_________________________________________________________________
Please download MP3 Audio
Broadcast of this Blog > here
(42 min 15 Mb)
_________________________________________________________________
This is Frank O’Collins doing a blog for Wednesday, December 18, 2013. Thank you for listening. Given that we are a few days away from the end of 2013 and we are a few days away from Christmas Day, a day that was transformed through the Victorian Era from being a purely Christian holiday to becoming a pagan holiday or Pagan-Christian holiday in the exchange of presents by returning back to the older traditions of the celebration of the Winter Solstice when the sun appears at noon at its lowest altitude above the horizon in the northern hemisphere and later the celebration of Saturnalia, the celebrations of pagan Rome.
I want to look forward rather than just backward and we will talk about some points of reference, but I want to look forward tonight at this time and I want to consider the topic tonight as Three Questions for 2014. The Questions I’d like you to ask yourself, and indeed ask those that you know, those who are around you, those who may have questioned why you are listening to this fellow, Frank O’Collins, or why you are reading the material of Ucadia or why you are spending so much time reading this material. I want to give you Three Questions to consider:
Q1. Is the present system capable of really being fixed? And if so, can Rule of Law, Justice and Due Process be restored within it?
Q2. How do we survive and keep ourselves and family safe during these changes?
Q3. If the present system is unfixable- what is the best future model and what are you doing to help make such a dream come true?
We’ll go through these questions through this audio and we will refer to some key messages at this time of Christmas that may help us answer and give us some strength. The reason I wanted to raise the Three Questions tonight is the feedback that so many of you have given over this year and over the several years that some of you have been reading Ucadia. I’ll try to boil it down to this: those that are in a relationship have said words to the effect that while they have found benefit in reading Ucadia and listening to the audios, and studying the material on the websites one-heaven.org or one-evil.org or any of the Ucadia sites, while they have found benefit in reading that material, they have found it very difficult then to express that to their partner and to their families who think that by and large they are wasting their time and that this has no direct relevance to the immediacy and importance of survival and how we might get more work or to find ways to make more money or get bills paid or do whatever it takes to stay alive.
Other feedback that people have shared relates to the Will and Testament and the material that we have been going through that you can go and see at restorelaw.org under estate forms. You can go see what we call the Voluntatem et Testamentum. Quite a few people have said, regarding the Will and Testament, that when they have tried to explain this even to their own brothers and sisters, to their families and friends, people think this is strange.
Why spend so much time on these documents? Is this some sort of crazy legal group? Why spend so much time on these documents when the system is coming after people, when debt collectors keep calling, when people are being arrested or harassed, so why bother when survival is hard enough and there seems to be such a lack of any enforcement, relief or remedy whatsoever?
Finally, there are people that have shared their feedback regarding Ucadia, relative to while we have asked the questions tonight, that say no matter what I say to people not only do they not “get it,” they simply don’t care. They are numb. It’s as if they are talking to a brick wall. And so there is this, not hopelessness, but frustration of the lack of response to the kind of ideas that we have been sharing. This is, I guess, the struggles of life and we can talk as we have, and if you listen to the audios you know that I have spoken on many aspects of why people may seem to still be living in the clouds not the least of which is the sugar hit, the food we eat, the drugs we take, the electromagnetic radiation that surrounds us, but also other aspects as well—that middle world, that world of angry spirit that surrounds us and seems to envelop our culture, particularly when we are driving or going to a mall or any public place with that crazy energy, that danger we sense whenever we venture out into public.
We have talked about these different things and about why people find it difficult and why, for example, there is a very pragmatic sense and fear, that fear that drives so many people. There is a fear that if we spend time on things that don’t directly help bring in money, that don’t directly address how we are going to survive, and that at the moment we do not have the luxury to spend time on these things. That is why it may be, not because our relatives are anti-material or even that they think the material is ultimately a waste of time. It is just that right now in the sense of fear and trepidation of the unknown and the uncertainty, how can people spend so much time when there doesn’t seem to be yet, the practical answers. So there is a sense and a reason that people may be getting this kind of feedback from friends, relatives and acquaintances.
So let’s go through these Three Questions and let’s see if there is anything in the recent updates of the Ucadia model that may give us strength to those answers. Let’s begin with the first question of the Three Questions of 2014 being: Is the system capable of being fixed? If so, can Rule of Law, Justice and Due Process be restored within it? Incredibly there are actually people, and this is why it’s so amazing, who are media commentators and talking heads who even today are on the airwaves and on the TV trying to convince you that there is actually nothing wrong with the present system. Probably the starkest example of this complete lunacy, delusion and utter falsity would have to be the recent attacks by nihilists and by the weasel talking heads that support the nihilists against the comments and writings of Pope Francis when he said, “the present economic system is unjust and the present economic system is not addressing the plight of the poor and the concept of ‘Trickle down’ that the poor will get the scraps after the rich and fat have eaten, does not work.”
In response what we saw were the largest and most grotesque of the talking heads, like extras of Star Wars or like key characters of some Monty Python movie like “The Meaning of Life.” These grotesque talking heads and radio personalities, people such as Rush Limbaugh, didn’t think twice to launch in and attack Pope Francis on the very words that Jesus Christ himself is supposed to have said. In a classic proof of the utter psychopathy, sociopathy and lunacy of these people in the same breath people such as Steve Varney on Fox News said they found it perfectly fine to be both a Christian and attack Pope Francis and be an utter zealot to the existing system of rampant, corrupt capitalism. They found no problems whatsoever. It’s gotten to a point and you can always the measure the health of a society by the underlying comic message of satirists and comedians such as Jon Stewart for example.
When Jon Stewart presents as he has recently, story after story, example after example, where Wall Street is so broken and the level of corruption of Wall Street is so great that not even the New York Times can be bothered any more to express the level of corruption unless it is in the billions. If it is corruption of only hundreds of millions of theft it doesn’t rate a mention. Certainly the SEC and other entities have no interest. Only if you are a small fish will they “throw the book at you.” Only if you are one will they come after you with all their force and might. If you are a large bank, a brokerage firm, a derivative trader, an algorithmic platform, then they have no problem with the level of corruption to the system.
We are at a point now where the stock market is so disconnected to the reality of the world because of these algorithmic trades that people are making money on the stock market and more and more people are suckered in to the false belief that it can only go up and the underlying mechanics of the economy do not in any way match up to the valuations that have been placed on stocks and shares. Is the present system capable of being fixed when leaders such as President Obama, cannot even remember the lies he told in his election campaign and he cannot even remember what he recited and said a week ago. He will look straight into the camera and pretend that what he is saying today is true and what he said a week ago never existed. He’s not the only one.
We have the same example on the side of the Republicans. We see it in other countries. We see it as a universal malaise and it could be the United Kingdom, Australia, wherever it is, a malaise of incompetence and complete and total sociopathy in our leaders. Is the present system capable of being fixed—a system that we have spoken about over and over again that is based on slavery, financial slavery, where you are born a slave to a debt that your father, your grandfather and your ancestors were not responsible for. I am not talking about original sin which is the ecclesiastical argument. I am talking about the debts of wars for which our ancestors and we are bound as slaves to pay. I am talking about wars that we never started but only died and yet we are considered responsible for paying those debts.
We gave a list of things some months ago when we spoke about the financial aspect of the system. We gave a list of ten or so steps that could be taken to restore some life and some hope to the existing financial system. So far I have to say, not a single one of those things have been addressed and the livelihood of the repair of the existing financial system at this point is close to zero. For those that you know and those that question you on the value of your reading Ucadia or listening to these audios, studying the Ucadia model, as them this question: “Is the present system capable of being fixed?” and if it cannot be fixed and if it appears that even if it is fixed we are just going back to a worse state of slavery, a worse system of oppression, and if that is the reality of the first question, then let’s get it on the table. Let’s be clear about what we are dealing with; that is the problem.
This then leads us to the second question: “How do we survive and keep ourselves and our families safe during these changes?” If you have had a chance to listen to these audios you would have heard me say over and over that amidst the injustice and the system crumbling, the last thing you want to do is make it easier for the present system to crush you further and impose further misery upon you. I am, of course, referring to people who have followed all kinds of gurus on the internet, promoters of various ideas who have said that it’s fine to do your own plates and make up your own drivers’ license and don’t go to court and don’t pay those fines. What I have said all along and I respect when people don’t have the money to pay, but there are ways to pay by installment. The principle is what I have been concerned with and what I have tried to share is this: the system is so automated now that modern police cars in countries such as Australia, the United States, Canada and United Kingdom have automatic plate recognition that police don’t even have to nor are they able to, apply any discernment now. The computer pretty much tells them that this driver is unlicensed or this car in unregistered and it’s time to make an arrest.
These systems are so efficient that they can process in one shift thousands of numbered plate recognitions. So, whereas maybe ten or fifteen years ago, one might live in a community and act in such a fashion and may have been lucky enough that the local sheriffs and police ignored drivers who didn’t have proper plates and proper licenses. Now you are dealing with a machine. It’s not acquiescence; it’s sheer survival. The amount of energy that you expend in defending a parking fine can be roughly the same amount of energy you can use in perfecting your Will and Testament and perfecting exactly where you stand. So it’s absurd and an act of bloody stupidity to exert all your energy on such smaller issues, under an automated system, when the larger and key issue, I hope you realize, is the presumption that you are a slave, a lunatic, a ward of the state, or dead. That is the key issue; the underpinnings of a breaking and collapsing system.
If we wish to survive and keep our families safe during these changes, then the first thing we need to consider is not to do anything bloody stupid. Sorry for the language but I can’t be any more direct to you than what I have just said. The other thing we can do to survive and keep ourselves and families safe, particularly if we find ourselves in positions that we no longer can give any more blood as the system crushes us and it is crushing people more and more, is to get our paperwork in order. That doesn’t mean the system stops at the door when you have your paperwork in order. You know that I hope and I hope no one ever makes the claim or misrepresents me as I have never claimed that paper is a magic remedy or a silver bullet.
What the material regarding your estate on the website restorelaw.org is about, is that it is the very foundation of their system presented in a clear manner and a step-by-step form. If you do take the time to complete and you genuinely find yourself acting in the manner of a true mendicant, in honor and respect even to those that approach you with disrespect, that you do not attack, that you are not violent and that you are respectful to those that claim to be officers of the law, even if they are absolute imposters, and that you use affidavits and the proof of their dishonor, that you demonstrate clearly the will of the person, the testament of the man or the woman, and what you do then is that you don’t make yourself a target, not if you act with honor and peaceful resistance. You don’t come across as a smart Alec. You are honorable in your behavior.
What happens then is that you become a harder target for the debt collectors and for the bottom feeders, pirates and robbers. Rather than the argument that these people make it their goal then to break you down because you resist, if you do stand in honor and for the Rule of Law, Justice and Due Process, and if you do take the time to do this properly, but most importantly change your attitude and live your life according to some basic values and not simply mimic the behavior of pirates, then you become less of a target for the system and not more of a target for the system. There are plenty of people for the system to still attack and crush. I don’t wish ill on people and I’m certainly not doing Ucadia out of some selfish reason, but we are talking on the second question of survival in keeping ourselves and our families safe during these changes. The point I am trying to make in the second question is really an answer to those, and often those of you with partners and friends who ask you why you are bothering with this and what is the point of this? Why aren’t you going out and doing “XYZ?” Why are you finding more work? Why aren’t you getting on your hands and knees and saying please forgive me to whoever is hassling you?
The point is that if you are following the material regarding the estate it is directly relevant to your survival in a collapsing system. Some might say, “What’s the point?” In societies where there are still laws where you can own a gun some might say that the only way to defend yourself is with those kinds of implements. I say that violence as any form of defense is ultimately futile. You only have to look at the way the media picks up the extreme stories of people that intended to be violent or acted even for an instant to be violent and they use that to say that these people who are studying the history of law, trying to find remedy are not people who love the law, but extremists and terrorists. More recently they used the absurd concept of the use of sovereign citizen, the concept invented by the founders of the United States Constitution and the Declaration of Independence. They are the ones that invented the concept of sovereign citizen and now we live in such an Orwellian society that those weasels of media commentators are calling these kinds of extreme cases sovereign citizens.
How do we survive and how do we keep ourselves and our families safe? We don’t make ourselves easy targets. We address our behavior and we consider the triage of how we survive before we look for ways of being ‘smarter.’ This leads us to the third question tonight: “If the present system is unfixable, then what is the best future model and what are you doing to help making such a dream come true?” So long as we are islands in there system and so long as they can keep us isolated, so long as we are unable to establish and re-establish trust amongst ourselves, then at best our lives will be marginal and survival will be difficult.
Once we find a way of coming together, once we accept that only by coming together and re-establishing trust, will we not only survive in the long term, but thrive. The question then is, “What is the best model for coming together?” What is best model for the future dream of prosperity, happiness and the very things that are written into the Declaration of Independence? This third question is really a call and challenge to anyone who may have been cynical in research and the describing of Ucadia and may still, even today, be sitting on the fence. Ultimately it is a way of ‘smoking people out’ through logic and to say, “Okay, is this present system fixable and is it worth fixing?” If the answer to both questions is, “No,” then there is no point in spending time looking back with the rose colored glasses of belief that twenty years ago things were better, or ten years ago things were better. It’s about where we go from here.
That is what the Ucadia model developed now over thirty years is about. if you have been listening to the audios, then you are probably aware, hopefully, that those last obstacles within the charters to the Globe Union, the Americas Union, the Africas Union, the Oceanic Union, that make the ability for people to come together of their own accord without any central control mechanism, without any central ‘rubber stamping,’ without the need of some high council or architects or protho-notaries, or any other groups. People can come together and use this model after it’s up and start to form communities. Those obstacles are almost completely removed. No only are the charters clear on how people can come together but also perform a level of clarity that approximates an instruction manual as well, on how men and women can come together and form communities.
The same can be said to the work that is still underway concerning the energy, the tokens of energy, in the forms of the currencies and financial tools of the Ucadia model which will also be perfected into a grass-roots, self-executing model. What this means is that from the perspective of anybody who is genuine in looking to the future and re-establishing trust, and not simply surviving in a marginal fashion but actually thriving with others, you have a model from the grass roots up and if you follow it you will be able to form communities with other like-minded people and, more, that within that framework, the promise that the Ucadia model itself is fully vested and owned by the same members and communities.
Unlike the Covenant of One Heaven, Pactum de Singularis Caelum, which cannot be edited after the 21st of December, 2013, until the next Conclave, the charters can be refined and perfected to some degree up until the existence of a probational Union and a probational structure for the entire region. There is the chance as we go through to correct mistakes as we find them. There is still a lot of work to do, but if you take the time to read and if you take the time to look, I know of no other model, no other structure that better expresses a way that people can come together without it simply being a mirror of the existing system and a way to reestablish trust.
So there are the Three Questions to consider leading into 2014. There are lots of other things I’d love to cover with you, but tonight I think we will leave it with the Three Questions. If you haven’t had a chance to read the updates to The Book of the Green Race, Lebor Clann Glas, on one-heaven then I hope you do get the chance to read. But, until we speak again after the Christmas holiday, I want to say, “Thank you.” I want to say a heartfelt thanks to all of you this year who took the time to read or listen or watch some of the You Tube videos on some of the material we presented this year. I want to personally thank each and every one of you who wrote to me. Even if I was unable to engage in a conversation with you, I want you to know that I appreciate and I want to express my appreciation to each and every one of you who took the time to provide your opinion and feedback.
To those who found a way to give financial support and help I want to give a huge and heartfelt thanks. This is still and has been the most difficult financial year of my life as to the pressures, the financial pressures of continuing to maintain the infrastructure and expenses of supporting the Ucadia model. Of course over time as communities, hopefully we will grow and rightfully claim ownership of the Ucadia model and those expenses will shift to others.
The legacy will shift to others as it should always be. I want to give thanks to all of you who have found a way to help this year and who are still contemplating in some way to help.
Lastly, as this is a time of celebration, reflection and renewal, I want to say “thank you” to each and everyone of you and that you have the safest and happiest of times with your friends and family and that you have a joyous year to come. Whatever I can do through the Ucadia model in completing what I promised to do and continue to fulfill, I will. Until we speak next time, be safe and be well. Thank you and good night.
Wednesday, December 18, 2013
Wednesday, December 11, 2013
How much are you worth as a slave (animal) vs. a thing (stock)?: Why the pirate bankers have completely destroyed their own system
_________________________________________________________________
Please download MP3 Audio Broadcast of this Blog > here (43 min 16 Mb)
_________________________________________________________________
Thank you for listening; this is Frank O’Collins for the Ucadia Blog on Wednesday, December 11, 2013. The topic this week is how much are you worth as a slave, an animal, versus a thing or a commodity of stock? and why the pirate bankers have completely destroyed their own system. If you have been reading and listening to the Ucadia blogs, then the number of stories that are continuing to rise is evidence of courts that no longer even pretend to be courts of law and judges and magistrates that now openly state that the law is whatever they say it is. If they are confronted with the foundation of their law and the foundation of Rule of Law and the foundation of justice and due process, they are perfectly happy to simply change the rules to suit themselves and do we even have this recorded on the record?
Every day it seems that more and more stories appear where corporations are able to pay a mere pittance of their ill-gotten gains and for the executives of those corporations to avoid prison while you, I and others that we know are imprisoned, tortured, harassed for mere pennies. As we have said over the last few years there will come a time, there will come a day, where our neighbors, our relatives and our friends who may have laughed at us when we said to them that, “You are to the system but a slave, to the system you are a pauper, to the system you are a mere commodity, a thing, a security, an infant, a lunatic. Now we find those same friends, relatives and neighbors speak to us and while they may not admit that what we said to them was prophetic compared to what they thought they knew, no one can argue that the system is falling apart. More and more people are seeing it and the nihilists are being exposed for what they are.
The topic tonight is to return to the subject, the subject of the system designed with our being slaves and the system that worked in parallel and then took over from our value as slaves to being commodities and things. The reason I chose this topic tonight is for two events that are unfolding as we speak. The first is the memorial and the remembrance of that great man, Nelson Mandela, a rare symbol of triumph over seemingly insurmountable odds and the ability of one man of character to change a system. The other is the debate that is occurring as we speak in the United States, particularly regarding the basic wage and whether men and women who are literally struggling to feed themselves are entitled to something that at least brings them above or at least level with the line of poverty. A third, now that I think about it, is also the fact that in reaction to the Evangeli Gaudium (Gospel of Joy) of Pope Francis (Time Person of the Year 2013) as to the evils and malevolence of the western system and model of law that it has become, we have seen the reaction of the nihilists and stupid and mindless idiots who are the spokespersons of many nihilists who have come out and shrieked at the considered and balanced comments of the head of the Catholic Church to claim that they are perfectly happy with the notion of being a Christian and at the same time treating everyone else with contempt and allowing the starving and imprisonment of millions in countries as wealthy as the United States.
If we are going to talk about the subject of,”How much are we worth as a slave and as an animal versus a thing, and why this comparison is a way of demonstrating that the private bankers have completely destroyed their own system,” then we need to address a blind spot that so many of us and so many of the people we know still refuse to accept. That is that we have been effectively slaves to the system for hundreds and hundreds of years, and they architected that. We have proof that the system viewed us a slaves and that they designed the system for slavery. We have proof of that. I want to address that first.
Slavery wasn't abolished it was just "rebranded"
I want to address some of the elements of proof first before we get into the comparison and why we make this comparison of our value as a slave versus the value of commodity because many still do not believe that we are legally considered slaves. We are brought up and told that slavery was abolished. It wasn’t abolished; it was merely re-branded. There are effectively three ways to view slavery. The first is the concept that existed in ancient times and culture of forced bondage that was effectively when men and women were captured by an invading force as prisoners. Rather than being executed they were forced into some form of labor.
This first form of slavery is as prisoners. This type of slavery requires an enormous amount of force in order to effect it operation. It is an admission in this first type of slavery that there is no legal basis, claim or attempt to be any legal basis or claim other than “might is right,” with the use of fear, threat and real violence. It should make sense then, that this type of slavery, the slavery of being forced laborers and prisoners is the type of slavery most often seen with tyrants. So long as the force of resistance is less than the force of oppression, the system holds. But once the force of resistance exceeds the force of oppression, and then such a system collapses.
If you wish to see signs of this form of prison, then there are actual statutes of Law, the foundation of the Industrial Revolution where the Acts themselves were explicitly written for poor prisoners. The origin of the Workhouse Act (22 Car.II c.18 [1670]), the creation of the concept of workhouses in the year 1670, we see in the Poor Prisoners Act (18 Car.II c.4 [1666]), the creation of these hellholes for the poor that were consider idle and under-employed and that they may be forced into heavy labor for the profit of a few.
Another example of slavery as prisoners is where we see the increase of the elements of prison, where we see the arming of guards and police, where we see the use of surveillance and walls, where we see the restrictions of movement. If all these sound ominous because we see that they are increasing, then what you see in the prison societies of the United States, Canada, Australia, Europe and the rest of the world, is a marked increase in the overt use of force, fear and threat to keep people in line as other forms of slavery reduce in effectiveness.
The second form of slavery is the form of slavery in the form of a pledge to service or servitude and this is where we get the word, “servant.” Involuntary servitude is where through a pledge, a man or a woman bonds themselves for a period of service. This is where we see the concept of Vow: “I pledge my allegiance to the flag…” This is a form of servitude and usually has a time limit or be it that now we are compelled and coerced to pledge our entire lives. Pledging and servitude was considered for most societies such as the Roman society, the Mesopotamian Society, the Egyptian Society as an essential component for their operation. Another sign that is not necessarily an evil concept and while we refer to it as a second form of slavery or servitude, when it is an open and honest system there is nothing intrinsically evil when one pledges oneself to some higher ideal or some higher service for the benefit of others. The third form of slavery or servitude is the use of magic and specifically the use of the concept of curse. This is found in the origin of the concept of making one’s mark and what is referred to making one’s mark is in the use of blood to make a sign, signature of mark, an “X” representing a blood oath.
I have mentioned as I did the other day that there is certainly strong evidence to show that within the New Testament and in particular within the Gospel of Matthew that some of the teachings of Jesus Christ appear overwhelmingly to be manipulated in terms of the words. If you are not aware of what I was speaking about then I encourage you to go back and listen to the previous audio concerning this. What I was referring to is the intrinsic importance of oaths and vows within ancient societies as the emphasis and the foundation of the Rule of Law. Without vows and without oaths, our ability and the ability of ancient cultures to hold together the Rule of Law, justice and due process would have been impossible. There would have been no civilization ever created if oaths and vows were not considered of the utmost importance and significance.
When we come to blood oaths and the use of blood in the form of a self-curse, this is an entirely different matter. If we were to consider the references within Matthew in regards to one never making an Oath or a Vow, if that was to mean a Blood Oath or a Blood Vow, then certainly that would be accurate, valid and consistent. Where do we find these blood oaths and self-curses occurring? Well, we know for example that there has been a hidden history where the spot of blood has been included on birth records at the time of birth and that there are some jurisdictions where this may still be happening today. We also know that blood and blood signatures have been used by secret societies for some time, and other secret fraternities.
The most significant use of this concept of “oathing our blood” or “oathing our flesh” and cursing ourselves is actually in the origin and the concept of debt, that is, debt as opposed to obligation. The difference to this really owes itself back to a time under the Roman Empire and the origin of taxes, the origin of inherited obligation and the original meaning of debt as opposed to owing someone money. There needs to be a distinction between owing someone something and the nature concerning debt. If you haven’t already, what you may find useful is to read some of Lebor Clann Glas which you can find at www.one-heaven.org under Sacred Texts where some of the history concerning Rome is made clearer.
If you have a look at the Roman system and particular from about 6CE, something dramatically changed between the merchant militia that had taken over Rome from the time of Julius Kaiser (Caesar), from 43 and 44 and going through to Octavius Augustus. But from 6CE the Roman system had switched from a system of booty where countries were invaded, treasures were divvied up, to this concept that Rome would charge reparation for lands that it had seized and invaded as the concept that we saw in WWI in the form of war reparations. In order for this war reparation to be paid, Rome conducted a census of the population and then divided the amount that they claimed was owed, and then apportioned out what each man, woman and merchant was to pay. This was the origin of the concept of tax. Tax in this form was not only considered a tribute to the conquering army, but it was considered a sacred, inherited obligation, and the beginning and the point of origin of the concept of original sin as a concept of a blood debt.
Whenever we see an obligation in the present system and converted into the far more serious concept of the blood debt before heaven. We see this when an obligation or claim is brought into one of their courts and converted into a debt. As I said there are the 3 types of slavery. Since even the time of Jesus and before, those three forms of obligation have been used, but the one that has become the most powerful of the 3 at least for the last 200 years has been the concept of curse, cursing ourselves and the obligation of payment of debt, war reparation and original sin.
The proof is overwhelming the system views you as a slave
People still may not believe, may not agree that we are considered slaves in their system, even today. Yet, there is proof that we can see in plain sight that is unmistakable, cannot be explained away, that owes its heritage to the concept of slavery and is blatant and obvious and indisputable proof that we are still considered to the bankers, to the pirates as slaves. I will give two clear examples. The first is the origin of the letter “P”, the Roman letter “P” that is found within your Passport. If you open up your Passport you will see that under “status” or some other field equivalent to the concept of status, you will see the Roman letter, “P.” I know when you ask officials they will come up with all kinds of crap, lies, misdirection or stunned silence. There is an origin for what the “P” means. The origin is still in effect today and the origin that is found in the laws and the origin that is unmistakable. The “P” in your Passport recognizes you as a Pauper, or the word, “Poor.” You are a pauper and you are one of the poor. You are without rights of land, you are a ward of the state, you are in ‘infant’ therefore, and you are a ‘lunatic’ therefore, and must be insured wherever you travel and you must have a certificate wherever you travel as well.
The origin of the use of “P” can be found Acts such as the Poor Settlement Act of 1691 (3 Will. & Mar. c.11 [1691]) and in 1697 (8 & 9 Will.III c.30 [1697]). And there were subsequent Poor Relief Acts. If you look at the links that are part of this audio and you can go see those Acts, and you can see in plain sight that the “P” represents that you are a Pauper, you are Poor, and therefore you are a criminal, infant, or lunatic and you are a slave. The other piece of obvious proof that we still have today is our Birth Certificate which owes its origin directly from the concept of Settlement Certificates from the Settlement Act of 1691 and the Poor Relief Act of 1662 (13 & 14 Car.II c.12 [1662]) through to the Settlement Acts of the 18th Century.
Again in 1691 and 1698 and even in the Poor Relief Act of 1713 (12 Ann. c.18 [1713]) we could not work, nor get a job without a Settlement Certificate. If you have a Birth Certificate, you have a Settlement Certificate. I know there are many other things than just the Settlement Certificate but this is its origin. If you have a Birth Certificate you have a Settlement Certificate. If you have a Settlement Certificate then you are a Pauper. You are a ward, lunatic, prisoner, criminal by their system and you are a slave under their system. In fact the Acts throughout the 17th, 18th, and 19th centuries of Westminster made clear that the work given to the poor, the employment, the concept of employment was to make the slaves useful.
See also (9 Geo.I c.7 [1722]), (10 Geo.I c.7 [1723]) and (KEY ACT - 22 Geo.III c.83 [1782]).
The Slave Trade stopped because of competition with easy supply of Poor
They don’t hide the fact and they use language to the equivalent. The Workhouse Act of 1723 (10 Geo.I c.7 [1723]) is the very origin of the "hellhole" workhouses for "privatized" slaves to corporations. First in the enclosure Acts they kicked the poor off the land so they could not feed themselves. Secondly, they put them into workhouses that were run by the Quakers, the Brethren, the Mennonites, and the Methodists as money-making ventures to rent out the poor and to make money for our effort. In exchange we were given pennies and if we were lucky we were allowed to live. If we were lucky we had something to eat and nothing more. And, of course, we see that today. Look at how much money Wal-Mart makes. And look at how little they pay their employees. Nothing has changed.
Nothing has changed, and you still believe that you are not a slave? Under the Poor Law Amendment Act of 1834, an Act of Westminster that applies to all former and current colonies, the poor could not receive any benefit unless they were constantly employed. This is after the Slave Trade Act of 1807 and the Slavery Abolition Act of 1833. Think about this when people argue that slavery was abolished. The Slave Trade Act of 1807 and the Slavery Abolition Act of 1833 applied to all dominions except land owned by the East India Company. Can you think of a place in the world where slavery continued after 1833, a former colony?
In any event the abolition of slavery was the abolition of stealing and imprisoning people from Africa and other parts of the world. It had nothing to do with the enslavement of Caucasian children, men and women in Britain, Ireland, England, Scotland, Wales and Europe. Why do you think that the Quakers and the Methodists and Brethren were so vocal in shutting down the slave trade from Africa?
Remember, as we said last week these same people were responsible for the murder, death, and crimes against humanity against hundreds of people who died in work houses because of them and the fortunes that were made by these awful, awful people who are lauded today and praised today as great people with hundreds of thousands if not millions who died in their custody. Why do you think these people were so active in abolishing the trade of people from Africa? Simply, there was more money to be made in converting everyone to being poor than there was in importing more people from foreign lands. There was more money for them in White Slavery converting us into the Poor than there was in the original concept of invading a country and imprisoning the people.
That is the honest truth. The legacy of that is what they did to Ireland, Scotland and Wales after they had done it to their own people in England.
See also: (1 & 2 Geo. IV c.56 [1821]) and (KEY ACT - 4 & 5 Will. 4 c.76 [1834])
The system is completely broken when you are worth more to the bankers as a "dead commodity" than a "working slave"
If we look to the answer of the question of what you are worth as a slave to the system today, then I guess the base value is somewhere in the order of $25,000 to $30,000 a year as a slave. That is about the amount of sustenance and maintenance that they give people as a basic wage, certainly in America. The basic wage in Australia and elsewhere may be higher, but it is still a pittance. What about our value as a “thing,” a thing being a mindless and soulless commodity or stock. What is our value as a “thing” to the system? Well, beginning with the creation of the annuities that we have spoken about back at the end of the 17th century and the beginning of the 18th century, and then the extension of that system into a global system of slave bonds, one could argue that the value of our being a commodity was more than what they recognized as a slave, but with a reasonable margin of two, three or four times of the value of slavery as a commodity given the speculative nature of selling something for more than its base value in markets.
Today the annuity accounts which we can prove exist because since 1790, if we take the United States under the debt funding laws of Congress, the reports are still published by County and these are the reports that give us the value of these assets held at a County level that are in many cases 1000, 2000, 3000 times the value of the debts of the County. If we would divide those numbers in those annual reports against the number of people living in the County, then we would see that the value of the annuities, the slave bonds traded on our being a “think”, a “stock,” is some millions of dollars. Some 200 to 300 in some cases 1000 times more our value as an animal, an animal being with a mind but without a soul. In fact if one was to look at one of the fundamental and catastrophic collapses within the current system of the pirate bankers in the last 50 years, it is the disconnect in their minds full of nihilism and stupidity between the fact that our value as a slave and our a value as a “thin”, as “stock” rests on the existence of us in flesh.
The banks have reached the point that they have completely disconnected from the productivity of the slave to the value of the speculative value of derivatives, securities and bonds by perceiving us as “stock” to the point that they have destroyed their own system as the values have absolutely no rational basis. We have seen an extended period, an unbelievable period where the banks have actually encouraged the destruction of jobs, and even encouraged the promotion of people if left to their own devices, starving, but yet still basing their future on the trading of the same instruments against the value of people. So today, the pirate bankers value us as a “thing” hundreds if not thousands of times more than the value as a slave. Here again we find the proof that they have completely destroyed their own system by such a lack of logic and sense.
Well maybe those who listen to this audio and maybe those that read these Acts and hear discussion about this, the credibility and the conceding that we are treated and viewed as slaves may still be difficult to accept. But I have given you tonight two key areas of evidence in the form of the “P” and the origin of the “P” showing you as a Pauper, a Prisoner, Poor and therefore an infant, a lunatic, a ward of the state. The fact that you have a Birth Certificate is a continuation of Settlement Certificates and the Settlement Certificates are for the Poor. If you see those pieces still working today and they do, the system still views you as a slave.
What can we do? We can do what we speak about each week; we can become more competent in our own affairs. We can become clear on what the Rule of Law is, and what Justice and Due Process are. I leave you with two thoughts tonight: if you want to see clarity as to the law, then I can offer you no better summary than section 16 of the Age of Nazarenes under The Book of the Green Race, Lebor Clann Glas.
Finally, I want to thank all of you who continue to read and continue to review, continue to help, continue to learn and wake up, and continue to represent the true Rule of Law in competence. Until we speak next week, thank you and be well. Thank you and Good Night.
[If you wish to support and keep these research projects continuing, then please help by supporting Ucadia. Thank you]
Please download MP3 Audio Broadcast of this Blog > here (43 min 16 Mb)
_________________________________________________________________
Thank you for listening; this is Frank O’Collins for the Ucadia Blog on Wednesday, December 11, 2013. The topic this week is how much are you worth as a slave, an animal, versus a thing or a commodity of stock? and why the pirate bankers have completely destroyed their own system. If you have been reading and listening to the Ucadia blogs, then the number of stories that are continuing to rise is evidence of courts that no longer even pretend to be courts of law and judges and magistrates that now openly state that the law is whatever they say it is. If they are confronted with the foundation of their law and the foundation of Rule of Law and the foundation of justice and due process, they are perfectly happy to simply change the rules to suit themselves and do we even have this recorded on the record?
Every day it seems that more and more stories appear where corporations are able to pay a mere pittance of their ill-gotten gains and for the executives of those corporations to avoid prison while you, I and others that we know are imprisoned, tortured, harassed for mere pennies. As we have said over the last few years there will come a time, there will come a day, where our neighbors, our relatives and our friends who may have laughed at us when we said to them that, “You are to the system but a slave, to the system you are a pauper, to the system you are a mere commodity, a thing, a security, an infant, a lunatic. Now we find those same friends, relatives and neighbors speak to us and while they may not admit that what we said to them was prophetic compared to what they thought they knew, no one can argue that the system is falling apart. More and more people are seeing it and the nihilists are being exposed for what they are.
The topic tonight is to return to the subject, the subject of the system designed with our being slaves and the system that worked in parallel and then took over from our value as slaves to being commodities and things. The reason I chose this topic tonight is for two events that are unfolding as we speak. The first is the memorial and the remembrance of that great man, Nelson Mandela, a rare symbol of triumph over seemingly insurmountable odds and the ability of one man of character to change a system. The other is the debate that is occurring as we speak in the United States, particularly regarding the basic wage and whether men and women who are literally struggling to feed themselves are entitled to something that at least brings them above or at least level with the line of poverty. A third, now that I think about it, is also the fact that in reaction to the Evangeli Gaudium (Gospel of Joy) of Pope Francis (Time Person of the Year 2013) as to the evils and malevolence of the western system and model of law that it has become, we have seen the reaction of the nihilists and stupid and mindless idiots who are the spokespersons of many nihilists who have come out and shrieked at the considered and balanced comments of the head of the Catholic Church to claim that they are perfectly happy with the notion of being a Christian and at the same time treating everyone else with contempt and allowing the starving and imprisonment of millions in countries as wealthy as the United States.
If we are going to talk about the subject of,”How much are we worth as a slave and as an animal versus a thing, and why this comparison is a way of demonstrating that the private bankers have completely destroyed their own system,” then we need to address a blind spot that so many of us and so many of the people we know still refuse to accept. That is that we have been effectively slaves to the system for hundreds and hundreds of years, and they architected that. We have proof that the system viewed us a slaves and that they designed the system for slavery. We have proof of that. I want to address that first.
Slavery wasn't abolished it was just "rebranded"
I want to address some of the elements of proof first before we get into the comparison and why we make this comparison of our value as a slave versus the value of commodity because many still do not believe that we are legally considered slaves. We are brought up and told that slavery was abolished. It wasn’t abolished; it was merely re-branded. There are effectively three ways to view slavery. The first is the concept that existed in ancient times and culture of forced bondage that was effectively when men and women were captured by an invading force as prisoners. Rather than being executed they were forced into some form of labor.
This first form of slavery is as prisoners. This type of slavery requires an enormous amount of force in order to effect it operation. It is an admission in this first type of slavery that there is no legal basis, claim or attempt to be any legal basis or claim other than “might is right,” with the use of fear, threat and real violence. It should make sense then, that this type of slavery, the slavery of being forced laborers and prisoners is the type of slavery most often seen with tyrants. So long as the force of resistance is less than the force of oppression, the system holds. But once the force of resistance exceeds the force of oppression, and then such a system collapses.
If you wish to see signs of this form of prison, then there are actual statutes of Law, the foundation of the Industrial Revolution where the Acts themselves were explicitly written for poor prisoners. The origin of the Workhouse Act (22 Car.II c.18 [1670]), the creation of the concept of workhouses in the year 1670, we see in the Poor Prisoners Act (18 Car.II c.4 [1666]), the creation of these hellholes for the poor that were consider idle and under-employed and that they may be forced into heavy labor for the profit of a few.
Another example of slavery as prisoners is where we see the increase of the elements of prison, where we see the arming of guards and police, where we see the use of surveillance and walls, where we see the restrictions of movement. If all these sound ominous because we see that they are increasing, then what you see in the prison societies of the United States, Canada, Australia, Europe and the rest of the world, is a marked increase in the overt use of force, fear and threat to keep people in line as other forms of slavery reduce in effectiveness.
The second form of slavery is the form of slavery in the form of a pledge to service or servitude and this is where we get the word, “servant.” Involuntary servitude is where through a pledge, a man or a woman bonds themselves for a period of service. This is where we see the concept of Vow: “I pledge my allegiance to the flag…” This is a form of servitude and usually has a time limit or be it that now we are compelled and coerced to pledge our entire lives. Pledging and servitude was considered for most societies such as the Roman society, the Mesopotamian Society, the Egyptian Society as an essential component for their operation. Another sign that is not necessarily an evil concept and while we refer to it as a second form of slavery or servitude, when it is an open and honest system there is nothing intrinsically evil when one pledges oneself to some higher ideal or some higher service for the benefit of others. The third form of slavery or servitude is the use of magic and specifically the use of the concept of curse. This is found in the origin of the concept of making one’s mark and what is referred to making one’s mark is in the use of blood to make a sign, signature of mark, an “X” representing a blood oath.
I have mentioned as I did the other day that there is certainly strong evidence to show that within the New Testament and in particular within the Gospel of Matthew that some of the teachings of Jesus Christ appear overwhelmingly to be manipulated in terms of the words. If you are not aware of what I was speaking about then I encourage you to go back and listen to the previous audio concerning this. What I was referring to is the intrinsic importance of oaths and vows within ancient societies as the emphasis and the foundation of the Rule of Law. Without vows and without oaths, our ability and the ability of ancient cultures to hold together the Rule of Law, justice and due process would have been impossible. There would have been no civilization ever created if oaths and vows were not considered of the utmost importance and significance.
When we come to blood oaths and the use of blood in the form of a self-curse, this is an entirely different matter. If we were to consider the references within Matthew in regards to one never making an Oath or a Vow, if that was to mean a Blood Oath or a Blood Vow, then certainly that would be accurate, valid and consistent. Where do we find these blood oaths and self-curses occurring? Well, we know for example that there has been a hidden history where the spot of blood has been included on birth records at the time of birth and that there are some jurisdictions where this may still be happening today. We also know that blood and blood signatures have been used by secret societies for some time, and other secret fraternities.
The most significant use of this concept of “oathing our blood” or “oathing our flesh” and cursing ourselves is actually in the origin and the concept of debt, that is, debt as opposed to obligation. The difference to this really owes itself back to a time under the Roman Empire and the origin of taxes, the origin of inherited obligation and the original meaning of debt as opposed to owing someone money. There needs to be a distinction between owing someone something and the nature concerning debt. If you haven’t already, what you may find useful is to read some of Lebor Clann Glas which you can find at www.one-heaven.org under Sacred Texts where some of the history concerning Rome is made clearer.
If you have a look at the Roman system and particular from about 6CE, something dramatically changed between the merchant militia that had taken over Rome from the time of Julius Kaiser (Caesar), from 43 and 44 and going through to Octavius Augustus. But from 6CE the Roman system had switched from a system of booty where countries were invaded, treasures were divvied up, to this concept that Rome would charge reparation for lands that it had seized and invaded as the concept that we saw in WWI in the form of war reparations. In order for this war reparation to be paid, Rome conducted a census of the population and then divided the amount that they claimed was owed, and then apportioned out what each man, woman and merchant was to pay. This was the origin of the concept of tax. Tax in this form was not only considered a tribute to the conquering army, but it was considered a sacred, inherited obligation, and the beginning and the point of origin of the concept of original sin as a concept of a blood debt.
Whenever we see an obligation in the present system and converted into the far more serious concept of the blood debt before heaven. We see this when an obligation or claim is brought into one of their courts and converted into a debt. As I said there are the 3 types of slavery. Since even the time of Jesus and before, those three forms of obligation have been used, but the one that has become the most powerful of the 3 at least for the last 200 years has been the concept of curse, cursing ourselves and the obligation of payment of debt, war reparation and original sin.
The proof is overwhelming the system views you as a slave
People still may not believe, may not agree that we are considered slaves in their system, even today. Yet, there is proof that we can see in plain sight that is unmistakable, cannot be explained away, that owes its heritage to the concept of slavery and is blatant and obvious and indisputable proof that we are still considered to the bankers, to the pirates as slaves. I will give two clear examples. The first is the origin of the letter “P”, the Roman letter “P” that is found within your Passport. If you open up your Passport you will see that under “status” or some other field equivalent to the concept of status, you will see the Roman letter, “P.” I know when you ask officials they will come up with all kinds of crap, lies, misdirection or stunned silence. There is an origin for what the “P” means. The origin is still in effect today and the origin that is found in the laws and the origin that is unmistakable. The “P” in your Passport recognizes you as a Pauper, or the word, “Poor.” You are a pauper and you are one of the poor. You are without rights of land, you are a ward of the state, you are in ‘infant’ therefore, and you are a ‘lunatic’ therefore, and must be insured wherever you travel and you must have a certificate wherever you travel as well.
The origin of the use of “P” can be found Acts such as the Poor Settlement Act of 1691 (3 Will. & Mar. c.11 [1691]) and in 1697 (8 & 9 Will.III c.30 [1697]). And there were subsequent Poor Relief Acts. If you look at the links that are part of this audio and you can go see those Acts, and you can see in plain sight that the “P” represents that you are a Pauper, you are Poor, and therefore you are a criminal, infant, or lunatic and you are a slave. The other piece of obvious proof that we still have today is our Birth Certificate which owes its origin directly from the concept of Settlement Certificates from the Settlement Act of 1691 and the Poor Relief Act of 1662 (13 & 14 Car.II c.12 [1662]) through to the Settlement Acts of the 18th Century.
Again in 1691 and 1698 and even in the Poor Relief Act of 1713 (12 Ann. c.18 [1713]) we could not work, nor get a job without a Settlement Certificate. If you have a Birth Certificate, you have a Settlement Certificate. I know there are many other things than just the Settlement Certificate but this is its origin. If you have a Birth Certificate you have a Settlement Certificate. If you have a Settlement Certificate then you are a Pauper. You are a ward, lunatic, prisoner, criminal by their system and you are a slave under their system. In fact the Acts throughout the 17th, 18th, and 19th centuries of Westminster made clear that the work given to the poor, the employment, the concept of employment was to make the slaves useful.
See also (9 Geo.I c.7 [1722]), (10 Geo.I c.7 [1723]) and (KEY ACT - 22 Geo.III c.83 [1782]).
The Slave Trade stopped because of competition with easy supply of Poor
They don’t hide the fact and they use language to the equivalent. The Workhouse Act of 1723 (10 Geo.I c.7 [1723]) is the very origin of the "hellhole" workhouses for "privatized" slaves to corporations. First in the enclosure Acts they kicked the poor off the land so they could not feed themselves. Secondly, they put them into workhouses that were run by the Quakers, the Brethren, the Mennonites, and the Methodists as money-making ventures to rent out the poor and to make money for our effort. In exchange we were given pennies and if we were lucky we were allowed to live. If we were lucky we had something to eat and nothing more. And, of course, we see that today. Look at how much money Wal-Mart makes. And look at how little they pay their employees. Nothing has changed.
Nothing has changed, and you still believe that you are not a slave? Under the Poor Law Amendment Act of 1834, an Act of Westminster that applies to all former and current colonies, the poor could not receive any benefit unless they were constantly employed. This is after the Slave Trade Act of 1807 and the Slavery Abolition Act of 1833. Think about this when people argue that slavery was abolished. The Slave Trade Act of 1807 and the Slavery Abolition Act of 1833 applied to all dominions except land owned by the East India Company. Can you think of a place in the world where slavery continued after 1833, a former colony?
In any event the abolition of slavery was the abolition of stealing and imprisoning people from Africa and other parts of the world. It had nothing to do with the enslavement of Caucasian children, men and women in Britain, Ireland, England, Scotland, Wales and Europe. Why do you think that the Quakers and the Methodists and Brethren were so vocal in shutting down the slave trade from Africa?
Remember, as we said last week these same people were responsible for the murder, death, and crimes against humanity against hundreds of people who died in work houses because of them and the fortunes that were made by these awful, awful people who are lauded today and praised today as great people with hundreds of thousands if not millions who died in their custody. Why do you think these people were so active in abolishing the trade of people from Africa? Simply, there was more money to be made in converting everyone to being poor than there was in importing more people from foreign lands. There was more money for them in White Slavery converting us into the Poor than there was in the original concept of invading a country and imprisoning the people.
That is the honest truth. The legacy of that is what they did to Ireland, Scotland and Wales after they had done it to their own people in England.
See also: (1 & 2 Geo. IV c.56 [1821]) and (KEY ACT - 4 & 5 Will. 4 c.76 [1834])
The system is completely broken when you are worth more to the bankers as a "dead commodity" than a "working slave"
If we look to the answer of the question of what you are worth as a slave to the system today, then I guess the base value is somewhere in the order of $25,000 to $30,000 a year as a slave. That is about the amount of sustenance and maintenance that they give people as a basic wage, certainly in America. The basic wage in Australia and elsewhere may be higher, but it is still a pittance. What about our value as a “thing,” a thing being a mindless and soulless commodity or stock. What is our value as a “thing” to the system? Well, beginning with the creation of the annuities that we have spoken about back at the end of the 17th century and the beginning of the 18th century, and then the extension of that system into a global system of slave bonds, one could argue that the value of our being a commodity was more than what they recognized as a slave, but with a reasonable margin of two, three or four times of the value of slavery as a commodity given the speculative nature of selling something for more than its base value in markets.
Today the annuity accounts which we can prove exist because since 1790, if we take the United States under the debt funding laws of Congress, the reports are still published by County and these are the reports that give us the value of these assets held at a County level that are in many cases 1000, 2000, 3000 times the value of the debts of the County. If we would divide those numbers in those annual reports against the number of people living in the County, then we would see that the value of the annuities, the slave bonds traded on our being a “think”, a “stock,” is some millions of dollars. Some 200 to 300 in some cases 1000 times more our value as an animal, an animal being with a mind but without a soul. In fact if one was to look at one of the fundamental and catastrophic collapses within the current system of the pirate bankers in the last 50 years, it is the disconnect in their minds full of nihilism and stupidity between the fact that our value as a slave and our a value as a “thin”, as “stock” rests on the existence of us in flesh.
The banks have reached the point that they have completely disconnected from the productivity of the slave to the value of the speculative value of derivatives, securities and bonds by perceiving us as “stock” to the point that they have destroyed their own system as the values have absolutely no rational basis. We have seen an extended period, an unbelievable period where the banks have actually encouraged the destruction of jobs, and even encouraged the promotion of people if left to their own devices, starving, but yet still basing their future on the trading of the same instruments against the value of people. So today, the pirate bankers value us as a “thing” hundreds if not thousands of times more than the value as a slave. Here again we find the proof that they have completely destroyed their own system by such a lack of logic and sense.
Well maybe those who listen to this audio and maybe those that read these Acts and hear discussion about this, the credibility and the conceding that we are treated and viewed as slaves may still be difficult to accept. But I have given you tonight two key areas of evidence in the form of the “P” and the origin of the “P” showing you as a Pauper, a Prisoner, Poor and therefore an infant, a lunatic, a ward of the state. The fact that you have a Birth Certificate is a continuation of Settlement Certificates and the Settlement Certificates are for the Poor. If you see those pieces still working today and they do, the system still views you as a slave.
What can we do? We can do what we speak about each week; we can become more competent in our own affairs. We can become clear on what the Rule of Law is, and what Justice and Due Process are. I leave you with two thoughts tonight: if you want to see clarity as to the law, then I can offer you no better summary than section 16 of the Age of Nazarenes under The Book of the Green Race, Lebor Clann Glas.
Finally, I want to thank all of you who continue to read and continue to review, continue to help, continue to learn and wake up, and continue to represent the true Rule of Law in competence. Until we speak next week, thank you and be well. Thank you and Good Night.
[If you wish to support and keep these research projects continuing, then please help by supporting Ucadia. Thank you]
Wednesday, December 4, 2013
The Sovereign Citizen Phenomena: Why the pirates and bankers fear the restoration of rule of law, justice and due process
_________________________________________________________________
Please download MP3 Audio Broadcast of this Blog > here (24 min 18 Mb)
_________________________________________________________________
Hello and thanks for listening and reading. Before we start, I would like to ask you a question: Have you heard the term Sovereign Citizen recently? Chances are if you are watching a network TV news channel or reading a network owned newspaper or web site then you have started to see this term used more and more when describing extreme cases of selfishness, abuse of law and justice and just plain stupidity.
Whereas three or even five years ago, the term Sovereign Citizen was nowhere to be found and similar examples of selfish, stupid and abusive behavior was painted as the acts of various alleged “freemen” or “patriots” or “anti-government militia”. So how come network controlled media has started to use the label Sovereign Citizen when painting these kinds of extreme acts?
Well, before we answer why this might happening, let me ask you a second set of quick questions beginning with the question of whether you believe any one group of society should be above the law and immune from prosecution even if they completely disregard their sworn duties and obligations? I hope you said “No” as any case where one group is given such special privileges to be above the law and unaccountable is when the Rule of Law and the Golden Rule that “all are equal” ceases to exist.
What about justice? Do you believe that people should be legally and financially bound to debt as slaves from the time of their birth? And do you believe all your rights should be taken away from you even if you behave as a good and contributing member of your society and never seek to injure or harm others? Again, I hope you said “no” to these questions as any system of complete slavery, disregard for rights or prejudice is a system without any legitimacy whatsoever.
Finally, what about due process? Do you believe people should be considered guilty before even the accusations against them are decided? Or that people can be charged and never shown an originating accusation or the form of law by which such charges were derived? Or do you believe that people who determine the innocence or guilt of people be allowed to change processes, or forms at will to ensure there is absolutely no relief other than those who have extreme wealth or connections to power? I hope once again you said “no” to these questions for such abuse of due process means no court can be regarded as a legitimate forum of law, nor those who sit in judgment be regarded as valid judges or magistrates.
The concept of “Sovereign Citizen” explained by the men who invented the idea
Why are these questions relevant when we speak of the Sovereign Citizen Phenomena? Well, let me answer this specific question with the words of some men that invented the very concept of “Sovereign Citizen” and the importance of recognizing all citizens as equal and sovereign. Please bear with me, I will only read the first two paragraphs of what they wrote on the subject and what they meant:
When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.
The relevance of the words of the founders of the concept of sovereign citizen
Now these men went further in their documents to make sure that absolutely no official, or agent, or independent contractor or media commentator could be so stupid or idiotic or malicious or untruthful as to disregard their intentions and get away with it in the long run.
This is why when they wrote into Article I Section 9 of the United States Constitution these following words:
No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.
Why did they write these words? Because all men and women are equal before the law and there was to be no such thing in the United States as first class or second class citizens. In other words, all are sovereign citizens. In other words from the very foundation of the United States the inventors and founders of the concept of Sovereign Citizens ensured that all are Sovereign Citizens.
A further issue to point out is that these men were very clear in making certain no one could abuse their intention to restore the Rule of Law, Justice and Due Process. They did this by prolific writing and mountains of documents from the Federalist Papers, Letters, Judgments, Statutes and all kinds of insights.
Some might have said that all this paper was an overkill but these men, these founders of the concept of Sovereign Citizen, these founders of the United States of America, these founders of a higher form of democracy who sought to be a light for the world would disagree with anyone who thought the defense of the Sovereign rights of all citizens was a waste of time or was an act of terrorism or was an illegal act – especially if such an idiot was presently employed who made such claims by a corporate agency pretending to honor the United States Constitution.
There is no time, there is no case where compromise to evil in law, where granting immunity and destroying the golden rule that “all are equal under the law” is a positive and necessary step. Anyone and everyone who has ever argued for the diminishing of rights of all men and women has been and is a liar, a thief, an imposter and a pirate.
The founders of the concept of Sovereign Citizen more than two hundred and thirty years ago knew this. That is why they tried to write documents that would overcome the corruptions, the lies and the manipulations of men without conscience and mentally ill with mind virus.
What a Sovereign Citizen is not
Having explained what the founders of the concept of Sovereign Citizen meant when they invented the idea more than two hundred and thirty years ago, let us briefly outline what a Sovereign Citizen is not.
By the very definition of the term, as it was intended by the founders of the United States of America, a Sovereign Citizen cannot be someone who has a flagrant disregard to the true Rule of Law under the Golden Rule, or of Justice or of Due Process.
A Sovereign Citizen is not one who is severely drug addicted, or seeks to fleece people out of money, or steal their homes, or lock them out of their homes, or demands something for nothing; and
A Sovereign Citizen is not someone who is abusive or violent to positions of assumed authority, even in the face of tyranny. The greatest weapon of the Sovereign Citizen against evil is passive and lawful resistance – knowing that even the worst system of tyranny cannot survive without consent; and
As it is, most of the people labeled by the media as Sovereign Citizens are not in anyway shape or form comparable to the intentions and founders of the United States of America as the exemplars of what it means to be a Sovereign Citizen.
Why then is the media networks using the term Sovereign Citizen?
Why then does the media keep taking extreme cases of people who clearly are in contradiction to the very meaning of the words Sovereign Citizen and the actions required of a Sovereign Citizen and then falsely mislabel people as such? One reason is because they were told to do that .
But another reason is because the people who told them to use the term are hoping that if enough extreme cases are painted as Sovereign Citizens and if enough out of context quotes are aired, then the public will form the impression that people who read history, statutes and laws are “whackos” and people who ask questions about lack of due process and accountability of government and law are conspiracist “nut jobs” and anyone who talks about the absence of any real Rule of Law or Justice are seen as anti-government, anti-social terrorists.
It is a pretty audacious and arrogant strategy based really on the hope that the plan to continue to dumb down the schools will also lead people to stop thinking and reading- like reading the Declaration of Independence, or reading the United States Constitution or the United Nations Declaration on Human Rights or completely ignore the latest Apostolic Exhortation known as Evangelii Gaudium by Pope Francis.
In fact the reaction by Nihilism Central being Georgetown University and the insane rebel Jesuits of the United States and Washington has been to sever ties with the Vatican and move its embassy outside the walls, than be accountable for the restoration of the Rule of Law, or Justice or Due Process.
At the same time, banks in the United States and elsewhere in the world have responded to the call for more accountability and honesty by pushing harder than ever to be more corrupt with the Bank of America even promoting the securitization of trustees, that offices of trustees can be purchased and sold – in arguably one of the most blatant attacks against The Bible and the Rule of Law and Law itself since the beginning of civilization.
So what do we do midst such madness?
So what do we do midst such madness, such arrogant ignorance and such disregard for any decency? We do what all men and women who love the law and who trust in a higher power have done throughout time. We stand our ground and peacefully resist by the promotion of withdrawal of consent, by reminding people of what the words In God we Trust means and the concept of the Golden Rule and Rule of Law.
We prepare and perfect our Will and Testament and the management of our Estate as we have spoken about in these very blogs. We prove that we are lawful and respectful members of society and that we respect the proper Rule of Law and Justice and Due Process and reject the falsities of pirates and liars and moneylenders who seek to continually destroy and attack our communities.
Above all this we stop believing the propaganda of the network cable, television and internet news sites and encourage people to stop watching and to stop reading such absolute garbage. And, most importantly, we work together. We work together in forming communities. We work together in forming and honoring our rights as we find in the charters and the Covenant of the Ucadia model. We stop being isolated and islands.
Over the coming weeks as I have promised, I look forward to sharing with you the reforms and the improvements and the completions of the Charters and the Covenants of Ucadia before December 21, 2013. And, I am sorry that it has taken so long and there have been so many complex elements to it and that the Rights of Ucadia have not, until now, been properly vested and embedded within the Charters and that no can claim to be the owner of Ucadia, that no one can claim to be the Architect, the Director or the one who judges or the one who approves, or that any council or any elect is required for the management of Ucadia. It is a self-executing model. It is a gift for every Man and Woman. And, that promise and that gift will be fulfilled.
For those of you who have been able to help and support, I thank you in this cause and I thank all of those who have helped this year and who continue to help. For those who read, I thank you for taking the journey to read and for those of you who listen I thank you also. In a world of such distraction to find time to even listen for a few minutes is a rare event. And, so, in conclusion in the coming weeks I look forward to sharing with you the improvements, completions and the updates as we have discussed and as I have promised. Until then thank you for your support, thank you for reading and thank you for your help. Please be safe this week. Thank you and good night.
Please download MP3 Audio Broadcast of this Blog > here (24 min 18 Mb)
_________________________________________________________________
Hello and thanks for listening and reading. Before we start, I would like to ask you a question: Have you heard the term Sovereign Citizen recently? Chances are if you are watching a network TV news channel or reading a network owned newspaper or web site then you have started to see this term used more and more when describing extreme cases of selfishness, abuse of law and justice and just plain stupidity.
Whereas three or even five years ago, the term Sovereign Citizen was nowhere to be found and similar examples of selfish, stupid and abusive behavior was painted as the acts of various alleged “freemen” or “patriots” or “anti-government militia”. So how come network controlled media has started to use the label Sovereign Citizen when painting these kinds of extreme acts?
Well, before we answer why this might happening, let me ask you a second set of quick questions beginning with the question of whether you believe any one group of society should be above the law and immune from prosecution even if they completely disregard their sworn duties and obligations? I hope you said “No” as any case where one group is given such special privileges to be above the law and unaccountable is when the Rule of Law and the Golden Rule that “all are equal” ceases to exist.
What about justice? Do you believe that people should be legally and financially bound to debt as slaves from the time of their birth? And do you believe all your rights should be taken away from you even if you behave as a good and contributing member of your society and never seek to injure or harm others? Again, I hope you said “no” to these questions as any system of complete slavery, disregard for rights or prejudice is a system without any legitimacy whatsoever.
Finally, what about due process? Do you believe people should be considered guilty before even the accusations against them are decided? Or that people can be charged and never shown an originating accusation or the form of law by which such charges were derived? Or do you believe that people who determine the innocence or guilt of people be allowed to change processes, or forms at will to ensure there is absolutely no relief other than those who have extreme wealth or connections to power? I hope once again you said “no” to these questions for such abuse of due process means no court can be regarded as a legitimate forum of law, nor those who sit in judgment be regarded as valid judges or magistrates.
The concept of “Sovereign Citizen” explained by the men who invented the idea
Why are these questions relevant when we speak of the Sovereign Citizen Phenomena? Well, let me answer this specific question with the words of some men that invented the very concept of “Sovereign Citizen” and the importance of recognizing all citizens as equal and sovereign. Please bear with me, I will only read the first two paragraphs of what they wrote on the subject and what they meant:
When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.
The relevance of the words of the founders of the concept of sovereign citizen
Now these men went further in their documents to make sure that absolutely no official, or agent, or independent contractor or media commentator could be so stupid or idiotic or malicious or untruthful as to disregard their intentions and get away with it in the long run.
This is why when they wrote into Article I Section 9 of the United States Constitution these following words:
No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.
Why did they write these words? Because all men and women are equal before the law and there was to be no such thing in the United States as first class or second class citizens. In other words, all are sovereign citizens. In other words from the very foundation of the United States the inventors and founders of the concept of Sovereign Citizens ensured that all are Sovereign Citizens.
A further issue to point out is that these men were very clear in making certain no one could abuse their intention to restore the Rule of Law, Justice and Due Process. They did this by prolific writing and mountains of documents from the Federalist Papers, Letters, Judgments, Statutes and all kinds of insights.
Some might have said that all this paper was an overkill but these men, these founders of the concept of Sovereign Citizen, these founders of the United States of America, these founders of a higher form of democracy who sought to be a light for the world would disagree with anyone who thought the defense of the Sovereign rights of all citizens was a waste of time or was an act of terrorism or was an illegal act – especially if such an idiot was presently employed who made such claims by a corporate agency pretending to honor the United States Constitution.
There is no time, there is no case where compromise to evil in law, where granting immunity and destroying the golden rule that “all are equal under the law” is a positive and necessary step. Anyone and everyone who has ever argued for the diminishing of rights of all men and women has been and is a liar, a thief, an imposter and a pirate.
The founders of the concept of Sovereign Citizen more than two hundred and thirty years ago knew this. That is why they tried to write documents that would overcome the corruptions, the lies and the manipulations of men without conscience and mentally ill with mind virus.
What a Sovereign Citizen is not
Having explained what the founders of the concept of Sovereign Citizen meant when they invented the idea more than two hundred and thirty years ago, let us briefly outline what a Sovereign Citizen is not.
By the very definition of the term, as it was intended by the founders of the United States of America, a Sovereign Citizen cannot be someone who has a flagrant disregard to the true Rule of Law under the Golden Rule, or of Justice or of Due Process.
A Sovereign Citizen is not one who is severely drug addicted, or seeks to fleece people out of money, or steal their homes, or lock them out of their homes, or demands something for nothing; and
A Sovereign Citizen is not someone who is abusive or violent to positions of assumed authority, even in the face of tyranny. The greatest weapon of the Sovereign Citizen against evil is passive and lawful resistance – knowing that even the worst system of tyranny cannot survive without consent; and
As it is, most of the people labeled by the media as Sovereign Citizens are not in anyway shape or form comparable to the intentions and founders of the United States of America as the exemplars of what it means to be a Sovereign Citizen.
Why then is the media networks using the term Sovereign Citizen?
Why then does the media keep taking extreme cases of people who clearly are in contradiction to the very meaning of the words Sovereign Citizen and the actions required of a Sovereign Citizen and then falsely mislabel people as such? One reason is because they were told to do that .
But another reason is because the people who told them to use the term are hoping that if enough extreme cases are painted as Sovereign Citizens and if enough out of context quotes are aired, then the public will form the impression that people who read history, statutes and laws are “whackos” and people who ask questions about lack of due process and accountability of government and law are conspiracist “nut jobs” and anyone who talks about the absence of any real Rule of Law or Justice are seen as anti-government, anti-social terrorists.
It is a pretty audacious and arrogant strategy based really on the hope that the plan to continue to dumb down the schools will also lead people to stop thinking and reading- like reading the Declaration of Independence, or reading the United States Constitution or the United Nations Declaration on Human Rights or completely ignore the latest Apostolic Exhortation known as Evangelii Gaudium by Pope Francis.
In fact the reaction by Nihilism Central being Georgetown University and the insane rebel Jesuits of the United States and Washington has been to sever ties with the Vatican and move its embassy outside the walls, than be accountable for the restoration of the Rule of Law, or Justice or Due Process.
At the same time, banks in the United States and elsewhere in the world have responded to the call for more accountability and honesty by pushing harder than ever to be more corrupt with the Bank of America even promoting the securitization of trustees, that offices of trustees can be purchased and sold – in arguably one of the most blatant attacks against The Bible and the Rule of Law and Law itself since the beginning of civilization.
So what do we do midst such madness?
So what do we do midst such madness, such arrogant ignorance and such disregard for any decency? We do what all men and women who love the law and who trust in a higher power have done throughout time. We stand our ground and peacefully resist by the promotion of withdrawal of consent, by reminding people of what the words In God we Trust means and the concept of the Golden Rule and Rule of Law.
We prepare and perfect our Will and Testament and the management of our Estate as we have spoken about in these very blogs. We prove that we are lawful and respectful members of society and that we respect the proper Rule of Law and Justice and Due Process and reject the falsities of pirates and liars and moneylenders who seek to continually destroy and attack our communities.
Above all this we stop believing the propaganda of the network cable, television and internet news sites and encourage people to stop watching and to stop reading such absolute garbage. And, most importantly, we work together. We work together in forming communities. We work together in forming and honoring our rights as we find in the charters and the Covenant of the Ucadia model. We stop being isolated and islands.
Over the coming weeks as I have promised, I look forward to sharing with you the reforms and the improvements and the completions of the Charters and the Covenants of Ucadia before December 21, 2013. And, I am sorry that it has taken so long and there have been so many complex elements to it and that the Rights of Ucadia have not, until now, been properly vested and embedded within the Charters and that no can claim to be the owner of Ucadia, that no one can claim to be the Architect, the Director or the one who judges or the one who approves, or that any council or any elect is required for the management of Ucadia. It is a self-executing model. It is a gift for every Man and Woman. And, that promise and that gift will be fulfilled.
For those of you who have been able to help and support, I thank you in this cause and I thank all of those who have helped this year and who continue to help. For those who read, I thank you for taking the journey to read and for those of you who listen I thank you also. In a world of such distraction to find time to even listen for a few minutes is a rare event. And, so, in conclusion in the coming weeks I look forward to sharing with you the improvements, completions and the updates as we have discussed and as I have promised. Until then thank you for your support, thank you for reading and thank you for your help. Please be safe this week. Thank you and good night.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)