Agents Part 1: What is an Agent? How are they appointed? How do they work and other questions

_________________________________________________________________________________
Please download MP3 Audio Broadcast of this Blog > here   (104 min 22 Mb)
_________________________________________________________________________________

The topic for the audio and blog this week is Part 1 of a new series following the three blogs and audios on Estates and the one blog and audio on Trusts concerning: What is an agent? Why are the roles of agents so important to the present Private Corporation System? How are agents supposed to be appointed? How do their powers work in practice and how can any impostor agents and false powers be brought to account and dissolved?

The reason why we return in the Ucadia blog series to discussing agents is for several reasons.  One is that it is in fact the logical follow-up to the end of the blog and article series on estates.  The last element of the paperwork in your estates was the appointing of the minister plenipotentiary under "full powers" (LL0011 word template) which happens to be the primary agent of your estate.  This is why we begin to talk about agents and what that role is.  The other is the promise that was made last week and throughout the series concerning estates, that we would start to provide practical examples of how this information over the previous series may be specifically applied to the issues you are facing.

For example, at the end of the audio and blog last week, we discussed a detailed definition of affidavits and the fact that when affidavits are properly constructed they form an incredibly important element of defense and response to claims by the pirates of the private bar guilds. In fact the first application of properly constructed affidavits for many will probably be addressing the issue of having a properly appointed Agent as Attorney-In-Fact, possessing valid Powers of Attorney and therefore able to overcome any false or impostor agents that are trying to get you to claim to be a “legal person” and wholly under their control.

It is why we begin then with the definition of function and role of agent once again- to make clear of what we mean by, “What is an agent?”  “Why the role of agent is so important and powerful in the present private corporate system?”  “How is an Aagent properly appointed and how may this be validly used to dissolve any false claims of agency appointments and false agency powers?”

Now given the role of agent and principal is so important to the existing system, it should not be surprising that there is a huge amount of disinformation and deliberate confusion on the subject.  So to be clear, let’s go back to what we already know in history and try to make sense of the origin of the concept of agent and principal in history and how these terms and concepts came about:

The origin of an Agent, Principal and relation to types of Persons

While the concept of Estates we discussed in the past three audios comes from the 16th Century, the origin of agents comes from a century earlier and the 15th Century in Europe.  As we cover this background, please have a look on http://one-heaven.org  at the Canons of Sovereign Law and Article 205 - Central Bank.  There are quite a few canons and I want to cover a few of these that directly relate to the origin and history of agent.  We are talking about banks so we will start with we actually mean by the term ‘bank.’  

I apologize for the technical nature of the definitions, but given that you have listened to the last three audios regarding estates  and read the last three blogs concerning estates (see Estates Part 1, Part 2, Part 3), and I hope you have listened to the first audio regarding trusts  and the blog regarding trusts (see Trust blog and audio), that what we have in the canons in the definition of bank should hopefully and immediately create a light bulb going off in your mind in that this definition is eerily similar to the definition of what exactly an estate.  

An estate in the English law of the 16th century concept is the derivative of a trust, a temporary trust, a Cestui Que Vie Trust, and indeed a hypothecation of its value.   In the canons below we see in the origin of banks that is precisely what banks were doing; they were storing valuable objects in trust and therefore creating a trust and then hypothecating the value of those valuables and effectively creating ‘estates’ with the accounts.

The origin of hypothecation and derivatives is not unique to this century.  You will see that expressed in Canon 6865 with example of clay and paper certificates going back to the great Karnak temples and exchanges in Upper Egypt back to the 16th and even 17th centuries, BCE, which is more than 3500 years ago.  The Carolingians through the creation of chancery were doing the same thing in regards to gold certificates.  Under the Venetians, and the Pisans that founded it when they created the Order of the Poor Knights of the Temple, or what we know as the Ordo Pauperes Templum, or simply the Knights Templar, we see the extension of banking and the creation of banking networks to an entirely new level.

Canon 6864 

Bank is a 15th Century term describing a body possessing certain franchised rights to create and distribute funds through the hypothecation of valuables given or granted in trust then recorded against accounts for the conduct and settlement of trade including official business of the state through the management of such accounts, funds, valuables and associated derivative instruments.

Canon 6865 

While the term “bank” or “banco” originates from the 15th Century, the concepts associated with financial services (deposits, loans, credit, bills of exchange), date as far back as the Karnak Temple and Exchange of the Hyksos in Ancient Egypt:

(i) The issue of a hypothecation or derivative such as a paper or clay certificate or token in exchange for coin or actual goods was in complete operation in the 16th Century BCE at the great Karnak Temple and Exchange in ancient Egypt. Similarly, the Romans and Persians heavily used such facilities both to mint and validate coin and to exchange and settle debts and commercial transactions; and

(ii) The Carolingian Empire from 8th Century to 10th Century greatly restricted financial practices of hypothecation (and therefore trade) in preference for the promotion of actual standard coin, which had the effect of creating a “boom-bust” environment due to a lack of capital, rise in corruption and an inability to settle debts effectively; and

(iii) The Persian and “High Moor” exiles that founded the Pisan Empire of the Western and Eastern Mediterranean were the first to reintroduce by Doga (Doge) Pietro Morosini (1088 - 1119) of Pisa and Roman Pontiff Callixtus I (II) (1119 - 1130) a stable international financial system through a semi-religious Ordo Pauperes Templum or “Order of the Poor of the (Money) Temple”, later known as the “Knights Templar”. The Pisan Knights issued certificates upon the deposit of valuables and coin at one secure fortress which could then be exchanged by the possessor of a valid certificate (bill of exchange) for coin at another sometimes thousands of miles away; and

(iv) In 1306, the network of Ordo Pauperes Templum (Knights Templar) was seized by combined forces of the Genoese and Lavagna under Count Ottobuono Fieschi of Lavagna and the French under King Philip IV of France (1268-1314). In 1339, Simon “Boccanegra” Fieschi took power over Genoa and had himself declared “Doge” including the formation of the second financial system based around Palaces called “Houses” known as the Palazzo delle Compere di San Giorgio or “House of Merchandizing of St George”. Each Palace had a public place for trade out front called the quadrate (public square) and an inner space called the cort (court) for private and exclusive business. The Genoese then established “Houses” managed by noble Genoese families at key locations around the world; and

(v) In contrast to the Genoese model of adopting a purely “public/private” model of commerce around a Palace (Palazzo) for financial services, in 1374 the Venetians adopted an ecclesiastical model by modifying St Mark’s Basilica and a created a new sacred space called the “sagrestia” (sacristy) for the operation of the camera di prestiti or “Chamber of Loans”; and

(vi) By 1401, the use of a form of financial services began in Barcelona then Valencia was the Plaza de Barcelona or “Plaza of Barcelona” whereby a large public space was divided for merchants and a section was exclusively rented as benches and tables or “banco” for moneylenders. Therefore, the association of moneylenders or loan merchants or pawnbrokers being “banco” or “banks” grew from this formalization of regular markets at a permanent space; and

(vii) In 1406, the Medici of Florence sought to control both financial services and the growing prosperity of trade by demanding an edict from Roman Pontiff Innocent VI (VII) (1404-1406) (Cosimo de Migliorati, Naples) licensed the Medici so that only the Medici could operate moneylending. Thus the Banco di Medici network controlled by a sole family was born; and

(viii) In reaction to the attempted banking monopoly by the Medici of Florence and following Roman Pontiff Gregory VI (XII) (1406-1415) (Angelo Corraro, Venice) coming to power, in late 1406 the Banco della Piazza di Rialto or “Bank of the Piazza of Rialto (Island)” or Bank of Venice was formed. However, instead of being held by one family such as the Medici of Florence, the Bank of Venice granted exclusive franchises eventually to all the ten patriarchal families representing the Council of Ten and leadership of Venice to form “Palaces” or Banking Houses. The first was Palazzo Pisani by 1408, followed by Palazzo Contarini by 1410, Palazzo Priuli by 1415, Palazzo Barbaro by 1425 and then Palazzo Gradenigo and others by 1430; and

(ix) During the 15th Century, the trade war between Genoa, Naples, Florence and Venice forced the Venetian Banking Houses to radically modify their business practices by eliminating the need for physical shipment of coin to Venice for settlement (account to account settlement), make the bank the central record of trade as well as market and exchange (Venetian bookkeeping) and agents of the bank accompanying the transport of cargo, shipments and major trade to both record details and validate the exchange remotely for the bank. These skills created out of necessity would prove to be a strength of Venetian banking in the 16th Century and beyond; and

(x) Following the near collapse of the Venetian State against the Habsburgs and Genoa, Venice and Pisan banking families pursued an aggressive stand at establishing a new form of banking intimately linked to royal families whereby the “value” was in knowledge not in stores of gold that could be expropriated by a monarch. The first of these “private partnerships” was in 1515 under Francis I (1515- 1547) of France and the creation of the Chambres des comptes (Court of Exchequer) with the Pisan exiles. The second was in 1518 and the House (Bank) of Pisano and King Henry VIII (1509-1547) of England and another Court of Exchequer. The third was in 1525 in Sweden through Gustav I (1523-1560) of Sweden and the formation of Kammarkollegium.

In the case of Venice and the rivals of Venice was the breakup of the Pisan Empire known as Genoa.  We see the creation firstly of banking houses and then the forced need for the Venetians to extend what their banks did and the origin of the creation of agent and principal roles.  Under the Genoese we see the creation of the Palaces, or Palazzos, the creation of squares at the front and we see this in Venice in point (vi) under Canon 6865, regarding the creation of the plazas for banking.  What we see at the time of the Venetians in point (ix) and (x) of Canon 6865 is when the Venetians were under attack, their ability to settle debts by merchants bringing their gold to Venice became prohibitively dangerous and indeed, the Venetians being able to send gold out also became extremely dangerous at the time that Venice was under attack.  

So to solve this problem, the Venetians radically modified their business practices which we cover in point (ix) of Canon 6865, “The Origins of the Agent and the Principal.”  The first agent in history was the creation of the Venetian banking agent known as a ‘chartered accountant.’  These skills were born out of necessity and proved to be the enormous strength of the Venetian banking system from the 16th century and beyond.  Point (x) in Canon 6865 covers the next challenges the Venetians overcame which we will cover.  That is how private banks became central banks.  This was when the Hapsburgs and others started to ex-appropriate the very gold that was underpinning the value of these now sophisticated banks.  This required the Pisan and Venetian houses to form alliances directly with Crowns in the creation of Courts of Exchequer.  The first was in 1515 under Francis I under the Chambres des comptes (Court of Exchequer) and the second was in 1518 with the House (Bank) of Pisano and King Henry VIII and the Court of Exchequer and the third was 1525 in Sweden through Gustav I and the formation of Kammarkollegium and was the third central bank, the third Court of Exchequer.

We see the origin of the agent which was derived directly out of necessity through the Venetian banking system where now, instead of the merchants coming to the bank with their gold, with their records to settle the accounts, the bank sent their own agents out into the field with those merchants and business was settled, in the first instance in the field.  Then it was ratified by the bank when those agents returned with the receipts to the bank to perform an accounting.

This leads us then to understanding exactly what is meant by accounting which is a central role and a central function of the agent.  The agent must absolutely be able to provide a means of accounting and a mechanism of accounting as to their authority.  Now look at Article 202- Accounting on Sovereign Law.  Let’s see what we mean by accounting, since the first agents were accountants.  Remember, we covered accounting in some degree in the last audio.  I am not going through all the canons that are listed under Article 202, here, but will pick out the key points to make sense of the power of the agent and having a proper set of accounts, and the role of the agent in being able to competently address matters of accounting for the estate.

What is an account and what is accounting?

Canon 6853 

Accounting is a 16th Century term used to describe an organized system centered on the concept of “accounts” for recording, tabulating and extracting information from various record keeping systems for the purpose of banking, commerce, taxation and governance.

Canon 6854 

An Account is (1) a collection of documents, books and records relating to a distinct relation formed in trust; and (2) the original record of event as to its creation and validity entered into some formal register of similar types of accounts; and (3) any subsequent statement or summary in time referencing key information concerning its function and performance.

A Trust, Entity or Company possesses a single supreme Account or “Master Account”, but may possess one (1) or several lesser Accounts or “Sub Accounts” attached to the “Master Account”.

Canon 6855 

The collection of documents, books and records relating to an Account may include an Inventory, Manifest, Memorandum, Journal, Ledger and Statement:

(i) An Inventory is the survey of all property, or debts or credits associated with the Account completed immediately after its creation and thereafter at an appointed regular time; and

(ii) A Manifest is the history of ownership and possession of any property, rights, money and other interests now recorded as associated with the Account; and

(iii) A Memorandum is a book of detailed records of all transactions associated with the Account, including minutes, resolutions, letters, correspondence, decisions and procedural actions recorded in day and time order; and

(iv) A Journal is a book that extracts the information recorded and memorialized in the Memorandum and arranges it in category order and then day/time order according to a journal; and

(v) A Ledger is a book that extracts the information recorded in a Journal Entry and extracts the highest level information matched according to double entry bookkeeping; and

(vi) A Statement is an extract of a Ledger Balance or Simple Balance of Assets and Debts, or Concessions and Remittances of the Account.

Canon 6856 

The term Account and Accounting is derived from three (3) Latin words ac- meaning “to, towards or near”; and con- meaning “with; together” and te meaning “the letter t and balance”.  Thus account (acconte) in its original etymological form literally defined “to balance the T (debts and credits)”. 

Canon 6857 

Two (2) of the oldest concepts of calculation and financial reckoning is checking an inventory and crossing values received and given known as “checking the I’s and crossing the T’s” whereby:

(i) A tablet or papyrus writing surface is prepared and two (2) lines drawn being one (1) down the center separating the surface into two (2) halves. The second line separates the top of the surface into two (2) small boxes into which the top left lists a reference in time / space / age for the review and the right references some total or confirmation of check; and

(ii) Into the left hand side of the surface is placed all those values received and credited, while into the right hand side are all those values given, paid or stored in inventory; and

(iii) What is received is then added up against what is pair or stored in inventory and the total value should be 0. If the number is still in the positive, then an asset or value has not been properly accounted. If the number is in the negative then an expense or inventory has not been properly accounted.

(iv) This system existed until its dramatic corruption in 14th Century by the Venetians in association with the Roman Cult by its inversion thus perversely creating debt into an asset and debits into credit.

Canon 6858 

While the recording, keeping and calculation of financial information is a feature of virtually all advanced civilizations for at least seven thousand (7,000) years, the “modern” system of accounting was formalized by the Venetians in the 14th Century:

(i) General accounting practices, particularly the concept of “double-entry bookkeeping”- whereby each transaction is extracted into a summary ledger as two “separate” entries under different categories of debt and credit - was well established by the Persian traders and Byzantine Empire well before the 4th Century CE. While almost all historic records have otherwise been destroyed or lost over time, there is sufficient evidence to suggest ancient double entry bookkeeping treated income as credits and expenses as debt, consistent with natural logic. Therefore, the Venetian invention in the 14th Century is the reversal of ancient logic and a new system of bookkeeping based on ecclesiastical principles; and

(ii) During the growth of dominance of the Pisan Empire of the Western and Eastern Mediterranean during the 12th and 13th Century, followed by the civil war between major centers such as Genoa versus Venice from 14th to 16th Century, major houses increasingly faced ruin from defaults against loans. At the same time, from 1356 following the “Golden Bull” of Charles IV, the primary of the Venetian-Pisan controlled Roman Cult over the true Catholic Church of France-Saxony was secured. The changes to accounting by the Venetians was in response to “harnessing” this new found power to enforce their financial claims against delinquent debtors; and

(iii) The Venetians through the development of the theology of the Roman Cult from the 14th Century, firstly infused the notion that all transactions on Earth have a mirror twin in Heaven and so to default against a loan on Earth is a grave and mortal sin against Heaven. This introduced a much stronger precedence to the notion of “all debts must be paid” even if such debts are unfair and carry extraordinary levels of interest. The Venetians then secondly promoted the notion that giving to pay ones debts is the only “true credit”, whereas to receive is the lesser and in effect an obligation and a “debt”- flipping seven thousand (7,000) years of logic on its head. This introduced the perverse notion of cerebrating “poverty” as somehow a gift and grace; and

(iv) To reinforce the dramatic changes in philosophy concerning the reversal of ancient accounting practices by make its purely ecclesiastical in terms of the philosophy of the Roman Cult, the Venetians also introduced a step by step ritual, to mimic the concept of sacraments both as claimed “proof” and to reinforce the sacred nature of proper accounting. (1) Competent owners were required to be able to account for their property through a detailed inventory, renewed annually; and (2) Merchants were required to record in a memorandum detailed records of all transactions associated with the Account, including minutes, resolutions, letters, correspondence, decisions and procedural actions recorded in day and time order; and (3) Periodically, merchants then were required to extract the information recorded and memorialized in the Memorandum and arranges it in category order and then day/time order according to a journal; and (4) Upon important days, merchants then were required to submit a book (ledger) that ext
racted the information recorded in a Journal Entry to the highest level information matched according to double entry bookkeeping whereby all value received (Credit) was to be entered as Debit and all value given (Expense or Debit) was to be entered as Credit; and

(v) The Venetian system of converting accounting into a purely administrative recording of sacred ecclesiastical events, combined with the detailed “proof” of Inventory, Memorandum, Journal and Ledger System both dramatically improved the financial management of Venetian resources, but enabled Venetian and later Genoese traders to periodically demand the enforcement of the repayments of debts by sovereigns in default, using the military forces of the Holy Roman Emperor as well as the ecclesiastical threats of the Vatican for “committing the sin” of failing to pay “valid” debts; and

(vi) It is the original creation by the Pisan and Venetian families of the concept of accounting being divinely inspired first and temporal second from the 14th Century that introduced the notion of fiduciary (accounting competence) responsibility being of the highest importance; and

(vii) The earliest surviving copy of describing the Venetian double-entry bookkeeping system is by Luca Pacioli an Summa de Aithmetica” from 1494 demonstrating the revised Venetian system of making accounting “ecclesiastical” was well established by this time; and

(viii) The first books on accounting practice in German appear in 1531 through Johan Gotleb with “Ein Tentsch…” and in Dutch by Jan Ympyn Christoffels in 1543 through “Nieuwe Instructie Eude Bewijs…”. However, the first books on accounting in English does not appear until 1588 and John Mellis through “a briefe instruction and maner to keepe books of accompts after the order of Debitor and Creditor..”; and

(ix) Contrary to deliberately false information, it appears the Venetian - Pisan method of double entry bookkeeping faced two (2) significant obstacles within England until a more complete work was published in 1636 called “The Merchants’ Mirror or Directions for the Perfect ordering and Keeping of His Accounts”: (1) the level of numeracy in England by 1500 was less than four percent (4%) of the population, well lower than Continental Europe and (2) a persistent refusal by the educated classes of England to adopt the illogic of flipping income to debit and expenses to credit as per the Venetian Ecclesiastical system of accounting. However, by the mid 18th Century, the Kingdom of Great Britain had become an accounting powerhouse through its banking and merchant practices in adopting the Venetian Vatican standards of accounting.

Many of you, if you listened to the third audio on estates last week, may have groaned at the amount of detail involved in the Maner Role (Manor Roll), but now I hope this will start to make sense when we talk about accounting, the primary functions of the agent and the primary agent which is the Minister Plenipotentiary.  It is directly related and relevant to dealing with the Roman system.

We see the meaning of “account” in Canon 6854 1. It is a collection of documents, books and records relating to a distinct relation formed in trust and 2. The original record of the even as to its creation and validity entered in some form of register of similar types of accounts, and 3. Any subsequent statement or summary in time referencing key information concerning its function and performance.  If you look at the definition of accounts, and these are and need to be very technical in their detail, then what you see is in effect a summary of everything we described last week in regards to the Manor Role and in regards to the various registers of the estate. That is to say, the accounts and the records and the proper management of your estate are indeed, accounting.  They are one and the same.

Why is this important?  If you properly manage your Manor Roles, having established a Manor Role, if you have established a Will and Testament of your estate, if you are General Executor as sovereign of your estate and has been duly appointed by the Great Register and if you have appointed the primary agent of the estate in the form of the Minister Plenipotentiary by the appointment and it has been accepted then you possess the master accounts.  I REPEAT, YOU POSSESS THE MASTER ACCOUNTS OF THE ESTATE, THE ROMAN SYSTEM DO NOT, THE TREASURY DO NOT, THE IRS OR TAX DEPARTMENT DO NOT, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL’S DEPARTMENT DO NOT.  You hold the master accounts and by that all other accounts must be brought into alignment with those master accounts.  There must be a proper accounting and a balancing.  

Anyone that is conducting business regarding the estate must recognize that.  If they do not they are breaching the most fundamental rules of their entire banking system, the most fundamental rules of their entire legal system, the most fundamental rules to the entire commercial system in the world at present.  THIS IS HOW IMPORTANT THESE PRINCIPLES ARE.  This is not information plucked out of thin air; it is not supposition, it is not fallacy, it is not guessing, but information borne out of forensic, detailed, documented research as to the provenance and history of law, the history of banking, the history of commerce and a level of competence, reasoning and overview that brings us to clarity of what these things are.

What are accounts in regard to accounting?  This is covered under Canon 6855 which says that the collection of documents, books and records relating to an account may include: inventory, manifest, memorandum, journal, ledger, and a statement.  These are all the things we spoke about on the third audio on Estates last week.  All of those are directly related to accounts.  Two of the oldest concepts of accounting are covered in Canon 6857.  These are the concepts of calculation and financial reckoning which is the inventory and crossing of values which is known as dotting the ‘i’s and crossing the ‘t’s which is settling the accounts and providing the accounting.

Before we move on, let’s summarize what we have said to date in regards to the origin of the agent and to the relationship with the accounts, accounting, and accountants.  What we have said is that the original role of the agent, as is still in operation today, was borne out of necessity by the Pisan and the Venetian banks which were under siege and unable to conduct the banking in the traditional methods, and then forced to find a way to maintain and settle accounts by creating the role of a foreign, traveling, commercial agent who was an official of the bank.  The bank was the Principal.  These agents were sent out into the field with the merchants to maintain the records of trade, the books and the ledger, and to be able to provide an accounting and indeed authorized to issue paper for the bank, such as bills of exchange before those bills and accounts are reckoned and settled by the central bank.

As to the accounts and accounting, we see that it is the proper records of the estate and if we do maintain those records ourselves properly, we are ecclesiastically, lawfully and legally able to hold the master accounts of our own estate.  All other accounting by other agents MUST BE BROUGHT TO THE PRINCIPAL AS THE MINISTER PLENIPOTENTIARY TO BE BALANCED.  If they do not they are in breach of the most basic rules of their own system.

The origin of "Principal" and Central Banks

Before we complete the background and before we get to the contemporary meaning of Agent, let’s cover one more key and missing piece of the historical puzzle in regards to Agent.  That is, what exactly is meant by ‘Principal’ in the Agent/Principal relationship?  For many of you and many over time there has been a lot of confusion as to who and what is the Principal is.  Let’s have a look at Article 203 regarding Exchequer.  Before, you heard me speak about the origin of Central Banking and I said that the first three central banks were created by necessity because the groups such as the Hapsburg's were plundering the gold of the private banks, so the first three private partnerships with monarchs were Francis I under the Chambres des comptes (Court of Exchequer) with the Pisan exiles.  The second was in 1518 with the House (Bank) of Pisano and King Henry VIII and the first Court of Exchequer was formed.  The third was 1525 in Sweden through Gustav I and the formation of Kammarkollegium and was the third central bank, the third Court of Exchequer.

What do we mean by Exchequer?  Let’s cover this history now that gives context to the meaning and the real function of Agent.  There is a lot of disinformation creating confusion that is deliberate.  Look at Article 203 - Exchequer and Canon 6859 and see what we mean by Exchequer.  
Canon 6859 

The Exchequer, or more formally the “Court of the Exchequer” is a private franchise first formed in the 16th Century (but claimed of much older provenance) possessing the rights as Principal of the Crown or simply Principal to control and enclose commerce, collect taxes and to distribute funds through the hypothecation of valuables given or granted in trust then recorded against accounts for the conduct and settlement of trade including official business of the state through the management of such accounts, funds, valuables and associated derivative instruments on behalf of the “crown”.

Canon 6860 

The word Exchequer is derived from the Anglaise word eschequier meaning “chessboard” in direct reference to the chessboard literally referring to all commerce and trade of the realm and the public “squares” of commerce consistent with 14th Century “plaza” banking model. Thus the phrase “Court of Exchequer” literally means "Private Public (Bank)".

Canon 6861 

In contradiction to the false historical claims of the Court of Exchequer, its formation was under King Henry VIII (1508-1547) of England and Wales in agreement with the House (Bank) of Pisano of Venice for a series of loans beginning with 40,000 gold ducats in 1518-19 to remodel the English economy, military and government:

(i) Contrary to false history, the English had little to no organized record keeping, low literacy and relatively poor economy prior to the arrival of the Venetians and Pisan exiles; and

(ii) The “new banking” model of Venice both enclosed trade and commerce through sophisticated record keeping (Venetian double entry bookkeeping) as well as generating substantial increases in trade and revenue; and

(iii) While the public statutes of 1516 to 1522 have been deliberately lost or destroyed, it is probable that the false claims of Exchequer statutes dating earlier are based on the acts passed during this period; and

(iv) The reference to the word “court” is in respect of the conduct of private business within the Venetian pseudo-legal procedures of the Venetian private banks, not as is presumed an adaption of the Curia (Legal Chambers) or “halls” of ancient Feudal and Sacred (Carolingian) law; and

(v) The success of the House of Pisani in acquiring the control of taxation and revenue collection for the Crown of England as the Court of Exchequer, encouraged other Venetian noble families to offer further loans and rewards in the enclosure or “privatization” of other areas of Crown business including the Courts of Assize by the House (Bank) of Priuli and the Courts of Wards and Liveries by the House (Bank) of Barbaro; and

(vi) In the 17th Century when the Venetian and Pisan nobles staged a coup de’tat to take over control sparking the first Civil War in England, the defeat of the Parliamentary forces saw the abolition of certain court franchises and the sale of the Court of Exchequer to the Inns of Court, also known as the Inner and Middle Temple; and

(vii) In the 19th Century, upon the Bank of England assuming effective control of the Government of Great Britain due to debts, the bankers regained effective control of the Exchequer by creating the Exchequer of the United Kingdom controlled by the Bank.

Summary of the origins and history of Agent

So what we see is that the role of agent was originally formed out of necessity as the duly authorized representative of a private bank and then a central bank or exchequer.  The key words under the definition of Canon 6859 are the words, “private franchise formed through the Crown through the General Executor of the Estate as the Principal of the Crown, the Minister Plenipotentiary of the Crown, to enclose everything within regarding the funds.  This is the chessboard in the game of chess.  They don’t want you to know this and they cannot afford for you to know this.  That is why the exchequer is never defined as private; it is always obscured and it is desperately described as coming from a much, much earlier provenance than the 16th century. Most of the flaws within the statutes and the fraudulent statutes of within English law claim that exchequer originated in the 13th century, which is complete rubbish.  Their accounting concepts claimed in the 13th century weren’t invented until the 15th century.

It is easily exposed once you see what accounting is.  However, like much of their system of fraud, they do not want you to know the origin.  Once you know the origin, you know what the principal is.

What is the principal?  The principal is that franchise, that central bank, the central banker for the estate.  Every since the officials of the estate have been paid directly by the central bank which began in the 19th century when the Bank of England was allowed to pay public servants in their own script.  Once that started the central bank became not only the controlling franchise in terms of commerce, taxes, and funds, but became the government.  THE BANK ALSO BECAME THE GOVERNMENT OF THE ESTATE, OF THE NATION in the 19th century.  This is why when you go to court or write in any of your documents and claim that you are the principal or you are acting for the principal those few judges, those few magistrates, or even fewer prosecutors and/or attorneys that know the origin of their law, or the basic competence of their law, just smile.

What you have done when you say that you are the principal or that you are acting for the principal, is that you truly do not know the provenance of these most essential terms.  If we claim to be the Agent of the Principal we have accepted that we are wholly and totally under the jurisdiction of the government, and the government is the central bank, and the private bank under the control of the families that control the central banks.  Now you see that in exchequer, through the original definition, what the real meaning of the Principal is.  This is why the government is perfectly happy when people say I am the principal.  The government is the principal in their minds, because they were appointed by the processes of the law when the estate was abandoned.

What is considered an agent today?

Let’s consider what the system describes as the meaning of Agent today.  Blacks 9th Edition Pg 72 defines an “agent” as “one who is authorized to act for or in place of another; a representative”.  That is an unfinished definition and in the earlier Black’s Law editions they complete the definition and let us know that “another” was the principal and the representative was the principal.  So, “One who is authorized to act for or in place of the Principal” is the more complete and honest definition of an agent.  We are living in times of rampant incompetence, piracy, thievery, stupidity and insanity by their system, so you cannot expect to be given such clarity.

Black’s goes on to say on page 72 and this is an insight into how they view us and the challenge to all of us in terms of competency, “generally speaking, anyone can be an agent who is in fact capable of performing the functions involved.  The agent normally binds not himself but his principal by the contract he makes…Thus an infant or a lunatic may be an agent, though doubtless the court would disregard either’s attempt to act as if he were so young or so hopelessly devoid of reason as to be completely incapable of grasping the function he was attempting to perform”.  The Principal is the government and the Will of the Principal, or the Government, is its statutes which define who and what you may be such as an ‘infant’ under parens patriae, the power of the father, or a ward of the state, or mentally ill, lunatic, criminal, enemy of the bank, enemy of the state.  All of these things have been put in place.  There are a wide variety of ways that the government and its duly authorized agents in the court can deny your ability to act effectively as an Agent.  They disregard any attempt you make as an agent through that.

Another way they have of interpreting the clause which reinforces what we have been speaking constantly through these audios, is that if you refuse to read, if you refuse to hear, if you refuse to learn and be competent, then you accept whether you realize it or not, the full consequences of your actions.  What the government does to you because you have tacitly and/or openly admitted that you are in fact an infant, an incompetent, a lunatic, when you fill in and send some of the most absurd documents that are floating around (whether they are documents that are sent out as claimed ‘writs’ or ‘claims’ or ‘notices’ or other absolutely false, absurd, and deliberately misconstruing things like courtesy notices) and when you believe all that rubbish, then you are telling the system that not only do you refuse to obey but you are a belligerent incompetent, an absolute lunatic who needs to be locked up.  You are saying, “please take away my property, please strip me of every right because I do not deserve those rights and I’m an idiot.

You are telling the government that you are a complete and total idiot because you are too lazy to read, too deluded to listen and whatever other excuses you make not to read and listen.  What you have just seen in the definition of Agent that the Agent is at the center of their system.  If you are not prepared to learn and if you are too busy being lazy and there are a million excuses such as “I am under attack; I don’t have time; I can’t, I can’t, I can’t.”  You don’t want to learn; you are abdicating (responsibility of learning).  So you must accept the full consequences of what happens.  There is no guarantee if you do read, listen, become competent, that pirates being pirates will do the right thing.  No one can promise that.  If anyone promises you that they are not telling the truth.

What is possible is to force the pirates, impostors  to clearly and openly defy their own rules and to openly commit crimes against their own rules, to openly declare there is no justice and to have it on the record there is no justice.  What is possible is to expose themselves before their own superiors and the world that they are criminal.  That is what you can do when you are competent. You can push them to that point.  No one force anyone, especially not you, to do the right thing.  And, if you cannot be forced then you cannot force them to do the right thing.  But, when you stand in honor you can push them to that point where it is overwhelmingly clear in your case that they have committed crimes, they have breached every single rule of their own duties and that if you even bothered to pursue the matter a number of people could quite possible be charged, lose their jobs and go to prison.  It has happened before, even in the pirate system.  Judges have gone to prison.  Attorneys and prosecutors have gone to prison.  Why?  Competent, diligent, honorable, sensible, reasonable people have bothered to take care of themselves and the law and have stood up and not given up.  It has happened before.  Unless competent people do stand up, then there won’t be any change.

There are all kinds of agents and I am trying my absolute best in these audios and in the decades of research I have done to try to help you.  I can’t help each and every man and woman who write to me.  I am trying everything (in the research) to specifically help those men and women.  Listen and read, please.

There are many types of labels and some of those labels deliberately create confusion. Some of the labels are just ‘slicing and dicing’ and in some cases the law is strategy and piracy.  There are many types of agents now including (but not limited to):

Apparent Agent
Bail-Enforcement Agent or Bounty Hunter
Bargaining Agent
Broker Agent
Business Agent
Clearing Agent
Closing Agent, or Settlement Agent
Co-Agent or Dual Agent
Commercial Agent
Common Agent
Corporate Agent
Del Credere Agent
Diplomatic Agent
General Agent
Special Agent

Black’s even defines the etymology of “agent” as “from the Latin verb, ago, agere; the noun agens, agentis. The word agent denotes one who acts, a doer, force or power that accomplishes things”; and Blacks 9th Pg 147 defines an attorney firstly as “one who is designated to transact business for another; a legal agent. – Also termed attorney-in-fact; private attorney”.  The definition of an attorney being “a person who practices law; lawyer” is a distinct and secondary definition to attorney;

Similarly, Blacks 9th Edition Pg 401 defines a “counsel” firstly as “advice or assistance” without any reference to a Counsel in the first definition having to be a Lawyer or member of the Bar, which is listed as the second and third separate definitions respectively;

The right to appoint an attorney is well established in English and Western-Roman Law with the Statute of Merton (1235), considered to be the first English statute, stating “Every freeman that oweth suit to the county, tithing, hundred, or wapentake, or to a court baron, may make an attorney to do those suits for him, 20 H.3. Stat. Merton c.10.  It was not until the reign of George II and 2 Geo.2. c.23 in 1729 that the role of Attorney and Solicitor was enclosed across the realm to a system of indenture with existing members of the Inns Court, also known as “The Temple” and “Temple Bar”.

We have defined the origin of Agent from its commercial sense, where it comes from, the origin of Principal and where it comes from and we have been absolutely clear about who and what the Principal is and how they view the Principal.  How do we tackle this issue of the Principal and what other tricks up their sleeves does the system have to keep us in control in regards to the Agent.  I was going to review some of the definition of person as an agent is obviously a person.  I do ask you to go and look at Article 17 under Positive Law at www.one-heaven.org .  In particular look at the different types of persons defined under Canon 1503 and the concept of a ‘second person.’  When we talk about Agents we are talking about second persons:

Canon 1503 

All Persons may be categorized according to the three (3) possible types of Relation being the Author (Principal) to Actor (Agent) being: 1st Person (Self), 2nd Person (Another) and 3rd Person (Not Known):

(i) 1st Person, also known as a Natural Person and in propria persona is when the competent mind of a carnate Level 6 Higher Order Life Form as Author (Principal) appoints, records and publishes themselves by Special (Private) appointment as Actor (Agent) by some solemn binding agreement. Therefore, a 1st Person or Natural Person possesses “natural title” to right of beneficial use associated with the 1st Person synonymous with such pronouns as “I, thou, me, my, mine, myself, we, us, our, ours and ourselves”; and

(ii) 2nd Person, also known as an Artificial Person is when a carnate Level 6 Higher Order Life Form as Author (Principal) appoints another carnate Level 6 Higher Order Life Form by Special (Private) appointment as Actor (Agent) by some solemn binding agreement. Thus, a 2nd Person or Artificial Person is synonymous with such pronouns as “you, yours, yourself and yourselves”; and

(iii) 3rd Person, also known as a Legal Person, or Statutory Person or Surrogate Person is when the Author (Principal) is hidden or not known and the Level 6 Higher Order Life Form fails to properly express any competent in propria persona (1st Person) or 2nd Person Author (Principal) to Actor (Agent) Relation prior to the commencement of any interpersonal intercourse. In the 3rd Person, the flesh and body of a Living Level 6 Higher Order Life Form is mis-taken, and presumed to be, by default, the "person" and the Statutes of Law, or Rules of the Court as Script (Deed) and the Judge or Magistrate as the Author (Principal). Thus, a 3rd Person or Legal Person is synonymous with such pronouns as “he, she, it, they, them, their, theirs and themselves”.

There are three different types of persons defined under Canon 1503. In particular there is the concept of a ‘second person.’  When we talk about agents, we are talking about ‘second persons.’  So, artificial persons are formed between the author and another high order life form who is appointed as the actor as the agent.  So the author is the principal appointing the actor as the agent by some binding agreement.  They are you, yours, yourself—all are the second person. These canons bring it into focus.

When you look at Canon 1503 you see the third person, the legal person which is the type of person that the courts need you to be.  That is why the government can claim itself as the principal and then steps in and demotes any claim you have as an Agent so you end up going back to becoming a legal person.  They need you to be the legal person.  If you are the legal person then they have the ability to say the author is hidden and not known so they step in as the surrogate.  Then they use their law to impose their will against your will and against your estate and make that ‘legal.’  That is what they are doing in foreclosures, criminal matters, any matters in their courts.  This is exactly how the system runs so smoothly.

Applying the knowledge of Agent and Person relating to Private Courts

All administrative law, all public statute law and all court rules and procedures depend and rest upon the presence of a legal person (also known as a statutory person or surrogate person) or the effect “control of the person. If the Person present for the matter of controversy is not a legal person, but a “superior form” of person that does not agree to surrender its authority to the court, then the court has a problem – as it has to serve the best interests of resolving the controversy concerning the person associated with the matter; and

Names such as employee, citizen, taxpayer, driver, employer, and recipient are some of the many hundreds of terms used within public statutes to describe “legal persons”. As modern Western-Roman courts operate within the first form of law (without recess or deliberate change of form) as administrative law courts, the application of personal jurisdiction of the court pertains to an alleged controversy associated with a public statute concerning a type of legal person and the presence of the legal person in question; and

If however, the person who is present is not a legal person, but a Level 6 Higher Order Life form that has chosen to represent themselves in propria persona as a Natural Person then the court must effectively convince the natural person to surrender their position to the absolute authority of the court. This is most frequently done by a combination of force, trickery and intimidation through such corruptions as:

(i) forcing the Natural Person to stand “pro se” and therefore automatically agree to the personal jurisdiction; or

(ii) asking if the Natural Person is willing to “understand the charges against (the person)” therefore stand under the absolute authority of the court; or

(iii) demand the Natural Person take an oath “under the court” thereby creating a legal person and automatically surrendering their Natural Person; or

(iv) if all else fails, simply intimidate, trick, falsify and unsettle the Natural Person by ignoring due process until through inaction by the Natural Person against breach of due process they “surrender” to the power of the judge or magistrate; and

If the person is a 2nd person, also known as an “artificial person” as in a classic agent-principal relation, then courts frequently obtain personal jurisdiction by:

(i) Demanding only members of the Private Bar Guild may be agents or attorneys and therefore by their oaths, automatically submitted to the absolute authority of the court; or

(ii) Demanding the agents have suitable insurance (bond) and swear an oath to “uphold due process” and by default to stand under the absolute authority of the court; or

(iii) Demanding the paperwork of agents are originals with wet ink signatures when submitted to the court clerk, therefore transferring original “title” of the agent-principal relation to the control of court; or

(iv) Removing the right, or mention or forms available for proper recording of an agent or power of attorney to represent the principal in court.

So properly establishing the Agent-Principal relation in respect of your estate is essential to reducing the risk of such obstruction of justice by pirates of the private bar guilds.

Durable Powers of Attorney and Revocable Powers of Attorney

What are other tricks of the system?  There are two powers that are important in their system.  One is the concept of the durable powers of attorney and the other is the revocable powers of attorney.  What do I mean by an attorney?  Black’s 9th on page 147 defines an attorney as one who is designated to transact business for another; a legal agent, which is also termed an ‘attorney-in-fact’ or ‘private attorney.’  The concept of an attorney is a person who practices law or a lawyer is distinct and the secondary definition.  So the first definition, the primary definition of an attorney is actually one who transacts business for another, a legal agent, and attorney-in-fact.

The durable power of attorney means a power that continues beyond the point that the one who conveys the power is disabled or incapable of engaging his in own affairs.  So, the durable power of attorney would be the kind of power that is granted to someone before a severe illness occurs or some dangerous activity or voyage where there is the risk of being delayed or incapacitated.  This means that the management of your estate could be in jeopardy so the one given durable power of attorney would then be able to step in even though you are obstructed, incapable of executing instructions.  The real chestnut, the one that is established in America for example, has three points.  They are through the Department of Agriculture, the Department of Treasury, and through the Department of Transportation.  This is the concept of what is called the irrevocable power of attorney and is the humdinger that is used to bring actions against one.  What is the irrevocable power of attorney?

The irrevocable power of attorney in one sense is the durable power of attorney, a power that extends beyond our incapacitation and beyond our inability if we are obstructed or in custody.  It goes further: the irrevocable power of attorney actually prevents the Principal, the one who is said to grant the power in the first place, from dissolving the power.  You can see how this is extremely important for the system.  In fact it is central to them.  If a government cannot dissolve the powers granted to certain agents in Treasury and therefore the IRS, in Agriculture and therefore treating you as animals and social security and chattel; and Transportation in regards to your being an agent of commerce, then the system really has a failsafe.    Its control is unassailable in theory so long as the exiting principal, the existing bank, the existing arrangement is not challenged.

How is an irrevocable power of attorney formed?  It is an artful and perverse method that they use.  What they do is they say that an interest is granted when an irrevocable power of attorney is created.  What do we mean by interest?  We mean that the agent that is involved in the process actually has an interest in the estate.  It is created in the estate at the time the estate is created.  When the agency as a franchise is created, they have an interest.  Until that interest is resolved, not even the Principal can dissolve it.  Think about the reason why.

An interest is, of course, a benefit.  A benefit means that they become a beneficiary.  By becoming a beneficiary it means that the in the role of the Agent and the Principal as the primary agent only someone higher up in the estate can in fact dissolve such an arrangement.  That is what they mean regarding when the agent is granted a benefit say in court cases, you have an absolute perversion of the course of justice, a perversion of all known law, a complete perversion of the concept of ‘clean hands’ and there is not a single case in the United States of America that I am aware of now that is conducted with true ‘clean hands.’  What an abomination that is; every single court case has with it a financial claim entered with the Department of Treasury through the UCC whereby the private contractor in the form of the Magistrate or the Judge takes up an interest and forms an irrevocable power of attorney in the matter.  They have the controlling power of attorney role in the matter being brought before them.  What an abomination and extraordinary perversion that is.

How do we deal with it?  We appoint an Agent with Power of Attorney.  That is what we do.  But first we make it clear that the Principal has been replaced and that the powers of the Principal have been revoked and the government can no longer consider itself to be the government of your estate by presumption, assumption, and supposition.  We do that by presenting to key areas of the existing system a Notice of the Appointment of the Minister Plenipotentiary.  Why can you never, ever, ever stand in court and claim to be the General Executor?  If you do that you might as well give up.  Why can you never engage in commerce in the role of the General Executor, unless you are dealing directly with an agent as to their agency powers?   You should never deal with that directly and that should be up to your primary Agent, your Minister Plenipotentiary.  It is because of Clean Hands.

The sovereign of your Estate is the General Executor is bound to remain objective and impartial as to all matter concerning the estate.  Therefore the General Executor appoints another person to deal with matters so that the General Executor is above commerce, business and banking.  This is crucial particularly when you consider another failsafe in their system which considers that “commerce is a sin.”  When you send notice of the appointment of a Minister Plenipotentiary you are indeed sending notice of the appointment of the Principal to the Secretary of State, to the office of Secretary of Transportation, to the Secretary of the Treasury, and to the Secretary of Agriculture.  Never send it to the man, or woman.  Never send a document to a man or woman, just to the office.

It is the office of the Secretaries of State, Treasury, Transportation, and Agriculture that you are sending notice.  Now, as a courtesy it can be said that the US Secretary of State and your State Secretary of State receive notice from you.  It is entirely up to you.  If you have given notice and your Maner Role proves that you have given notice, and you have records of that, and you have given notice as an extract that is perfectly fine.  That means that you don’t give them a white copy, you don’t give them a yellow copy, you give them a BLUE COPY of the Notice of Appointment of the Minister Plenipotentiary.  The pink copy goes to the various sub-departments and the blue copy goes to the Secretary of State.  I have not given a template on this at the moment, as if you have complete your estate material, this step should be well within your competencies.

Now you have given notice that there is a new government of your estate under the Will and Testament.  Part of that process includes sending the credentials and I have links on the audio so you can see how simple it is to set this up.  These are simply taking extracts of what we have already done in the third part of your estate.  Once you have given notice that the Principal, when you refer to the Principal, is the Minister Plenipotentiary of your Estate and the Primary Agent, then you are in a position to now appoint a Power of Attorney.  You appoint that to an Agent.  The functions and role of the Power of Attorney when you appoint a new agent, is outlined in the example that we give here.  In granting this role (see Power of Attorney Appointment example) and in granting the fact that there is a new Principal, all durable and irrevocable powers of attorney (the have in the system) are null and void.

You see, when a beneficial interest is created by the Principal, he or she cannot change it.  But, when the General Executor who is the sovereign (of the Estate) is the one whom appoints a Principal through the Appointment of the Minister Plenipotentiary and therefore has the absolute power to revoke and nullifies all previous actions of previous Ministers Plenipotentiary, then all irrevocable and durable powers of attorney are null and void.  It all starts again.  One of the key things in regard to the appointment of power of attorney is that it is done by Affidavit.  There is an example of a very simple affidavit.  I leave that up to you because in certain jurisdictions the way that you design the affidavit will be different.  But, what the power of attorney affidavit does is that it shows the terms of the appointment as Facts, it shows the acknowledgement of an oath being given in the process, it shows the acknowledgement that it is a true affidavit and it shows separately to that an affidavit of the acceptance of the power of attorney.

Once you have done this, once you have given notice of the appointment of the Minister Plenipotentiary as the new Principal of the Estate, and once you have then prepared an affidavit in regards to any of the matters that are before you in the appointment of Power of Attorney and then revoking through that any previous, existing powers of attorney and any attorney appointed by the court, then that Agent holding those powers of Attorney then has the powers by their system to demand an accounting, to settle the matter, to clear the record and to close the matter.  As to how they conduct themselves in regards to these matters, we will deal with that in the second part of Agent next week, of how the Agent clears up the matters.

Let’s summarize from this audio exactly what we have now accomplished and exactly where we are.  We now realize that the role of the Agent is front and center.  We know their system is commercial.  We see that the role of the Agent is key and we realize now what the Principal is in terms of the government or the central bank.  We realize from the work we did last week that we are that point in our own records to establish that.  We see how important our master records are as Maner Roles (Manor Rolls) as the master accounts.  We see that we need to give notice so that there can be no dispute that the Estate has appointed a new government and has appointed a new Minister Plenipotentiary.  We are then in position to appoint a power of attorney and revoke any claimed durable or irrevocable powers (the system claims).  At that point we are then able to have that role of Agent deal with settling matters and resolving disputes.

Mark my words you will be tested by their system.  As many of you may find and as you see their system as criminal as it has become, and sadly they will try everything they can to put you in dishonor, to obfuscate, delay and defer.  It is why we will be addressing in part 2 next week, the conduct of the duly appointed and authorized agent with proper Powers of Attorney "smoking out" these impostor agents and false powers which they refuse to dissolve, including how to remain always in honor when pursuing key questions for the estate and what to do when faced with the typical silence, dishonor, trickery and deception of pirates of the private bar guilds.

Thank you for listening and thank you for all of those of you who continue to support Ucadia and help.  Without your help, this research and educational work provided without cost could not continue.  So, thank all of you who genuinely care about seeing proper rule of law and justice restored in supporting the work of Ucadia.