Please download MP3 Audio Broadcast of this Blog > here (42 min 15 Mb)
_________________________________________________________________
Welcome, it’s Frank O’Collins doing an audio blog for Wednesday the 30th of April, 2014. Thanks very much for listening. The topic for today, given that we haven’t had a blog audio for three months now is Ucadia—what has been happening and what is new? Thank you for taking the time to listen and for taking the time to read.
Let me start first by just taking you back a few months for those that have been listening and those that have been reading the Ucadia material and the Ucadia blogs to what I spoke about and what I hope to be able to go through tonight in terms of updates. Tonight I want to share with you updates that I have done and continue to do in the Ucadia canons of law. These are the rules, the norms, and the maxims that you can find in twenty-two books located on one-heaven.org under the canons of law.
I want to go through some important updates and research that has been progressing in the last three months. I also want to share with you the updates that have taken place with the sacred texts also on one-heaven.org as well as other updates I have been working on, particularly some of the websites that need to be converted, reloaded and then turned on. While I haven’t spoken with you for three months there has been a lot that has been happening. In a sense I am remiss for not putting an audio up earlier and letting you know what has been happening. There have been quite a few people that have written to me and written only to see what is happening and if everything is okay.
If it is an excuse - and it may come across as an excuse – then one of the things I found that delayed the audio today a bit was that I wanted to be able to at least have a line in the sand and say “Look, for example, fiduciary law is finished and you can go and see it is all done.” I had to laugh at myself because in a way I remembered today that this journey of creating Ucadia is not as easy as jut putting a line in the sand and saying “there you go; it’s all done, it’s all dusted and you can go and have a look.” It’s a moving feast. It’s a work in progress. I would like to talk about that a bit as well and just explain why the time and the value. I’m not just putting things up for the sake of it, but really trying to get to the heart of an issue, of a definition of a meaning, or maxims, particularly when we are talking about law.
Before we start, I’ll walk through some of the updates and I want to share with you some of the key insights and I apologize if my thoughts today are not in any coherent order. But getting back in to the discussion with you and sharing information with you, what I want to start with is to say, “Thank you.” I want to say thank you to all of those who continue to read and those that share with me that they continue to read and continue to find material on Ucadia is useful. I want to give the most heartfelt thanks to all of you, the many of you who found a way to still provide support and to give a donation, no matter what the amount was. And not because there was a regular broadcast asking for help and not because there was ongoing discussion and explaining how the reality is that almost 95% of Ucadia is still funded by me and while I still do the research, I still have to find a way everyday and every week and month of making ends meet, because there is still no government, no organization, no secret society and not even a single millionaire who has found it in themselves to put any value on what Ucadia has been about for over 20 years.
I understand why people might view Ucadia and the material that hopefully you have been reading and the audios that hopefully you have been listening to as not relevant. We live in a world our day to day objective is to make money. Why would people want to support something that doesn't have as its primary aim how you can get rich or how you can be a pirate? In a world geared to pleasure, drugs and all kinds of escapism, who wants to support something that is trying to get to the heart of why we have such inequality and why what happens in the world is not some curious arrangement of random events, but is a deliberate, built-in, automated program. It’s not a conspiracy. In fact we can look at statutes; we can look at people, events and proof. It’s not conjecture or supposition, but it is black and white primae facie evidence.
I know from my own experience when people want to share with me some home truth, sometimes the home truth is hard to realize. There are some people who are still trying to belittle and attack Ucadia as being a cult. Well, if that is the case, it has to be the most failed attempt ever in history because I assure you my survival next month is far from certain. My ability to fund and support myself in the complete absence of any real patron is far from assured, so that is why I want to give a heartfelt thank you to all those who have found a way to still support even though I haven’t done an audio for three months.
Canons of Law
So, let’s not dilly dally around, but get into some of the key insights that this time off for the last few months has allowed me to do. Let me start with the canons of law, one of the key foundations and elements of the Ucadia model now. I didn’t start writing the canons of law when I started the Ucadia model; the canons really came as a by-product of the work that was done in trying to put the Ucadia model and the ideas in the Journey of UCA and the Journey of Self into some practical framework.
At the time and I have spoken about this before, what frustrated me enormously when talking about issues of law, justice and due process was the consistent meaning of key elements. What are the foundations of law? I didn't mean all the overlay and misdirection. I mean, “Give me the basics that have existed in law from the very beginnings of civilization.” Show me what makes the law. Don’t shove it down my throat; don’t turn it into occult. Don’t run off with all kinds of “look how smart I am.” Give it to me; give me the clarity of it. That is what I wanted.
Of course, that is not how law is in most societies; it is the opposite. It’s a celebration and an orgy of obfuscation, mystery, diversion, obstruction. And so I started to write down what I was able to research and find. Pretty soon we had the beginnings of the framework of the canons of law. That work and research has continued and I have in the last three months, been working to present to you the canons of fiduciary law. I’m glad to say there is quite a bit of work that has already been put up. It’s not finished but you can go to fiduciary law on the home page of one-heaven.org and you can review and see the progress that has been made in fiduciary law.
If you do go there and have a look, and I’m going to the website now, there are a few things I’d like to highlight for you now even thought it’s not completely finished. What I am trying to do in the presentment of fiduciary law, given that property, trusts, estates, funds, corporations, agents, all these key concepts are absolutely fundamental to the world we live in today and they are absolutely fundamental to making sense of what happens to us when we go to court and certainly they are fundamental if we wish to leave any kind of legacy for our children.
What is am trying to do is lay out the key concepts, the arrangement of key concepts to make it as clear as possible given that like so much of law, fiduciary law is also obstructed and diluted and obfuscated. You will wee in 1.2 a range of concepts that are at the heart of fiduciary law. Just as we have been able to state clearly that the highest rule of law, the highest law is the Golden Rule, the Golden Rule is that none is higher than another and all are equal to the law. No one is above the law.
We can say the same if we look at Article 5 of Fiduciary Law in Trustee and see that a part of Fiduciary Law is the concept of the trustee. The concept of the trustee, unless someone is prepared to act under oath as to the terms of a trust, in good faith, in good conscience and in good character then they do not act with any fiduciary capacity and they do not honor Fiduciary Law.
That is really what Fiduciary Law is. Fiduciary Law is the good faith, the good character, the good conduct of trustees in the management, of the intentions in terms of trusts, estates and fund as intended. It is no more complex than that. But, of course, when you are dealing with issues of property, rights, money and power then you can see how these simple concepts can become very complex over time. So we go through and look at the elements that build up what are the proper duties of a trustee, the character of a trustee, the concepts of integrity, frugality, prudence, humility, competency and accountability. We go through those when you look at Fiduciary Law.
We have moved beyond just the conceptual elements and some of them have direct relevance, particularly in following from previous discussions regarding the management of your estate. When we talk about the proper management of your estate we are talking about fiduciary capacity and so here under Fiduciary Law we start to see some of the detail that I know many of you have been asking for such as, “How do I manage a journal? How do I manage memorandums? How do I deal with inventories, manifests, records and accounts? Give me the outline of how I manage my estate?”
Well, you can go and see those details now in Fiduciary Law. This then is the logical continuation of our discussion as to the management of your estate. As a consequence of Fiduciary Law and the research and clarity here, I will be able to restore the templates that we have put forward on Voluntatem et Testamentum, on the superior models of the superior estate, but now with substance and with detail and with better help for anyone who comes genuinely to free themselves of being considered a slave and to actually follow and understand through this knowledge exactly what we are talking about when we talk about estates, trusts, funds, and corporations.
Under Fiduciary Law we also cover under Section 2 or Section II, instruments. I am working through the history of instruments, the evolution of instruments that are used with Fiduciary Law beginning with scripture and the Carolingians and then the Age of Scientum Mysterium or Occult Knowledge which pervades everything today and then through the corporate securities and the evolution to a system of automation a couple of hundred years ago.
Then under Section III we will be talking about fund and the origin of funds. You will see, then, the history of funds, the key infrast5ructure of the New World Order, the Illuminati, and of the control mechanisms of the world. I won’t talk about that today because I don’t have information against the architecture of that yet. But it’s something that we are going to come back to in the coming weeks with the returning of the regular Ucadia blogs.
Lebor Clann Glas
The other thing I have been working on has been completing the Book of the Green Race, Lebor Clann Glas. If you look under sacred texts under one-heaven.org then you can go and see the progress in the sacred text, Lebor Clann Glas. If you haven’t had a chance to read then I hope you will take the time to have a read because it is the most extraordinary story, the most extraordinary journey to read the Book of the Green Race, particularly The Age of the Nazarenes, the Age of Judaism and now I am on to The Age the Gnostics. When you read it, which I hope you do, I want you to keep in mind a couple of things. The first is that it really doesn’t matter to argue whether the story Lebor Clann Glas is or is not 100% factual. Any argument of who wrote it, what authority, where did it come from, why did they do it, will they stand by it and claim what they claim… all of that is just simple white noise. The reason that it is white noise is that it is the quality of the story, the contextual strength of the story, the fact that the story gives us knowledge, context, motive and makes sense of things that up until now did not make sense.
If something makes sense to us, gives us context, if something is a better and more comprehensive story than anything that we have read before, then that is more than enough for the Book of the Green Race, Lebor Clann Glas to be respected without long debates, long-winded arguments of “Prove to me it is true. Prove to me that it is divinely inspired. Prove to me that it is factual.” In fact what I would say to anyone who throws it to you is “Prove to me it is not true. Prove to me that the alternative is better.” Put Lebor Clann Glas up against any other story of the same time period and then let others decide if you really want to push the case. At the end of the day the better the story, the more useful the story, the more useful the information the better it can help us make sense.
In truth in so many parts of history what is claimed as evidence is a bald-faced lie. I’ll give you an example with statutes. I have been studying statutes up and down, left and right, backwards and forwards particularly from Westminster from the time of Henry III for more than ten years now. It’s been extremely frustrating and probably one of the most frustrating elements is the fact that you look at statutes prior to Henry VIII and they include concepts that weren’t invented until the 17th century. Now what is a concept invented in the 17th century doing in a statute claimed to be from the 13th century?
There is a statute that was claimed to have been resurrected after two, not one, but two known great fires that were supposed to have destroyed the repository of statutes. One was the Great Fire of 1666 and the second was the Revolution after the overthrow of Cromwell and the rebellion Parliament and the restoration of Charles II. There are oodles and oodles of text that we are told are historic and accurate and they are nothing more than bare-faced lies, fraud, and forgeries. So in the end you decide. If you read you can make that choice. I do hope if you have not already; please have a look at The Book of the Green Race, Lebor Clann Glas which is what I have been working on.
Theology and ‘Original Sin’
The other area I have been working on is the issue of theology. By theology I mean the Science of Heaven, the Science of God, and the Science of the Divine Creator. When you hear the word, theology, as I did for ages most people think automatically that you are talking about an aspect, a claim of the Roman Catholic Church and in a sense you would be right.
Other than the Anglican Church and a few other churches, for the most part, the arguments and work and focus on this thing called theology is no where near as explicit as it is with the Catholic Church, the Anglican Church and some of the other Christian churches. The reason I raise theology as I begin to start to wrap up this call and the blog for this week is that it is not enough to just present a model, an overlay to fill a space and void and make a comment and say, ”Look, we have covered all bases.” If we cannot see the mechanisms that entrap and enslave us today, if we cannot see express to people in the simplest of terms those abominable concepts that enslave and entrap all of humanity then we haven’t really done our job yet.
In the case of theology and in the case of canons of law, of history and of groups of history that saw a way to corrupt and enslave all that helps us narrow down to a handful of concepts that remain today at the heart of the control mechanism that tell us and prove to us that unless these concepts are changed, unless these concepts are ended, not only will the world continue the way it is, but you must expect worse things to come, not as a fear but as an inevitable consequence of an automated system based on the most wicked, horrendous, profane concepts ever conceived in the history of civilization and the cornerstone is the concept of ‘original sin.’ I have spoken about ‘original sin’ before and I was waiting to be able to walk through with you and share with you the structure and the critical role that ‘original sin’ plays in the corruption of Fiduciary Law. I have been off the air for a few weeks and I do need to get back in and share progress with you and talk with you regularly and give you updates, letting you know what is happening.
Original sin is the idea that you may already know that we can inherit not only the sins of our father, but the sins of our grandparents, our great grandparents, our great-great grandparents all the way back to the primordial man and woman, Adam and Eve. Because of events they did, we are condemned. They may not use that language, “Oh no, you’re not condemned” and come up with some legalese, but at the end of the day, original sin declares that you are spiritually and morally insolvent, that you are bankrupt. There is the clue for the motive of original sin, because original sin when put into practice in declaring us spiritually and morally bankrupt and physically bankrupt, means that men and women no longer entitled to directly owned property.
Men and women are not entitled to directly owned property because we have lost all our rights and we are bankrupt and insolvent. Do you follow that? So, the only things that can technically own property are corporations. Persons are a type of corporation. A person in our cases is a corporation sole, a spiritual person. This presents a bit of a challenge because the invention of corporations under this model, the invention of ‘person,’ did not happen in the 6th and 7th century as the frauds that are in existence in Corpus Iuris Civilis and other frauds of the 16th and 17th century. Person didn't exist until the end of the 16th century and the beginning of the 17th century. The concept of “person” as we know it today did not exist as a form of corporation. Corporation as we know it didn't exist, and estate as we know it did not exist. All of these apparatus were created from the time of Henry VIII onward in line with the mission of the Pisan bankers taking control of a country.
All of these concepts (of person, original sin, corporation and estate) coincide with a monarch declaring himself the supreme head of a new church and annexing all property, large and small, to himself. All of this coincides with the Protestant religions, the Protestant creed and the confirmation of the same concepts 15 to 20 years after they had been invented and ‘road-tested’ in Protestantism through the Council of Trent. In other words ‘original sin’ translates as spiritual bankruptcy, moral bankruptcy, physical bankruptcy and ties exactly to the dependency of having corporations and persons in the apparatus in law of estates in the 16th century. Original sin cannot work without that apparatus. So how in the hell can anyone claim that the concepts (of person, original sin, corporation and estate) were earlier than the 16th century? They cannot without lying. They are deliberately lying, obstructing and confusing what the most important foundation is that concept of original sin.
Now, maybe, you can see why it makes sense, why courts don’t interact with men, why everything in their system is (based on) persons, why corporations have more power now than corporation soles of us and why everything seems bizarre and why we are considered ‘dead.’ Of course it makes sense, because what original sin allowed the bankers, advisors, nobles and monarchs to do was to take everything and put it in corporations. Under original sin, no one unless one is born without sin, no one has the right anymore to rights and to property. This abomination, this profanity, these absolutely wicked, disgusting, sickening, immoral, false, deceptive and fraudulent concepts of the 16th century remains the heart of commerce today. No matter how much reform you think you have seen within the Catholic Church and even though the Catholic Church and the Jesuits have been told time and time again, this concept must end. This abomination must end. This aberration is profanity against all spirituality and against all scripture must end. They continue. They will not change it because it is at the heart of the system today.
Just to show you how absurd it is, go look at the opening of the Declaration of Independence. All of us are granted inalienable rights of life, liberty, pursuit of happiness and yet at the same time the bankers claim through their spiritual partners that we are spiritually, morally and physically insolvent. And so the bankers and the politicians and the Jesuits and others are absolutely diametrically opposed to the Declaration of Independence as they are opposed to the Bible. The opening page of the Bible says that “all men are granted rights; all men are granted dominion.” Yet under this horrendous, wicked, deliberately deceptive, intentionally deceptive, false concept the bankers and their assistants claim that no one has any rights.
They will obstruct, lie, say nothing, confuse, delay, be mute; they will do everything possible not to address the simple fact that the concept of ‘original sin’ is the foundation stone of the global system of slavery. It is the foundation stone and they will not move it, they will not change it and they will do everything possible to keep it there.
So, I ask you, what will it take? These people don’t believe in spirit. These people don’t believe in prophecy. If they did, they would have changed it. These people don’t believe in morality or church law or their own sacred scripture. If they did, they would have changed and corrected it and ended this now. Instead it is ‘business as usual.’ We are not standing idly by and we will finish fiduciary law. We will finish the Book of the Green Race, Lebor Clann Glas, and we will finish the sacred scripture. We will finish theology and make it plain so that when you speak to people about this, when you share this and they laugh and call it conspiracy theories, and ask who the crackpot is, you can say, “No, ask yourself: are you, according to the Declaration of Independence, and put into the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights, do you think you are a slave? Do you think you are spiritually, morally, financially and physically bankrupt? If you do, go ahead and be a slave. But don’t put your stupidity on me.”
If millionaires want to go ahead and be better pirates and ignore Ucadia, then that's fine. Ucadia will find a way to survive. If corporations and governments and other organizations still will find a way not to give any money or financial support at all to Ucadia, fine. We will find a way to survive. Why? Because there are enough people like who actually give a damn, who actually care and who are not going to be distracted by the crap that people throw around. For that, I cannot thank you enough.
The Blogs Will Return and Continue
In the weeks to come I will my get my broadcast back into a pattern and a theme and we will go through step by step and I look forward to showing you detail. It’s good to speak with you again. To all of you, I hope that your life, the challenges and issues that you face can some way make sense and that what we share helps in some way.
Thank you for all who continue to help and support. Until we speak next week, when I will post another blog, please be well, please be safe. Thank you and good night.
No comments:
Post a Comment