What are your Rights if there is truly Rule of Law in your Society?

_________________________________________________________________
Please download MP3 Audio Broadcast of this Blog > here   (43 min 15 Mb)
_________________________________________________________________

Hello and thanks for reading and listening to the Ucadia blog for this week (the 6th of November 2013) entitled “What are your Rights if there is truly any Rule of Law and Justice in your Society?”. 

The reason I’ve chosen this topic this week is in light of the enormous preparation and research being done as part of the improvements to the Ucadia Trust and Estate Templates and Information. It gives me a chance to share some of the extraordinarily powerful new research. What I am referring to are the templates and information we’ve been discussing for the past two years that unless you demonstrate you are not dead, you are competent in managing your own affairs and you are not a thing, then the system through its laws can keep on assuming you to be dead, or a slave, or a lunatic and a ward of the state.  

If you are new to reading the Ucadia blogs and want to know more about what I am speaking about, then please have a read and listen to the three part audio and blog series (see: Part 1, Part 2 and Part 3) on Estates from March this year.

If you’ve had the chance to listen to some of the previous audios and blogs over the past few weeks then this is a chance to demonstrate some of the fruits of the hard work in updating foundational concepts associated with restoring the law and reclaiming of rights through the proper management of our own affairs and estates.The other reason for the topic this week of “What are your Rights if there is truly any Rule of Law and Justice in your Society?” is that the massive research on Rights which you can see under Article 27 and Article 28 from the Covenant on the One-Heaven site or Article 10 and 11 and 12 on the Globe Union Charter on globe-union.org is a perfect follow on from some of the previous blogs concerning the Rule of Law and Justice.

So I hope you find this article and audio useful as a natural follow-on and how we might be specific concerning those Rights that we can truly say must be the base of any society that recognizes and respects the Rule of Law and Justice.

The Rule of Law and the Golden Rule

Let’s begin by recalling and briefly discussing an article and audio that was posted on this site at the end of July (see: Article) of this year concerning an official decree called a Motu Proprio that had been issued by Pope Francis a few weeks earlier. Motu Proprio is Latin meaning literally “of his own accord” and is technically the highest form of legal instrument on the planet in accord with the Western-Roman Legal System of which all former British colonies and European nations are part.

In any event, what made this particular legal decree so significant is that it heralded a line in the sand whereby all officials were given notice that no one can act above the law and all are subject to the Rule of Law consistent with the Golden Rule. 

The Golden Rule is the term given to the one constant Rule we find that is taught in Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, Taoism, Confucianism and virtually every major civilization since the beginning of time being that “No one is above the law” or as the UN Declaration of Human Rights (unanimously ratified in 1948 by 48 countries including such countries as the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and New Zealand) says at the start of Article 7 “All are equal before the law”.

Since this earlier article and since many people have come to consider the significant of the Motu Proprio concerning the cleaning up of the Vatican, especially the Vatican Bank and all lesser officials throughout the world, there has definitely been a revival in people’s minds about the importance of the Golden Rule as the Rule of Law and taking a stand again pirates and tyrants and criminals hiding behind systems of fake laws and fake justice. 

In the same article in July we then went on to give examples that if there are different sets of laws for one part of society giving them an unfair advantage over another, then there is no rule of law; and 

If there is different application of the laws for one group over another or advantage, then there is no rule of law; and

If there are absurd and wholly abhorrent laws that render some people immune from the laws, such as magistrates and judges being immune from being accountable for the laws they administer or politicians being immune for the terrible laws they make then there is no rule of law.

In response, we have seen the white noise machine and the apologists connected to the nihilist network we discussed at the beginning of September this year. These talking heads and bloggers and internet radio gurus have all been madly trying to “water down” the importance of the Golden Rule and the Rule of Law saying that they are really just ideals and the fact is that we live in a complex world full of terrorists and financial security concerns and so should not be taken literally.

Well guess what, Jesus Christ lived at a time of terrorism and complex financial security concerns as well, but he didn’t mince words about the significance of the Golden Rule and the Rule of Law. Have you ever heard of Judas Iscariot or Judas the Sicari? The Sicari were considered by some historians of the Roman Empire to be terrorists. And complex issues of money and state and religion- what do you think was happening at the Great Temple at Jerusalem and the story of Jesus and the moneylenders? 

So I say to all those nihilist talking heads and apologists for the status quo – your arguments fail to stack up when you offer excuses why we all have to live under the Patriot Act and the insanity and madness of the world you have now created.

Justice and the Golden Rule

In any event, the problem when nihilist and disinfo agents start to throw mud and turn up their white noise machines is that it does succeed in confusing and distracting some people. So as a follow up to the article on Motu Proprio and the Golden Rule, back in August 7th of this year we spoke about “Why Justice does not exist unless the Rule of Law is applied to the Golden Rule”

In that article we introduced the very meaning of justice originating from the 8th Century Anglaise or Old French sacred law of the Carolingians under Charles Martel. The Carolingians created the word from an older key Latin word iusus ius+us.  

The word ius  or ious in ancient Latin meant three things “a right granted by rule or lawful grant, the instrument or law or grant that made it and the obligations or duty attached to it”

The word –us is itself a shortened version of usus meaning “enjoyment, practice, skill, experience, usage, custom, intercourse, familiarity, benefit, advantage, need or necessity”.

So, if we look at all of this, we see that the word Justice as created by the Carolingians in the 8th Century meant simply “lawful right of use” or “lawful property rights”.

Now, I know for many of you who wrote back to me, this article and audio definitely struck a chord because when we start speaking about Rights, this is something most of us have some knowledge and can relate.

Declaration of Independence (1776)

For example, we referred to the US Declaration of Independence of July 1776 and one of the most famous phrases in history, namely:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.

Not only is this Trust Deed still in effect today, it makes absolutely clear that we possess certain Rights associated with Justice and connected to the Golden Rule as the Rule of Law.

Yet, the Declaration of Independence is not the only key legal document of history that makes clear what is Justice, what are our Rights under the Golden Rule and Rule of Law.

Magna Carta (1216)

The Magna Carta or “Great Charter” as first formed in 1215 under King John of England and later by subsequent monarchs such as King Edward of England in 1297 as an even earlier example of defining basic rights of Rule of Law and Justice.

The original version of 1215 had some 63 clauses and the 1297 version for which originals still exist today, had some 37 clauses, outlining a range of Rights and conditions and limits on Sovereign Power. Prior to 1829, the Magna Carta was consider inviolable as a foundation document to English law as many people still believe it is today.

In truth, the document has been virtually wholly repudiated by Parliament of Westminster, the Crown of England and the British Aristocracy starting with 9 Geo. 4. C31 and Offences against the Person Act of 1828 repealed clause 26 concerning the issuing of the original writs. By 1969, all but three parts of the Magna Carta remain in effect being the freedom of the church, the liberties of the merchants of London and the right to due process of the law. (see what is left in effect of Magna Carta)

Petition of Right (1628)

Some other ancient documents defining inalienable rights have fared slightly better than the Magna Carta. The Petition of Right of 1628 is an example.

The Petition of Right (3 Car 1 c.1) is a significant document that sets out specific liberties of the subject that the English king is prohibited from infringing. Passed on 7 June 1628, the Petition of Right declares that Englishmen have various "rights and liberties", and provides that “no person should be forced to provide a gift, loan or tax without an Act of Parliament, that no free individual should be imprisoned or detained unless a cause has been shown, and that soldiers or members of the Royal Navy should not be billeted in private houses without the free consent of the owner”.

Admittedly, it is not a big list of rights, but it is foundational law that is still in operation and force today as the bedrock of all former British colonies and existing Commonwealth Countries – making such claims by the present political elite about the suspension of such rights as Habeas Corpus to be wholly immoral, unlawful, illegal and treasonous.

Bill of Rights (1689)

Just to reinforce this point, there exist other ancient documents of Rights that remain in force and effect such as the Bill of Rights 1689 (1 William & Mary Sess 2 c.2)

The Bill of Rights laid out certain basic rights for all Englishmen including (but not limited to):

• no royal interference with the law. Though the sovereign remains the fount of justice, he or she cannot unilaterally establish new courts or act as a judge; and

• no taxation by Royal Prerogative. The agreement of the parliament became necessary for the implementation of any new taxes; and

• freedom to petition the monarch without fear of retribution; and

• no standing army may be maintained during a time of peace without the consent of parliament; and

• no royal interference in the freedom of the people to have arms for their own defence as suitable to their class and as allowed by law; and

• no royal interference in the election of members of parliament,

• "grants and promises of fines or forfeitures" before conviction are void; and

• no excessive bail or "cruel and unusual" punishments may be imposed. 

Bill of Rights (1791)

Another key instrument still in force is the United States Bill of Rights of 1791 as the name given to effectively the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution, which included such Rights as:

The Right to the freedom of speech, freedom of press, religious association and to petition Government for redress of grievances (1st Amendment); and

Right to bear arms (2nd Amendment); and

Right against unlawful arrest, seizure, or search under Rule of Law (4th Amendment); 

Now unfortunately, because of time I can’t go through all ten of these clauses of the United States Bill of Rights.  But what can be said is that there is no question since they were first formed, like the Magna Carta they are clearly no longer followed in practice by the Executive and branches of Government.

In fact, government laws such as the Patriot Act openly and blatantly contradict, abrogate and destroy any claim that the Bill of Rights of the United States is still in force and honored by the federal government and state governments as no less than five of the original clauses and amendments are directly and openly violated.

Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen (1789)

The same sadly can be said for the historic document born out of the French Revolution called the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, also known as the Declaration of Human and Civic Rights.

The Declaration outlined 17 essential Rights of men and women, reinforcing the importance of the Golden Rule and the Rule of Law as well as fairness and equality of Justice.

But like the United States Bill of Rights, the French Declaration of Rights has been completely trashed.

Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948)

Which brings us then to yet another example of a legal framework of Rights for all men and women – only this one actually still has some teeth to it, given it is still completely in force and effect and is the highest active law in virtually every country on the planet, especially such countries as the United States, United Kingdom, Australia, Canada and Europe.

The United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights is thirty Articles ratified as part of the highest law on the planet. So if it is so important, why has the UN Declaration on Human Rights not been pursued so strongly by people within the Truth Movement?

The answer probably rests with two words- which are treated as “beware of the dog” signs namely the word “human” and “person”. If you have concerns about Person, then I suggest you have a look at an article I did in October of 2012 entitled “The Paradox of Person” which explains the positives and negatives and the key differences between types of persons. You may also like to have a look at the explanation of persons within the canons of law under Positive Law on the One-Heaven.Org website

Once you get over these concerns, then the document can be seen for what it is- an incredibly powerful and important document.

Which brings us to our next question – if all these laws exist to protect our Rights, if all these laws are still in force to uphold our Rights, then how come the courts, the political and banking elite are still getting away with infringing and stealing our Rights? To answer this, we need to go back to considering how Rights as one or more concepts are defined by their system.

What are Rights?

Blacks 9th Law Dictionary gives us no less than seven definitions for Rights, namely:

1. That which is proper under law, morality, or ethics <know right from wrong>; and

2. Something that is due to a person by just claim, legal guarantee, or moral principle <the right of liberty>; and

3. A power, privilege, or immunity secured to a person by law <the right to dispose of one's estate>; and

4. A legally enforceable claim that another will do or will not do a given act; a recognized and protected interest the violation of which is a wrong <a breach of duty that infringes one's right>; and

5. (often pl.) The interest, claim, or ownership that one has in tangible or intangible property <a debtor's rights in collateral> <publishing rights>; and

6. The privilege of corporate shareholders to purchase newly issued securities in amounts proportionate to their holdings; and

7. The negotiable certificate granting such a privilege to a corporate shareholder.

OK, so this list of meanings seems reasonably in order until you consider what these definitions are saying. On the one hand, there is the recognition of the historic rights as we described in ancient laws and Bills of Rights. But these are positioned as moral and ethical principles or if you want to be really cynical – guidelines.  While at the same time, there exist certain rights that are powers and privileges secured by law.

In other words, all these wonderful philosophical rights have been diminished to mere ideals and aspirations, while the only rights that mean anything are these mysterious ones mentioned in some of the definitions.  Actually, we have spoken about these before and at the beginning of this audio- they are called Ius, or Jus as in the basis of Justice.

Want to see the “real” Rights claimed by the system?  OK, here is the list we included in the article back in August. Please don’t be intimidated by the number, just have a look at the hierarchy and what is claimed.

CHURCH

Jus Divinum as Divine Law

Jus Canonicum as Canon Law 

Jus Ecclesiasticum as Ecclesiastical Law, 

Jus Devolutum as the right of a church to present a minister to a vacant parish

MONARCH/EXECUTIVE

Jus Corona as the rights of the crown, 

Jus Curialitatis Angliae as the rights and laws called the courtesy of England, 

Jus Patronatus as the rights or a cleric to an ecclesiastical benefice, 

Jus Anglorum as the laws and customs of the West Saxons, 

Jus Cudendae Monetae as the claimed exclusive right to mint money, 

Jus Edicendi as the right to issue edicts, 

Jus Regale as a sovereign right, 

Jus Regendi as a proprietary right vested in a sovereign

ELITE/ILLUMINATI/NOBLE FAMILIES

Jus Aelianum as the claimed original rights and laws of the twelve tables of Rome, 

Jus Aesneciae as the rights of primogeniture or inheritance rights of first born son, 

Jus Feciale as the claimed ancient law of arms or of heralds, 

Jus Italicum as the claimed ancient rights and privileges of cities (as bodies politic or companies) to be exempt from obligations under their own constitution, 

Jus Latii as the claimed ancient rights of the Latins, 

Jus Quiritium as the claimed ancient Roman laws and rights only applicable to patricians or noble families, 

Jus Singulare as a peculiar or individual rule, differing from Jus Commune or common rule of right and established for some special reason, 

Jus Nobilus as a superior or noble right

NATION/BODY POLITIC

Jus Belli as the laws of nations as applied during wartime and conflict, 

Jus Bellum Dicendi as the right to proclaim war, 

Jus Civile as the laws and customs of civil law, 

Jus Gentium as the rights and laws of all nations, 

Jus Incognitum as the right to create secret rights or laws, unknown to the public and others, 

Jus Publicum as the laws relating to the constitution and functions of government, 

Jus Scriptum as the rights of the written law and statutes, 

Jus Stapulae as a right or privilege of certain towns of stopping imported merchandise and it being offered for sale in local markets, 

Jus Albanagii as the right to confiscate the goods of aliens, 

Jus Albinatus as the right to alien confiscation and interment, 

Jus Cogens as a mandatory right or law in domestic and international law which is not subject to the disposition of the parties and for which no derogation is permitted, 

Jus Dispositivum as a norm of law created by the consent of participating nations, binding only to nations that agree to be bound, 

Jus Inter Gentes as the law amongst nations, 

Jus Naturale as Natural Law

LAW GUILDS/COURTS

Jus ad Rem as the right to control a thing not in ones possession, 

Jus in Rem the right to control a thing in ones custody or possession, 

Jus Aequum as the right and law to make flexible and adapted judgments as to a particular case, 

Jus Banci as the rights of the bench to exclusively administer law; and, 

Jus de non Appellando as supreme judicial power for which there is no higher grounds of appeal, 

Jus Dicere as the right to make the law whatever is necessary, 

Jus Dispondendi as the right to part, sell, dispose of a thing and its alienation, 

Jus Rerum as the general rights of control over things, sometimes just written as “re”;, 

Jus Precarium as the rights to a thing held for another, for which there was no remedy except by entreaty or request, 

Jus Deliberandi as the claimed right a proper officer to deliberate in matters of inheritance or probate, 

Jus Flavianum as the claimed ancient laws and rights defined by Cneius Flavius, 

Jus Gladii the right of the sword and executor power of the law, 

Jus Habendi as the right to have or hold a thing, 

Jus Honorarum as the claimed ancient Roman laws of magistrates and judges created by edict to which only they have right, 

Jus Immunitatis as the right and laws of immunity or exemption from the burdens of public office, 

Jus in Personam as the right which gives its possessor a power to oblige another person to give or procure, to do or not to do something, 

Jus Latium as the claimed exclusive rights of magistrates that raised the dignity of himself and family above others, 

Jus Necis as the claimed lawful right to put someone to death, 

Jus Non Scriptum as the claimed unwritten laws, 

Jus Papirianum as the claimed laws of Papirius of Rome, 

Jus Praetorium as the claimed rights and discretion of the praetor (or judge) as distinct from the standing laws (or statutes);, 

Jus Tripertitum as the claimed ancient law of wills from the time of Justinian as claiming precedence over a mans’ estate by claim of edict, civil law and constitutions, 

Jus Antiquum as the claimed old Roman law in its entirety, 

Jus Praeventionis as the claimed jurisdictional superiority of a court by virtue of it being the first court to exercise its jurisdiction in a case, 

Jus Respondendi as the right and authority of jurists when delivering legal opinions, 

Jus Retentionis as the right to hold or retain a thing in custody until the delivery of something else that the person retaining the thing is entitled to

MERCHANTS/PROPERTY OWNERS

Jus Abutendi as the right to abuse or waste property as exactly one likes, 

Jus Aquaeductus as the claimed ancient rights to bring water through or from the land of another,  

Jus Postlimini as the rights of reprisal to be restored to possession of a thing as if he had never been deprived in the first place, 

Jus Retractus Jus Retractus or Jus Retrovendendi being the right of the seller or their heirs to buy back any goods or wares before any other claim, 

Jus Propritetatis as the rights of property ownership as distinct from possession, 

Jus Cloacae as the rights of sewerage or drainage, 

Jus Dividendi as the right of disposing of real property by will, 

Jus Fodiendi as the right of digging on another’s land, 

Jus Futurum as a claimed future right, not yet fully vested, 

Jus Pascendi as the claimed right of pasturing cattle, 

Jus Portus as the right of port or safe harbor, 

Jus Praesens a claimed present or vested right, 

Jus Projiciendi as the right to build a projection such as balcony or gallery from ones house in the open space belonging to a neighbour, 

Jus Protegendi as the right by which a part of the roof or tiling of one house is made to extend over the adjoining house, 

Jus Quaesitum as the right to ask or recover, 

Jus Recuperandi as the right of recovery of lands, 

Jus Utendi as the right to use property without destroying its substance, 

Jus Commercii as the right to make contracts, acquire and transfer property and conduct business transactions, 

Jus Distrahendi as the right to sell pledged goods upon default, 

Jus Exigendi as the rights of a creditor to enforce immediate payment of a debt, 

Jus in re Aliena as an easement or right in or over the property of another, 

Jus in re Propria as the right of enjoyment that is incident to full ownership of the property, 

Jus Pignoris as a creditor’s right in the property that a debtor pledges to secure a debt, 

Jus Retractus as the right to repurchase property for the same price within a year

OFFICERS/MILITARY/AGENTS

Jus Fiduciarum as the rights in trust; (7) Jus Gentium as the rights and laws of all nations, 

Jus Possessionis as the rights to seize, evict and hold possession, 

Jus Privatum as the rights of private law, 

Jus Offerendi as the right for a person to take over the rights or remedies of another against a third party as if it were their own, 

Jus Presentationis as the right of presentation, 

Jus Fetiale as the right and laws to negotiate or engage in diplomacy, 

Jus Liquidissimum as the right of a salvager to a reward for saving life or property imperiled at sea

ALL PEOPLE/COMMON LAW RIGHTS

Jus Actionis as the claimed right of action, 

Jus Actus as the right of the peasant to the right of passage for a carriage or cattle, 

Jus Agenda as the right to take action to pursue one’s rights, 

Jus Apparentiae as the right of an heir not fully vested in title allowing action on behalf of estate, 

Jus Aucupandi as the right of catching birds and fowling, 

Jus Capiendi as the right to take or receive property under a will, 

Jus Compascuum as the right to feed together, 

Jus Connubii as the right of marriage, 

Jus Crediti as the creditors right to a debt and rights to recover debts through legal process, 

Jus Possidendi as the right to possess, hold or own property, 

Jus Abstinendi the right of renunciation, 

Jus Accrescendi the right of survivorship, 

Jus Hereditatis as the rights of inheritance, 

Jus Mariti as the rights of the husband over the property of the wife, 

Jus Personarum as the rights of persons, 

Jus Representationis as the right of representation, 

Jus Tertii as the rights of a third person, 

Jus Abstinendi the right of renunciation, 

Jus Civitatis as the rights of citizenship claimed from Rome, even Rome never used the word citizen, 

Jus Commune as the common and natural rule of right, 

Jus Fluminum the right to the use of rivers, 

Jus Hauriendi as the right of drawing water, 

Jus Imaginis as the right to use or display pictures or statues of ancestors, 

Jus Individuum as an individual or indivisible right, 

Jus Navigandi as the right of navigating or navigation, 

Jus Poenitendi as the right of recission or revocation of an executor contract on failure of other party to fulfil his part, 

Jus Vendandi et Piscandi as the right of hunting and fishing,

Jus Incorporale as an incorporeal right (being something having no material body or form), 

Jus Itineris as the ancient claimed right to pass over an adjoining property on foot or horseback (such as fox hunting and gaming), 

Jus Liberorum as the right of children and the right of compulsory guardianship of the state over families with less than three children, 

Jus Necessitatis as the right to what is required for which no threat of legal punishment is a dissuasion, 

Jus Obligationis as a right of obligation, 

Jus Provocationis as the claimed ancient Roman Right to appeal to the parliamentary body politic or highest official from the infliction of punishment by a magistrate or judge, 

Jus Sanguinis as the law that the status and citizenship of the child is determined by the status of the parents, 

Jus Soli as the law that the status and citizenship of a child is determined by place of birth, 

Jus Spatiandi as the public right of way over specific land for purpose of recreation and instruction, 

Jus Suffragii as the right of a citizen to vote

What do we do to restore our Rights?

The point about the list above of claimed legal Rights within the legal fraternity is that most of them are complete bullshit – fraud and made up fantasies of laws that never existed or rights that never were, that are unchecked and uncontested.

Yet the argument that a Right undefined has no existence is an argument that cannot be easily dismissed. Nor can the argument that philosophical ideals described as rights are themselves insufficiently defined to be effectively within the constraints of the operation of law and can only ever then be a guide.

So the answer is simple- make clear those basic rights that are reflected in law for the past two thousand years or more in a form that no court, no parliament, no sovereign, no church, no government, no government agency can deny is a specific right supported by real laws in force.

What then might this list be – again please do not be intimidated by the length of the list, but if you go to Article 12 Positive Rights under the Globe Union, you will see a list of 99 rights known as Universal Positive Rights:

The following ninety-nine (99) valid Universal Positive Rights are recognized in accord with the most sacred Covenant Pactum de Singularis Caelum and the present Charter and as the fundamental base of Rule of Law and Justice of any valid Society:

(i) Ius Iuris as the Universal Right to Rights as derived from Ius Naturale Iuris; and

(ii) Ius Definire as the Universal Right to Define Rights as derived from Ius Naturale Definire; and

(iii) Ius Concedere as the Universal Right to Grant Rights as derived from Ius Naturale Concedere; and

(iv) Ius Hereditatis as the Universal Right of Inheritance as derived from Ius Naturale Hereditatis; and

(v) Ius Nascendi as the Universal Right to be Born as derived from Ius Naturale Nascendi; and

(vi) Ius Vitam as the Universal Right to Life as derived from Ius Naturale Vitam; and

(vii) Ius Mori Eligate as the Universal Right to Choose to Die as derived from Ius Naturale Mori Eligate; and

(viii) Ius Victus as the Universal Right to receive sustenance as derived from Ius Naturale Victus; and

(ix) Ius Tectum as the Universal Right to be provided shelter as derived from Ius Naturale Tectum; and

(x) Ius Salutus as the Universal Right of providing (physical) safety as derived from Ius Naturale Salutus; and

(xi) Ius Possessionis as the Universal Right to have, possess and hold property as derived from Ius Naturale Possessionis; and

(xii) Ius Habendi as the Universal Right to have, possess and hold a thing as derived from Ius Naturale Habendi; and

(xiii) Ius Propritetatis as the Universal Right of dominion, ownership, occupation and title as distinct from possession as derived from Ius Naturale Proprietatis; and

(xiv) Ius Registrum as the Universal Right for Registers of Rights and Possession of Property as derived from Ius Naturale Registrum; and

(xv) Ius Album as Universal Right to Record Rights and Possessions of Property as derived from Ius Naturale Album; and

(xvi) Ius Nomenis as the Universal Right to Name, Title and Reputation as derived from Ius Naturale Nomenis; and

(xvii) Ius Usus as the Universal Right to use property as derived from Ius Naturale Usus; and

(xviii) Ius Petitionis Iuris as the Universal Right to petition and pray for relief and remedy for a lawful right withheld from ones possession as derived from Ius Naturale Petitionis; and

(xix) Ius Defendum Iuris as the Universal Right to defend a lawful right as derived from Ius Naturale Defendum Iuris; and

(xx) Ius Clamatum Iuris as the Universal Right to claim a lawful right withheld from ones possession as derived from Ius Naturale Clamatum Iuris; and

(xxi) Ius Agendi Iuris as the Universal Right to take action upon a lawful right as derived from Ius Naturale Agendi Iuris; and

(xxii) Ius Consensum as the Universal Right to Consent as derived from Ius Naturale Consensum; and

(xxiii) Ius Consensu Recedere as the Universal Right to withdraw Consent as derived from Ius Naturale Consensu Recedere; and

(xxiv) Ius Societas as the Universal Right of Association as derived from Ius Naturale Societas; and

(xxv) Ius Abstinendi as the Universal Right of Renunciation as derived from Ius Naturale Abstinendi; and

(xxvi) Ius Loqui as the Universal Right to Speak as derived from Ius Naturale Loqui; and

(xxvii) Ius Silentium as the Universal Right to Silence as derived from Ius Naturale Silentium; and

(xxviii) Ius Scriptum as the Universal Right to handwrite or print in script as derived from Ius Naturale Scriptum; and

(xxix) Ius Subscribere as the Universal Right to Sign and Seal as derived from Ius Naturale Subscribere; and

(xxx) Ius Iurandum as the Universal Right to make an Oath or Vow as derived from Ius Naturale Iurandum; and

(xxxi) Ius Dirimere as Universal Right to have all Long-Term Obligations (Debts) Settled, Forgiven and Closed as derived from Ius Naturale Dirimere; and

(xxxii) Ius Fecerim as the Universal Right to invent, create and make seals, arms, heralds, instruments and other property of value as derived from Ius Naturale Fecerim; and

(xxxiii) Ius Testamentum as the Universal Right to make a Will and Testament as derived from Ius Naturale Testamentum; and

(xxxiv) Ius Aequum as Universal Right of Equality, Fairness and Justice as derived from Ius Naturale Aequum; and

(xxxv) Ius Sociari as Universal Right of Membership to the Society in which one is born as derived from Ius Naturale Sodalis; and

(xxxvi) Ius Non Res as the Universal Right not to be treated as a thing as derived from Ius Naturale Non Res; and

(xxxvii) Ius Honestas as the Universal Right to Honor, Integrity and Respect as derived from Ius Naturale Honestas; and

(xxxviii) Ius Verum as the Universal Right to the Truth as derived from Ius Naturale Verum; and

(xxxix) Ius Libertatis as the Universal Right of Freedom from Bondage and Slavery as derived from Ius Naturale Libertatis; and

(xl) Ius Geneticae as the Universal Rights of ownership over one’s own Body and Genetic Material as derived from Ius Naturale Geneticae; and

(xli) Ius Facies as the Universal Right of ownership over one’s own Face and Voice as derived from Ius Naturale Facies; and

(xlii) Ius Indicium as the Universal Right of Freedom of Knowledge and Information as derived from Ius Naturale Indicium; and

(xliii) Ius Honeste Conveniendi as the Universal Right to Peaceful Assembly as derived from Ius Naturale Honeste Conveniendi; and

(xliv) Ius Concordia as the Universal Right to make Agreements as derived from Ius Naturale Concordia; and

(xlv) Ius Concordia Honorari as the Universal Right to have Agreements Honored as derived from Ius Naturale Concordia Honorari; and

(xlvi) Ius Concordia Fraudulenta as the Universal Right to have Fraudulent Agreements Annulled, Voided and Expunged as derived from Ius Naturale Concordia Fraudulenta; and

(xlvii) Ius Concordia Terminare as the Universal Right to Terminate Agreements that fail to be Honored as derived from Ius Naturale Concordia Terminare; and

(xlviii) Ius Perfungor as the Universal Right to Perform (Work) as derived from Ius Naturale Perfungor; and

(xlix) Ius Nolle Perfungor as the Universal Right to Refuse to Perform (Work) as derived from Ius Naturale Nolle Perfungor; and

(l) Ius Fructibus as the Universal Right to the fruits, energy, results and product of ones performance, work and effort as derived from Ius Naturale Fructibus; and

(li) Ius Solutionis Perfungor as the Universal Right to receive fair payment in exchange for fruits, energy, results and product of ones performance, work and effort as derived from Ius Naturale Solutionis Perfungor; and

(lii) Ius Commercium as the Universal Right to trade and exchange as derived from Ius Naturale Commercium; and

(liii) Ius Pecuniam as the Universal Right to make and use Money for Trade as derived from Ius Naturale Pecuniam; and

(liv) Ius Imaginis as the Universal Right to make an image, reflection, portrait, likeness, imitation, representation or copy as derived from Ius Naturale Imaginis; and

(lv) Ius Praedicamus as the Universal Right to make public, publish, transmit, distribute, broadcast and preach as derived from Ius Naturale Praedicamus; and

(lvi) Ius Secare Arbores as the Universal Right to cut down trees, plants or crops as derived from Ius Naturale Secare Arbores; and

(lvii) Ius Vendandi et Piscandi as the Universal Right to Hunt and Fish as derived from Ius Naturale Vendandi et Piscandi; and

(lviii) Ius Aucupandi as the Universal Right of catching birds and fowling as derived from Ius Naturale Aucupandi; and

(lix) Ius Pascendi as the Universal Right to Pasture (Feed) Animals as derived from Ius Naturale Pascendi; and

(lx) Ius Fluminum the Universal Right to the use of rivers as derived from Ius Naturale Fluminum; and

(lxi) Ius Iter the Universal Right to travel and use the Roads and Highways as derived from Ius Naturale Iter; and

(lxii) Ius Portus as the Universal Right of port or safe harbor as derived from Ius Naturale Portus; and

(lxiii) Ius Unionis as the Universal Right of Union between consenting couple as derived from Ius Naturale Connubii; and

(lxiv) Ius Coitus as the Universal Right for consenting adults to engage in intercourse as derived from Ius Naturale Coitus; and

(lxv) Ius Nativitas as the Universal Right to give birth as derived from Ius Naturale Nativitas; and

(lxvi) Ius Filios as the Universal Right to have, nurture, support, supervise and teach children as derived from Ius Naturale Filios; and

(lxvii) Ius Parentum as the Universal Right of parents to the custody, protection, well being, discipline and education of children as derived from Ius Naturale Parentum; and

(lxviii) Ius Suffragii as the Universal Right to vote and have such choice counted in the democratic process of electing officials of society as derived from Ius Naturale Suffragii; and

(lxix) Ius Leges Sciri as the Universal Right that all Laws be known and none secret as derived from Ius Naturale Indicium; and

(lxx) Ius Accusare as Universal Right to accuse another of a transgression as derived from Ius Naturale Verum; and

(lxxi) Ius Defensionis as Universal Right to defend against any accusation and accuser as derived from Ius Naturale Honestas; and

(lxxii) Ius Accusationis Sciri as Universal Right to know the accuser and accusations as derived from Ius Naturale Indicium; and

(lxxiii) Ius Vocatio as Universal Right to summons all parties to a competent forum of law to resolve a controversy as derived from Ius Naturale Indicium; and

(lxxiv) Ius Prendi as Universal Right to arrest a suspect on warrant or good cause for the purpose of serving an indictment and summons as derived from Ius Naturale Indicium; and

(lxxv) Ius Teneam as Universal Right to detain a party associated with a controversy if good cause exists they be a risk of non-appearance or committing further controversies as derived from Ius Naturale Indicium; and

(lxxvi) Ius Innocentiae as Universal Right of Innocence until accusation proven as derived from Ius Naturale Aequum; and

(lxxvii) Ius Defensionis Tempus as Universal Right for sufficient time to prepare defense as derived from Ius Naturale Aequum; and

(lxxviii) Ius Oratorium as Universal Right for matters to be heard in competent forum of law as derived from Ius Naturale Aequum; and

(lxxix) Ius Sui Iuris as Universal Right to defend or accuse as oneself as derived from Ius Naturale Aequum; and

(lxxx) Ius Agens as Universal Right to appoint an agent to defend or accuse as derived from Ius Naturale Aequum; and

(lxxxi) Ius Iudicium as Universal Right for a matter to be decided by a jury of peers as derived from Ius Naturale Aequum; and

(lxxxii) Ius Tribunal as Universal Right for a matter to be decided by a competent tribunal as derived from Ius Naturale Aequum; and

(lxxxiii) Ius Bonum Fidei as Universal Right for a matter to be decided in Good Faith (Under Oath) as derived from Ius Naturale Verum; and

(lxxxiv) Ius Sine Praeiudicium as Universal Right for a matter to be decided without Prejudice as derived from Ius Naturale Honestas; and

(lxxxv) Ius Mundis Manibus as Universal Right for a matter to be decided with Clean Hands as derived from Ius Naturale Honestas; and

(lxxxvi) Ius Habeas Corpus as the Universal Right to challenge detention without proof of valid cause as derived from Ius Naturale Honestas; and

(lxxxvii) Ius Mandamus as the Universal Right to demand an officer perform their mandated duties as derived from Ius Naturale Honestas; and

(lxxxviii) Ius Quo Warranto as the Universal Right to demand evidence to any claimed exercised authority as derived from Ius Naturale Honestas; and

(lxxxix) Ius Certiorari as the Universal Right for the venue of a matter to be changed to competent forum as derived from Ius Naturale Aequum; and

(xc) Ius Prohibitio as the Universal Right to demand an action cease until decided by competent forum as derived from Ius Naturale Aequum; and

(xci) Ius Procedendo as the Universal Right to demand an action commence given proper adjudication as derived from Ius Naturale Aequum; and

(xcii) Ius Error Coram Nobis as the Universal Right to demand determined errors of record be corrected as derived from Ius Naturale Aequum; and

(xciii) Ius Scire Facias as the Universal Right to demand false claims be removed or assigned to proper owner as derived from Ius Naturale Aequum; and

(xciv) Ius Jus Sentio as the Universal Right to dissolve mandate or warrant for the purpose of election as derived from Ius Naturale Aequum; and

(xcv) Ius Terram as the Universal Right to Land as derived from Ius Naturale Terrae; and

(xcvi) Ius Usum Terram as the Universal Right of Use of the Land as derived from Ius Naturale Terrae; and

(xcvii) Ius Mutat Terram as the Universal Right to Alter the (Top of the) Land as derived from Ius Naturale Terrae; and

(xcviii) Ius Fodere Terram as the Universal Right to Dig (or Mine) the Land as derived from Ius Naturale Terrae; and

(xcix) Ius Aqua as the Universal Right to Water as derived from Ius Naturale Hauriendi.

Significance of Universal Positive Rights

Now, what makes this list of Universal Positive Rights significant is:

They fully comply with existing laws concerning universal and inalienable rights. They do not seek to exceed community standards or beliefs; and

The Universal Positive Rights are supported in their origin and provenance from natural Rights, which supports the arguments of all those who believe in the strength of common law; and

Not only is the list of Universal Positive Rights supported in provenance to natural rights, but is further supported in provenance back to Divine Rights. For example, have a look at Article 11 of the Globe Union.

So what does this mean?  Lets take one example such as The rights of Inheritance or number 4 (iv) as Ius Hereditatis. It lists that it is derived from the right of Ius Naturale Hereditatis.  So when we go and have a look at Article 11 and Clause 11.5 Absolute Natural Rights, we see that Ius Naturale Hereditatis is derived itself from the Divine Right Ius Divinum Hereditatis.

So what does this all mean?  Lets take the first Chapter of the first book of the Holy Bible or Genesis. Here we are told that we the Homo Sapien Species Inherit certain rights from the Divine Creator. That is Ius Divinum Hereditatis. That means, no one can take that inheritance away or argue that it has been taken away such as the horrible and false and wicked curse of Original Sin. For Original Sin to stand, we have to have lost the right of Ius Divinum Hereditatis, which we have not. Therefore all the legal and philosophical and religious and commercial arguments of Original Sin are gone, null, void and finished.

Significance of Ucadia Defined Rights and restoring our Rights

Yet it is what we do with our own affairs of Estate where the work on Rights that I have shown you comes into its own.

Consider for example the simple phrase All Rights Reserved.  Now, when we define our Rights within our Will and Testament; when the Recital of Terms reflects these Rights protected as Divine Rights, then Natural Rights before they are considered Positive Rights, we have an unbreakable, indefeasible framework for our Rights to be honored.

In simple terms – when you perfect your position of your Estate and the local court, or state or federal government dishonors you, then there can be absolutely no argument, no argument that any Rule of Law exists or Justice exists.

That is one of the key points- so long as the media and the private bar guilds can continue to get away with the lie that there is the Rule of Law and Justice, then corruption and injury to the law will continue.

Lets take another example. If it is a core right for men and women not to be treated as a thing as in the Right (xxxvi) Ius Non Res and the Court ignores and demands you be recognized as Pro Se as short for Pro Se in Rem, then not only are they denying one of your defined and fundamental rights, but they have openly breached the Declaration of Human Rights in admintting to slavery as a thing is something that can be owned and if you are a thing and owned against your will then someone is claiming you through the court as a slave.

Or lets take the Right (lxxvi) Ius Innocentiae as Universal Right of Innocence until accusation proven as derived from Ius Naturale Aequum. Now if you ask the court if it is a court of summary jurisdiction and they say yes, then they have breached this fundamental right- as any court that is a court of summary jurisdiction presumes you to be guilty before being considered innocent in accord with the Summary Jurisdiction Acts of 1848, 1879 ad 1884.

Now you can be specific. Now you can empower the laws defining the ethical framework of Rights with your real and define rights. Now we can drain the swamp and expose the pirates for what they are.

So I hope you find this useful and beneficial.

Thank you for all who continue to support despite those efforts by some to attack, obstruct, starve and stop Ucadia

To all who continue to find a way to help and support- thank you.  It has never been harder than now, nor has there been a more concerted effort by various forces to obstruct, attack, confuse, starve and ultimately stop this work to help all of you restore your rights and regain competent control over your own affairs.

There has been absolutely no help by any external group, entity, government, agency, society, wealthy benefactor whatsoever.  The survival of this work has really rested on those very few people who have been willing to ignore the threats, attacks, disinfo and pressures to step forward and continue to help and support the work of Ucadia.

To all of you brave enough, honorable enough and caring enough to help - Thank You. I hope you see from this article, the fruits of your support are not in vain.

Till next week, please be safe and well.

Cheers.  Frank