Motu Proprio of Francis and why by Rule of Law means no one can be above the Law

_________________________________________________________________
Please download MP3 Audio Broadcast of this Blog > here   (45 min 15 Mb)
_________________________________________________________________

Hello and thanks for reading and listening to this weeks blog and audio on the Motu Proprio issued by Pope Francis on the 11th of July 2013 and why under proper Rule of Law, no one can be above the Law.

Well a lot has happened since last weeks blog and audio on “Why the meaning of everything is Awareness Loves Life not Life Loves Awareness”: In the first instance, the news of this historic edict by Pope Francis has taken the internet by storm, with the predictable bunch of headline grabbers deeply infected with Mind Virus arrogantly and stupidly claiming they and they alone are responsible for this action of the Pope. Ordinarily it would be laughable if people did not take such outrageous claims so seriously.

In the second instance, I have found myself apologizing yet again for the fact that the development of the Ucadia model is not occurring in a perfectly straight line with no mistakes and referring to a blog and audio I did on Wednesday 17th July entitled The Ucadia Model- Why the mind virus and spiritual fog needs to attack it.

Given I was emotionally upset that people who I previously trusted and that even now claim to be honorable and only attacking Ucadia and Frank O’Collins as a kind of public service benefit, I apologize to these people attacking for me again.  I should not have demonstrated any emotion. I should have let your actions speak for themselves.

Some people have asked and suggested that I respond in a point by point basis to the claims and accusations. To that I say the following – every week I offer to answer questions people ask of me and every week I try to do just that, despite the ridiculous attempt to say otherwise. Secondly, I covered much of the points in the blog two weeks ago. Thirdly, anyone can spin anything into whatever they like. I once watched a show of The Daily Show with Jon Stewart where all they did was put some scary music over the children’s cartoon Dora the Explorer and used some video editing techniques to look like it was a covert message from Satan.  That’s how easy it is. 

I have answered the objections in the blog previously mentioned about being attacked by the mind virus. I answer questions every week to those who wish to ask in good faith and I have apologized even again in this blog and audio without reservation for any hurt I have caused people. 

The model is one thing, how it is used, whether people like it and whether people want to form communities by it is something else. So once again, I call out to all those people continuing mischief and pretending they are doing it for some kind of collective good – please I beg you, stop wasting all our time and let me finish the model and correcting those things which you think need to be fixed.

In fact, returning back to the Ucadia model now, there is a lot we can discuss in terms of the topic of the Motu Proprio issued by Pope Francis on the 11th of July 2013 and why under proper Rule of Law, no one can be above the Law.

The Golden Rule and the Golden Rule of Law

What is the most important law?  What is the most fundamental of precepts that if it does not exist, the very rule of law does not exist? You may already have an opinion, but before we discuss, lets review what is meant by Rule of Law?

The United Nations states that Rule of Law refers to “a principle of governance in which all persons, institutions and entities, public and private, including the State itself, are accountable to laws that are publicly promulgated, equally enforced and independently adjudicated, and which are consistent with international human rights norms and standards”.

A simpler definition of Rule of Law popular amongst dictionaries such as Merriam-Webster is “adherence to due process of law; government by law”.

Yet when it comes to the courts, to lawyers, to judges, magistrates and members of the Private Bar Association, their recollection of this most fundamental of concepts is far from certain, almost vague and corrupt. For example, Blacks 2nd Edition defines Rule of Law in vague and obscure terms as “a legal principle of general application, sanctioned by the recognition of authorities and usually expressed in the form of a maxim or logical proposition”. Nothing about how fundamental it is – The Guiding rule over all law for goodness sake is diminished by the lawyers to merely an ideal, a proposition, a hope or quest.

It turns out that Aristotle and other cultures before the invention of the Private Bar Guilds and clubs for lawyers were less vague. For Aristotle was reputed to have written”

“It is more proper that law should govern than any one of the citizens upon the same principle.”

In other words, that every member of a society are subject to the same set of laws. That no one is above the law. That is simply, precisely what the primary rule of law is.  Put more simply, the Golden Rule is the Rule of Law and the Rule of Law is the Golden Rule.

Sometimes expressed as the ethic of reciprocity or the ethic of equality, what do we mean by the Golden Rule? It is a feature of law found in sacred texts and scripture throughout every major culture since the beginning of civilization itself.

For example:

From at least 1800 BCE from the Ancient Egyptian text Tales of the Eloquent Servant we have: "Do for one who may do for you, that you may cause him thus to do." 

From the 6th Century BCE we have through Confucius Analects 15:23:  "Do not do to others what you do not want them to do to you".

From the Brahman Mahabharata, 5:1517 we have: "This is the sum of Dharma [duty]: Do naught unto others which would cause you pain if done to you".

From the Buddhist work Udana-Varga 5:18 we have “Hurt not others in ways that you yourself would find hurtful”

From the Jainism work Acarangasutra 5.101-2 we have "Therefore, neither does he [a sage] cause violence to others nor does he make others do so.".  

In the Christian New Testament we have under Matthew 7:12, King James Version “Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them: for this is the law and the prophets."

If we have a look at the Ucadia Model, then there are numerous examples as the fundamental importance of the Golden Rule and Rule of Law, such as the ancient laws of Yapa, the indigenous first peoples of Australia such as Book 5 the First Law and the First Law of Truth:

1 This be the First Law of Truth: 

2 There is, there was, there has only ever been One Law; 

3 All law is equal that no one is above it; 

4 All law is measured that all may learn and know it; 

5 All law is standard that it may always be applied the same. 

6 A law be a rule given by divine instruction; 

7 This being the highest law. 

8 No lesser law may contradict it. 

9 A law be an edict, given by a great council of wise elders and agreed by all tribes; 

10 This being the second highest law. 

11 No lesser law may contradict it. 

12 A law be custom and ceremony over time. 

13 This being the third highest law. 

14 A rule that is secret cannot be a law; 

15 A rule that is unclear in meaning cannot be a law. 

16 A rule that cannot be applied cannot be a law. 

17 A rule may be written by sign or symbol, 

18 But only when spoken at a place of law is it law. 

19 A law may be spoken, 

20 But only when it is comprehended and agreed is it justice. 

21 All people of the same community, 

22 Are subject to the same rule of law. 

23 All men and women of a community, 

24 Are bound to live by the rule of law of the community. 

25 No one may be accused except by rule of law. 

26 No one may be punished except by rule of law. 

27 Where there is no justice, there is no law. 

28 Where there is no honor, there is no law. 

29 A man or woman who are not taught how to comprehend a law, 

30 Cannot be bound by it. 

31 Any law that is against such truth cannot be law.

There are many more examples, but these are just some. Now sometimes, the ethic of reciprocity, the ethic of equality is ignorantly and falsely boiled down to the clique “Do no harm”. That is not what these examples of the Golden Rule are saying. Every one of them is the positive expression of the Rule of Law that all are the same under the law, that No One is Above the Law.

The Golden Rule and History of Authority

If you have skimmed through any history book then you know that the idea of all the people voting to elect their leaders is far from an ancient concept well established. Instead, the concept of open elections for all people, not just an elite is a relatively recent event.

You may have also read and reviewed that one of the core arguments used by the professional political classes as well as the professional legal class for their authority is the constant consent of the people. That they govern by the will and consent of the people.

There is of course another source of authority that is of at least equal importance that is plastered on most government and judicial buildings around the world and it is the concept of the mandate of heaven.

Rightly, or wrongly, the oldest of civilized cultures believe the highest law to be the laws of heaven or “Divine Law”, followed then by the laws of nature and then the laws of men. 

Indeed, the foundation of all civilized rule of law, including all Western Roman Law, begins with the acknowledgment that the highest law comes from the Divine Creator of all things in the Universe expressed through the laws of the Universe and then through the reason and spirit of man to make Positive Laws.

The very meaning and essence of the idea of “office” is derived from ecclesiastical and ceremonial duty (officium) and service when in possession of some circumscribed space such as a chapel, temple, altar or sanctuary.

In recognition of the fact that the legitimacy of office is through the recognition of the supremacy of Divine Law over Positive Law, the investiture of people into office is normally created upon a sacred and ecclesiastical oath to some higher spiritual power.

Therefore all valid official positions of all legitimate governments of all societies on planet Earth depend on the acknowledgment and recognition that the highest law comes from the Divine Creator of all things in the Universe; and

The very meaning and purpose of the word “authority” is derived from the creation of instruments and pronouncements of law (auctor) in accordance with ecclesiastical ritual, ceremony or property (ritus).

Therefore all legitimate authority of all officials of all valid governments of all societies on planet Earth depend on the acknowledgment and recognition that all authority is ultimately derived from the highest authority being the Divine Creator of all things in the Universe.

Thus, the very existence of all societies and the idea of Rule of Law across Planet Earth is dependent on the idea of the existence of the Divine Creator which under the Ucadia model we describe as the Unique Collective Awareness (UCA).

As the authority and legitimacy of an office is derived from ecclesiastical authority, then the obeying of the Rule of Law is not merely duty, but necessary for the lawful effect of any action. This is because no spiritual force may flow through natural law and positive law of this world, if the sacred rules that establish such law are willingly broken.

It is why through the original laws of trust between the entrustor and the trustee known as Fiduciary Laws require such diligence. It is also why the laws between the trustee and beneficiary originally known as the Laws of Equity are equally as stringent.

How important is the Golden Rule and the Rule of Law?

So how important then is the Golden Rule and the Rule of Law? Well, if the lawyers, the judges, the magistrates and members of the Private Bar Associations as well as their colleagues as professional politicians are to be believed, then the Golden Rule as well as the Rule of Law are just sign posts, ideals, propositions, hopes and aspirations.

But if one applies even the smallest ounce of deductive reasoning then one can clearly conclude the following:

(1) If there are different rules for one set of society compared to the other set of society, then there is no Golden Rule, there is no Rule of Law and so any conveyance, ruling, statute, promulgation, trust, sentence is without any force or effect of law and is wholly immoral, unlawful and maintained only by force and fear;

(2) If there is different application of rules for one group or [over] another, then there is no Golden Rule and there is no Rule of Law and again any action done by such judges, magistrates, politicians and their business friends is without any legitimacy [whatsoever]; and

(3) If there are any absurd and wholly false statutes and rules that render judges or magistrates or politicians immune from the law they administer, if there are rulings that render banks or industries immune from prosecution then by such actions, the politicians who issue such false statutes destroy the golden rule and extinguish any form of Rule of Law until they are arrested, run out of office, imprisoned and/or held to account.

That is how clear and important Rule of Law is. No ifs or buts. No confusion. No vaguery. If the law is no equal, if it is not equally applied then there is no law. You are living under tyranny; you are living under the yoke of criminals, of warlords.

Lets take some practical examples starting with the absurdity and immorality of judicial and political immunity. What right, what sensible and ethical argument can possibly support good government by permitting judges and magistrates to be put above the law they are supposed to administer?

And yet in most if not all Western democracies, laws now exist that mean people acting in the capacity of public officials as judges, magistrates and politicians are immune from prosecution – in the case of judges in many places even if clear demonstration that they acted improperly and with malice exists.

Are there examples of judges and magistrates or even politicians going to prison? - Absolutely yes. But only after the court of public opinion overwhelmingly demanded such action and the stench of corruption was to overpowering to hide.

Of course the pathetic argument given why judges and magistrates need immunity is to protect them from interference or pressure in making their decisions. What utter malarkey.  It is the same lame and idiotic excuses they are used to create militia forces against the population in the last ten years because in the United States four thousand people have died from terrorist related incidents sponsored by shadowy alphabet quasi government agencies while there have been nearly one million deaths by firearms and they still won’t do anything about it.

The law is supposed to protect everyone including judges. So the lie about judicial immunity is easily exposed as a cover to permit nothing more than organized criminal conspiracy and public theft through the operation of private for business courts that profit from crime. It means there is no Rule of Law in any country that permits Judicial or Political Immunity. That is an absolute statement of fact, not subject to conjecture or debate.

What is another example? How about the creation of the cestui que vie trusts, the copyhold estates and the sale of these estates to private banks and business as organized commercial slavery. That would be pretty overwhelming evidence of crimes against humanity and the absence of any rule of law, wouldn’t it?

Well, as I continue to finish the canons of Fiduciary Law and Administrative Law that is clearly what the evidence in black and white in statute shows.

In the United Kingdom, you see the creation of the oxymoron of Ecclesiastical Corporations in 1832 (c. 80) and then the gradual disenfranchising of rights of people through their copyhold estates starting in 1841 (c.35) and then 1852 (c.51) and then 1853 (c.57). If you have a look at these statutes have a look at the fact that the Bank of England is considered immune from prosecution in what it does.

But wait until 1853, there you see as plain as day in the Ecclesiastical transfer of Persons to private corporations 1853 (c.50) and then the sale of copyhold estates to corporations 1853 (c.51) the blatant sale of the estates of our ancestors to banks – the formation of the commercial matrix, without our consent and with clear disparity in the law. This is not the Golden Rule, this is not Rule of Law. This is open defiance of law, open commercial slavery for the benefit of a few and elite, which these same elite deny, obfuscate, hide, they have ever done.

Carry it then through to 1858 (c.94) and then the 1894 copyhold estate act and then the property act of 1922, when they artfully hide the existence of the estates and create the copyhold enfranchisements as the corporations to which we are now attached today through our birth certificate.

Have a look at the rules as trustees used by the courts in their system where they openly mock any principles of fiduciary law such as Trustee Act of 1850 (c.60) , then 1852 (c.55), then 1888 (c.52) then 1893 (c.53) and finally 1925 (c.19) , which they still use in their system today. All the while, the courts deny deny deny they ever create trusts or that they ever convey property without our consent. There you have it, through those links, in black and white.

We see similar examples in the United States and the acts of congress in 1933 (ch. 274) that created the FDIC and for the first time in US history permitted private corporations to be the controlling interest of a publicly created entity, controlling all the assets and trusts of the nation. The act that corporatized the United States in plain sight.

The Importance of Motu Propria by Pope Francis

According to the New Advent Catholic Encyclopedia, Motu Propria in Latin stands for “of his own accord” and is the name given to an official decree by a Pope personally in his capacity and office as supreme sovereign pontiff and not in his capacity as the apostolic leader and teacher of the Universal Church. To put it more bluntly, a Motu Propria is the highest form of legal instrument on the planet in accordance to its provenance, influence and structure to the Western-Roman world, over riding anything that could be issued by the United Nations, the Inner and Middle Temple, the Crown of Great Britain or any other Monarch and indeed by any head of state or body politic. If you are a member of the United Nations, or recognized by the United States or the United Kingdom or have a bank account anywhere on the planet, then a Motu Propria is the highest legal instrument, no question.

In the case of the Motu Propria issued by Pope Francis on July 11th 2013, it is an instrument of several functions and layers.

In the first instance, it may be legally construed to apply to the local matters of the administration of the Holy See.

In the second instance, the document relates to the fact that the Holy See is the underpinning to the whole global system of law, therefore anyone holding an office anywhere in the world is also subject to these limits and that immunity no longer applies.

Thirdly, we see the Holy See and the Universal Church clearly separating itself from the nihilist world of the professional elite who continue, to be proven time and time again, to be criminally insane, bark raving mad and with no desire to do anything honorable until they are torn from power by anyone, any body who cares for the law. 

On several audios and interviews I have made the clear statements that the age of the Roman Cult, as first formed in the 11th Century and that hijacked the Catholic Church first formed by the Carolingians in the 8th Century, then the Holly Christian Empire or Byzantine Church by the 13th Century and the world at large by the 16th Century ceased to exist around March 14th 2013 upon the election of Pope Francis.

There are many, many conspiracists out there, who remain highly skeptical and in reply to each and every dramatic announcements crow – it is all a smokescreen, or it isn’t enough, or it is all double speak.  The same lunacy, and I mean extreme mental illness that you can see promulgated for centuries that anyone who proposes better models of society, or the end of corruption, or to reconstitute the rule of law must be the anti-christ because he will try to deceive the world by doing good things, not evil. Utter madness. Utter barking stupidity, but sadly some people in every generation willingly drink the cool aid given to them, by disinformation agents, without using any form of reason.

In any event this document issued by Pope Francis is historic on multiple levels, but most significant above all others in that it recognizes the supremecy of the Golden Rule, the same teaching ascribed to Jesus Christ and the intimate connection to the Rule of Law, that all are subject to the rule of law, no one is above the law.

What about the existing political/business/legal elite?

So will the existing ruling elite of bankers, of politicians and judges and magistrates get the message? Sadly, I doubt it.

I have made the point of highlighting the 20 greatest lies of nihilism on the website One-Evil to highlight the fog of stupidity that entraps so many countries around the world. To the nihilists who honestly believe their own absurd sayings such as “the law is whatever we say it is” or “might is right” or we can continue to deceive the public, they will continue doing what they are doing.

But now there is a body, the Universal Church, the true Catholic Church restored that has placed a line in the sand and restored Rule of Law on Earth. Now, there can be no mistake.

We can only pray that some of the ruling elite or at least part of the governments will wake up. If they do change, then what can they do?

There are thousands of practical and sensible things the professional elites could do, to turn the world back from the brink.

But in the first instance, the top five would be:

#1.  Require all public officials to properly swear public oaths and have such proper oaths recorded on the public record so that they are subject to fiduciary law and not as agents, to be done by every politician, every office holder, every prosecutor, every judge, every magistrate, every sheriff, etc.; and

#2-Repeal all laws granting immunity to officials, corporations, judges and politicians; and repeal those laws because those laws are contrary to the laws that give them authority. If a government has a law granting immunity from prosecution, it is contrary to Motu Proprio and the Golden Rule; and

#3-Restore all statutes against frauds and treason that ensured public officials cannot commit fraud, cannot steal and cannot get away with committing treason against their own people and get away with it; and

#4-Repeal all laws granting private control of annuities (cestui que vie trusts and estates), public trusts created against citizens and return them to public administration away from private corporations including ensuring the benefits of such annuities are returning to the people as originally intended when created in 1791; and

#5-Create public banks, that cannot be privatized using the annuities of the people as the assets to back a public currency and phase out all privately issued currencies for publicly backed currencies. You don’t have to change the designs of existing currencies, but merely create public banks that are not owned by private individuals and families; and use the public assets that are returned from having been stolen by the private people and allow that publicly backed money to be circulated without interest being charged to the people by the private bankers who profit through the stealing of the energy of the public.

Stop it now and restore the law!

All public officials could restore these today if they actually cared at all about the Golden Rule and restoring the law.

You may have items you consider more important. But that is a starting list that wouldn’t involve the end of the world.  

In any event what took place in July and issued by Pope Francis is historic and the changes continue. In the meantime, I will continue to finish Fiduciary Law and Administrative Law.

Thank you to all who continue to help and support Ucadia and finishing the model. 

Cheers. Frank