The Supernatural Revolution vs. the False Priests: Why conservative Christian leaders are really Radical Apostates

_________________________________________________________________
Please download MP3 Audio Broadcast of this Blog > here   (73 min 25 Mb)
_________________________________________________________________

Hello, this is Frank O’Collins and thank you for taking the time to read and listen to the Ucadia Blog for Wednesday 5th November 2014 entitled “The Supernatural Revolution vs. the False Priests: Why conservative Christian leaders are really radical apostates”.

By the phrase “Supernatural Revolution”, I am referring to the undeniable and irrefutable evidence of a spiritual awakening across the full physical and conscious spectrum of our Solar System, our planet and our species – despite the deliberate poisoning of our water with elements designed to keep us numb and docile; and despite the deliberate poisoning of our food with bromides and chemicals designed to weaken our body, not strengthen it; and despite the deliberate and calculated “dumbing down” of culture, of education and society in general. Yet when I speak of the Supernatural Revolution, I am also referring to the unfolding events within the spiritual dimensions of what we sometimes call Heaven, or the Afterlife or the Purgatory of souls held between two worlds.

By the term “False Priests”, I am referring to those priests and clergy such as certain Cardinals, Bishops, Clergy and other Christian leaders who profess to be protectors of traditions; and who proclaim themselves to be the guardians of the moral compass of Christianity, yet are in truth nothing of the sort. In reality, these cabals and networks of self-confessed arch conservatives are in many cases simply the public relations fronts for traditional pedophile and child molestation rings, organized criminal networks, nihilists and bizarre sects and sub groups that mimic certain dark occult rituals without a clue about demons and the supernatural; and with absolutely no respect for Satan or for Lucifer. Therefore, they are False Priests both to Heaven and to the Divine Creator and to the entirety of the world of Demons and ancient leaders.

And by the term “Apostasy” I mean the deliberate and willful act of abandoning the fundamental position of Christian Faith as expressed by the words of Jesus; or in the abdication of responsibility to perform ecclesiastical obligations of high office; or even in the treachery of breaking solemn vows to a religious life. These are the true and ancient conditions of Apostasy and are not simply antiquated offences, but still considered high criminal offences in many countries. For example, in countries founded on Western-Roman Law, a first offence is punishable by inability to hold any office such as a Cardinal, or Bishop, or Minister or Judge or Magistrate; and punishment for a second offence is the incapacity to bring any action or to be a guardian, executor, legatee, or grantee and in some cases imprisonment for three or more years. So I am neither being flippant or careless with my words tonight as I realize that in law and in particular canon law, such claims carry very serious consequences.

The article and blog tonight is a follow on, or “part 2” to an audio and blog I did earlier in October entitled “The Supernatural Revolution vs. the Dying World of the Illuminati and the Elite”. In that blog and article we discussed what do we really mean by the concept of “supernatural”? As well as the complexities of consciousness and the origins of our species, as well as the tell-tale signs of madness we see in many of our political leaders and the complete absence of the supernatural. So if you have not yet had the opportunity to read and listen, I urge you to read and listen to this particular blog and audio first as I will be building on the points discussed in this previous blog within this blog.

I will be continuing the series on Ucadia Campuses in coming weeks (See: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3 and Part 4), but recent events over the past couple of weeks really crystallized my thinking as to the importance of having this article and blog on the record. The first incident occurred some nine days after the first blog on this series regarding “The Supernatural Revolution” when Pope Francis expressed some extraordinary illuminated comments, unprecedented from any Pope for over a thousand years, when he said “God is not a magician with a magic wand” and that “theories of evolution and the Big Bang are real”.  

I must admit, I do not follow all the announcements that come out of the Vatican, but this one was so profound it received global media coverage and was impossible to miss. In any event, the comments by Pope Francis have sparked huge debate across the world and many self proclaimed arch-conservative Christian leaders and even some Cardinals and Bishops have responded with vile personal attacks against the Pope. Some have likened the Pope to a drunk driver, while others have claimed Pope Francis is “putting man’s words above God’s words”.

What these often self appointed “guardians of faith” have accused Pope Francis and in some respects the Jesuit Order of saying and doing is “blasphemy” and “heresy”. Of course, to use such words would be legally even more controversial than what these leaders of millions have already done. To accuse a Pope of heresy is a very serious accusation, which according to the Canon Laws of the Church carries severe consequences.

Like I just said, I do not follow all the announcements that come out of the Vatican. Nor do I have any form of communication with the Vatican or any regular contact with the Catholic Church. I did for a brief period have some contact with my uncle who is a very senior Jesuit Scholar, yet he is now in his late 80’s in years and for whatever reason has chosen not to follow up with any contact for some time now. So no, I do not receive help or assistance or support from anyone in Rome or London or the Jesuits or anywhere else. In fact, I receive so little support now, I honestly do not have enough to cover the cost of these sites, much less pay for rent next month. The very fact I am still here and these sites are still running is a miracle – because most people who listen to these blogs or read Ucadia or who claim they want the truth to be heard do not contribute in anyway.

In any event, it is the comments by those who call themselves conservative Christian leaders that has made my blood boil in not only the way they contradict their own beliefs; and not only in the deception and treachery of their actions but in the fact that it is virtually impossible to find commentary that exposes their deliberate falsities and attacks as at best hypocritical and at worst criminal.

So this is why I am writing and speaking about the topic “The Supernatural Revolution vs. the False Priests: Why conservative Christian leaders are really radical apostates” tonight. I don’t expect these Christian leaders to read or listen to this blog, or even for their followers to read and listen to this blog. In fact, I expect very few people carnate in flesh to read and listen to this blog.  But I know that those spirits and those who are central to the Supernatural Revolution will hear this blog – and that is why I am writing and recording it tonight.

A Greater Explanation on Heresy

Now, before we get into responding to the vitriol and criticism aimed at Pope Francis by the self-proclaimed protectors of Christian tradition, we need to be clear as to some cornerstone concepts about just what is heresy? And what is apostasy? And what are the punishments such as excommunication and worse for such offences? Notwithstanding the topic for this article and blog tonight, which some may claim imputes a preconceived bias, let me dispel any notion of bias or prejudice or bad faith by this and the next few sections of the blog. Frankly, if we are not clear about these concepts such as doctrine, dogma, theology, heresy and apostasy, then how can we be certain whether the accusations leveled at Pope Francis and the Jesuits are true, or whether those making the accusations are the ones who are culpable?

So to begin, let us have a look at the definition of what is meant by “heresy” according to the current canons of law of the Catholic Church:

Can. 751 Heresy is the obstinate denial or obstinate doubt after the reception of baptism of some truth which is to be believed by divine and Catholic faith.

For many listening to this blog tonight, the notion of heresy and heretics may well evoke the images of priests and inquisitors burning people at the stake or torturing poor victims to death. Unfortunately, this is the brutality of the past and was written into the fabric of the Laws of England such as in 1400 (2Hen4. c.15) under Henry 4th and 1414 (2Hen5. c.7) under Henry 5th and also in 1533 (25Hen8. c.14) under Henry 8th. Yet while we are told by Westminster that the punishment of burning and death to heretics was abolished in 1547 (1Ed6. c.12) under King Edward 6th, we have the evidence of heretics being burnt under both Queen Mary and Queen Elizabeth according to the laws of Westminster. The fact that people were “lawfully” burned at the stake after 1547 is irrefutable. Even Rev. John Wesley attests to this fact in a text from 1835 – so either the good reverend is lying or we continue to be victims of revisionist legislators and their false scribes who serve us up wholly fraudulent and invented statutes having no validity and legitimacy to the real laws of the day. In any event, the punishment for heresy is still death by burning according to the laws of the Catholic Church, by virtue of omission and selectively forbidding certain forms of death and execution. In other words, no definitive statement yet exists under Catholic Law explicitly abolishing the punishment of death by fire for heresy. 

I don’t want to get too sidetracked on the punishment of heresy but return to the accusation itself as to its relevance to this blog and the concept of “obstinate denial or obstinate doubt…of some truth which is to be believed by divine and Catholic faith”. Because, this is really what a number of these arch-conservatives are claiming against the Pope and the Jesuits – that they are denying or doubting fundamental beliefs of the Christianity – or more formally the concept of Doctrines and Dogmata.

The words “Dogma” and “Dogmata” originally come from Latin and means a “philosophical tenet, belief or principle; or a decree or edict”. “Dogmata” means plural. The term originates from Ancient Greek δόγμα (dogma) meaning “opinion, belief, tenet or principle”.

The words “Doctrine” originally comes from Latin meaning a “teaching or instruction; an erudition or learning”. The term originates from Ancient Greek δοκέω (dokeō) meaning “thinking or teaching; or perception or consideration”.

Now contrary to the false claims of arch-conservatives, discussions concerning equal recognition of unions between couples, or allowing divorced couples to participate in receiving sacraments, or the notion of dying with dignity, or the right of matrimony of priests, or contraception, or abortion, or discussions of evolution, or ideas as to the mind and nature of God are not taboo – because many of the most significant and “traditional” Doctrines and Dogmata of the major Christian Churches are not traditional or customary at all and are in fact less than 500 years old. To put it another way – many of the teachings that arch-conservatives are up in arms about should be properly described as radical and controversial ideas introduced 1,500 years after Jesus was supposed to have lived and more than 1,200 years after the first official Bible was prescribed by Emperor Constantine in the recognition of Christianity.

For example, let’s take the Dogma of Original Sin which was not presented for endorsement as an act of faith until the Augsburg Confession of Faith in June 1530 by Martin Luther. The notion of Original Sin, that is so fundamental to the corporate and commercial model of Protestantism – to steal the rights of men and women and to commercialize salvation was so radical, so blasphemous and so heretical a notion to Christianity at the time, that it took a full seventeen years until 1547 for the idea to become an official belief of the Catholic Church. After – yes after it was imposed as Dogma of Protestant religion. At no point did Jesus ever speak of Original Sin. At no point did any of the true Apostles of Jesus speak of Original Sin. It is only through the claimed writings of the nefarious character called Paul in Romans 5:12 and 1 Corinthians that it is claimed Original Sin as a Dogma is valid in Holy Scripture. And as for those versus, it has been proven without a doubt that the words in Ancient Greek simply did not exist to describe such a modern commercial and wicked pirate concept at the time of the Apostles. Instead such concepts did not arise until the times of the master pirates of Venice in the 16th Century – the same time these radical and new concepts were imposed on the traditions and ancient customs of Christianity.

How about the sacrament of Holy Eucharist which has a number of Cardinals and Bishops up in arms about the comments of the Pope and the Jesuits in saying that people who are divorced or who have left and reconciled with the Church should be able to receive Holy Communion? – do you think this is an old and fundamental belief of Christianity? The word Eucharist comes from the practices of Mithra, that in turn are stolen from the rites of Osiris and Isis and the corrupt Egyptian religious practices of the Ramesess pharaohs who hastily concocted a pseudo-religion to fill the void after the fall of Akhenaten, also known as Moses and the Hyksos pharaohs. 

The Eucharist never had anything to do with Christianity, nor do its cannibalistic overtones have any legitimate supernatural power or provenance. It is a mind control trick, introduced on the insistence of Venetian occult bankers to their prodigy Martin Luther in 1526 and made the Dogma of the Protestants in 1530 a full 21 years – yes twenty one years before it became the official Dogma of the Catholic Church!  If you still don’t trust what I am saying is true, then have a look at an act by King Edward 6th in 1547 (1Ed6. c.1)  that was issued four years before the Eucharist became official Dogma of the Catholic Church. Here, the Protestant King and Bishops and Politicians and Clergy are forced to defend the Dogma of the Holy Eucharist as a Protestant Belief against Christian and Catholic backlash– yes let me say it again – defending the Eucharist as a wholly Protestant belief against Christian and Catholic backlash. Now while the act does not make clear the penalty for heresy – you can guess what would have happened if you were found guilty of speaking against the notion of Holy Communion? So do you still think then that Pope Francis and the Jesuits speaking about making the ritual symbolizing austerity and community and self-sacrifice more inclusive is some radical plot, or maybe these arch-conservatives are the hidden radicals?

How about one more example in the form of Marriage? There is and continues to be uproar among self proclaimed arch-conservatives to the notion of equality of recognition of unions between adults- otherwise called same sex marriage or “gay marriage” as if this is the beginning of the downfall of civilized society.  So let me speak as to the facts of why the people promoting such fear, such negativity are really trying to hold onto their treacherous and perfidious ways and has nothing to do with the sanctity of men and women. Let me now prove this to you with undeniable and irrefutable proof.

The ancient tenet of Christian faith as taught by Jesus was the sacredness of matrimony between a man and a woman. That not only was this a sacred bond recognized in heaven, but that such a bond was a one-time union within this lifetime. This is also how Ucadia recognizes the sacred sacrament of matrimony.  Yet, this has got nothing to do with the notion of the pseudo ecclesiastical and civil union known as marriage.  Under the deliberate commercial and pirate corruptions of Christianity by the Venetian and Pisan nobility, the concept of matrimony was converted into a mortal sin, redeemable only by receipt of an indulgence in a Catholic country and a dispensation in a Protestant country – in other words a marriage license. Now in case you have no idea what license means – the legal notion of a license is a permit to perform an act that would otherwise be unlawful and illegal. So marriage became the false condemnation and commercialization of matrimony, as demonstrated by the Augsburg Confession of faith in 1530 and the Marriage Licenses Act of Henry VIII in 1533 (25Hen8. c.22). So controversial was this money grabbing, mind controlling, wicked heresy against Christianity that it took the Catholic Church a full thirty three years, to accept the wicked commercial heresy of Marriage as a sacrament (in 1563).

So the fact that Pope Francis and a few people in the Catholic Hierarchy who actually still know how to read, write and think, then want to restore Christianity to its fundamental roots and restore the notion of Matrimony as exclusively for men and women, yet civil union being acknowledged for all consenting adults – this should be welcomed as acts of ultra-conservatism and those who attack him exposed as ignorant and heretical impostors or the nihilists they truly are.

A Greater Explanation on Apostasy

Now, before I explain the very simple and undeniable proof that the same people who are attacking Pope Francis and accusing him of views contrary to Christianity, are impostors and frauds; I need to explain a little bit more about Apostasy and its central place as a protection in the fabric of Western-Roman Law.

Firstly, the word Apostasy itself is a conjunction of two Latin words apo meaning “I fasten; or I attach or connect; or I join or bind” and statio meaning “outpost, station, watch, position or standing”. Under ancient Roman Law, the very worst crime against society and heaven was to abandon or corrupt your post or position. In logical terms, you can see why the notion of “abandoning or failing one’s duty at post” was the very worst of offences because the discipline of the legions and the functioning of the courts and the operation of the entire empire depended upon people doing their duty.

The Catholic Church did not add to the severity concerning Apostasy, as the Romans considered it such a transgression against the gods and society that it demanded not just death, but punishment, torture and death. 

However, in devising the global system of law that dominates the world today and that every President, every Judge, every Attorney, every Magistrate, every Clerk and Officer is bound to honor and follow, the Catholic Church refined the notion of Apostasy into the three primary types we mentioned in the introduction of this article.

#1 Perfidiae or “Perfidy” is the formal term in law given to the offence of a deliberate and willful act of abandoning the fundamental positions of Christian Faith as first expressed by the words of Jesus. The difference with heresy is that a heretic is one who deliberately and willfully contradicts one or more fundamental doctrines or dogmata of Christianity, whereas one culpable of Perfidy deliberately and willfully abandons the very notion and fabric of Christianity itself.

#2 Ab Ordine meaning literally “in respect of one’s order, class, station, rank or command” is the formal term in law given to the offence of the abdication of responsibility to perform ecclesiastical obligations of high office such as clerics.  Now when I mean clerics, I don’t just mean Cardinals, Bishops and Priests, I also mean all who hold any form of ecclesiastical office, regardless of their oath and vows or whether they are valid. For example, anyone wearing a black robe, or purple robe or red robe in a court is openly telling you they hold an ecclesiastical office, regardless of how many people then spew lies about such a fact.  Indeed, the 1875 Supreme Court Procedures Act (36&37Vict. c.77) states blatantly that you are dealing with Registrars of Ecclesiastical and Admiralty Causes in most of the Western-Roman Courts.  

So if it can be proven and witnessed and noted that a cleric has deliberately and willfully abdicated their responsibilities to perform ecclesiastical obligations of some high office, then they may well be culpable of the apostasy of Ab Ordine.

#3 Monachatus or more formally “Monachatus non est pietas” meaning literally “One’s state of Monasticism is not pius” is the formal term in law given to the treachery of breaking solemn vows or oaths to a religious life or ecclesiastical office. Now in several previous articles and blogs we have discussed the severity of when a judge or magistrate or clerk breaks their oath or vow of office – particularly if they are wearing ecclesiastical robes. Now you know, there is no hiding the fact that they are apostates.

So how are apostates punished? Let’s have a look again at the Canon laws of the Catholic Church as one example:

Can. 1364 §1. Without prejudice to the prescript of ⇒ can. 194, §1, n. 2, an apostate from the faith, a heretic, or a schismatic incurs a latae sententiae excommunication; in addition, a cleric can be punished with the penalties mentioned in ⇒ can. 1336, §1, nn. 1, 2, and 3. §2. If contumacy of long duration or the gravity of scandal demands it, other penalties can be added, including dismissal from the clerical state.

Can. 1336 §1. In addition to other penalties which the law may have established, the following are expiatory penalties which can affect an offender either perpetually, for a prescribed time, or for an indeterminate time:

1/ a prohibition or an order concerning residence in a certain place or territory;

2/ privation of a power, office, function, right, privilege, faculty, favor, title, or insignia, even merely honorary;

3/ a prohibition against exercising those things listed under n. 2, or a prohibition against exercising them in a certain place or outside a certain place; these prohibitions are never under pain of nullity;

4/ a penal transfer to another office;

5/ dismissal from the clerical state.

In any country or state that claims to be under Common Law, the punishments mirror the laws of the Catholic Church. For example, under William 3rd in 1698 (9&10W3. c.32) a first offence is punishable by inability to hold any office such as a Bishop, or Minister or Judge or Magistrate or Clerk; and punishment for a second offence is the incapacity to bring any action or to be a guardian, executor, legatee, or grantee and imprisonment for minimum of three years.

By the laws of the Catholic Church and by the laws of Westminster, all that has to be proven is that the Apostate has professed their guilt in some public manner witnessed by two or more persons; and that they have failed to remedy their actions; and that such willful apostasy has been noted on the record or published in some formal manner such as a Gazette. This process then formalizes that such a man or woman is excommunicated and is an apostate, whether or not their superiors act to have them removed, or charged or not.

Now be careful, because accusations of heresy and apostasy are not to be treated lightly – particularly in this time of Supernatural Revolution. The pseudo conservatives may not give a damn – but any accusation that cannot be proven has deep consequences. Most importantly, the one who makes such an accusation must themselves demonstrate the highest of moral character and integrity and competence – precisely as we described last week.

To put it bluntly, if you are not ready to form a Ucadia Campus because of not being ready in your own mind and character and actions – then you are definitely not ready to bring forth an accusation of apostasy against someone else. If you do and you ignore this warning, then you will invoke the full force of the supernatural and the law against yourself and must accept the consequences that come from such willful and deliberate stupidity. So you have been warned.

But for those few of you, facing seeming insurmountable odds and calling out for some kind of supernatural and divine assistance, then know that you possess the rights, the authority and the power to restore the law and hold those who are heretics and apostates to account – even if their superior bishops and even cardinals refuse to perform their ecclesiastical obligations.

Proof that Conservative Christian Leaders are not really Christians

So we have covered a lot in this blog already about exposing the double standards and willful ignorance and falsities of those who proclaim themselves to be the protectors of Christian tradition. Now it is time to prove without question that these same conservative Christian Leaders are not really Christians at all, but radical apostates.

It begins with a simple test of whether you are a Christian or not: Take a lined piece of paper and a pen and then write down the numbers one through to ten consecutively on the page, with each number corresponding to one row. Now either from memory, or by grabbing a Bible, please write down in order the most important books of the Bible for you, beginning with the most important and influential book for you as No.1 and then down the list until you have put in a record for No.10.

By way of some general statistics using the King James Bible for example, there are 66 books and a total of 1,189 chapters and 31,102 verses. Now, in your own list of the ten most important books out of the sixty-six books of the King James Bible for example, where did you place the Gospel of Matthew? And then the Gospel of John? And then Mark? And finally Luke? Were all four gospels of the New Testament in your top 10? Or were only some of the Gospels in your top 10?  Were any of the Gospels in your top 4 positions?

This is not merely an academic exercise as I will now explain. For if you proclaim yourself to be a true Christian, then this means you place the words and teachings of Jesus Christ above all others. That’s it! No excuses, no small print qualification or disclaimer. Either the words as we are told were spoken by Jesus Christ are No 1, No 2, No 3 and No 4 on your list or they are not. Only you know the truth. If you only had one Gospel in the top 4, then you are a Christian, but almost certainly confused by the contradictory messages of your priest, or pastor or teachers – because the first four spots should be the four Gospels and nothing else. But if not one Gospel is in the top four of your list, then that does not make you a bad person, it just means you are not a Christian, but something else.

That is not the same if the person doing the test is a priest, or a bishop or cardinal or leader of some church or claimed Christian movement – because in accepting such a position, they are also accepting the ecclesiastical responsibilities that come with such office. So when such a priest or bishop or cardinal or pastor promotes the words of someone other than Jesus as more important, then they are an apostate and guilty of Perfidiae (Perfidy).

Maybe you felt that test was unfair and that if given a second chance you would probably have put all the Gospels in some order in the top four positions. OK, how about we do one more test then? This test can also be applied to the priests, the bishops and cardinals who proclaim to be conservatives against the messages of Pope Francis and the Jesuits.

So take another sheet of paper and repeat the process in putting down on the page 10 numbers in order, with one per row. This time we are only going to deal with verses found in the four gospels of Matthew (1,071 verses), Mark (678 verses), Luke (1,151 verses) and John (879 verses). Now what I would like you to do is consider all the rights, rules and maxims of law you can remember Jesus speaking throughout the four Gospels and beginning with the most important, please write down your list in order, with the reference in scripture and then the brief summary or heading of the rule in your own words, so it fits on one line. 

There are a total of 3,779 verses between the four gospels and yet less than 16% of these are attributed to sayings of Jesus (which is less than 2% of the total verses of the King James Bible). So how did you do?

Did you put John 8:7 in your list being “Let him who is without sin among you be the first to throw a stone…” Or maybe John 13:34 “A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another, just as I have loved you”. Or maybe you didn’t listen to my instruction and put in quotes such as John 3:16 saying “For God so loved the world etc etc”, that is not a rule or a maxim or an expression of rights and so is invalid. In any event, did you put the most important maxim and rule ever taught by Jesus Christ in your list of the top ten being Matthew 7:12? Or is it not even on your list of top ten?

Now, just to remember what Matthew 7:12 used to say in the earlier versions of the King James Bible, before it was emasculated, here it is : “Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them: for this is the law and the law of the prophets”. If you look at your own Bible you see the deliberate redactions designed to confuse and minimize the significance of the point here.  Because this is Jesus saying that the most important law of all history of all prophets and all humanity is the Golden Rule of Law –that all are equal and none are above the law.

So why did some get this wrong and not put this as the number one saying of Jesus Christ, when clearly it is the most fundamental rule of law of all religion, all courts and secular institutions and all society?  Because guess what?  The same conservatives attacking Pope Francis never ever want you to learn about the Golden Rule of Law – much less that this is the most important verse of all Christianity. Why?  Because once you know what the Golden Rule of Law is, then you can see their perfidy and falsity and fakery for what it is – nothing more than commercial piracy and organized criminals dressing up as cardinals and bishops and Christian leaders to suck the spirit and life and energy from those too confused, too gullible and too ignorant to know better.

Now, I don’t need to ask these arch-conservatives to do this test, because thankfully many of those who are attacking Pope Francis and the Jesuit suggestions of reform have put up their own lists of key sayings of Jesus and guess what? None of them, absolutely none of them talk about or teach the Golden Rule of Law.

Proof that Evolution and the Big Bang is entirely consistent with Christian Teaching

So what about the comments of the Pope about evolution and the Big Bang being real? OK, so open up your Bible again and start reading Genesis Chapter 1. It is an order of creation right?  And we find similar creation stories in indigenous cultures from the Original Australian Nations, to the Original Nations of North America or Great Turtle Island, as well in Sumeria and many other cultures.  So the opening of Genesis is not unique compared to the rest of sacred scripture and history.  It is merely one in literally a hundred variations on the creation of our species.

But in all those different creation stories – not one group except those who follow arch-conservative Christian leaders, who steal from their congregations and who lie to those who follow them; not one group in history were so trained to be so willfully stupid and believe the creation story was literal.  Every other culture, including the Hopi Indian and the Bushmen of Africa knew it was allegory – a way of making sense and order and never, never to be taken literally.

While science and certain scientists might like to poke fun at such scripture as Genesis and point out obvious errors in time and logical sequence, there is nothing associated with the formation or operation of the Universe that is incompatible with the notion of the existence of the Divine Creator.

Actually, for the interest of time and brevity, go and have a look at Article 11 on Theology on the sacred covenant Pactum De Singularis Caelum. I mean, we have arch conservatives who know nothing about theology and nothing about God and nothing about the rituals they perform, making willfully false and stupid comments about things they are completely incompetent to discuss.  So please have a read of Theology and in particular Trinitate Theologiae and the 22 arguments and proofs for the existence of Divine Creator, that depends upon science and the Big Bang and not fairy tales of literal creationists and other denials of common sense.

To disavow such knowledge and to disavow such reasoning makes each and every arch conservative not only an apostate to Christianity but an apostate to all Heaven and to Earth and all Angels and Demons.

The Supernatural Revolution and the end of this utter madness

So the arch conservative cardinals and bishops and Christian leaders cry out in public for the fulfilment of prophecy and the arrival of supernatural and divine wisdom and it comes – so they ignore it.

Then these same arch conservatives and their enforcers continue to promote the End of Days or Armageddon or Judgment Day or the Apocalypse and the End of the World as we know and the start anew- and a miracle plan and time and proof comes to show that this has already happened with the proof that they were repeatedly notified, yet they refused to read or listen or acknowledge.

Then these same arch conservatives in secret proclaim their loyalty to Satan or Lucifer or Moloch and the fulfilment of their vow of absolute obedience – and then they are given the clearest and most unambiguous instructions and they ignore them.

So some of them in public call for signs and miracles – two doves in St Peters square – one killed by the supernatural messenger of the land being a crow and one killed by the supernatural messenger of the sea being a gull in front of billions on television and they refuse to see.

Then they call for a sign that all of this is really a message from Lucifer and the time to obey his commands and in response the most hidden and secret knowledge in the history of humanity for more than 2,000 years is revealed with the 300 mile wide Pentagram and the occult plans behind the death camps of World War II and they still won’t wake up.

So just two weeks ago when I launched part one of this series on the Supernatural Revolution, the Sun burst forth a flame and sun spot - the largest since post World War II taking out several secret military satellites and still they refuse to listen.

Yet here is the thing. Neither the Divine Creator nor Lucifer are magicians that wave magic wands. Neither the arch angels or arch demons are here to entertain such stupid and hollow examples of humanity who have been given more opportunities to be honorable than any other generation and still they have refused.  So I say then to the Jesuits and to others: Do your job and all the Angels and Demons and Supernatural Forces shall be by your side. Do your job and follow the instructions that the unmistakable signs have validated. Do what you vowed to do and clean up this mess. Because there have been more than enough signs of the Supernatural Revolution.

Finally, if you do not trust what I am saying or you are confused, then view Article 121 of the sacred covenant. And to all who have awakened and are assisting Ucadia and helping or donating to its survival - thank you. To the rest of you who refuse to make a difference and refuse to help and merely wish to be passive bystanders to history – Bless you and may the Supernatural Forces have mercy upon you.

Till next week, please be safe, be well, thank you and good night.