The Ucadia Model – Why the mind virus and spiritual fog need to attack it

_________________________________________________________________________________
Please download MP3 Audio Broadcast of this Blog > here   (35 min 12 Mb)
_________________________________________________________________________________

Hello and thanks for taking the time to read and listen to this weeks blog on “The Ucadia Model and why the mind virus (ego) and spiritual fog is desperate for you not to study it, comprehend it and subscribe to it”.

Last week, the topic was Taking stock – What is Ucadia? Where do I find other answers etc? It was a fairly short blog, but packed with various facts and figures, in particular the size, breath and depth of the Ucadia model developed over 28 years and virtually full time for the past 18 years.

To some, the sheer size of the Ucadia model is intimidating just in listing its facts, particularly when you look at the number of web pages, web sites and sections to it:

+ The Journey of Unique Collective Awareness; and

+ The Journey of Self; and

+ The Will and Testament and package of material to help you perfect the claim of right of your own body, mind, name and spirit as well as that which is entitled to you;

+ Maxima Textibus Sacris The foundation of twenty two (22) collection of the most sacred texts of history; and

+ The eleven (11) most sacred covenants and charters of history borne from Pactum de Singularis Caelum; and

+ Astrum Iuris Divini Canonum being the Twenty two (22) books of canons of law; and

+ The seven (7) Ucadia Patents; and

+ The thirty three (33) codes of law; and

+ The over 7,000 forms and processes defined by the codes; and

+ The Ucadia Financial System as a complete structure of assets, currencies, treasuries, rules and banks.

Over 70 web sites and nearly one million web pages.

Apart from its sheer size, the other frustration to many about the Ucadia model is just how much is not completely finished – such as the canons of law, with many books still to have all the canons listed, for example.  Then there are some who are upset when they come to the Ucadia model when they find inconsistencies and errors.

Each week on a Wednesday for nearly three years now on Talkshoe.Com, I have been part of a regular call where people are invited to call in and voice their concerns, questions or issues, or post their questions in the chat box providing the questions or comments are in good faith and not deliberately designed to be abusive. 

Excluding the very rare abusive questions, I have tried to answer every question or concern anyone asks. If I cannot answer, then I take it on notice for the next call, so that over the years I have answered many hundreds and hundreds of questions, concerns and issues. 

Another level of disclosure is the Frequently Asked Questions on the Ucadia site and other sites as well as these blogs, which allow me the opportunity to reply to concerns and to highlight the truth that despite being the author and architect of Ucadia, I have made frequent mistakes in my life, I continue to make errors from time to time and I have apologized and apologize again for my mistakes.

As anyone who has emailed me highlighting what they perceive to be an error can testify, if something is a major mistake, then I will fix it.  If someone has a difference of opinion based on reason, on reading what is already written in the model, then I certainly will consider how the model need to be improved. That is why the Ucadia Model is a model. It is why it has continued to evolved. 

For example, just as people are perfectly free by their own consent to recognize their membership to One Heaven and redeem their membership number, they are also free to revoke their membership number and choose to leave and have nothing to do with One Heaven or Ucadia.  Free will is the most important force in the universe, and this is reflected respectfully within Pactum de Singularis Caelum, the Covenant of One Heaven. See: Article 38.14 of the Covenant. That this section has not been clear in the past is an obvious mistake and the deepest of gratitude to those who highlighted such errors.

Having developed Ucadia over 28 years as the author and architect, there is much I regret and am genuinely sorry as mistakes: I am sorry for ever giving into the extreme and unrelenting pressure put on me not one, but over two years to publicly proclaim several times and in writing that I intended to walk away from all that I invented and created and hand it to people I have never met face to face. While the notion and ideal that Ucadia is ultimately a gift for everyone was correct, giving into to such pressuring from people claiming to be friends and making such statements under extreme duress was a stupid mistake, which I deeply regret as the Ucadia model is far from finished. 

I regret the mistakes in giving into the pressure to spend years and years on community development debates, discussions, groups well before the Ucadia model is finished.  As you can see from these blogs, I am very much aware of the pressures that people are under and continue to do my best to provide practical research. 

I regret the many times I have reacted negatively, often on the recordings, in not supporting external groups who genuinely want to create communities and subscribe to transparency, honesty and the ideals of the Ucadia model.

I regret not finishing the Ucadia model to the level that I hoped at this stage. There is so much that is not completed. The canons of law need to be completed. I still do not have all the words properly defined in the Lexica, nor is there the proper Lexica of symbol definitions for all the hundreds of symbols used throughout Ucadia.  In fact, the point that I have not had the time yet to properly define the meaning, purpose and provenance of all the symbols used within Ucadia is actually a pretext by some to belittle my constant previous explanations that Ucadia seeks to reclaim, to consume, to enclose the symbols previously claimed as symbols of power and re-establish their ancient provenance for positive, not negative. 

And most of all I regret any hurt, anger, frustration, bitterness or hatred I have caused in others because they felt that by not giving them what they wanted, or what they demanded of me that they were somehow cheated, or that in making mistakes and then correcting them, I somehow could not be trusted.

I certainly do not regret trusting people or trying to help people. That has been an absolute joy and I hope and wish to continue until I leave this planet. Even when people have come along and claimed to be trustworthy and friendly, only to use any form of contact or engagement as a weapon to attack either myself or Ucadia, that does not diminish my faith in the fundamental goodness of people.  It is the mind virus that wants to destroy the thing it thinks it cannot have or control.  It is the fog, that keeps us divided, not the essence of the man or woman.

I made a solemn and sacred promise 18 years ago to the Divine Creator of everything, of all and the Unique Collective Awareness, that I would finish the Ucadia Model. I was not asked to make a promise to stop work in 2011, or 2012 or 2015. Nor, was I asked to build a community or a financial system, but a comprehensive, detailed fictional model of how life could exist if heaven was on earth.  That is a promise that I try every day now to keep and not be distracted by the mind virus and the fog of negativity.

Yet there are some people who no matter what is said, refuse to view Ucadia as a model, refuse to accept to be a man or a woman is to make mistakes, who refuse to accept my apologies for previous errors and instead seek to discredit Ucadia in any manner, shape, form and method they can.  The most obvious being to try to attack Frank O’Collins and in doing so, seek to reduce the level of interest of people actually reading the Ucadia model.

Why? Why would some people be so desperate to attack Ucadia and use every trick in the book to discredit it?  Why would there be some people who have actually spoken with me, now use that contact in a deliberately misconstrued way, to try and discredit Ucadia? If Ucadia is a fictional model? If errors in Ucadia are fixed? If mistakes are corrected and apologies made, then why is Ucadia so threatening?

Also why bother speaking about it?  Why take the time out to answer such negativity?  The answer rests not only in the importance of there being a clear record in response, so people making false statements are held to account, but also to learn from what people are saying and to be reminded of just how powerful the mind virus is, how thick the fog that blinds the world.

When any excuse will do

I am reminded of a parable (and by the way, the people who hate Ucadia ABSOLUTELY HATE the parables) of the Wolf and the Lamb:

The Wolf and the Lamb

1. A Wolf finding a Lamb astray upon a path, resolved not to lay violent hands on him,

2. But to find some plea to justify to the Lamb the Wolf's right to eat him.

3. He thus addressed him: Sir, in the year past you grossly insulted me.

4. The Lamb replied: You are mistaken honorable Wolf, as I was not then born.

5. Frustrated, the Wolf then said: You trespass and feed in my pasture.

6. The Lamb replied: You are mistaken mighty Wolf, as I have not yet tasted grass.

7. Angry the Wolf then said: Then you steal and drink of my well.

8. The Lamb replied: Alas! fearsome Wolf you are in error, but for my mothers’ milk, as yet I have never yet drunk water.

9. The Wolf seized the Lamb and cried out: Be that as it is you refute all my imputations,

10. There is one you cannot deny, for I am a Wolf and you a Lamb.

11. In one final breath, the Lamb did say thus: Indeed you are a Wolf and tyrant,

12. And a tyrant will always find a pretext to justify his tyranny.

The point of this parable is that when people are full of hate, full of bitterness and self loathing; when they are crippled by the mind virus, they will use any excuse to justify their blame.

Maybe that is – why the mind virus and spiritual fog need to attack it

The responsibility when you make an oath to yourself

One of the areas that the same people who will stop at nothing to find an excuse to attack Ucadia have focused their bitterness is in somehow claiming that the public Ucadia and One-Heaven is a mirror of secret societies such as the Freemasons – keeping in mind the very statement something public and disclosed is somehow secret exposes the absurdity of mind virus in full flight.

Lets have a look at some of the words now attacked – the oath at time of membership redemption to One Heaven:

We [Your Name],

being the Divine Immortal Spiritual, expressed in our Trust Number to the circumscribed Living Flesh occupying the Earth known as [Community] within the metes and bounds of the Region known as [Province] within the metes and bounds of the Nation known as [Nation], hereby freely and of My own free will, without duress, give My oath and witness to the Sacred Covenant, also known as Pactum de Singularis Caelum; and

Furthermore, We pledge Our sacred oath to uphold the Articles of the Sacred Covenant of the Society and Our allegiance to abide by the rules and regulations as set forth by the Society and its valid Canons; and

Upon this day We hereby give notice and full consent for the Society to register Our sacred Membership Number of One Heaven through the creation of a Perfect Divine Trust in spirit and a union with a Perfect True Trust in flesh; and

Made by Me this day through the selection of the button below and the recording of this act as associated with the valid registration of My True Trust.

Now lets have a look at what this Oath actually means in the context of the sacred Covenant Pactum de Singularis Caelum and the Ucadia Model.

What are you ultimately? If you have read anything of Ucadia then you know you are the personification of the absolute, the all, the divine, the almighty in flesh. If you have spent even a few minutes listening to the audios then you will have heard me speak the same phrase over and over “nothing stands between you and the divine”. Yet does this stop the assassin, the mind virus? The spiritual fog?

What the oath is saying, based on the meaning of Ucadia model and the Covenant of One Heaven is that you (in flesh) pledge an oath to you (the divine) to live according to some basic self discipline and values reflected in the Covenant of One Heaven. Is that evil? Or is that an incredibly enlightening step forward from previous oaths and affirmations we may have made in courts, or professions or any form of club you may be associated?

You are responsible for yourself. You cannot blame Ucadia if you have failed to take accountability for your own predicament. You can’t blame Frank O’Collins that somehow through failure of access to speak with him or engage with him, you have somehow been betrayed, giving you license to seek to discredit Ucadia on falsities and deliberate misrepresentations.

This oath, this promise which says no one stand between you and the divine is your promise to your highest self that you will stop running away, you will stop hiding from your past mistakes, that you will stop searching for someone to blame, that you will stop being a negative troll attacking other people trying to make a difference.

Instead, if you are someone who has made the solemn oath to your higher self, you will try every day to tackle the mind virus that is ego. It is a promise to yourself that you will try to make the world a better place and not revert to old habits, or fear mongering, or not taking competent control of your own affairs. 

Learning from your mistakes

If you are going to try and tackle the Western Roman Legal System and unearth its hidden meanings, provenance, structures and functions then I assure you, you are going to make a lot of mistakes.

If you approach the investigative process by publishing and talking about what you discover along the way, then you probably have quite a few regrets along the way in what you have said a few years ago, even six months ago compared to today.

For example, when the audios first started, I felt the Ecclesiastical Deed Poll was an excellent method to rebut the false presumptions of the Bar Associations claims of ownership of our name, our body and indeed, our soul.  It turned out thanks to more detailed research that it is our will and testament that is ultimately the most superior form of claim and rebuttal.  It turns out there is nothing legally deficient, nothing wrong with an EDP. Yet there are still people even today, who are bitter that we moved to the concepts of will and testament.

Another example is the difference between affirmations, affidavits and declarations.  Again, when we started out, there were concerns over affidavits until they were investigated in the context of the strength of sworn testimony under oath and testimony under conscience.  

But even though I have done several audios on affidavits and even though I have answered this question, there are people who remain bitter in the fact that as we learned, we changed our opinion towards affidavits.

Another example is the role of the General Executor Did I say on different talks that one might consider approaching the court process from the position of the General Executor? Yes, I did, several times.  That was the optimum research at the time.  Now, I regret those discussions as we have come so much further in realizing the pure commercial and agency roles of the courts and indeed how the courts know they are breaking their own rules.

But will I stop learning? No.  Will I stop completing the Ucadia model? No?  Would opening up the Ucadia model to groups debating again, each point as was the case over the past few years? Absolutely not.

An accusation that some make against me is I am a dictator to my own work, my own creation, invention and authorship.  Of course I need to be. I am the author and the architect of the Ucadia model.  But the argument is, well people need to debate and argue whether they like or dislike the Ucadia model and change bits they don’t like.  So hold on a second – the first part is about creating and developing a model and the second is the debate on its utility, its efficiency and its accuracy and relevance.

The second part – debating the usefulness of the Ucadia model – is already happening and has been happening for years. People vote every day by either coming to it, or ignoring it.  People express their opinions by supporting it, or attacking it.  And lets not forget that many groups, have taken large parts of Ucadia to develop their own communities.

Let me finish the Ucadia model and to those who are riddled with the mind virus, who are trapped in bitterness, or hate or a sense of betrayal, or simply want to disrupt and cripple, please I beg you, let me finish by Divine Commission. If you want to debate, then debate. If you want to form communities then go ahead, but let me finish the model.

Yes, Ucadia is fiction!

Now, if there is something more than parables that the mind virus and the spiritual fog hates more than anything is the truth that the Ucadia Model is pure fiction – it is simply an idea about an idea. That idea being that life, the universe and existence is a dream – a fiction.

I cannot tell you how that turns people riddled with the mind virus into the image of Linda Blair in the exorcist. They froth, they curse, they accuse and the mind virus reveals itself for all to see.

Because Ucadia does not use citations to other wholly fictional works.  The gifts of Constantine – a complete fraud; The texts created in the 16th and 17th Century, including many spiritual texts being a horrendous fraud, which is explained in great detail under the canons of Sovereign Law; the statutes of Westminster – completely re-written in many areas since the opportunistic fire of 1666.

The challenge of the mind virus and spiritual fog is how can something that is fictional be factual? The answer is simple – so long as the model – I mean the whole model taken as nearly one million web pages largely does not contradict itself, provides a comprehensive structure and is clear, then it serves a powerful utility- as a genuine alternative.

I do not need a letter from a king or queen or bishop to tell me I am valid or not.  Yet we are so imaged trained that so many believe unless you have a letter saying congratulations, you are no longer a slave or congratulations, we agree, then it has no value.

Think about the absurdity of the arguments of ego and mind virus when confronted with something as massive as Ucadia and the absolute confidence in knowing the whole model is fiction? Look at its great distress, its frustration, its programmed hatred.

Why? You can attack something that claims to be factual, you can belittle something that claims to be factual. But fictional models are hard to attack. Even if you throw every piece of green slime and vomit you can at the author, only some may stick.  You might try vomiting that it is a cult, or that he is possessed by some demon, or really stoop to the lowest of the low and start quoting scripture.

In the end, if you read the Ucadia model and find any part of it useful, then it is useful. That’s it.

Thank you

Finally, let me thank you all for taking the time to read. I am honestly humbled by all those who continue to find ways to help and support, despite the growing desperation of the mind virus and the spiritual fog to attack Ucadia and its author Frank O’Collins.

But, it would be remiss of me if I did not make it clear that I forgive, truly forgive those who have demonstrated perfidy against me, who lie about me, who deliberately try and misconstrue the purpose and function of Ucadia for their own ends.

I realize how powerful the mind virus is.  I have struggled with it my whole life and as many know, have sometimes failed.

But to err is to be a man or a woman.  That is why we are here. To live, to learn and to grow.  I hope you all continue to grow and find something useful within the pages and audios and materials of Ucadia. Thank you.