics aside, that the vast majority of people would say, unknowing that a place was the site of a terrible tragedy, but it has a certain sense about it.  Without trying to rationalize what there is, there is recognition that places hold and retain energy. Once something like this has occurred the after effects can linger on, sometimes hundreds of years, if not decades after the effect. 

The handprints of negative mind that is neither in body or pure spirit

My last preface is this:  we say in the Covenant and make it clear that over time there have been influences over the history of the world.  Those influences from a spiritual or mind point of view can be identified in the imagery of beings in the forms of archangels or arch demons; that is prevalent in the cultural history of virtually every culture in the world.  What we are saying and what we are saying heralded the significance of 2012 and now moving into 2013 are the treaties and peace between those levels of energy. 

This begs the question then of why is there still blockage?  Why is Congress in the United States getting worse?  Why is the Senate getting worse?   Why is the White House falling apart and why is it that people are not waking up and reading?  Why is it that no matter what we say and for the first time in two and a half thousand years I revealed the history of the true tree of life and the true Kabbalah in Egypt.   It’s a physical energy structure of centers of worship overlaying Thebes, Karnak, the Valley of the Kings, and the full structure.  There was information about Dendara, the Island of Yeb, Elephantine Island which was revealed last week and there was not one single peep. 

What is this cloak that is blocking people that they cannot distinguish the significance of this?   Am I over reaching and expecting too much?  Or is there something happening that we finally need to name just as we drain the swamp when we deal with the pirates, do we need to name things in this cross over between energies?  Let’s look at all those elements and try to make sense of our world.  There are some people that say watching porn does no harm.  There are lots of people that say watching horror movies and movies of serial killers in no way can be viewed as the same thing as going out and doing it.   They are totally different things, even though the body will produce the same signs, effects, adrenaline as people participating while the mind absorbs and memorizes it. It has the same effects when they have measured sociopaths and the people that actually committed the crimes that the mimicking in terms of mind memory and physical body emotions between people who watch and people who do have been measured as virtually identical. 

There is an endless Congo-line of psychologists, surprise, surprise, who are more than willing to testify that in no way can you regard graphic, high definition horror movies any way to the acts of murdering, raping, and torturing.  The industry that makes money off these things is most grateful to those “experts.”  If they didn’t they affect what is 80 to 90% of all their high-definition video games.  We don’t just shoot someone now; you see their brains scatter, their arms come off, the tendons or better still you have a sword and when you ‘cut’ people you see the internal organs, the bones, the sinew and the controls move and there are real sounds to these events. 

The graphics are so interactive that when you go and play these games where you are killing people, you are killing people in these games.  The same “experts” that make their money from these people still claim to be “independent.”  This is another example of people with unclean hands who say, “Oh no, this high-definition is in no-way producing any negative effect in our young.”  Horseshit.   Bullshit.  Sorry for swearing but that is complete and utter crap.   The mind is affected whether you have gone out and killed someone with a sword or whether you have played a high-definition game. Not only has your mind been imprinted with that, but you have manifested energy around you and you have created a portal.  It is no different than the energy that is around actual places of mass murders.  It is no different to the negative energy that we see seeping throughout the world.

If this is true there will be some people who listen to this broadcast and say, “this guy is nuts.”  There is no evidence.  I feel comfortable and I believe the “experts.”  Deny, deny, deny.  But if you have any respect for the oldest knowledge behind the Tree of Life, behind the wisdom, if Life is a Dream and if you accept that, then by reason and logic you have to accept that every thought then is real and the action is the illusion.  If your thought in playing a game and murdering people has no effect in a dream, you are have rocks in your brain.  You are really kidding yourself or something is influencing you for you not to see how stupid and contradictory your thought process has become.  In fact that is what we are trying to look and identify this spiritual blockage.  Why can’t you see and why can’t we see those things that are misdirecting and blocking us to where we say, no, no we don’t have a problem?

When we watch the series about gladiators carving each other up or people killing each other, in years gone past, the number of people that actually did it and participated in it were very, very small relative to the rest of the population.  if you look at the number of people alive today, now well over 7 billion, and you look at the prevalence of hard-core porn simulating rape and deprivation and you look at hard-core video games and you look at graphic news, then I would suggest to you that there would be few people on the planet today that have not witnessed at least a few dozen people physically murdered, hacked to death, sodomized and brutally raped.  This is now the common menu of entertainment in households throughout the world.  Add to that the music that worships negativity, brutality and destruction and depravity as well.

If the Druids and the Cuilliaéan were right that physical action of negative intent produce a low-level uncarnated negative energy and that negative energy becomes a portal for other  things, then it could be argued the world has never been more immersed in this low-level negative energy that cloaks, chokes and hugs all of us like the cold.  It chokes our homes. It chokes our neighborhoods.  It chokes our Senates and Congresses, Parliaments, and courts.  It is around us all, this low-level negative energy that festers and ferments.

Is it its own intelligence?  No, I said that it is an energy that is produced and is something that exists in the physical and the spiritual and is a cross-point, a portal.  It affects around and it’s like a fog.  But, add to the mix a consciousness that can utilize and manipulate that.  And then you have a very real problem this is a problem that has not been expressed and it’s a problem we have not dealt with in the past.

Are negative minds as ghosts really harmless after all?

I don’t refer to demons.  They want to be known as that and they demand to be known as that and they get kicks when people misname them.  I am referring to ghosts.  The manifestation in the physical form of a spirit of a deceased person or animal capable of being seen by one or more living persons or felt by one or more living person, a mind that has refused a transition back into the collective truth is a ghost.  Now, if you have a look at www.one-heaven.org under ecclesiastical law under 2.2 supernatural entity you will see Article 40 in reference to ghosts, or "jinn" as some cultures call them.  We will go through some of these canons.

There is another point.  People are naturally skeptical and say that they watch ghost entertainment but really don’t believe in ghosts, or some will say they think there are ghosts but they really can’t do anything.  What?  They can’t do anything because people told you they can’t do anything?  Is it something that you read?  How can you be so sure that ghosts can do nothing or that they are benign?  If someone is a ghost why will they follow a rule book?  Is there a rule book for ghosts?  Hollywood has done this and being the great propaganda arm has produced several films where it lists ghosts as having some kind of ‘rulebook.’  On the one hand you are deprived of the transition into a greater collective awareness and on the other hand you are going to a base rule book. 

As absurd as it is people accept that. Some people say, “hold on a second, why can’t there be negative awareness, like unholy?  Why can’t there be an awareness that is malevolent that influences us?”  I’ll explain it this way, quite simply.  If one is part of the part of the collective dream and yet one hates the dream, then one in that thought is conscientiousness separating itself from the collective which is a point of isolation.  This is why many of the enlightened philosophers have said that the real “hell” when we reach the point of spirituality is isolation in our own madness and hatred.  I would agree with unresolved madness and hatred. 

When we are in a point of spirit, when we isolate ourselves, we weaken ourselves and then we are at our weakest point.  So that contradicts the argument that when someone has transitioned they can also maintain a powerful effectiveness in being malevolent.  So really it eliminates that argument and it means that if we are dealing with a malevolent force, a force that hates life and a force that is influencing the living in a negative way, whispering, “Add fluoride to the water, poison the people, don’t do this…”  It’s a force that contradicts logic and it’s a force that we have been seeing in the actions of the politicians and courts seems totally and utterly insane, where people poison themselves, their children and everybody else.  Are these not signs of a force that is not working from the position of being alive, but being of the position of being the ‘undead.’ 

Are we not now getting closer to naming what is happening around this blockage that we are dealing with ghosts, that we are dealing ghosts that are harnessing and feeding off and needing this fog of negative energy and portal in order to expand and extend their influence all the while that they are remaining in this ‘two-world’ between world states.
I know people will listen to this and ask, “What was he talking about?  Ghosts are features of homes and they are benign and if you go look at Hollywood they are always there helping people like Casper the friendly ghost.   They come in and they frighten people and that is the extent of it.” 

Greys, ghosts and negative energy - is this the real matrix of control?

What if that is not the extent of it?  What if the manifestation of a complete and utter insanity world where our politicians now absolutely bat-shit crazy?  I tell you they are the most insane bunch of morons we have ever seen in their insane approach.  How can anyone be that insane?  We are not just dealing with stupid people; we are dealing with an energy that is harnessing and promoting that stupidity and wants that stupidity.  It’s an energy that hates the world and doesn’t want the world to wake up.  It’s fighting its last battle tooth and nail.  It will not transition and it doesn’t believe there is redemption and it doesn’t believe that there is a healing.  It is trying its absolute best to stop the collective awakening of the world.  It is at a grass roots level around hospitals and schools, around courts and homes and the young in the first world countries that absolutely worship death and destruction and take drugs. 

Maybe the spiritual blockage that is still holding this world to ransom is a combination of this lack of accountability for producing this incarnated, negative energy and those few ghosts that are using and harnessing that to extend their power and deem themselves as ghosts.  If we don’t take account for our own spirit, certainly if we don’t take account for our own lives we aren’t going to take account for our own minds and if we don’t take account for our own mind we are definitely not going to take account for our own spirits.   If we don’t take responsibility for ourselves how can we expect the courts to accept that they have over-reached?  How can we expect any resolution if we don’t take personal responsibility?

There is no being ‘half-pregnant’ in being a witness, passive or being a participant in the simulation of negative energy?  I’m sorry this is not entertainment and it has a consequence to it.  If you eat a bag of sugar there is a consequence; if you leave a hot tub running in front of a small infant there is a consequence.  If you refuse to take control of your life and present an argument and show logically that you have claimed your own estate, there is a consequence.  If you take drugs that affect your consciousness, there is a consequence.  If you dream and fixate about hurting and murdering people, there is a consequence.  If you cut people off on the road, there is a consequence.  If you hit someone and hurt them, there is a consequence.  That is life; it isn’t unfair, it’s life. 

The only thing in true revelation that you have ever been given is the divine right of use of your own body, the divinity of your own name and your own existence.  That is the talent given to you by the Divine Creator whether you know it or not.  The rest is not yours to claim, keep, own, or destroy.  The world?  You are a custodian.  You are a custodian with other custodians and it is not yours to claim, to destroy.  If you are still dealing with internal, unresolved issues, and there are still remnants in your character where you sense and feel that you are being hurt and there is a sense of revenge, then there is a portal in you, not just to manifest negative energy if you lived around someone that was murdered or the negative energy of kids watching constant horror movies and playing games of dismembering that the experts falsely tell us have no repercussions in a dream existence, then you leave yourself open.

If you leave yourself open it can be simply this:  don’t read this, don’t listen to that, he has no idea.  Do you think the same energy that has cloaked the world in this negative form, the same energy that wants to be know as ‘the devil,’ Satan, Lucifer which it is not, this ghost energy that is so screwed up in its own attitude manifests these contradictory forms?   It wants power but it hates life?  It wants progress but it hates knowledge.  These are contradictions and these are all signs of a screwed up mind.  Do you think that energy, that consciousness wants this to succeed?  It will try whatever it can; it will be frightened of it, absolutely. When you name something for what it is, it is frightened.  Do you honestly think that it wants us to succeed?  Of course it doesn’t. 

The first words that I expect people to hear when they listen to Ucadia in their minds if they are portals and have any openings in their psyches will be, “Don’t worry about it. There’s a simpler way. There has to be something better than that.  Don’t support it.  What does he know?”  Sure, it could be as simple and ‘benign’ as that.  But seeing as though we are on the subject of ghosts having the possibility of profoundly negative influence, particularly if this low-level non-carnate energy exists as a fog which allows them to move easily and transport themselves on this negative mindset easily to anywhere in the world, they can almost extend their power to simultaneous negative.

There is an antidote.  Some may not like the antidote and it’s very simple.  Don’t play games that simulate the murder and destruction of other people.  If you truly respect life, you wouldn’t do it. You wouldn’t play games that kill people.  That is your choice.  If you choose to still participate and do it, then realize that you cannot claim that you respect life.  You cannot claim that you respect life, because that simulation is a disrespect of life.  It is no different in a spiritual or a dream world whether you go out and do it or you simulate it.  The first thing you do is you stop playing games that simulate the destruction and murder and deprivation of others.  Secondly you definitely don’t participate and watch horror movies that are willingly dismembering and torturing people. 

I know most movies have some ‘blood and guts’ in them.  I’m not saying you cannot watch movies.  I’m not saying that at all.  But that movies that serve no other purpose than to glorify violence, you have to make a choice.  You have to make a choice.   Because it may not be as interactive and dangerous as a video game, but it is certainly being witness to it.  If you are addicted to drugs then you have a major portal and weakness in your character.  Not only are you disrespecting your own body by virtue of that addiction, but you may through that addiction place less value on other people and their property.  That is why there is such a promotion of addiction in our society. You need to think about that and address that.

You need to read, and reflect and above all you need to pray and heal your spirit.  You need to reflect to those things in your life that hurt and bring them to resolution.  And then, you have the power to do something truly remarkable.  You have the power because of what you have done in not promoting the continued creation of this incarnate fog of negative energy and the healing of yourself.  You have the power then to address these negative ghosts that are disrupting and blocking your awakening.  You can emancipate and forgive them.

Because whatever caused them to be ghosts in the first place must have encompassed some terrible sadness. What caused them not to transition into awareness must have been horrific in some form.  To live 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 years or more as a ghost must be a horrendous experience.  And to wantonly and actively disrupt this world must be a terrible feeling to be that sick in consciousness.  You can feel sorry for them, empathize with them.  Feel back in your own lives where you felt angry and sad.  Sometimes you might even know their names such as friends that were murdered, colleagues that died with regrets. 

It’s a grass roots network when we talk about ghosts.  You can forgive them, pray for them, and cry for the terrible tragedies they have gone through.  You can help them release it by saying that I forgive you for all the frustration and negative influence that you have continued.  I let you go, I don’t demand you out of my home, and I let you go.  I help you, I feel the light and I lift your burden.  You can free them.  But until we stop this cycle of manifesting this negative energy in thinking that on one hand we can pretend to be spiritually enlightened beings but on the other hand continue to participate in this creation of this fog, and unless we address this very real element that is deliberately, consciously and willingly blocking us, the world will not change.  None of what we have spoken about will manifest and it will still be in this stasis it is in for however long.

I want to thank you and I know these are challenging subjects and I want to thank all of you who continue to help and support.  I say each week that without your support I could not continue to survive.  Above all I hope you find this useful, and if nothing else as a reflection of where you are yourself.  Next week we will return to the nitty gritty and the practicality.  Hopefully you will keep in your mind these other dimensions that are actively participating and having an effect.  Are you going to help?  Are you going to change?   Are you going to be a participant in the positive or a supporter of the status quo?  You cannot be both.  You cannot be both and that is the lesson tonight.  You are either an active participant for change in the positive or you are a willing supporter of the status quo.  You cannot be both.  Which one are you?  Ask yourself.


Thanks and goodnight.     

Wednesday, May 22, 2013

The pirate hand caught in the cookie jar – Exposing and ending corporate fraud


_________________________________________________________________________________
Please download MP3 Audio Broadcast of this Blog > here   (108 min 24 Mb)
_________________________________________________________________________________


The topic for this blog is "the pirate hand caught in the cookie jar, exposing and ending corporate fraud".  The reason I have chosen this topic is that while I receive feedback from many of you that find the information regarding Ucadia useful and helpful and while we continue to unearth and explain the history, the context and provenance of law, the biggest negative and argument that is shared to me about Ucadia and this material is that it simply doesn’t appear to be working when one is faced in practical terms in going to one of the commercial, private courts, the private  BAR guilds of the pirates.  

They just don’t seem to be following their own laws.  They don’t seem to have any competence regarding law.  They ignore us, they fight tooth and nail and it seems impossible to stop them.  

Tonight we are going to expose and address proof, hard proof, of the pirates getting their hands caught in the proverbial cookie jar, creating charges to be set off against the estate and by committing open fraud.  

Before we get into the topic and into the detail off the topic tonight there are several things to cover first.  The first thing I want to address a promise I have made in the last two weeks in regards to providing information on the Tree of Life.  I have done that and you can see a new article at www.one-evil.org on the home page where you will see a graphic and a link to the Tree of Life.  If you click on the link and follow the details, you will come to an article that reveals knowledge that has been lost in the public mind for more than 2500 years.   So I have delivered on that promise.

The second point I want to make before we get into the detail of this blog and audio is the comment that when I speak about fraud and when I speak using terms like pirates and privateers, when I speak about officials whether it be magistrates or judges, prosecutors, clerks, attorneys, I want to make clear that I am not attacking those that perform such roles personally.  I mean that.  For all the attorneys, judges, magistrates and people that I have met in the legal fraternity above and beyond when taken out of that environment, they are highly intelligent, conscientious, community minded folks that should be regarded and deserve to be regarded as decent.  But transplant them back into this system, this trading, this shark-infested system that is the commercial courts and I do not hold back in my disdain and disgust at the rampant corruption, malfeasance and incompetence of the system.  

The third point that I want to make is that Ucadia and myself have made it abundantly clear in dozens and dozens of articles and audios, that all that we do in discussion of these audios and all that we do in discussion of these blogs is for the restoration of law and not for its emaciation, hijacking, ransom, attack, destruction, threat, or any other false claim.  

In fact I spend a great deal of time preparing and presenting and you can see that on seven separate websites a comprehensive, civil code and a comprehensive criminal code where I took the existing civil and criminal codes of more than 25 different nations and prepared a solution whereby a civil code and criminal code could be effected in operation that did not have to go through the commercialization and the making money off peoples’ injuries, the rampant corruption and fraud that we are talking about tonight. They proved in those two forms and you can see them at www.globe-union.org and www.globe-union-court.org that it is perfectly possible at any point for the existing hierarchy of the BAR association to end their game of corruption, this malfeasance and attack and ransoming of the rule of law, and return our society back to a form of law and justice that people deserve and expect.  

At some point if more become aware of this knowledge I do expect that there will be people in roles of propaganda that will try to falsely claim that what we are about is threatening the safety of society, that somehow we are revealing secrets that put society ‘in danger.’  That is complete and utter rubbish.  That is absurd.  If anything the existing court system has proven itself incapable of protecting society through fair justice.  Why? Because people who are dangerous appear to be let out in society within minutes and people who have only made one mistake in their lives could be crucified and commercialized as assets under now a privatized prison system.  It is broken.  The justice system is broken.  

So the reason I say that and I preface that is that these are the kinds of arguments that people will put to you if you ever get to the point of really finally zeroing in on proving the out and out fraud.  At the end of the day they will throw their hands up and say that you can’t tell people that we are committing fraud and that we are criminals because if you do, you threaten society.  

It is the old, last vestige of the coward which is to cover himself in the flag.   That is precisely what I expect to see by certain commentators.  You can’t tell people about this because you ‘threaten national security.’  Rubbish.  That is crap.  The biggest threat to the safety and security of all these nations is the continued corruption, incompetence and destruction of the law by these people and their failure to administer themselves and reform their system themselves, and by their failure to take personal responsibility.  

They are the ones who are the present and clear danger.  They are the ones who are the real terrorists, not the ones who are willing to learn the law, learn history and stand in honor and peace and accept where they have made mistakes and ask one thing and one thing only:  justice, fair and reasonable justice.  

Hard proof exposing and ending corporate fraud

Well enough of the soapbox.  Let’s now get into explaining what we mean as to the hard proof under the topic: the pirate hand caught in the cookie jar, exposing and ending corporate fraud.  We will start by remembering and reviewing what we outlined last week.  The topic last week in the blog on Tuesday, May 14, 2013, was through the eyes of the pirates, simplifying knowledge of law, court from the perspective of the pirates of the private BAR guild.  What we tried to do last week in the audio and the blog was to simplify what we know is going on and what the essential components are that must be in place within the existing, present day courts as opposed to the vast knowledge, history and discussions of law that we have covered over many, many weeks, months and now years with Ucadia.  

In other words for all that we have spoken about last week we tried to bring it into focus and focus on two key things:  1. that the system relies upon there being a legal person first.  The commercial courts need a legal person before they can proceed.  2.  The charges that are laid are put against that legal person.  These are the two key things that we covered last week when we brought everything back to simple terms.  

I know in one sense that when we have spoken about trusts and estates and more recently about the role of the agent, many have felt that it was a lot of information and when you have shared it, and it may be with people employed in the existing legal system.  You may have mentioned some of this in passing or in documents within your issues with the courts.  

You may have found or heard from people, the unanimous response where lawyers, judges, magistrates, attorneys, clerks all say the same thing:  What are you talking about?  This is all gobbledy good and we have never heard of this they say.  So in a way it calls into a question whether this information no matter how strongly claimed to be the provenance of their system and the very foundation of their system, that kind of constant feedback really has cut away the confidence of many people who are saying it sounds plausible and reasonable.  Yet some also say "I have read Blackstone, the statutes and what you are saying makes perfect sense in their creating temporary trusts, the Cestui Que Vie (CQV) trusts and then creating an estate that they then trade against and put bonds against and then monetizes the bonds.  It makes sense then that they derive the value and trying to charge those estates.  This is all part and parcel of trying to make sense of the relationship of the treasuries of today, the accounts of today and the making of money of the courts".  

But the feedback for the people who are in the industry seem to be at odds with what we say.  Tonight we will prove that not only is the information we have said is absolutely accurate, but we will be able to prove that one of the reasons there has been trouble is the absolute incompetence of people and the way that they are trained in law now, but also the fact that they are committing out and fraud in many locations.  

If you are ever able to expose it clearly and simply, then they are in a mountain of trouble.  One of the things that we shared last week as a way of exposing the truth that the courts are indeed corporate businesses, for-profit businesses, and that the states, counties and the nations that claim to be estates or states, are really now taken over by corporations for profit and that the true (de jure) nation, state, or county are now hidden by these corporations that are usurping such rules, rights and constitutions.  

One of the ways that we explained that anomaly was back to the simple two concepts I said earlier about the need for their system to have first a legal person and secondly the charges that are laid against the legal person.  This is versus the tradition both in the United States and Commonwealth Countries, as well as European Countries that before a charge can be leveled against an estate there must be evidence and grounds for that charge to be valid before you even step out and contest whether the charge needs to be paid or not.   

What we covered is that corporations do not have the power to issue true bills nor writs.  Corporations can certainly mimic and pretend to be the United States in all aspects except in the issuance of true bills and writs.   Corporations can pretend to be countries like Australia or Canada or United Kingdom until they are required to issue a writ.   Their powers do not extend to the ability of issuing writs or in the case of the United States, a true bill.   What I am talking about is the original form of how a case was to be made.  If you go back to the original constitution and the federalist Papers and the foundation of the United States the sole purpose of the grand jury is to investigate the bill.  Is there a true bill? 

If there is not a true bill, the grand jury is not permitted to allow the case to pursue.  So what the corporations have done is that they have removed that knowledge from history so that people don’t know it and instead of a bill they issue an invoice and instead of a writ they issue an order.   Both of those, the invoice and the order do not have the requisite powers of an edict under the state and instead they are commercial offers that really have little teeth except by forcing us into dishonor and thus conveying them into accepted bills of exchange.  In other words the way system gets away with this is by tricking, enticing and convincing us to stand there and say, I won’t pay; I refuse to pay. 

They want us to be the ones who commit the dishonor because it gets them off the hook.  That is why they spend so much time and so money and effort grooming people in the truth movement and elsewhere and feeding them, stuffing them full of false information.  They hope they go out there and become famous gurus and send a whole lot more people to prison (who have listened to these gurus).  You know what?  They have done a mightily good job.   You will see even day the disinformation agents with the information we talk about today are hard at work serving their masters, the privates, the privateers, the heads of organized crime.  

How do we know of and what is the fraud that we speak of?  In order for a charge to be laid there need to be a legal person.  Indeed for corporations to generate income there needs to be legal persons in place.  This is part of their franchise with the higher estate.  When the corporations took over from the estate and inserted themselves into positions whether it is through transport, or through the Treasury or Social Security, government or the executive, the fulfillment of that role was under the guise of that all-encompassing word, Welfare or Health.  Welfare of the poor, or health of the poor.  

That is what they claimed that they could do better and those are the primary terms of their franchise.   So, for a corporation to have jurisdiction, it must create a legal person that is a subsidiary to itself.  If you live in Australia, United Kingdom, or any modern economy, by the time you are an adult, you will have participated in, agreed and consented to the creation of at least one or more legal persons.   

I am not talking about the Birth Certificate (BC).  For the topic tonight the BC is totally irrelevant.  I am not really even talking about estates or any of that.  I am talking about the simple commercial establishment of a legal person with unlimited liability for which the corporate entity can claim jurisdiction and can basically add charges.  Now the first thing is when they start work that people are part of or join up to some common health or national welfare scheme.  

In America we have the social security system and in Australia we have Medicare and in England there is the NHS system and many systems like this around the world.  When you join that and sign your name and give consent not only is an unlimited liability person created in the same name as a subsidiary, sole trader under that corporation but that legal person is publicly listed and is able to be found publicly.  

Let’s repeat that again as a key point.  When a valid legal person is created within the franchised rules, within the policies of a corporation masquerading as an estate, whether it be a county, state, country or department, a sole trader legal person of unlimited liability is created and there must be, has to be consent for this because of the unlimited liability factor.  

Without consent it cannot be argued and it must be publicly listed. In the case of social security if you know the number you can go and find the social security; in the case of drivers’ licenses when you know the numbers you can check drivers’ licenses.  In the case of a tax relationship the legal person for tax purposes you can go and search for that legal person.  They have a number, a unique identity, they are clearly subsidiaries and they are on public registries.   

The system must have a legal person to lay charges

When we say the system must have a legal person in order to lay charges and there is more than one legal person that the separate corporations create we can go and prove that by showing in the public that there is more than one public register publicly available where you can go and find those legal persons created in your name by these corporations.   Now, why isn’t there simply one legal person created to cover all the corporations?  The answer is that in many jurisdictions and many places like the United States, counties, indeed states and even the DMV, the Treasury departments all function as separately competing businesses.   They may appear to be within a structure and they may claim to be part of a hierarchy living up to the Constitution of the United States.  In reality they are wholly separate trading corporations that therefore must create their own legal persons in order to add charges and trade.

Why can’t a corporation simply take control of a person?   That would be trafficking in persons and in 1948 the United Nations insured that corporations did not do that. We all think it is the trafficking of flesh.  If you go to court and indeed if you talk to your relatives, everyone you talk to mostly will make the same imaging mistake and when you say person they think body, flesh, you.  

You are not the drivers’ license; that is a piece of plastic, or a piece of paper. But, we are being so thoroughly trained that we all think that of person as ‘you’, you are the person.  No, person is a fictional identity and you are not the person, the straw person.  Even judges and magistrates made that mistake.   The system is very, very clear.  Under the rules of the United Nations and the conventions around the world they are forbidden to trade in persons.  They can buy and sell the claims, debt, or course you can.  That is what money is.  That is what loans are, what mortgage and collateral debt objects are.   You can go and buy and sell claims and debt, but you cannot trade persons.  

If a person wants to buy a debt against your name or create a debt against your name, they need to create a legal person.  How does this work?  How does it work in practice when we go to court?  We have said that the most obvious example of legal persons, because they have to be unlimited liability and they have to be in their system in the public and they have to be searchable.  Why do they have to be in the public?  When we talk about organized crime in commercializing sin and making money from us, they are transferring from the private to the public.  If they are going to create instruments of securities then the laws established in regards to securities demand that such trade happens in the public and not in the private, in the daylight and not in the dark.   

Why is this vital?  It is vital because by doing in the public, they are forced to give public notice.  If we fail to act then that is an essential element to their system of plausible deniability.  The legal person was created in the public, you did not object, you did not counter the claim, therefore you agreed.  

Performing this in public is necessary by their higher laws; it is necessary to validate the monetization and creation of securities.   That is what they are doing when they create bonds against cases.  That is what they are doing when these private commercial outfits are creating more and more prisons and more people in them.  It’s business.  What do you think a charge is?  A charge is a commercial word.  A charge is a claim no different than to a claim in probate.  In fact a claim in probate is dealing directly with the estate and a charge in their system is an as-yet unverified claim that later if validated can then be offset against the huge amounts of money that are put against accounts in our names as the golden handcuffs to keep the entire system running.

Where is the creation of the unlimited liability legal person without our consent?
This is the monetization of the bonds created against our Birth Certificates, the bonds against our marriages, the bonds that become functional against our work.  This system is why the existing system of the banks has continued for so long; it’s the golden handcuffs and the giant, immense cookie jar.   

So if there is proof of legal persons and there is proof that it needs our consent whether it be the social security that we have signed, whether it be tax returns we have signed, or the drivers license we sign, where is the example of a legal person being created where we did not give consent through tacit and clear approval.  Where is the creation of the unlimited liability legal person where we did not give consent?  

Think about what happens when you go to court, when you are summonsed to go to court, when you are arrested?  Someone puts charges against you in going to court, so there must be a legal person and it cannot be the same legal person as social security, cannot be the same legal person with your drivers’ license.  The claim may originate from those corporations but when you go to the court it is members of the guild, a commercial outfit, and organized crime outfit that is performing the actions.

What is the legal person that they create?  Remember it must be in plain sight and it must be clear.  The fact that it is in plain sight and the fact that it is clear, is part of the plausible deniability, part of the public notice to you.  What do you think the proof is that a new unique legal person was created this time without your consent?   They have neither grounds nor argument they can use to argue for it.  You can prove that a corporation has stolen property and a corporation has committed fraud, clearly on both counts.  

Where do you think you can find the legal person in plain sight with these private courts?   Well, what is the key number when you have social security?  It’s called a social security number, right?  That social security number allows you to distinguish from Frank O’Collins from Social Security versus Frank O’Collins from a driver’s license.  They sound the same but they are really two different legal persons.   

In the case of a court case we have been saying the word all along.  Is it not the case number?  Do they not create a unique case number once you go to court for the first time and they attach your name to it?  They may have other bits to it but your name is attached to that unique number; that is the legal person.  That commercial outfit that private BAR guild court, that business for making money has created a legal person and this time they have done it without your consent.   How do they get away with that?  They get away with it several ways.  

Each of the ways as arguments can be easily defeated and proven as invalid.  The first and simplest argument they use is that you front up and don’t contest the legal person.  Now I know that we have said that we put an affidavit in and we will come back to affidavits before we end the broadcast and the power of the affidavit.  

You may go there and say, I am here in propria persona.  That is not the issue. Have you ever heard of anyone challenging the case number of the file, the case number of the case?  No, probably not.  If you are not challenging the creation of that case number, do you realize that case numbers did not exist against matters before the courts 100 years ago?  They didn’t exist.  There were not any case numbers.  Why?  Because they weren’t creating legal persons.   

Why weren’t they creating legal persons 100 years ago?

Why weren’t they creating legal persons?  Because corporations weren’t running the courts then.  They were the estates.  Private, for-profit businesses and corruption of the law was not in place 100 years ago.  If you track the origin of case numbers, you see the birth of organized crime taking control of our courts. It is absolutely the pirates taking total control and throwing out any last vestige of justice and replacing it with the appearance of justice within the tolerance of the court of public opinion.   So, the first and obvious way they get past it is by our not challenging the case number. Therefore when we argue in propria persona and we don’t pick the issue up about the legal person as the court case number.  Then we prove ourselves incompetent.  

Incompetence is the second and the biggest issue:  incompetence.  We mix metaphors and terms.  We come into the court and run off our mouths and say we are the executor or this or that, or you are a fraud, or we attack them, or we are arrogant as so many people have promoted or we are just believing some guru and filling paper in blindly and we read off some instructed words that the gurus promise and tell us.  We absolutely slam duck and make it an easy system to process us because we show ourselves to be incompetent.  That is really the biggest and most desperate thing the BAR is continuing to try to promote with people.   They do this by selling out disinformation and promoting through agents and people who desperately want to be known as being famous.   

Incompetence is essential.  Why?  That is one of the key arguments of why they can get away with creating the legal person.  Think about the creation of legal person when someone is diagnosed with mental illness or incapacitated.  That is in one sense the origin of the concept of the wards.  This is the use of wards and the use of council commissioners in charge of the poor for their welfare.  The assumption and what they did in the 19th century is that they made a connection between mental health and criminality and if you are insane you are a criminal.  If you are poor they made that connection by the start of the 20th century.  If you are poor then of course you are a criminal because you are insane.  Who wants to be poor?  You have to be insane to be poor.  

To the corporations and to the nihilists that run them it is an obvious slur against such organizations such as priests and mendicants and others who do not worship the golden calf of money. So what they need to prove if someone does not consent is that you are mentally unwell, unbalanced or insane.  That is why they fall on the review; that is why we need a mental assessment.  They need it to update the diagnosis and that is why they are introducing a new manual of diagnosis for their friends in psychology to back them up.  

If you question anything you are insane

The argument now is that if you question anything you are mentally insane.  I assure you that will be the new manual of psychology.  If you question anything you have a mental illness.  Only when you accept everything without question are you deemed to be ‘normal.’  That is the insanity of the system and they believe they will get away with it. 
Of course they won’t, but they believe they will get away with it.   So the risk that anyone faces when they are lazy, stupid, angry, hateful, vengeful, disrespectful, confused, when they go anywhere near the courts,  their actions are used to create the validity of what they have done in the creation of a legal person without our consent.  If we are incapacitated their ability to create it is assured.  

The last reason and the last way that the commercial BAR organizations create these persons in the form of a case number and your name as proof of the person being created without your consent is in the transference of a right or a privilege across to you by the cancellation of a number or part of a service by another entity.  Here is an example:  in the United States I know of a fellow who was driving through one state, a state that he had never lived in and that was Washington State.  He was driving through Washington State and this fellow does not have a drivers’ license at the moment.  

I am not advocating that people do not have a drivers’ license or do have a drivers’ license.  To me that debate at this point is irrelevant.   The point is that he was stopped because he was speeding and he did not and still does not have a valid drivers’ license, let alone one for the State of Washington.  

What the system did is that it sent him a letter that said that his drivers’ license for Washington State has been cancelled.   Think about that.  He got a letter from Washington State that said his drivers’ license had been cancelled.  He never had a drivers’ license, much less a drivers’ license from Washington State.  So, what did they do?   And why did they do that?  What Washington State Corporation, a private corporation running the DMV, the traffic deed, is that they created a legal person?  They needed a legal person in order for them to put the infringement notice of the sheriff’s deputy against it.  Then they cancelled it and we will get to canceling in a minute and what canceling means.   But they needed to create the legal person in order to make the charges or the infringement stick as an employee.  That is a legal person with unlimited liability.  

Here is another example.  There is a fellow in Australia and he is in what is called the Northern Territory.  This man has been working for the improvement in the lives of the indigenous members of the community and he has taken a solemn oath to do no harm and he lives truly as a mendicant minister.  He does not participate in any form of violence and he does not take drugs.  He is no way involved in any form of anti-social behavior.   Far from it.  He has been an exemplary member of those communities. 

However, there are people who are threatened by that because of the money involved in promoting and supporting mining and theft of property and theft of property of Australians whether they be indigenous or not.  So what they did is they arrested this man for not having a license and they added a whole series of false charges against him such as resisting arrest, failing a breathalyzer test, failing to identify himself—a whole range of things in the desperate hope that they could put him in prison and shut him up.   He was a problem.  He has never had a driver’s license.  Unlike many people in the Northern Territory this man has not and is not receiving any form of government benefit.  

So for the corporation of the Northern Territory as a subsidiary of the corporation masquerading as Australia, registered in America with the SEC and the trust in Delaware, they had to create a legal person before they could bring charges.  So, what did they do?   They created a legal person, what is called an Australian Business Number which they needed and then they cancelled it.  What is more they backdated it to prior to the date of his arrest so that it appeared there was a legal person before they charged him?  Then they cancelled that legal person.   

What is cancellation?

What does this have to do at all with the organized crime outfit of the commercial courts/   and the continued obscene obstruction of justice.   The courts can argue that they have a right to create a legal person by the existing body conveying those rights to them.  That is what canceling is.  It is the ancient principle of the chancery or the cancelorum, the old concept that a privilege could be out and a warrant could be out in the field and if that warrant was cancelled then the documents and the rights would return back to the chancery if you issued them.  In this case the administrators for the chancery are the pirates of the BAR guild.   So whenever you see a canceling of a legal person, you can bet that those rights are not dissolved, but cancelled.  That is what a cancellation means. 

So that is another way that they argue.  They are on thin ice when they do that and the reason that they are on thin ice is that the courts are buying the claim from the corporation.  Remember this is all about making money.  The corporations are buying the debt, the claim.  They don’t get it for free.  DMV and the police do not give it to them for free.  Social security doesn’t give it to these BAR people for free.  They have to pay for it and they basically buy it on consignment on the promise that they will monetize it and they will send them a check.   It is because they have to pay for it, that the BAR when it takes on a court case, needs to monetize that as organized crime completely against the law.  You have to understand this is so fundamentally corrupt that Lord Blackstone (who wrote Blackstone’s Commentaries on Law) would be turning in his grave along with all the other leaders of law up until the 19th century.   

This is so far off the reservation of law it is not funny.  It is the worst thing.  Clean hands demands that you cannot administer a case with unclean hands.  That is a maxim of law that even the courts today cannot argue against.  Why? To allow it is corruption and that is what they are doing every single day.   So the parent corporation of the private BAR guild using the form of the Attorney General being the CEO of the corporation buys the debt and then they sell it to one of their franchises, the local court.  Then the local court sells it to a private contractor and that private contractor is the magistrate or judge.  Why do you think the initials of the judge are on the case number?   Because they purchased that debt and bought it on consignment.   They are independent contractors and that is how the corporations get themselves off the books by selling to the contractor who says he will buy that.

That is how courts work.  Judges buy the business. They are independent contractors.  Why do you think they have a brass plaque with their name on it in the court?  They are conducting their business.  Why do you think a judge can decide whether to admit something or not even if the clerk has prepared the document and put it on the case docket, the judge can throw it out?  Why?  Because it is his business that he is running.  So once you prove that you are competent and that you do not consent to the creation of a legal person and once you prove that without your consent this is a legal theft, you can prove if a case number has been created that a legal person of unlimited liability has been created without your consent and without your permission in outright public fraud.  This is a public fraud by a for-profit business.

How do you prove this is public fraud by a for-profit business?

How do you prove that?  It requires thought and obviously competence.  It requires you in fact to actually listen and believe what has been said in Ucadia for months and months, and please I beg you to listen and read the canons of law at www.one-heaven.org  and to read and listen to the canons of positive law.  And then to go and look at the summaries of trusts and the origins of estates and the reclaiming of your property.  If you have done that then what you are saying is this: you do not have my permission to take my property and use it; I have not given you consent nor can you argue in any fashion that there is by default some right that you can use and argue as a corporation to use my property.  

Why?  Because I hold the copyhold which is superior to a copyright.   I have reclaimed my name which means that not even a Roman estate can claim my name.   I administer my own affairs and my own estate.  I have appointed a general executor and that general executor has appointed a new principal in the form of a minister plenipotentiary.  And the minister himself has appointed an agent who conducts all my business. Unless the agent gives you consent, unless that minister as the principal gives you consent, then you have no consent.  You have committed an act of fraud in public.  

People rarely ever question the creation of a case number.  If you don’t do that and you attend court they can argue that by implicit agreement you have agreed to the forming of a legal person which means they can move forward on the charges and anything that you then do is merely proof that you are incompetent.  You are a lunatic?  Why?  On the one hand you are agreeing by implication and on the other hand you are protesting.  If someone is saying yes, no, no, yes, is that not a sign of someone who cannot make up his mind? Someone who is incapable of making a choice?  We make it easy for them.  

So we can ask the questions right up front:
Who created the legal person?
Who created the corporation?
When did they do this?
Under what permission do they presume it?  

Your affidavit needs to support in fact you have asked these questions and received no reply.    That is proof of why we must nip things in the bud from the very beginning.   If you are sent a summons that is the first and key time to challenge the creation of a legal person.   Now of course the system can automate and that is what happens often when you are unfairly arrested, intimidated and challenged.  It comes down to the point: do you truly believe that there is a legal person created as I have explained.  There is proof in public and it is there in plain sight.   

Do you trust your eyes with what you see or are you blinded for some reason?  Do you trust what your mind tells you in front of you?  Do you trust logic and reason?  Or, are you tricked into believing unreasonable claims.  Are you following someone who is telling you porkie pies?  There are many people who tell outrageous stories.   And, people believe the outrageous story before they believe the truth.   Do you believe that your name is sacred and your name along with your body is property granted to you under your administration?  They are the talents given to you by the Divine.   You are responsible for them.  If you cannot administer your name and your body, then how on earth could you claim then all the other things you may or may not want such as money, homes, and cars, whatever.  You know what people say:  I want this, I want that, me, me, my and more, more, more.   

If you can’t handle the one talent the Divine gives you then you don’t 3 or 4 talents.  You know the parable don’t you?   if you believe what you see and if you trust reason and logic, if you know that there is something more and there truly is a Divine and we have been given all that we need to know, then are you going to allow someone to come in and steal that which has been given to you, the right of the use of your name?   I know what people say.  They say that they go and protest and they are ignored.  Hold on a second.  If you truly, truly believe this to be property which is granted to you under your administration and that no one could reasonably argue that it is not yours?  

Are you Frank O’Collins?  Yes, and I claim the right of use of my name.  No, no, no, you are Frank O’Collins but you can’t write or sign that name.  That is absurd.  No one could argue that in public.  People would be in an absolute uproar.  

What do you do if someone is unreasonable and someone comes and takes and uses your property in public?  You know where they are, you know what they are doing and they ignore you.  Is there any relief or remedy in the system?  Of course there is.  But, there are disinformation agents and the beguiling tricky gurus and others that send miscues.  I kid you not, what the BAR guild has done now is that they have trained up disinformation agents who are right now promoting people to go and actually register legal persons.  Go and register your name, they say.  Go to the corporation and actually register a legal person in your name as a subsidiary. That is the latest craze of the private BAR guild to promote to people.  I am not attacking people, but if you follow that you have got to be stupid and at the very least incompetent.  People are believing they should do that and think it makes sense to go and register as a subsidiary and some how that makes things work better when I register my name as a subsidiary.  I actually make that step of the legal person with unlimited liability easy for them.  It is unbelievable. But that is what they are doing.

What they did a few years ago is they had people out there promoting liens.  There was a lot of stuff on liens.  They went out and encouraged people not to use liens as a last resort on property where there is no argument that it is yours; you can prove it is yours and there is an abundance of proof. There is no way that anyone could argue against it.  What they did was to say oh no, don’t worry about this; create liens against officials or against things that you really can’t prove.  And then make those liens huge so they take notice.  A reasonable person would say hold on a second.  If I put a lien against someone even if there is dispute that is unreasonable.  If you owe me $10 and I lien you $100 that is unreasonable. Some will say no, that you owe me $10.  So people went out for years under these disinformation gurus and wrote liens for billions and billions of dollars.  

Not only did those people go to prison in many cases but it also created the illusion that no one can ever issue a lien.  Until the issue is resolved of the creation of a legal person by a for-profit business without your permission, no one has the right to conduct business.  If there is no evidence of your tacit approval, in fact if there is evidence of your non-consent and you are competent then you have every right to put a lien against that legal person created as a fraud and call the party that did so to justify.  You don’t need to put a number against it in terms of value.  I assure you.  

How valuable is your name and how valuable is your life created by the Divine Creator?   Do you think that is cheap?  Do you think you are worth $100,000?    How about priceless?  Are you not part of the Divine?  Are you not the personification of the Divine?   If you are then there is no number on the planet that you can put against your name and your body that could justify the theft of your property.  Therefore you don’t put a number on the lien.  You simply lien the number of the case and the name connected to it so that it is clear; those two things combined represent the creation of a legal person without your permission.  

Who do you issue the lien against?  Well, you lodge it at the clerk of the court’s office remembering that the judge or magistrate is a private contractor that is using that property without your permission and you lodge it with the Attorney General which is the corporation that created the legal person in the first place.  And, you would probably issue the lien against the original body that cancelled whether it be the DMV, the Department of Transportation, Social Security, Medicare or a state or national business, whatever the corporation was that originally claimed the injury and then sold it to these pirates.  

This is not light-hearted.  This is very, very serious.  This is not a joke or a threat, nor is it legal advice or an attempt to obstruct or circumvent the cause of justice.   Nor is this in any fashion a way designed to weaken society.  It is a final call for reason and sense.  When will the pirates wake up?  WHEN WILL THE BAR STOP CORRUPTING OUR SOCIETY?  When will the nihilists wake up from their mental illness and disease?  It has to stop.  Our world is falling apart and people are dying because of the maladministration of the BAR guild.   

The alternatives have been written.  The laws are there to be enforced.  FOR GOD’S SAKE STOP THIS MONEY SYSTEM, THIS COMMERICALIZATION OF CRIME, PLEASE AND RETURN TO SOME SEMBLANCE OF JUSTICE.   But you as the BAR have no right under the present system to create a legal person and put charges against the legal person without my permission, and certainly not on the basis of any justification of an original bill, or an original writ.  Your magistrates, judges, attorneys, prosecutors and your lawyers must learn and be competent in the law and stop being gamblers and debt collectors and above all, pirates.

I say to everyone who comes and chooses to learn from Ucadia that we come as mendicants where we do not seek gluttony and greed but we seek austerity and poverty where we own nothing.  We come to law without arrogance and vengeance and we come with respect and obedience to law.  The principal that if I injure then I am responsible and I am obliged under the principal of honor to admit my fault.   It is not for society to prove my fault, I am obliged under honor.  And I do so.  I make fault all the time.  And finally when I acquire the knowledge and competence I do so humbly and I do not claim or wish to be some great millionaire, guru or messiah.  When I stand in honor and respect for the law and when I stand in honor and respect of their system of the Roman origin system of law, then I am the rule of law and anyone that seeks to corrupt it or circumvent it or in this case absolutely abuse it, woe behold them.  

The time has come.  The reckoning has come and now you know the proof and the evidence of the corporate fraud and that is why the affidavit proving your competence is so powerful.  That is why once you enter the court they refuse to acknowledge that you are in propria persona.  Now you know what to do about it.


Next steps and next week

I realize for many the emphasis is still "this is all fine, but what are we to affirm as truth in our affirmation in order to rebut the creation of the legal person and the claimed validity of the charge(s)?"

So there is still the practical need of walking through (again as we did some weeks ago) the meaning of affidavits, their form and the steps of documents. I will address this, for the coming week.  But for the moment, I hope and trust all who read and listen to this blog appreciate and absorb the knowledge first of the pirates creating a legal person without our consent in plain sight (public) and then refusing to recognize they neither have our consent to do so, nor are operating with clean hands. The proof being the case numbers itself.

Thanks again for listening and thank all of you who continue to support and help and donate to Ucadia.  I assure you as I have said before that I could not and would not be able to do what we do.  I have no sponsors, patrons that support financially.  It is through my own efforts to survive and through your good will that I am able to continue so thank you.  Until we speak again, be safe and be well. Thank you and good night.