The pirate hand caught in the cookie jar – Exposing and ending corporate fraud

_________________________________________________________________________________
Please download MP3 Audio Broadcast of this Blog > here   (108 min 24 Mb)
_________________________________________________________________________________


The topic for this blog is "the pirate hand caught in the cookie jar, exposing and ending corporate fraud".  The reason I have chosen this topic is that while I receive feedback from many of you that find the information regarding Ucadia useful and helpful and while we continue to unearth and explain the history, the context and provenance of law, the biggest negative and argument that is shared to me about Ucadia and this material is that it simply doesn’t appear to be working when one is faced in practical terms in going to one of the commercial, private courts, the private  BAR guilds of the pirates.  

They just don’t seem to be following their own laws.  They don’t seem to have any competence regarding law.  They ignore us, they fight tooth and nail and it seems impossible to stop them.  

Tonight we are going to expose and address proof, hard proof, of the pirates getting their hands caught in the proverbial cookie jar, creating charges to be set off against the estate and by committing open fraud.  

Before we get into the topic and into the detail off the topic tonight there are several things to cover first.  The first thing I want to address a promise I have made in the last two weeks in regards to providing information on the Tree of Life.  I have done that and you can see a new article at www.one-evil.org on the home page where you will see a graphic and a link to the Tree of Life.  If you click on the link and follow the details, you will come to an article that reveals knowledge that has been lost in the public mind for more than 2500 years.   So I have delivered on that promise.

The second point I want to make before we get into the detail of this blog and audio is the comment that when I speak about fraud and when I speak using terms like pirates and privateers, when I speak about officials whether it be magistrates or judges, prosecutors, clerks, attorneys, I want to make clear that I am not attacking those that perform such roles personally.  I mean that.  For all the attorneys, judges, magistrates and people that I have met in the legal fraternity above and beyond when taken out of that environment, they are highly intelligent, conscientious, community minded folks that should be regarded and deserve to be regarded as decent.  But transplant them back into this system, this trading, this shark-infested system that is the commercial courts and I do not hold back in my disdain and disgust at the rampant corruption, malfeasance and incompetence of the system.  

The third point that I want to make is that Ucadia and myself have made it abundantly clear in dozens and dozens of articles and audios, that all that we do in discussion of these audios and all that we do in discussion of these blogs is for the restoration of law and not for its emaciation, hijacking, ransom, attack, destruction, threat, or any other false claim.  

In fact I spend a great deal of time preparing and presenting and you can see that on seven separate websites a comprehensive, civil code and a comprehensive criminal code where I took the existing civil and criminal codes of more than 25 different nations and prepared a solution whereby a civil code and criminal code could be effected in operation that did not have to go through the commercialization and the making money off peoples’ injuries, the rampant corruption and fraud that we are talking about tonight. They proved in those two forms and you can see them at www.globe-union.org and www.globe-union-court.org that it is perfectly possible at any point for the existing hierarchy of the BAR association to end their game of corruption, this malfeasance and attack and ransoming of the rule of law, and return our society back to a form of law and justice that people deserve and expect.  

At some point if more become aware of this knowledge I do expect that there will be people in roles of propaganda that will try to falsely claim that what we are about is threatening the safety of society, that somehow we are revealing secrets that put society ‘in danger.’  That is complete and utter rubbish.  That is absurd.  If anything the existing court system has proven itself incapable of protecting society through fair justice.  Why? Because people who are dangerous appear to be let out in society within minutes and people who have only made one mistake in their lives could be crucified and commercialized as assets under now a privatized prison system.  It is broken.  The justice system is broken.  

So the reason I say that and I preface that is that these are the kinds of arguments that people will put to you if you ever get to the point of really finally zeroing in on proving the out and out fraud.  At the end of the day they will throw their hands up and say that you can’t tell people that we are committing fraud and that we are criminals because if you do, you threaten society.  

It is the old, last vestige of the coward which is to cover himself in the flag.   That is precisely what I expect to see by certain commentators.  You can’t tell people about this because you ‘threaten national security.’  Rubbish.  That is crap.  The biggest threat to the safety and security of all these nations is the continued corruption, incompetence and destruction of the law by these people and their failure to administer themselves and reform their system themselves, and by their failure to take personal responsibility.  

They are the ones who are the present and clear danger.  They are the ones who are the real terrorists, not the ones who are willing to learn the law, learn history and stand in honor and peace and accept where they have made mistakes and ask one thing and one thing only:  justice, fair and reasonable justice.  

Hard proof exposing and ending corporate fraud

Well enough of the soapbox.  Let’s now get into explaining what we mean as to the hard proof under the topic: the pirate hand caught in the cookie jar, exposing and ending corporate fraud.  We will start by remembering and reviewing what we outlined last week.  The topic last week in the blog on Tuesday, May 14, 2013, was through the eyes of the pirates, simplifying knowledge of law, court from the perspective of the pirates of the private BAR guild.  What we tried to do last week in the audio and the blog was to simplify what we know is going on and what the essential components are that must be in place within the existing, present day courts as opposed to the vast knowledge, history and discussions of law that we have covered over many, many weeks, months and now years with Ucadia.  

In other words for all that we have spoken about last week we tried to bring it into focus and focus on two key things:  1. that the system relies upon there being a legal person first.  The commercial courts need a legal person before they can proceed.  2.  The charges that are laid are put against that legal person.  These are the two key things that we covered last week when we brought everything back to simple terms.  

I know in one sense that when we have spoken about trusts and estates and more recently about the role of the agent, many have felt that it was a lot of information and when you have shared it, and it may be with people employed in the existing legal system.  You may have mentioned some of this in passing or in documents within your issues with the courts.  

You may have found or heard from people, the unanimous response where lawyers, judges, magistrates, attorneys, clerks all say the same thing:  What are you talking about?  This is all gobbledy good and we have never heard of this they say.  So in a way it calls into a question whether this information no matter how strongly claimed to be the provenance of their system and the very foundation of their system, that kind of constant feedback really has cut away the confidence of many people who are saying it sounds plausible and reasonable.  Yet some also say "I have read Blackstone, the statutes and what you are saying makes perfect sense in their creating temporary trusts, the Cestui Que Vie (CQV) trusts and then creating an estate that they then trade against and put bonds against and then monetizes the bonds.  It makes sense then that they derive the value and trying to charge those estates.  This is all part and parcel of trying to make sense of the relationship of the treasuries of today, the accounts of today and the making of money of the courts".  

But the feedback for the people who are in the industry seem to be at odds with what we say.  Tonight we will prove that not only is the information we have said is absolutely accurate, but we will be able to prove that one of the reasons there has been trouble is the absolute incompetence of people and the way that they are trained in law now, but also the fact that they are committing out and fraud in many locations.  

If you are ever able to expose it clearly and simply, then they are in a mountain of trouble.  One of the things that we shared last week as a way of exposing the truth that the courts are indeed corporate businesses, for-profit businesses, and that the states, counties and the nations that claim to be estates or states, are really now taken over by corporations for profit and that the true (de jure) nation, state, or county are now hidden by these corporations that are usurping such rules, rights and constitutions.  

One of the ways that we explained that anomaly was back to the simple two concepts I said earlier about the need for their system to have first a legal person and secondly the charges that are laid against the legal person.  This is versus the tradition both in the United States and Commonwealth Countries, as well as European Countries that before a charge can be leveled against an estate there must be evidence and grounds for that charge to be valid before you even step out and contest whether the charge needs to be paid or not.   

What we covered is that corporations do not have the power to issue true bills nor writs.  Corporations can certainly mimic and pretend to be the United States in all aspects except in the issuance of true bills and writs.   Corporations can pretend to be countries like Australia or Canada or United Kingdom until they are required to issue a writ.   Their powers do not extend to the ability of issuing writs or in the case of the United States, a true bill.   What I am talking about is the original form of how a case was to be made.  If you go back to the original constitution and the federalist Papers and the foundation of the United States the sole purpose of the grand jury is to investigate the bill.  Is there a true bill? 

If there is not a true bill, the grand jury is not permitted to allow the case to pursue.  So what the corporations have done is that they have removed that knowledge from history so that people don’t know it and instead of a bill they issue an invoice and instead of a writ they issue an order.   Both of those, the invoice and the order do not have the requisite powers of an edict under the state and instead they are commercial offers that really have little teeth except by forcing us into dishonor and thus conveying them into accepted bills of exchange.  In other words the way system gets away with this is by tricking, enticing and convincing us to stand there and say, I won’t pay; I refuse to pay. 

They want us to be the ones who commit the dishonor because it gets them off the hook.  That is why they spend so much time and so money and effort grooming people in the truth movement and elsewhere and feeding them, stuffing them full of false information.  They hope they go out there and become famous gurus and send a whole lot more people to prison (who have listened to these gurus).  You know what?  They have done a mightily good job.   You will see even day the disinformation agents with the information we talk about today are hard at work serving their masters, the privates, the privateers, the heads of organized crime.  

How do we know of and what is the fraud that we speak of?  In order for a charge to be laid there need to be a legal person.  Indeed for corporations to generate income there needs to be legal persons in place.  This is part of their franchise with the higher estate.  When the corporations took over from the estate and inserted themselves into positions whether it is through transport, or through the Treasury or Social Security, government or the executive, the fulfillment of that role was under the guise of that all-encompassing word, Welfare or Health.  Welfare of the poor, or health of the poor.  

That is what they claimed that they could do better and those are the primary terms of their franchise.   So, for a corporation to have jurisdiction, it must create a legal person that is a subsidiary to itself.  If you live in Australia, United Kingdom, or any modern economy, by the time you are an adult, you will have participated in, agreed and consented to the creation of at least one or more legal persons.   

I am not talking about the Birth Certificate (BC).  For the topic tonight the BC is totally irrelevant.  I am not really even talking about estates or any of that.  I am talking about the simple commercial establishment of a legal person with unlimited liability for which the corporate entity can claim jurisdiction and can basically add charges.  Now the first thing is when they start work that people are part of or join up to some common health or national welfare scheme.  

In America we have the social security system and in Australia we have Medicare and in England there is the NHS system and many systems like this around the world.  When you join that and sign your name and give consent not only is an unlimited liability person created in the same name as a subsidiary, sole trader under that corporation but that legal person is publicly listed and is able to be found publicly.  

Let’s repeat that again as a key point.  When a valid legal person is created within the franchised rules, within the policies of a corporation masquerading as an estate, whether it be a county, state, country or department, a sole trader legal person of unlimited liability is created and there must be, has to be consent for this because of the unlimited liability factor.  

Without consent it cannot be argued and it must be publicly listed. In the case of social security if you know the number you can go and find the social security; in the case of drivers’ licenses when you know the numbers you can check drivers’ licenses.  In the case of a tax relationship the legal person for tax purposes you can go and search for that legal person.  They have a number, a unique identity, they are clearly subsidiaries and they are on public registries.   

The system must have a legal person to lay charges

When we say the system must have a legal person in order to lay charges and there is more than one legal person that the separate corporations create we can go and prove that by showing in the public that there is more than one public register publicly available where you can go and find those legal persons created in your name by these corporations.   Now, why isn’t there simply one legal person created to cover all the corporations?  The answer is that in many jurisdictions and many places like the United States, counties, indeed states and even the DMV, the Treasury departments all function as separately competing businesses.   They may appear to be within a structure and they may claim to be part of a hierarchy living up to the Constitution of the United States.  In reality they are wholly separate trading corporations that therefore must create their own legal persons in order to add charges and trade.

Why can’t a corporation simply take control of a person?   That would be trafficking in persons and in 1948 the United Nations insured that corporations did not do that. We all think it is the trafficking of flesh.  If you go to court and indeed if you talk to your relatives, everyone you talk to mostly will make the same imaging mistake and when you say person they think body, flesh, you.  

You are not the drivers’ license; that is a piece of plastic, or a piece of paper. But, we are being so thoroughly trained that we all think that of person as ‘you’, you are the person.  No, person is a fictional identity and you are not the person, the straw person.  Even judges and magistrates made that mistake.   The system is very, very clear.  Under the rules of the United Nations and the conventions around the world they are forbidden to trade in persons.  They can buy and sell the claims, debt, or course you can.  That is what money is.  That is what loans are, what mortgage and collateral debt objects are.   You can go and buy and sell claims and debt, but you cannot trade persons.  

If a person wants to buy a debt against your name or create a debt against your name, they need to create a legal person.  How does this work?  How does it work in practice when we go to court?  We have said that the most obvious example of legal persons, because they have to be unlimited liability and they have to be in their system in the public and they have to be searchable.  Why do they have to be in the public?  When we talk about organized crime in commercializing sin and making money from us, they are transferring from the private to the public.  If they are going to create instruments of securities then the laws established in regards to securities demand that such trade happens in the public and not in the private, in the daylight and not in the dark.   

Why is this vital?  It is vital because by doing in the public, they are forced to give public notice.  If we fail to act then that is an essential element to their system of plausible deniability.  The legal person was created in the public, you did not object, you did not counter the claim, therefore you agreed.  

Performing this in public is necessary by their higher laws; it is necessary to validate the monetization and creation of securities.   That is what they are doing when they create bonds against cases.  That is what they are doing when these private commercial outfits are creating more and more prisons and more people in them.  It’s business.  What do you think a charge is?  A charge is a commercial word.  A charge is a claim no different than to a claim in probate.  In fact a claim in probate is dealing directly with the estate and a charge in their system is an as-yet unverified claim that later if validated can then be offset against the huge amounts of money that are put against accounts in our names as the golden handcuffs to keep the entire system running.

Where is the creation of the unlimited liability legal person without our consent?
This is the monetization of the bonds created against our Birth Certificates, the bonds against our marriages, the bonds that become functional against our work.  This system is why the existing system of the banks has continued for so long; it’s the golden handcuffs and the giant, immense cookie jar.   

So if there is proof of legal persons and there is proof that it needs our consent whether it be the social security that we have signed, whether it be tax returns we have signed, or the drivers license we sign, where is the example of a legal person being created where we did not give consent through tacit and clear approval.  Where is the creation of the unlimited liability legal person where we did not give consent?  

Think about what happens when you go to court, when you are summonsed to go to court, when you are arrested?  Someone puts charges against you in going to court, so there must be a legal person and it cannot be the same legal person as social security, cannot be the same legal person with your drivers’ license.  The claim may originate from those corporations but when you go to the court it is members of the guild, a commercial outfit, and organized crime outfit that is performing the actions.

What is the legal person that they create?  Remember it must be in plain sight and it must be clear.  The fact that it is in plain sight and the fact that it is clear, is part of the plausible deniability, part of the public notice to you.  What do you think the proof is that a new unique legal person was created this time without your consent?   They have neither grounds nor argument they can use to argue for it.  You can prove that a corporation has stolen property and a corporation has committed fraud, clearly on both counts.  

Where do you think you can find the legal person in plain sight with these private courts?   Well, what is the key number when you have social security?  It’s called a social security number, right?  That social security number allows you to distinguish from Frank O’Collins from Social Security versus Frank O’Collins from a driver’s license.  They sound the same but they are really two different legal persons.   

In the case of a court case we have been saying the word all along.  Is it not the case number?  Do they not create a unique case number once you go to court for the first time and they attach your name to it?  They may have other bits to it but your name is attached to that unique number; that is the legal person.  That commercial outfit that private BAR guild court, that business for making money has created a legal person and this time they have done it without your consent.   How do they get away with that?  They get away with it several ways.  

Each of the ways as arguments can be easily defeated and proven as invalid.  The first and simplest argument they use is that you front up and don’t contest the legal person.  Now I know that we have said that we put an affidavit in and we will come back to affidavits before we end the broadcast and the power of the affidavit.  

You may go there and say, I am here in propria persona.  That is not the issue. Have you ever heard of anyone challenging the case number of the file, the case number of the case?  No, probably not.  If you are not challenging the creation of that case number, do you realize that case numbers did not exist against matters before the courts 100 years ago?  They didn’t exist.  There were not any case numbers.  Why?  Because they weren’t creating legal persons.   

Why weren’t they creating legal persons 100 years ago?

Why weren’t they creating legal persons?  Because corporations weren’t running the courts then.  They were the estates.  Private, for-profit businesses and corruption of the law was not in place 100 years ago.  If you track the origin of case numbers, you see the birth of organized crime taking control of our courts. It is absolutely the pirates taking total control and throwing out any last vestige of justice and replacing it with the appearance of justice within the tolerance of the court of public opinion.   So, the first and obvious way they get past it is by our not challenging the case number. Therefore when we argue in propria persona and we don’t pick the issue up about the legal person as the court case number.  Then we prove ourselves incompetent.  

Incompetence is the second and the biggest issue:  incompetence.  We mix metaphors and terms.  We come into the court and run off our mouths and say we are the executor or this or that, or you are a fraud, or we attack them, or we are arrogant as so many people have promoted or we are just believing some guru and filling paper in blindly and we read off some instructed words that the gurus promise and tell us.  We absolutely slam duck and make it an easy system to process us because we show ourselves to be incompetent.  That is really the biggest and most desperate thing the BAR is continuing to try to promote with people.   They do this by selling out disinformation and promoting through agents and people who desperately want to be known as being famous.   

Incompetence is essential.  Why?  That is one of the key arguments of why they can get away with creating the legal person.  Think about the creation of legal person when someone is diagnosed with mental illness or incapacitated.  That is in one sense the origin of the concept of the wards.  This is the use of wards and the use of council commissioners in charge of the poor for their welfare.  The assumption and what they did in the 19th century is that they made a connection between mental health and criminality and if you are insane you are a criminal.  If you are poor they made that connection by the start of the 20th century.  If you are poor then of course you are a criminal because you are insane.  Who wants to be poor?  You have to be insane to be poor.  

To the corporations and to the nihilists that run them it is an obvious slur against such organizations such as priests and mendicants and others who do not worship the golden calf of money. So what they need to prove if someone does not consent is that you are mentally unwell, unbalanced or insane.  That is why they fall on the review; that is why we need a mental assessment.  They need it to update the diagnosis and that is why they are introducing a new manual of diagnosis for their friends in psychology to back them up.  

If you question anything you are insane

The argument now is that if you question anything you are mentally insane.  I assure you that will be the new manual of psychology.  If you question anything you have a mental illness.  Only when you accept everything without question are you deemed to be ‘normal.’  That is the insanity of the system and they believe they will get away with it. 
Of course they won’t, but they believe they will get away with it.   So the risk that anyone faces when they are lazy, stupid, angry, hateful, vengeful, disrespectful, confused, when they go anywhere near the courts,  their actions are used to create the validity of what they have done in the creation of a legal person without our consent.  If we are incapacitated their ability to create it is assured.  

The last reason and the last way that the commercial BAR organizations create these persons in the form of a case number and your name as proof of the person being created without your consent is in the transference of a right or a privilege across to you by the cancellation of a number or part of a service by another entity.  Here is an example:  in the United States I know of a fellow who was driving through one state, a state that he had never lived in and that was Washington State.  He was driving through Washington State and this fellow does not have a drivers’ license at the moment.  

I am not advocating that people do not have a drivers’ license or do have a drivers’ license.  To me that debate at this point is irrelevant.   The point is that he was stopped because he was speeding and he did not and still does not have a valid drivers’ license, let alone one for the State of Washington.  

What the system did is that it sent him a letter that said that his drivers’ license for Washington State has been cancelled.   Think about that.  He got a letter from Washington State that said his drivers’ license had been cancelled.  He never had a drivers’ license, much less a drivers’ license from Washington State.  So, what did they do?   And why did they do that?  What Washington State Corporation, a private corporation running the DMV, the traffic deed, is that they created a legal person?  They needed a legal person in order for them to put the infringement notice of the sheriff’s deputy against it.  Then they cancelled it and we will get to canceling in a minute and what canceling means.   But they needed to create the legal person in order to make the charges or the infringement stick as an employee.  That is a legal person with unlimited liability.  

Here is another example.  There is a fellow in Australia and he is in what is called the Northern Territory.  This man has been working for the improvement in the lives of the indigenous members of the community and he has taken a solemn oath to do no harm and he lives truly as a mendicant minister.  He does not participate in any form of violence and he does not take drugs.  He is no way involved in any form of anti-social behavior.   Far from it.  He has been an exemplary member of those communities. 

However, there are people who are threatened by that because of the money involved in promoting and supporting mining and theft of property and theft of property of Australians whether they be indigenous or not.  So what they did is they arrested this man for not having a license and they added a whole series of false charges against him such as resisting arrest, failing a breathalyzer test, failing to identify himself—a whole range of things in the desperate hope that they could put him in prison and shut him up.   He was a problem.  He has never had a driver’s license.  Unlike many people in the Northern Territory this man has not and is not receiving any form of government benefit.  

So for the corporation of the Northern Territory as a subsidiary of the corporation masquerading as Australia, registered in America with the SEC and the trust in Delaware, they had to create a legal person before they could bring charges.  So, what did they do?   They created a legal person, what is called an Australian Business Number which they needed and then they cancelled it.  What is more they backdated it to prior to the date of his arrest so that it appeared there was a legal person before they charged him?  Then they cancelled that legal person.   

What is cancellation?

What does this have to do at all with the organized crime outfit of the commercial courts/   and the continued obscene obstruction of justice.   The courts can argue that they have a right to create a legal person by the existing body conveying those rights to them.  That is what canceling is.  It is the ancient principle of the chancery or the cancelorum, the old concept that a privilege could be out and a warrant could be out in the field and if that warrant was cancelled then the documents and the rights would return back to the chancery if you issued them.  In this case the administrators for the chancery are the pirates of the BAR guild.   So whenever you see a canceling of a legal person, you can bet that those rights are not dissolved, but cancelled.  That is what a cancellation means. 

So that is another way that they argue.  They are on thin ice when they do that and the reason that they are on thin ice is that the courts are buying the claim from the corporation.  Remember this is all about making money.  The corporations are buying the debt, the claim.  They don’t get it for free.  DMV and the police do not give it to them for free.  Social security doesn’t give it to these BAR people for free.  They have to pay for it and they basically buy it on consignment on the promise that they will monetize it and they will send them a check.   It is because they have to pay for it, that the BAR when it takes on a court case, needs to monetize that as organized crime completely against the law.  You have to understand this is so fundamentally corrupt that Lord Blackstone (who wrote Blackstone’s Commentaries on Law) would be turning in his grave along with all the other leaders of law up until the 19th century.   

This is so far off the reservation of law it is not funny.  It is the worst thing.  Clean hands demands that you cannot administer a case with unclean hands.  That is a maxim of law that even the courts today cannot argue against.  Why? To allow it is corruption and that is what they are doing every single day.   So the parent corporation of the private BAR guild using the form of the Attorney General being the CEO of the corporation buys the debt and then they sell it to one of their franchises, the local court.  Then the local court sells it to a private contractor and that private contractor is the magistrate or judge.  Why do you think the initials of the judge are on the case number?   Because they purchased that debt and bought it on consignment.   They are independent contractors and that is how the corporations get themselves off the books by selling to the contractor who says he will buy that.

That is how courts work.  Judges buy the business. They are independent contractors.  Why do you think they have a brass plaque with their name on it in the court?  They are conducting their business.  Why do you think a judge can decide whether to admit something or not even if the clerk has prepared the document and put it on the case docket, the judge can throw it out?  Why?  Because it is his business that he is running.  So once you prove that you are competent and that you do not consent to the creation of a legal person and once you prove that without your consent this is a legal theft, you can prove if a case number has been created that a legal person of unlimited liability has been created without your consent and without your permission in outright public fraud.  This is a public fraud by a for-profit business.

How do you prove this is public fraud by a for-profit business?

How do you prove that?  It requires thought and obviously competence.  It requires you in fact to actually listen and believe what has been said in Ucadia for months and months, and please I beg you to listen and read the canons of law at www.one-heaven.org  and to read and listen to the canons of positive law.  And then to go and look at the summaries of trusts and the origins of estates and the reclaiming of your property.  If you have done that then what you are saying is this: you do not have my permission to take my property and use it; I have not given you consent nor can you argue in any fashion that there is by default some right that you can use and argue as a corporation to use my property.  

Why?  Because I hold the copyhold which is superior to a copyright.   I have reclaimed my name which means that not even a Roman estate can claim my name.   I administer my own affairs and my own estate.  I have appointed a general executor and that general executor has appointed a new principal in the form of a minister plenipotentiary.  And the minister himself has appointed an agent who conducts all my business. Unless the agent gives you consent, unless that minister as the principal gives you consent, then you have no consent.  You have committed an act of fraud in public.  

People rarely ever question the creation of a case number.  If you don’t do that and you attend court they can argue that by implicit agreement you have agreed to the forming of a legal person which means they can move forward on the charges and anything that you then do is merely proof that you are incompetent.  You are a lunatic?  Why?  On the one hand you are agreeing by implication and on the other hand you are protesting.  If someone is saying yes, no, no, yes, is that not a sign of someone who cannot make up his mind? Someone who is incapable of making a choice?  We make it easy for them.  

So we can ask the questions right up front:
Who created the legal person?
Who created the corporation?
When did they do this?
Under what permission do they presume it?  

Your affidavit needs to support in fact you have asked these questions and received no reply.    That is proof of why we must nip things in the bud from the very beginning.   If you are sent a summons that is the first and key time to challenge the creation of a legal person.   Now of course the system can automate and that is what happens often when you are unfairly arrested, intimidated and challenged.  It comes down to the point: do you truly believe that there is a legal person created as I have explained.  There is proof in public and it is there in plain sight.   

Do you trust your eyes with what you see or are you blinded for some reason?  Do you trust what your mind tells you in front of you?  Do you trust logic and reason?  Or, are you tricked into believing unreasonable claims.  Are you following someone who is telling you porkie pies?  There are many people who tell outrageous stories.   And, people believe the outrageous story before they believe the truth.   Do you believe that your name is sacred and your name along with your body is property granted to you under your administration?  They are the talents given to you by the Divine.   You are responsible for them.  If you cannot administer your name and your body, then how on earth could you claim then all the other things you may or may not want such as money, homes, and cars, whatever.  You know what people say:  I want this, I want that, me, me, my and more, more, more.   

If you can’t handle the one talent the Divine gives you then you don’t 3 or 4 talents.  You know the parable don’t you?   if you believe what you see and if you trust reason and logic, if you know that there is something more and there truly is a Divine and we have been given all that we need to know, then are you going to allow someone to come in and steal that which has been given to you, the right of the use of your name?   I know what people say.  They say that they go and protest and they are ignored.  Hold on a second.  If you truly, truly believe this to be property which is granted to you under your administration and that no one could reasonably argue that it is not yours?  

Are you Frank O’Collins?  Yes, and I claim the right of use of my name.  No, no, no, you are Frank O’Collins but you can’t write or sign that name.  That is absurd.  No one could argue that in public.  People would be in an absolute uproar.  

What do you do if someone is unreasonable and someone comes and takes and uses your property in public?  You know where they are, you know what they are doing and they ignore you.  Is there any relief or remedy in the system?  Of course there is.  But, there are disinformation agents and the beguiling tricky gurus and others that send miscues.  I kid you not, what the BAR guild has done now is that they have trained up disinformation agents who are right now promoting people to go and actually register legal persons.  Go and register your name, they say.  Go to the corporation and actually register a legal person in your name as a subsidiary. That is the latest craze of the private BAR guild to promote to people.  I am not attacking people, but if you follow that you have got to be stupid and at the very least incompetent.  People are believing they should do that and think it makes sense to go and register as a subsidiary and some how that makes things work better when I register my name as a subsidiary.  I actually make that step of the legal person with unlimited liability easy for them.  It is unbelievable. But that is what they are doing.

What they did a few years ago is they had people out there promoting liens.  There was a lot of stuff on liens.  They went out and encouraged people not to use liens as a last resort on property where there is no argument that it is yours; you can prove it is yours and there is an abundance of proof. There is no way that anyone could argue against it.  What they did was to say oh no, don’t worry about this; create liens against officials or against things that you really can’t prove.  And then make those liens huge so they take notice.  A reasonable person would say hold on a second.  If I put a lien against someone even if there is dispute that is unreasonable.  If you owe me $10 and I lien you $100 that is unreasonable. Some will say no, that you owe me $10.  So people went out for years under these disinformation gurus and wrote liens for billions and billions of dollars.  

Not only did those people go to prison in many cases but it also created the illusion that no one can ever issue a lien.  Until the issue is resolved of the creation of a legal person by a for-profit business without your permission, no one has the right to conduct business.  If there is no evidence of your tacit approval, in fact if there is evidence of your non-consent and you are competent then you have every right to put a lien against that legal person created as a fraud and call the party that did so to justify.  You don’t need to put a number against it in terms of value.  I assure you.  

How valuable is your name and how valuable is your life created by the Divine Creator?   Do you think that is cheap?  Do you think you are worth $100,000?    How about priceless?  Are you not part of the Divine?  Are you not the personification of the Divine?   If you are then there is no number on the planet that you can put against your name and your body that could justify the theft of your property.  Therefore you don’t put a number on the lien.  You simply lien the number of the case and the name connected to it so that it is clear; those two things combined represent the creation of a legal person without your permission.  

Who do you issue the lien against?  Well, you lodge it at the clerk of the court’s office remembering that the judge or magistrate is a private contractor that is using that property without your permission and you lodge it with the Attorney General which is the corporation that created the legal person in the first place.  And, you would probably issue the lien against the original body that cancelled whether it be the DMV, the Department of Transportation, Social Security, Medicare or a state or national business, whatever the corporation was that originally claimed the injury and then sold it to these pirates.  

This is not light-hearted.  This is very, very serious.  This is not a joke or a threat, nor is it legal advice or an attempt to obstruct or circumvent the cause of justice.   Nor is this in any fashion a way designed to weaken society.  It is a final call for reason and sense.  When will the pirates wake up?  WHEN WILL THE BAR STOP CORRUPTING OUR SOCIETY?  When will the nihilists wake up from their mental illness and disease?  It has to stop.  Our world is falling apart and people are dying because of the maladministration of the BAR guild.   

The alternatives have been written.  The laws are there to be enforced.  FOR GOD’S SAKE STOP THIS MONEY SYSTEM, THIS COMMERICALIZATION OF CRIME, PLEASE AND RETURN TO SOME SEMBLANCE OF JUSTICE.   But you as the BAR have no right under the present system to create a legal person and put charges against the legal person without my permission, and certainly not on the basis of any justification of an original bill, or an original writ.  Your magistrates, judges, attorneys, prosecutors and your lawyers must learn and be competent in the law and stop being gamblers and debt collectors and above all, pirates.

I say to everyone who comes and chooses to learn from Ucadia that we come as mendicants where we do not seek gluttony and greed but we seek austerity and poverty where we own nothing.  We come to law without arrogance and vengeance and we come with respect and obedience to law.  The principal that if I injure then I am responsible and I am obliged under the principal of honor to admit my fault.   It is not for society to prove my fault, I am obliged under honor.  And I do so.  I make fault all the time.  And finally when I acquire the knowledge and competence I do so humbly and I do not claim or wish to be some great millionaire, guru or messiah.  When I stand in honor and respect for the law and when I stand in honor and respect of their system of the Roman origin system of law, then I am the rule of law and anyone that seeks to corrupt it or circumvent it or in this case absolutely abuse it, woe behold them.  

The time has come.  The reckoning has come and now you know the proof and the evidence of the corporate fraud and that is why the affidavit proving your competence is so powerful.  That is why once you enter the court they refuse to acknowledge that you are in propria persona.  Now you know what to do about it.


Next steps and next week

I realize for many the emphasis is still "this is all fine, but what are we to affirm as truth in our affirmation in order to rebut the creation of the legal person and the claimed validity of the charge(s)?"

So there is still the practical need of walking through (again as we did some weeks ago) the meaning of affidavits, their form and the steps of documents. I will address this, for the coming week.  But for the moment, I hope and trust all who read and listen to this blog appreciate and absorb the knowledge first of the pirates creating a legal person without our consent in plain sight (public) and then refusing to recognize they neither have our consent to do so, nor are operating with clean hands. The proof being the case numbers itself.

Thanks again for listening and thank all of you who continue to support and help and donate to Ucadia.  I assure you as I have said before that I could not and would not be able to do what we do.  I have no sponsors, patrons that support financially.  It is through my own efforts to survive and through your good will that I am able to continue so thank you.  Until we speak again, be safe and be well. Thank you and good night.